Attacking the king of the ocean: The sharks that can't fight back
source: http://blogs.current.com/green/2010/02/08/attacking-the-king-of-the-ocean-the-sharks-that-ca...
-
-
- leahl
- added this
While attending the Ocean Film Festival this weekend I watched Requiem (while the film was too long and required patience to endure inexperienced filmmaking), it was worth it to see the awesome underwater footage as the filmmaker followed an underwater photographer from Hawaii as she familiarized herself with with the beauty, power and skills of one of the most infamous classification of sharks – the REQUIEM Family.
The film was filled with plenty of staggering facts such as three sharks are killed every second, 1 million are killed a year, and a myriad of fun comparison stats that compared shark attacks to the regular hazards on living on land such as in 1991 there were 1,300 deaths by bicycles and 4 deaths by sharks. The most staggering information was that many sharks are caught only to have their fins removed and then thrown back in the water and that while there is 350 or so species of sharks, 79 are imperiled.
Why should we care about these giants in the ocean that most of us will never come in contact with? Well…because they are what is considered a “keystone species“, in other words, they have a major influence on their entire environment. At the sustainable seafood pannel the following example was provided to illustrate the role and influence of sharks in the ecosystem: when the sharks disappear, there is an abundance of weak and diseased fish, which then influences the rate of the algae, which in turn influences the amount of oxygen in the water, which then influences the ability for all species in the area to survive. So in other words, if you want to keep eating your salmon and halibut, you might want to consider making sure that we don’t kill off all of the sharks.
How can you engage?
1. Learn more at wildaid, Monterey Bay Aquarium, Adopt A Shark, or the Shark Foundation.
2. Help get the information out to countries who are affected by the actions of their government but might not have access to the information (hello Twitter. We got a small thrill when one of our tweets about sea horse annihilation was translated and retweeted in Japanese, given that at the sustainable seafood panel one of the speakers stated that they did not have an education system in place to inform the Japanese population about the effects of the Japanese government policies).
3. Contact your local seafood restaurants and educate them about the dangers of shark fin soup. I felt a little nieve and shocked to find out that they serve shark fin soup right here in San Francisco (and if you want to get really crazy, start a campaign that educates the consumers at the restaurant about the dangers of shark fin soup).
Number of sharks that died while you read this post: approx 120
If you want to see more shark videos: check the blog post: http://blogs.current.com/green/2010/02/08/attacking-the-king-of-the-ocean-the-sh...
-
- tags:
- Earth and Science, Conservation, Ocean, Sharks, 1 more
-
-
richjm
-
"three sharks are killed every second, 1 million are killed a year"
There's 31, 556, 926 seconds in a year so if there first stat is correct, it must be about 100 million a year.
(Just looked around and the BBC says 100m http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE0DB1F3AF932
A25754C0A965958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all) - 2 years ago
-
richjm
-
-
goldfishy
-
-
Everyone should check out Sharkwater. It's a wonderful documentary and I encourage everyone to pass it on.
- 2 years ago
-
goldfishy
-
-
lookatmypix
-
-
"Between 60 and 90 million sharks are killed by humans each year"
"This is a mass-extinction event entirely of mankind’s creation. Many more consequences of these factors are still unknown but this severe depletion or possible extinction of such a vital predator as the shark which has been patrolling the oceans for over 400 million years will definitely cause irreversible damage to global marine ecosystems."
This passage in the article has surprised me:
"To maximise their profits the Spanish fisheries market abuses the consumer with incorrect product labelling so that shark meat can be passed as Emperor fish (Snapper fish) or Swordfish among many others because the similar tastes and textures can be easily confused by consumers. This deceit, deliberate or not, has caused the unintentional/unknowing consumption of shark by 96 per cent of the Spanish population."
http://www.oceansentry.org/lang-en/menu-articles/2227-campaign-for-sharks.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLZE6l3MmsU&feature=player_embedded#http://current.com/items/90834389_sharks-as-important-as-dolphins.htm
They use shark skin for luxury products as bags ,shoes etc.
Thank you Leah for this post. - 2 years ago
-
lookatmypix
-
-
rickm8
-
This is one of those things you need background to understand. Many people who have no idea about basic biological workings in the ocean will simply not understand the importance a keystone species has. Therefore people will tell you to join greenpeace or go hug a tree, when what you actually are saying is very important. It's sad but true, save the sharks!
- 2 years ago
-
rickm8
-
-
02
-
Why don't they start a fisheries survey that specifies just how many fish there are, how fish in each species can be taken while undermining the eco-system.
This would be a non-arbitrary, world-wide catch limits. Real management.
- 2 years ago
-
02
-
-
RodneyE
-
Very sad to think about. I have eaten shark and now haves sense of regret for killing this beautiful creature. I will resist fish mainly because the murcury though
- 2 years ago
-
RodneyE