Fuel Pumps? What're Those Daddy? Child we stopped using gas & diesel pumps in 2012 when all engines were fast-converted to Steam Power before another hot summer!

Our World today is a LIE. A LIE is what we live in. The Poverty, Mass Starvation, people not having CLEAN DRINKING WATER ALL DAY LONG, is all the result of living A LIE so a few of us can be wealthy~rich~affluent. A car engine ~WHEN ALLOWED TO OVERHEAT PAST 212F~ makes a Jim Dandy Steam Engine!

We never "needed" Crude Oil based engine fuels and we SURE DON'T NOW. Fossil Fuels need to be stuffed back inside the Pandora's Box from whence its Evil came to impoverish mankind, destroy mankind, sicken and kill mankind's little children.

The Anti-Christ is real and soon, they will die real.

1. Combustion Engines = Friction. 2. Friction = Heat. 3. Heat = Steam. 4. Steam = STEAM ENGINES!

GOOD-BYE CRUDE OIL MY OLD FRIEND.

AHH SO:

ENERGY WE HAVE HAD SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME:

= 1 ENGINE~FRICTION:
= 1 ENERGY~SOURCE:
= 1 WATER~BECOMES~STEAM

= NO+EXHAUST
= NO+RADIATOR
= ZERO+POLLUTANTS
= NO+COOLING+SYSTEM
= NO+CATALYTIC+CONVERTERS
= LIGHTWEIGHT+ENGINE
= LIGHTER+MEANS+LESS+HORSEPOWER+NEEDED
= HAHAHAHA+CRUDE+OIL+BELONGS+ON+HISTORY+CHANNEL

#2 ENGINE SOLUTION then once the engine is running off its own HEAT-GENERATED STEAM POWER the turbocharger then begins using the engine heat as a POWER SOURCE ALSO so then your engine is made to stream water droplets into the turbocharger heat stream CAUSING STEAM A SECOND WAY.

=> THIS ENGINE IS MUCH MORE VIABLE THAN I FIRST THOUGHT.
=> THIS ENGINE IS MUCH MORE VIABLE THAN I FIRST THOUGHT.
=> THIS ENGINE IS MUCH MORE VIABLE THAN I FIRST THOUGHT.
=> THIS ENGINE IS MUCH MORE VIABLE THAN I FIRST THOUGHT.

The world's combustion engines can indeed be converted to 100% steam engines the package has been delivered Mr. Obama, Peace Maker, now make Peace with Earth's Environment Pleez. Use that Presidential Seal and STAMP EM DAN-O, FROM HAWAII.

Put the death touch on combustion engines, 10/22/2011.

Man from Hawaii, stomp your feet.

The really excellent thing about making combustion engines into Full Steam Engines is that OIL AND WATER NEVER MIX => so even when some steam presses past the piston rings dripping forward into crankcase oil the two fluids still remain SEPARATED... therefore making the steam-powered no-longer-combustion-burning engine viable yet some more, for the water getting into the oil pan can easily be siphoned out as easily as it went in... and re-added back into the engine's Water-Steam Cycle.

=>>> WHEW, I LOVE IT WHEN A PLAN COMES TOGETHER.
=>>> WHEW, I LOVE IT WHEN A PLAN COMES TOGETHER.
=>>> WHEW, I LOVE IT WHEN A PLAN COMES TOGETHER.

=>>> CAN ANYBODY SPELL CAKE ICING OR WHAT?!

A STEAM ENGINE THAT NEVER EVER RUSTS?!

Yep. Because there would be just enough oil slipping past into the water to keep the cylinder metals from rusting.

THIS IS A DONE DEAL, 10/22/2011.

The combustion engine as used today has an oil filter that rids the engine of water WHICH IS WHAT I STATED FROM THE BEGINNING =>>> COMBUSTION ENGINES ARE MADE BACKWARDS. =>>> WATER WAS TREATED AS THE ENEMY and FRICTION WAS TREATED AS THE ENEMY.

BOTH WRONG SINCE HENRY FORD AND MR. DIESEL.

JUST AN ABUNDANCE OF LIARS CLAIMING THERE IS ONE.

Water used in this application is not fuel. It is a working fluid used to translate energy from one part of the engine to another. A fuel source of some kind is still required. Something must generate the heat needed to create the steam. The energy from the steam can then be used to create mechanical work. The work energy that the engine produces leaves the system and must be replaced by a fuel source to create more steam.

You're right water isn't a fuel => STEAM IS. It's a proven technology that began the Industrial Revolution in 1705~1712. You're under-estimating the awesome explosive power of steam and over-estimating the energy needed to send water over 212 degrees.

=> I have designed a new geometric shape and you're trying to make it fit all the shapes you already know, which is expected treatment for any new technology.

=> A combustion engine the power stroke fires the piston pushed the crankshaft, then it has to come back, swing around the crankshaft again, come back up STILL HAVING ENOUGH LEFTOVER POWER TO COMPRESS AIR TO 8:1. That's a lot of lost horsepower! That's why the Efficiency of a combustion engine is barely more than 25%.

=> Okay, now consider mine. Power stroke pushes crankshaft, water drips off as piston passes the exhaust port in the side of the cylinder wall, piston returns up DOESN'T COMPRESS ANY AIR, POWER STROKE AGAIN.

=> So in your previous post you asked how can this [super efficient] system generate the energy enough to make the electric to make the water into steam. Well, #1 spinning a generator does that and spinning that generator is MORE THAN MADE UP FOR by the Power Strokes being every down stroke not every other down stroke (plus compressing air at its weakest point the dilapidated exhausted energy remaining by the 4th stroke).

#2, in your mind, which is perfectly understandable you think this, you're thinking of the old locomotives needing a half ton tank of boiling water to produce the steam. That isn't the way this engine conversion operates! THE STEAM IS NOT BEING MADE OUTSIDE THE CYLINDER BUT INSIDE.

=> Once you add up all the above changes ~not to mention the later one I added of making the injector plug do double duty as the heater plug to flash the water to steam~ the end result is a fantastic, wonderful and very beautiful new engine WHICH CAN BE MADE FROM EXISTING ENGINES, which means an incredibly fast implementation time fractions of the time a new technology usually takes to implement widely.

=> You are certainly not the only person having a problem putting all this changes together. If I had the monies I would gladly commission a full motion video schematic the whole nine yards, but I do not. Explaining it using the typed word is very little chance of success. But if you make a List of each change and assign it a percentage improvement over the combustion engines you'll quickly discover the awesome energy this engine represents WITHOUT HAVING TO MELT DOWN EVERY ENGINE IN THE WORLD INTO SLAG AND STARTING OVER =>>> which is a terrific carbon saving.

=> This engine could be easily proven by putting a couple drops of water in a metal can and sealing it, then heating it to find out how much heat energy would be required to explode the can. Anyone who actually does that should have the can inside a strongbox. Water expands 800x (800 times, = 80,000% Gain). But if the H2O is expanded slowly this way it does not properly show how my engine does. The H2O is "FLASH STEAMED" not slow cooker Crock Pot speed. The water is liquid then it's flashed into full steam volume @BLINK EYE FAST INSTANT SPEED.

=> AND SINCE THE EQUATION FOR HORSEPOWER INCLUDES A TIME COMPONENT THE SPEED OF CONVERSION TIME ~SLOW vs FLASH~ REPRESENTS A VAST INCREASE IN GENERATED HORSEPOWER.

=> And no giant tanks of water are necessary doing it this way because such a small amount of water is being flashed to steam at any given time, so the water circulating around is your "storage".

=> Sir, you are looking at a multi-faceted diamond here. The internal combustion engine was made BACKWARDS. This diamond waiting to be polished and given to the World is not backwards as it has corrected all the things that were wrong with combustion engines we use today.

As I mentioned before but mistakenly typed above, the water expelled out of the cylinders is not merely "dripping" away => the exhaust holes will be drilled at a point where there's still a smidgeon of steam pressure remaining and will expel the water like a whale's blowhole.

Hmm. You say the "fuel source" has to be replenished. Well, hopefully one day you'll get past that. The Laws of Physics are doing the replenishing. Condensing by being cooled is returning the system to Square 1 => an automatic "refueling" so to speak.

hahaha I've been dealing with these new principles for many years through a succession of engines. You're also thinking of Entropy, that a system has to degrade, sputter to a stop and die, in this case die out of fuel.

That's why my engines are miracles. Physics is that miracle, just not the Physics you AND EVERYBODY ELSE has had drilled into your head => the old Physics. What I discovered was a higher level of Physics. Self-replenishing fuel.

YOU SHOULD SEE MY ONE FROM FEBRUARY 2005. HAHAHAHA

Actually, I was going to talk about enthalpy. Enthalpy is a measure of the energy in something. Water at the point of injection into your cylinder has a certain level of enthalpy. When you allow that water to expand and drive the cylinder, the remaining mixture of steam and condensate has an enthalpy that is less than the enthalpy you started with. This is as you planned, as part of that decrease in enthalpy translated into mechanical work energy. That work moves your car.

Now you have a mixture of steam and condensate at a lower temperature and pressure than the water you started with. You must then condense the remaining steam. You can't recover that energy in your steam cycle, because the steam temperature is already a lower temperature (and lower energy) than your water at the point of injection. Alternately, you could vent this steam and start over. Either way, it is a parasitic loss to your cycle efficiency.

The condensate you recover from your power stroke can be reused as it was. However, it is at a lower temperature than the feed water. It must be reheated if you want it to flash again. This reheating process requires a heat source. Again, it can't be reheated by the remaining steam, because those two fluids are the same temperature.

Basically, if you are going to take energy out of a system, like the mechanical work your steam does, you must replace the energy back into the system. You can't take out more energy than you put in.

So you would equate enthalpy out to be a Negative 80,000% Gain-per-stroke eh? hehehe The reason you still can't "see" it is because you want it so badly to be wrong it becomes a mirage of gold to you. Your blindness is killing you.

There isn't that much force to stop Steam as you claim. If Steam was that poor an Energy we wouldn't have had an Industrial Revolution and 200 years of many steam engines.

Your intention is to sway people away from this powerful innovation in Man's History but someone like you is too little to stop it. This is not the only place on the Internet I have posted this information. You are the only one whining like a baby for his bottle.

Everybody else knows from Steam History it will work.

At no point in any of my posts have I said "get more energy out than put in". And you're using a powerful word => "parasite" when there is no parasite around. You want it to be a parasite-level problem; it isn't. You're nit-picking and straining out as many gnats as you can.

You need not grasp so hard at straws to defeat me. I have no money, have no backing, have no organization behind me. WHY ARE YOU FLAILING LIKE A DROWNING MAN FOR? THE OVERKILL EFFORT FROM YOU IS AWESOME.

YOUR DESPERATION IS TELLING ON YOU SIR.

You're doing your best to defeat an adaptation of the engine that ran America and Europe and the world for 200 years. That's awesome of you. Do you think anyone reading your "arguments" will not see right through you, not see you're sweating and huffing & puffing to blow my house made of kindling over?

I'm not in any hurry to succeed. It's the other folks dying in Somalia and Kenya and many other places of the world people coughing & hacking & gagging from emphysema and lung cancer while watching their children starve and be eaten to death by house flies, it's those people who feel a pressing need. I have no such problems here.

Rest yoself and relax. You're straining too much, as if the world knows this little thread even exists.

You are funny. I enjoy discussing science, and you are so darn excited about it, it's hard to resist.

But, I still see a fundamental misunderstanding on the role steam plays in your idea. You have the "add heat" part to get steam in the first place, and you have the "expand to do work" part to change the heat energy into steam and from steam into mechanical work. What you don't have is: where does the heat come from that you are using to make the steam?

Heat in equals work out. That's the fundamental description of a steam driven engine. Trains did it with coal. So do power plants. Some factories used natural gas. What do you propose for your heat source?

Your answer spills from your own mouth => "That's the fundamental description of a steam driven engine". My engine is flash steam driven, a monumental step up from the steamers of yesteryear.

The heat source? The running engine does that, much like the 70,000 volt voltage coil does off a running combustion engine. My engine will not be powering a voltage coil, instead an additional amperage alternator THAT ENGINES ALREADY USE.

=> hahaha You're sort of funny too the way you keep re-phrasing questions I already answered. However, the finished engine will be using the TWO SYSTEMS I have written about here => #1 that keeps the engine block heated AROUND THE CYLINDERS and #2 using injector plugs spraying the H2O onto heated splash plate elements INSIDE THE CYLINDER.

=> So there's a double heat source, netiher one nor both together crippling the system as you are trying to project... any more than the stuff packed all over combustion engines forcing them to work inefficiently.

=> And truth be told an inefficient engine consumes much more energy than an efficient system like mine will ever need, which means my good man if the crap engines all over the world today can run then mine will also run, by the process of elimination (eliminating all their inefficiencies).

=> Think about that a minute before you step in it again pleez. You have entered a cyclical redundancy that reminds one of these ignorant internal combustion engines. 8/24/2011 the merry-go-round from hell we go while each passing day hundreds of thousands go without clean potable drinking water because of people just like you.

Okay - so you are adding heat to system #1 around the cylinders, and adding heat through the injection heating elements. Where are you getting that heat?

You can't get that heat from the flash steam. The flash steam is colder than the hot water used to create it. That is the definition of flash steam. After the steam flashes it is at a lower temperature and pressure than the water used to create it. It is at a lower energy state.

You also can't get that heat from electricity via an alternator driven by this engine. The alternator USES the energy difference between hot water and flashed steam to get mechanical energy to spin.

Neither one of your "sources" is a source. Each of your sources is instead a method to inject heat, without mentioning what the energy source for that heat is. The flash steam can't heat itself back up. In order for your engine to drive, it needs a big burner or a bigger battery connected to a really big water heater.

Do you REALLY want to go on record as stating steam is colder than hot water? Really? Okay, wow. But of course there's a temperature drop after the process has completed BUT SO WHAT?! It's being blown out the blowhole as the piston swings around for more blasts of flash steam, every piston returning to a Power Stroke totally unlike combustion engines needing 4 strokes PLUS compressing a cylinder load of air, a horsepower drain. My engine does not of that garbage, experiences none of those power losses.

"Heat injection" is not what drives this engine => STEAM EXPLOSION DOES, NOT STEAM "EXPANSION" like the old locomotives, but INSTANT+EXPLOSION. The difference between expansion and explosion is a Time Advantage that you continue failing to add => Instantaneous explosion means a Horpsepower boost that goes off-the-scale-exponential.

You're using the wrong scale. That exponential horsepower bump is more than enough to drive generators, or alternators, to heat the injector elements AND heat the cylinders! WHY?! Because you are over-estimating the temperatures required, that's why.

You're thinking too big, so then you're applying the wrong ideas to my engine changes. You continue trying to get a new geometric shape to fit through the already-drilled holes you are familiar with.

I do not envy you your pain but, your difficulty and pain is testimony to just how much and how many miracles are involved in this transformed engine that uses "Physics Fuel" not combustion. My engine is basically a WEATHER CYCLE.

Uhm, do you want to also go on record as not believing in the planet's weather cycles? If so, knock yerself out, because bottom line combustion engines in all their many LOUSY CONFIGURATIONS exhaust manifold times any heat loss in my engines IF INDEED THERE ARE ANY. But there aren't any because heat is being cycled around & around SOON AS THE ENGINE BLOCK REACHES OPERATING TEMPERATURE THE ENERGY NEEDS PLUMMET.

My engine does not have nor need a tailpipe.

HAHAHAHA I'm not laughing at you. You are making a really valiant effort to walk. I don't tell this to many but I didn't walk til I was like 15 months old. I had received a nasty concussion in a car accident where my forehead encountered Mr. 1948 Chevy Metal dashboard. Then I didn't learn to pronounce my own name correctly til I was past 7 years of age due to taking a fly from a car door popped open in a curve when I was 4YO, flipping til I hit on my head, again, on the back side that time.

Your struggle is the struggle we all go through.

Yes, I want to go on record that flash steam is colder than the hot water used to create it. Please google "steam tables" and explore this concept. They are kind of confusing, so take your time. You start with water at a higher temperature and pressure, allow it to expand and get water and steam at a lower temperature and pressure. The ratio of steam to condensate varies based on the differences between the initial temperature, pressure and volume, and the final values for those. Now you've got it!

As to the weather cycle - it has a big effing heater. Some people just call it the sun. The sun's energy adds the heat to make the cycle spin. I believe in that, too.

Also, you keep talking about the instantaneous power of the expansion What you are overlooking is that the extremely high instantaneous power happens for an extremely small duration. You might be dividing a number by near zero, but you are also multiplying that same number by near zero. The energy you get to harvest from your steam expansion is just a bit less than the energy difference between the hot water you started with, and the steam and condensate mixture you end with, regardless of how fast that expansion takes place.

The instantaneous nature of the change to mechanical work is only important as you design your engine not to get broken by the sudden changes in pressures.

Again, you've missed the point on the heat energy. Yes, your engine is hot when it is running. However, every pound of steam you make requires somewhere around 1200 BTU of heat. You use this heat to make steam, then let it expand to do mechanical work.

You must then add back to the system 1200 BTU more heat every time you want to make another pound of steam.

Apples versus Oranges. Expansion versus Explosion. Your steam tables yes, I saw them a long time ago. They are not crippling to my changes. Nice attempt tho. Kung Fu masters who break boards with their fingertips could understand the power in my engine.

You're simply not up to the task.

No, I understand, and work with, steam on a fairly regular basis. Which part of the steam tables are you not getting? Maybe I can help.

Hmm. Nope, you're wrong, because all the negatives you say are against my system are already against combustion engines, so in a comparison against each other they are a non issue by being equal.

And since the returning piston isn't doing the asinine job of being an AIR COMPRESSOR ~making mine FREE WHEELING without any negative pressure~ accumulating a massive Entropy Factor, plus slowing it down, hahaha my engine crosses the finish line like King Arthur's best stallion.

However, tomorrow I will address your question further.

I would not "have you believe" any "notions" => only apply standard facts YOU ALREADY KNOW WORK and use every day, and benefit from, EVERY DAY. Your argument about heat destroying the engine conversion is false too, because a combustion engine HAVING EXPLODING GASOLINE is a great deal superheated above my innovative idea causing water to explode.

This world today is built upon men's "notions" so what I perceive you trying to do is stop this particular one by hurling insults. Babies scream a lot trying to stop being born too, but when the birthing is over they LIVE. So please, ask serious questions not ones drawn out your derriere trying to stop a technology whose time has come to be birthed.

Your last point was a good solid inquiry about the lubricant being broken down. In fact just yesterday I was reading a long article in Wikipedia about how ANIMAL TALLOW was used to prevent "washing" which is exactly what you have raised. The article went on to mention there are other lubricants resistant to washing also, which is why the engine people got away from using animal tallow.

For every issue you have raised most of em have been encountered with previous combustion engines and overcome, so it is with COMPLETE CONFIDENCE IN OTHER INVENTIVE MEN that my engine can also be built and running quite well.

OPEC IS FINISHED. THE AMERICAN CRUDE OIL CARTEL IS FINISHED. A NEW WORLD IS ABOUT TO BE BIRTHED, GLORY TO GOD HIGH TIME TOO.

I have better than Physics Laws behind it I have WHALES! One or several whale-like blowholes have to be drilled down toward the end of the piston stroke, in the cylinder walls. The Steam pressure blows most the H2O out where it condenses outside the cylinder then the piston returns.

As the piston slides down, past the "blowholes", the remaining pressure does the job, clears its throat for the next gulp.

Almost like a LIVING ENGINE WOULD DO.

I see one problem you are having Credit Man is you are thinking in terms of "expansion" but this engine conversion is doing a flullblown EXPLOSION, just without any combustion. It is a new concept and rubbing your eyes might not help...

Interesting.. sounds like you have a handle on it. Godspeed, amigo.

If you ruminate over the exchange of posts between me and Sparky at this thread => http://current.com/community/93393869_cnn-comet-elenin-earthquakes-and-you.htm you'll find out I made this thread knowing it doesn't likely have time to be acted on. I revealed this engine conversion because it needed to be presented, a "line" that needed to be crossed, not from any expectation to have time to actually be adopted, or make money or anything.

People needed to know what an INCREDIBLE LIE THEY'VE BEEN SUFFERING UNDER => THE COMBUSTION ENGINE. Sort of like how the Bible says "the Law was given to make sins manifest".

Most people today haven't been trained to do manual hands-on stuff. I grew up not having much money, so when something around the house needed doing I was the only one around. I worked on our lawnmower without ever having been told how, just whipped out the Sears Roebuck owner's manual and did the best I could.

Your attitude is a luxury I never had. It took me a lifetime of not having money and not having stuff to come up with these ideas, and then when I did I ran into an entire generation of Americans FROM EVERY STATE who are just like you.

So I think you are a very honest person to recognize your limitations and my hat is off to you. The Wise man backs away from the neighbor's growling dog.

Thanks for putting the vote up on my thread. The starving and hungry, and those suffering in the awesome heat, also thank you.

It's a job for the 16-cylinder Bugatti geniuses anyway.

Having the power of an 1860's locomotive under the car hood ~without tugging 50 loaded boxcars behind your car/truck/SUV, is enough raw power to the ground to MELT & BURN THE TIRE RUBBER OFF FOR A FEW MILES DOWN THE HIGHWAY.

Anything less than this is a puny 27% efficiency combustion engine.

http://Currect.com

Morning Dugdog47, excellent question and one I should expand on. The radiator-replacement is a "tankless water heater" but WHAT'S THAT?! It sounds hard, as if it would require lots of electricity! However, that is not necessarily true. How big and how much juice it requires will be in a direct relation to engine size.

=> A large V-8 has lots of Mass in the metal, so to heat all that up to where the heat would press in on the cylinders ENOUGH TO EXPLODE THE WATER yes, that would require several big generators and likely a number of marine batteries.

=> The purpose of this thread was to show it could be done to every combustion engine, and it can. I am not a Chemist but the fluid used to heat the engine block would NOT BE PLAIN WATER => it would be a chemical mix having properties like napalm for instance, something already chemically hot... so that the tankless jobbie would have help heating it to Operating Temperature!

=> The fluid would also be thicker, denser than water because heat retention in a reversed-combustion engine would be DESIRABLE hahaha... so making this backwards engine requires some mental strain because to make it work YOU HAVE TO THINK BACKWARDS of what we have now => and have grown used to for over 100 years.

=> That being said, it is not a big "speed bump" like your question correctly raised. What IS a "tankless water heater". The name is long and killer but if you check out the schematics on them found in Google Images you will see it is a very simple device that can easily be made by any decent welder without having to slab down $650.00 for a store bought one.

=> Most of them I think run on 220 Volt so a strong battery pack would be required and a converter. This of course will add much weight to the vehicle but, it is balanced out too because you will be removing the carburetion/fuel injection system, the fan, the sparkplugs, and while I gussied up my idea by claiming the GAS TANK WOULD NOW BE FILLED WITH WATER that was just the P. T. Barnum circus act excitement I needed to employ.

=> Fact is the vehicle will not need a gas tank at all => so there goes a lot more vehicle weight, because the condensed water is being re-circulated almost immediately back into the cylinders. YOU'LL RECOGNIZE THIS AS A WEATHER CYCLE AND A REPEATING LOOP. hahaha

=> A gas tank filled with water would be 15 gallons give or take @ 8 lbs. per gallon = 120 POUNDS, plus the weight of the tank itself, for a total weight reduction of 160 pounds that more than counters the weight of a few SUPERHEATED CONDUIT PIPES, which is all a tankless water heater is anyway..

=> MY FRIENDS THIS IS ALL DOABLE. THERE ARE NO TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES REQUIRED FROM YEARS OF PAIN-STAKING RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT.

=> It would be advantageous to use this system on smaller engines, but had I used a picture of a dinky little 4-cylinder mouse peep who would read my information? However, the idea is AWESOME so the awesome size of a massive V-8 Dakota engine was appropriate and properly used TO PRESENT THE "BIG IDEA" TO THE ENERGY-CRAVING OF THIS WORLD who are strapped for money to pay for fuel.

=> Your question is honorable and I know it strains the old gourd to believe it can be so simple but there's a trick I have not yet written til now => the water spray-injected into the cylinders to make the Steam explosion has already been pre-heated to almost the point of steam before injection, so the temperature of the engine block does NOT have to be red hot-hot-hot, which would require massive Power to achieve.

=> An engine block temperature of barely 220-240 degrees might be all that's required to initiate the water~to~steam~explosion. That's the pinch bar my man, that's the pinch bar. That's the pole vaulting pole that can take us over the bar to a world that is no longer polluted as it is now => a world that is no longer having these droughts and intense summer heat => Arctic ice and Siberian permafrost meltdowns releasing Megatonnage of Methane/CO2/evaporated water vapor, greenhouse gases all => a world that can be temperature re-stabilized => IN ONE YEAR'S TIME WE WOULD BRING THE POT OFF THE STOVE.

=> Personally I'd like to have one on a 1200 cc Harley 2-banger... but what is needed isn't funding so much as Manhattan Project speed. Heck, I've got an old engine right here in my 302 Ford Maverick. It could be converted for under $1,000.00 but I am at the time putting most my disability check into a $720.00 a month apartment (inc'g electric). So there ya go. I'm a dead stick, for now.

=> If I asked for money and gave out my e-mail for people to send me a few bucks via my PayPal account that would seriously violate Current dot com guidelines otherwise I would. Soon as I get moved to a lower cost place with a garage to work in I'd be roasting marshmallows over this thing. I do however have a possible job lined up in a few weeks as my health has improved some so I'm not out of the action yet. Quite frankly tho this work is all so easy & simple a feat I imagine a great many people perhaps even you will be driving around never stopping at a gas pump again long before I make my move.

=> But why should anyone have to wait for me? If I had held this information back to myself it would've given "the man" time to do to me what they did to Mr. Pantone and his G.E.E.T. engine. They put him in a mental incarceration for 3 years. Forget that. NOW IT'S OUT HERE & HOPEFULLY IT CANNOT NOR WILL IT NOT BE STOPPED. JUGGERNAUT LIVES!!!!

Even 100% Prestone antifreeze is a "heat-retaining" fluid! That's why you have to cut it 50% antifreeze to 50% water.100% antifreeze will make a combustion engine overheat.

So it could be even more simple, no need for a chemist, none at all, JUST USE 100% ANTIFREEZE done deal.

You may be on to something there. However, how hot does antifreeze need to be to turn to steam? I was thinking something similar to antifreeze, but with a lower boiling temperature.

Of course IF A PERSON HAD MY ENGINE OUT IN THE DESERT SOMEWHERE IT WOULD ONLY WORK BETTER. Such as the Somalia and Egypt and Nevada deserts, it would do Great there. Anywhere within striking distance of the Equator. Dubai U.A.E. comes quickly to mind they would be living in 7th Heaven there.

Including ships and boats.

Colder areas would need more heated conduit pipes.

OH NOES! The antifreeze is heating all around the engine cylinders! This system is #1 heating the OUTSIDE and #2 the heat radiates in to the cylinder where #3 the water has been injected into and #4 runs into the heated cylinder walls.

It would be very easy to make one, a small lawnmower engine would do. I'm not situated at this time in a rental apt to be drilling on METAL. I think as the news spreads how to do it a whole BUNCHA people will be having free home electricity come the 2011 snows.

There's a world full of retired fellows who love doing this stuff. A small tankless water heater unit runs around $300, that's your big expense. Then purchase a homesize emergency generator where the motor is wore out, then SLAP PEANUT BUTTER TO CHOCOLATE!!!

Never fear a Power Outage, Brownout, or downed powerlines ever again.

I'd like to see this in action. Do you have a working prototype or a video of this system in action?

No, I just figured it out a few days ago. It's a take-off on an engine I figured out this past May... adapted to convert combustion engines. It can also power your home and stop paying a utility bill... put a few bucks back in your pocket eh?

hehe I'D LIKE TO SEE IT TOO. The Japanese doing without electric power would like to see one in action a lot more than you & me put together I imagine. It can be scaled up large enough (and multiple units enough) to replace nuclear power.

If you would like Proof of Principle just do this => take a skillet, place it on the stove. Get it hot then flick in a few drops of water. It instantly explodes into 800 times the Volume of the liquid H2O.

That's your proof.

How do you power the generator that heats the anti-freeze which in turn heats the engine block? I think you are forgetting about conservation of energy and the first law of thermodynamics. If you are using a generator to heat your water, the amount of heat generated to power the motor would all but negate the use of the water at all. You might as well use the generator to power the motor.

It does boggle the mind eh? You would benefit by reading my words more closely because we are not talking the slow pressured steam of past locomotives we are talking instant "FLASHED STEAM" where the water is going from H2O into full expansion in an instant of time, or very close.

Horsepower is calculated with a time component, the faster the explosion the more horsepower, so when one drop of water becomes the instant volume of 800 drops of water in the form of Steam the resulting horsepower goes off the charts. There is therefore ample power to drive a generator or alternator heavy-duty enough as will be needed.

But for as many times as I type it yep, it still boggles the mind. But a simple example of this is to heat a skillet on a stove and flick a drop of water into the frying pan. That is a small fraction of what such an engine conversion as this will do. The reason you and in fact most people have a problem conceiving of this is our engines today are CONTROL FREAK ENGINES. The power of unleashed steam is of uncontrolled. It goes far beyond anything we have ever had before.

Steam locomotives and steamships were examples of controlled steam and yet look what they were capable of. Today there is an aversion to all of my energy systems this one's just the latest I've revealed. The aversion comes because it is a single answer and the masses of America have been repeatedly brainwashed against believing there can be any such animal as a "SINGLE ANSWER".

So you are not having a problem with me or my engine conversion, not at all; your problem is the mass brainwashing that has been done on you. Brainwashing is difficult to overcome... but buddy when you do THE LIGHT'S GOING TO HIT YOU AND THEN YOU WILL KNOW... once you accept that the expansion of water represents an 80,000% instant power "State Change".

The power of water-to-steam goes exponential, and that mean tons of raw leverage. I am not however avoiding that a cold engine block won't take a few minutes of warm-up time either. It will, unless a heated dipstick is left on low overnite, but all these minor issues will be worked out during the time of discovery.

Today's massive engine block weights are not the ideal engine weight for this system anyway but I do know a way to vastly improve this system as presented, but for the time being I am holding it back. I do so because I recognize the power of brainwashing. It has defeated me many times before... so there's no sense revealing the icing on this cake at this time.

Thanks for your excellent question.

There's something else you should remember too. The present combustion engine is having a slugfest against its own self. When the sparkplugs fire that's 100% but then the returning piston is encountering a cylinder full of air that it has to compress.

My engine conversion doesn't do that. The 100% horsepower produced is not being used as an air compressor. This conversion system presented in this thread does what is called "free-wheeling", where all hp produced ~minus the internal friction losses of course~ is reaching the road surface. That is called "Mechanical Advantage".

Let me know when the lightbulb goes off. hahaha