Birth control could save as much carbon dioxide as 2 million giant wind turbines by 2050
source: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6922245.ece
-
-
- Chod77
- added this
And surprise! The Catholic Church is against it.
Investing in birth control to reduce population growth could be more effective in cutting greenhouse gas emissions than building wind turbines or nuclear power stations, according to a United Nations report. Taking action to prevent one billion births by 2050 would save as much carbon dioxide as constructing 2 million giant wind turbines.
The UN Population Fund report predicts that the global population could reach 10.5 billion by 2050, up from 6.8 billion today, unless urgent action is taken to reduce fertility rates.
It says that even its medium-growth forecast of 2.3 billion more people by 2050, which assumes a fall in average fertility from 2.56 to 2.02 children per woman, would make it much harder to achieve the cuts in carbon emissions needed to prevent catastrophic climate change.
The report says that reducing population growth would allow the 2050 target for global average emissions per person to be increased significantly above the 2 tonnes recommended by Lord Stern, the author of an influential government report on global warming in 2006. Living standards would be higher because each person would be able to emit more CO2.
More at link.....
Investing in birth control to reduce population growth could be more effective in cutting greenhouse gas emissions than building wind turbines or nuclear power stations, according to a United Nations report. Taking action to prevent one billion births by 2050 would save as much carbon dioxide as constructing 2 million giant wind turbines.
The UN Population Fund report predicts that the global population could reach 10.5 billion by 2050, up from 6.8 billion today, unless urgent action is taken to reduce fertility rates.
It says that even its medium-growth forecast of 2.3 billion more people by 2050, which assumes a fall in average fertility from 2.56 to 2.02 children per woman, would make it much harder to achieve the cuts in carbon emissions needed to prevent catastrophic climate change.
The report says that reducing population growth would allow the 2050 target for global average emissions per person to be increased significantly above the 2 tonnes recommended by Lord Stern, the author of an influential government report on global warming in 2006. Living standards would be higher because each person would be able to emit more CO2.
More at link.....
-
- tags:
- Birth Control, green house gases
-
-
CarolynGillis
-
We won't have to worry about overpopulation if the Pharmaceutical companies and US Media keep up their policies of huge profits before humanity. The next generations are going to be weaker and weaker unless we break this spell that is allowing half of our population believe that these all of vaccines and vast over-medication are necessary.
Maybe it will result in survival of the fit..where the wary will prosper. Not my idea of a proper way to solve a population crisis. There are more humane ways of course.
I plan to live a long life. - 2 years ago
-
CarolynGillis
