Is “frugal” the latest sexy trend?
source: http://blogs.current.com/green/2009/10/07/is-frugal-the-latest-sexy-green-trend/
-
-
- leahl
- added this
Now is the moment when I should step in and mock this, right?
Truth be told, I have no desire to. (I’m secretly craving a dose of this experience myself.) When the green movement began the media mantra was to show people there was a way to care for the environment and address sustainability issues without giving up the creature comforts of their current life style. And so the great green spending spree began. The message was, “you can keep spending, but use your dollar to vote for the sustainability practices that support your belief system.”
But is “extreme frugality” the latest emerging trend? Have we come to a place where we understand that (gasp) resources are limited: and the limited reources in our wallet could be the best metaphor to understand the limited resources on the planet?
As it turns out, while in the middle of writing this post I hopped on over to my personal email account to check in how many love letters I have received today (the answer is none btw), but what I did encounter was an email from my sister-in-law about a new initiative that launched today called “slow money.” Frankly, after spending 10 minutes on their site I wasn’t entirely sure of what they are up to but it has something to do with a grass roots effort to create a new economy and support sustainable agriculture and involves donatting $5. Here’s what they have to say:
"The perfect combo about slow food, slow money and local sustainable foodsystems, this “Thrive, Don’t Just Survive” set is a loaded, how-to guide on destressing, eating healthier with less, the missing links to achieving healthy immune and eco-systems, personal and planetary transformation, and Feeding Ourselves, No Matter What!"
Ok…so they say things come in threes….what do you think? Has “green” turned a new corner? Are we entering into the age of self reliance and frugality? (Meanwhile, I’m going to head on over to the library and check out a few of the Little House on Prairie books, and start studying…)
(this is the full post: but if you want links to everything mentioned: hop on over to the blog)
-
- groups:
- Green, Sustainable Agriculture, Green Living, No Impact Man
-
- recommended by:
- Vierotchka
-
-
spacemikey [removed]
-
I doubt it, it was like the "grunge" trend in the 90's it was all cool for a minute, but then when the phase passed and people realized I wasn't being trendy, just poor; I wasn't cool anymore......
- 2 years ago
-
spacemikey [removed]
-
-
emilio
-
Living a meaningful life IS sexy!
- 2 years ago
-
emilio
-
-
Theekshani
-
This photo reminds me of Zoolander. See Magnum on the left?
- 2 years ago
-
Theekshani
-
-
goldenone
-
I think it's more of a branch and less of a corner. But I also believe that there are many opportunities to be had in making your life more affordable while still being 'in fashion.'
- 2 years ago
-
goldenone
-
-
JuiceBug
-
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.
Extreme frugality is nice for those who choose it, but otherwise it will be a burden handed down by necessity (or else a tyrannical state). Also, it's hard to glamorize frugality without commercial interests to pay the marketing costs.
A 'house on the prairie'-like existence favored by educated liberals and backwoods home-school types assumes not only a number of rare skills but also available land, which is in reality a sort of luxury. Good stuff if you can get it, but otherwise the great mass of industrialized peoples will not be living 'frugally' but 'cheaply' - 99 Cents stores, Wal-Marts, thrift stores, clipping coupons, etc.
We won't see a truly 'green' shift until the economics of mass consumption and mass production break down - and that could be a very long time from now.
- 2 years ago
-
JuiceBug
-
-
ampersand
-
JuiceBug:
The great mass of people in the US already seem to live by Walmart and 99 Cent stores. In the Third World, of course, more than half of them get by on a dollar a day or less. It surprised me to find out this year that old saw about that being less than what Americans spend on pet food every day was actually true. One can of cheap pet tuna from Trader Joe's, (the evening meal for my ancient cat) is now 59 cents. With his morning dry food, that makes him a gastronomical king in the Third World.
I'm sure we both respect moderation, but I do agree with your point about frugality being chosen, rather than imposed. I don't see any American administration enforcing frugality, but I think we could both well imagine a completely looted economy insisting on it.
And you are also probably right about an end to the consumption economy being far off, (if ever).
Still, it's a wonderful warm fantasy to consider. - 2 years ago
-
ampersand
-
-
outtheinside
-
JuiceBug:
ampersand,
the comparison to spending on pet food is rather distressing. sure, in dollar to dollar terms we spend more on the pet food, but you also have to look at the many other factors that play into it. you're right, the 59 cents you pay for cat food would buy a whole bunch of other necessities for the poverty stricken in developing countries, but you have to look at it the other way as well. the 59 cents you're paying doesn't buy you much of anything else nearly as important as pet food. by placing a cheap price on something that we deem necessary (food for pets), while developing countries could care less about it, we end up making a horrible comparison between the life of humans to the life of pets. it's a horrible comparison not just in humanistic terms, but in terms of not comparing apples to apples when it comes to tastes and preferences.
by all means, i don't like hearing that millions survive on less than a dollar a day (now the correct rubric is actually between 1.25 and 1.50). needs and hopes should never be unfulfilled do to the location you are born in my opinion. i just don't think facts like the pet food make accurate comparisons and can be very dehumanizing for the 'others' being compared. many more accurate comparisons could be made than to spending on pet food, but i digress.. i study development econ btw, which is why this caught my eye...
- 2 years ago
-
outtheinside
-
-
pakazak
-
it's about time.
alvin toffler, back in the 70's - The Third Wave - is what started it for me.
we were gettin' tired of waiting for the world to catch up.
you'll still get the hummer cowboys and those that can afford extravagance, but middle america is realizing that the appearance of wealth is just a thin veil.
be real, be the earth - 2 years ago
-
pakazak
