Green | May 18, 2010 | 21 comments

'World's Biggest' Forest Protection Deal for Canada

Image
captainplanet71
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10123210.stm

Timber companies and environment groups including Greenpeace, Canopy, and ForestEthics have unveiled an agreement aimed at protecting two-thirds of Canada's vast forests from unsustainable logging.

Over 72 million hectares are included in what will become the world's largest commercial forest conservation deal.

Logging will be totally banned on some of the land, in the hope of sustaining endangered caribou populations.

Timber companies hope the deal will bring commercial gains, as timber buyers seek higher ethical standards.

The total protected area is about twice the size of Germany, and equals the area of forest lost globally between 1990 and 2005.

"The importance of this agreement cannot be overstated," said Avrim Lazar, president and CEO of the Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC).

"We're thrilled that this effort has led to the largest commercial forest conservation plan in history," said Steve Kallick of Pew Environment Group.

"Together we have identified a more intelligent, productive way to manage economic and environmental challenges in the Boreal [Forest] that will reassure global buyers of our products' sustainability."

The Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement (CBFA) brings together FPAC's 21 member companies and nine environment groups, many of which have fought a bitter battle against what they have sometimes criticised as rapacious logging.

As part of the agreement, those groups have agreed to suspend criticism of the industry and calls for boycotts.

The Pew Environment Group, which has worked for about a decade on trying to "green" Canada's forestry, said it was "excited" by the agreement.

"We're thrilled that this effort has led to the largest commercial forest conservation plan in history, which could not have happened without both sides looking beyond their differences," said Steve Kallick, director of Pew's International Boreal Conservation Campaign.

Pew notes that the total area covered by the deal is larger than in some agreements currently feted as global leaders, such as the Brazilian Amazon Region Protected Areas project.

Throughout the protected lands - which run right across the country from the Pacific to the Atlantic coasts - companies and environment groups are pledging to work together to implement "world-leading forest management and harvesting practices".

The effects of forest protection on wildlife, particularly caribou, will be monitored; and timber will be certified as coming from sustainable sources.

Pew believes the agreement could be a template for future forest agreements in other parts of the world, as industry leaders respond to an increasingly environmentally-aware public.

"There is a recognition that this is how forestry will be done in the 21st Century, and there's a great interest in getting ahead of the rest of the industry," Mr Kallick told BBC News.

The agreement at present covers companies and environment groups; both parties are looking now for backing and reinforcement from governments.

In the Canadian system that means the national and provincial authorities, and "First Nation" governments of indigenous groups, some of which have already indicated their support.
  1. groups:
    Green,   Earth and Science,   Sustainable Agriculture,   AAA News
  2. tags:
    Environment Canada Sustainability Oceans 5 more
  3.     
    |

21 comments // 'World's Biggest' Forest Protection Deal for Canada

  • TheGP2Project
    • 0
      TheGP2Project  
    • Image
    • On behalf of our Oceans, we are expanding our reach around the World to clean "The Great Pacific Garbage Patch" and ALL Ocean Gyres NOW. (Plastic, waste & industrial chemicals from our Oceans).

      Our vision is a Healthy & Vibrant Planet & Oceans.

      *Our mission includes having the resources & collaborations for clean-ups. We will partner with you, organizations, communities. We are forming collaborations on a global scale, fundraising and social networking to accomplish our mission.

      Register here, donate and join our team.
      http://www.stayclassy.org/san-diego-/events/the-gp2-project/e1696

      Thank you,
      The GP2 Project Staff and Team
      www.thegp2project.org

    • 2 years ago
  • suzane
  • Johnll
  • artemis6
  • hack26
  • CalgarC
  • KSirys
  • Dejan_Croatia
  • twohawks
    • 0
      twohawks  
    • I am feeling a bit challenged in determining how these two reports intersect. I would be very interested in any insights anyone may offer.

    • 2 years ago
  • twohawks
    • +1
      twohawks  
    • Image
    • This sounds like good news.

      I also see no reason to vote down what Jan is pointing out (whoever did that),
      and I appreciated your reply to her, Cap't.

      Here's another article from today:
      Canadian First Nations and Investors draw line in the tar sands with Shell at Annual General Meeting
      http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/05/first-nations-to-shell-tar-sands.html
      Excerpt: (but go to the link and read the whole thing)
      "Many investors have welcomed disclosures made on current tar sands operations, but the company has not provided reassurance about the profitability and risk management of planned ‘in-situ’ projects, which have higher production costs and greenhouse gas emissions. In-situ production is required for the majority of Shell’s vast undeveloped tar sand resources.

      Melina Laboucan-Massimo, Greenpeace Climate and Energy Campaigner and member of the Lubicon Cree First Nation attending the AGM stated, "While open pit mines are visually horrifying, the In Situ method of extraction is far more carbon-intensive, water-intensive, and energy-intensive. In Situ completely fragments the boreal forest in Canada, which is the largest terrestrial carbon sinks in the world.” Melina goes on to state, “Local communities are continually bearing the brunt of the detrimental effects of Shell's tar sands projects whether it be from toxic emissions and water contamination to the complete fragmenting and decimation of the boreal forest - tar sands development is completely altering our homelands and destroying the very foundation of who we are as Indigenous peoples."

      "Shell currently has three major operations in the area and has preliminary plans to expand."

    • 2 years ago
  • Robotic091
    • 0
      Robotic091  
    • I heard in a documentary that the bigger(older) the tree there is more wood produced per year on that tree. before they thought trees meet there peak production of wood growth then they would slow to a crawl and almost stop growing.

    • 2 years ago
  • Elligirl
    • +1
      Elligirl  
    • Restrict the supply and prices will float up. Or are those the areas already devastated by the pine beetle and are therefore much less profitable? Does it also mean that the currently available lands are the ONLY ones to be logged in future? Does this prevent any new companies from purchasing land timber rights? This smells fishy to me....

    • 2 years ago
  • NiceN
  • olddogdaddy
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Does this even begin to offset the carbon footprint and environmental devastation of the tarsands though? Also, I read above where this agreement stated: "As part of the agreement, those groups have agreed to suspend criticism of the industry and calls for boycotts." Giving up their right to free speech has to happen in order to preserve what should be a no brainer? Let us hope these companies then do not abuse this agreement as the groups have virtually given up their right to protest it.

    • 2 years ago
  • captainplanet71
    • +2
      captainplanet71  
    • Image
    • JanforGore:

      Stopping the tarsands is actually one of the biggest campaigns Greenpeace is waging right now. Can't speak about the other environmental groups that helped broker this deal for the forests. Hopefully we'll have some good news to report on the tarsands front one day soon.

      http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/tarsands/

      Environmental groups are suspending their boycotts as a sign of good faith that the timber companies will follow through -- but if the companies f*ck up, I have no doubt that the environmental movement will be all over them with boycotts and protests in a flash.

      They haven't "given up their right" to protest the companies. They're willing to suspend criticism as the timber companies implement changes. Again, if the timber companies break the agreement, then we'll be there to publicize, criticize, and protest!

      The great thing is now that we have these companies making a formal agreement, we have something we can hold them to. In other words, they're in OUR pockets for once.

    • 2 years ago
  • blaino
    • 0
      blaino  
    • JanforGore:

      Im sure that if the logging companies violated their end of the agreement the environmentalists would have no problem resuming their protests and boycotts.

      Look at the bigger picture here two sides with opposing mentalities working together to protect forests and wildlife. Making a historical deal that could change the way others feel about the issue of deforestation.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • captainplanet71:

      I understand, but also hope companies will also not now use this agreement as a way to say they have carbon credits to continue polluting with tarsands development. I suppose I simply have a hard time corrolating the word company with the words "good faith." I truly hope this works out.

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
  • onechance
  • freecrack
more from Green:

top videos