Green | September 23, 2011 | 34 comments

The Colorado River: Running Near Empty

JanforGore
Photographer Peter McBride traveled along the Colorado River from its source high in the Rocky Mountains to its historic mouth at the Sea of Cortez. In this Yale Environment 360 video, he follows the natural course of the Colorado by raft, on foot, and overhead in a small plane, telling the story of a river whose water is siphoned off at every turn, leaving it high and dry 80 miles from the sea.

In the video, McBride, a Colorado native, documents how increasing water demands have transformed the river that is the lifeblood for an arid Southwest.
  1. groups:
    Green,   Earth and Science,   Actual News,   Sustainable Agriculture,   7 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Climate Change Water Humanity 11 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

34 comments // The Colorado River: Running Near Empty // Video

  • Schnookums
    • +1
      Schnookums  
    • All I can say is, wow. I had no idea for the last 13 years the Colorado dried up before it made it to the sea. Thanks for posting......

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • ecoalex
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • http://www.savethecolorado.org/threats.php

      "A changing climate caused the rapid build-up of greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere will likely have profound impacts on the Colorado River basin. Warmer weather, less snow, a reduction in stream runoff, and changed timing of spring runoff are all likely impacts. Recent modeling suggests that a 10% reduction in stream runoff may cause delivery shortages in Las Vegas 58% of the time by the year 2050. A more recent study by the Bureau of Reclamation suggests that in as little as 2 years, there is a 20% chance that Lake Mead's water level could drop too low to produce electricity or supply enough water to Las Vegas.

      Water supplies to the entire basin may be impacted by climate change. Recent studies by the State of Colorado suggest that if climate change forecasts come true, water providers in Colorado may use all of water available to them through their legal allocation, thus reducing the amount of water that flows downstream for other cities as well as for the environment. Cities and water districts up and down the basin - as well as the U.S. Department of Interior - are spending vast amounts of money trying to understand and predict the extent and impacts of climate change on the Colorado River.
      Approximately 30 million people currently live in the Colorado River basin and depend on its water. Each of those people places a "demand" on the water in the basin. The average person in the Colorado River basin uses about 200 gallons of water per day - in kitchens, bathrooms, laundry rooms, and in their yards. Along the Front Range of Colorado, approximately 30% of all water is used for 3 months in the summer to keep lawns green; that percentage may be even higher in the desert landscapes of Arizona and southern California.

      Human populations are expected to continue to grow in the Colorado River basin. Compared to population numbers in 2000, the U.S. Census Bureau expects an average of a 53% increase in population in the year 2030 in the Colorado River basin states. This new population growth will all require new and more water, and place even more demand on the Colorado River and its tributaries. Due to population growth, demand for water in the Colorado River basin has already outstripped supply - this trend is expected to continue in the future as water supplies decrease (due to drought and climate change), and population increases.

      Water is taken out of the Colorado River through a phenomenal network of dams, reservoirs, and diversions. Over 100 dams have been built on the Colorado River and its tributaries for flood control, to create hydroelectricity, to store agricultural and municipal water, and to harness the river's widely varying flows to generate a steady water supply for people and crops. Despite the widespread benefits of dams and reservoirs, over-allocation and drought have placed significant stress on storage. The water levels of the river's two largest reservoirs - Mead and Powell, stored behindy Hoover and Glen Canyon Dams - have dropped significantly in recent years. Although dams and reservoirs provide enormous benefits for human populations, they are also threats to water supplies - over 10% of the flow in the Colorado River evaporates every year in reservoirs along its path.

      The Colorado River is often called one of the most controlled and plumbed rivers on the planet. In addition, more plumbing, and dams, and diversions are planned, especially in the upper basin in Colorado. Currently multiple projects are being proposed along the Front Range of Colorado that would remove over 300,000 acre feet of new water from the Colorado River and its tributaries - all of this would be removed even before the river reaches Lakes Powell and Mead. Currently, more water is requested from the river than the river can provide, and thus the river has been drained dry for the last decade before it reaches the Sea of Cortez.

      The Colorado River was originally home to an array of plant and animal species naturally fitted to its environment. Due to the actions of humans, some of these species are endangered and on the brink of extinction. The Colorado pikeminnow, razorback sucker, humpback chub and bonytail are endangered fish species that once thrived in the Colorado River system. These fish are endangered because of two types of habitat alterations - water developments (dams, reservoirs, diversions) and introductions of non-native fish. Over a hundred of dams, diversions, and other barriers have been constructed: river flows have been cut by a third or more, and in some places the river is completely dried up: and more than 40 species of non-native fish have been introduced in the upper Colorado River basin. A huge coalition of agencies and organizations came together in 1988 to recover endangered Colorado River basin fish. Those coalitions have spent over $200 million trying to save and recover the endangered fish with limited success so far - none of the fish have yet been removed from the federal Endangered Species list.

      Protecting endangered species in the Colorado River will continue to be an expensive and time-consuming task. More proposed dams and diversions, climate change, and the proliferation of non-native fish and other species will make recovery efforts harder and less likely to succeed. While the simple solutions of "getting more water in the river, and removing some dams" could solve the problem, those solutions face extraordinary economic and political roadblocks.

      The Colorado River basin has as many resources below ground as it does above ground. These underground resources lure countless extraction-based companies near the river every year in search of uranium, oil, natural gas, and oil shale. As energy prices have risen in the last decade, the demand for underground resources has ignited a flurry of claims, boreholes, and extraction proposals. Uranium mining is one of the biggest threats facing the Colorado River - 395 uranium mining claims currently exist along the river corridor; another 800 pending new claims are in the works.

      Oil and gas drilling, as well as the potential for oil shale development, are additional major concerns for the river. Water pollution, and the use of water in these extraction efforts, would place extraordinary demands on Colorado River and the ecosystems surrounding it. Oil shale extraction, in particular, proposes to use vast quantities of water - if such extraction would occur on a widespread basis in western Colorado and southern Utah, it would fundamentally change the water supply availability for the entire Southwestern U.S. Abandoned mines and tailings are an additional concern - in Utah, abandoned uranium mines and tailings lay alongside the Colorado River seemingly just waiting for the next major flood to wash them away and destroy the river's ecosystem.

      An ecosystem like the Colorado River evolved over thousands of years and includes myriad species adapted to that specific environment. However, through accidental and purposeful actions of humans, non-native species have been introduced in the ecosystem. Some of those non-native species have flourished, to the detriment of native species and to the river itself."

    • 8 months ago
  • wynnmeg61
    • 0
      wynnmeg61  
    • JanforGore:

      As long as you are not promoting the dismantling of the system altogether, I can agree with much that you do promote here. That being said, there are many pragmatic things we can do here in the rocky-mountain region that can conserve water. Things like rewarding conservation and punishing waste through water rates. If you use over a certain amount you pay triple rates or higher -- make it very punitive; if you use under a certain level per person in your household, you get a rebate. Apply punitive rates to Golf courses and certain types of lawn grasses. You would not believe the amount of water a Kentucky bluegrass lawn requires here in the desert, but many communities insist on it. Private swimming pools should just go away altogether, or if you insist on having one, you have to pay a premium of 100 times the going rate per gallon.

      You are correct that there are other forms of irrigation, however, you can't irrigate thousands of acre's using a drip system. There are also other variables involved in irrigating the desert. Our top soil is very thin, and varies from sandy to heavy clay, I know how bad those sprinkler systems appear but we do have to simulate rainfall, otherwise the water will runoff or siphon down into the water table without giving any benefit to the crop being irrigated.

      Yes, we have several species of salmonid (pike-minnow, for example) that are endangered. The other side of that coin though is that the dam and reservoir system has provided for a faster recovery of the bald eagle, peregrine falcon, southwest willow flycatcher, etc. than could have been otherwise expected. Water-resource management along the Colorado River Corridor is a many faceted project.

      The Edward Abbey plan just isn't a workable solution. If we decommission every dam on the river and return the river to it's "natural" state, where are we going to relocate all the animals and people who benefit? We already have a food security issue is this country, what will we do when we are no longer able to use those millions of acre's for agricultural production?

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • wynnmeg61
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • http://www.smithsonianmag.com/multimedia/videos/Climate-Change-and-the-Colorado-...

      The compact of 1922 didn't figure on so many people moving to the Nevada desert either or on climate change having such an effect through drought, water evaporation, as well as diversion, dams, etc. It is now challenging this area to have no other choice but to conserve and collaborate to find better ways to conserve water. If you look at this video, the sprinkler irrigation being used is very wasteful of water. There are other irrigation methods that can keep water closer to the roots without wasting it. Agroforestry might also be an option but ultimatlely it comes down to an attitude change within people themselves and in seeing the reality of what they are doing to this river by their own actions.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • wynnmeg61
    • +2
      wynnmeg61  
    • JanforGore:

      I think you might be surprised about how many of us are very very careful with water out here. When you live in a desert you have to be.

      Although, it would be a really good thing if some of these bedroom communities would allow xeroscaping, or native grasses and plants. My own community we got so good at conserving water that the city had to jump up our rates because they were not getting enough revenue. I know many people became very discouraged when that happened, as we are also the poorest county in the state.

    • 8 months ago
  • wynnmeg61
  • JanforGore
  • wynnmeg61
    • 0
      wynnmeg61  
    • JanforGore:

      Oh my yes it is very obvious, since population is the problem we should all step off the planet. My family was here long before the compact so we aren't leaving. You can go first though.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • Gravity_Man
    • +1
      Gravity_Man  
    • JanforGore:

      Good answers Jan. However, and unfortunately, the way water works sitting evaporating in a pan is at first it doesn't even appear to be evaporating. But when it gets closer to the end it goes exponentially faster. Super large rivers drying up is faster.

      Only way I see to pull up out of this nosedive into the ground is to give the planet's restoration an equal amount of funding as military expenditures. If they want to continue blowing it up they're gonna have to start repairing it back. Duh.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • wynnmeg61:

      Why so defensive? Do you understand this goes beyond you? Did you even watch the video, or just decide to jump on me because it's me? The point of all of this is that with other factors added to the population increases there such as more dams, diversions, drought, climate change, it is going to take a more concerted effort to conserve water for the future, and that includes regarding agriculture and business as well as those who live there. And that IS aimed at making golf courses in the middle of the desert, or diverting and damming it as well to the point where the natural flow of the river as well is a threat to other species. But what the hell, who should care about that right as long as you got yours? This goes beyond you and this post was not presented as pointing a finger but as an educational tool to show people what our actions collectively can do in time if we are not aware of the consequences.That is something we all need to learn in this new world we have made where water and land seem to be expendable regardless of the consequences to the future. If you have been there as long as you claim then this should matter to you more than just sniping at me for caring enough to bring it to others' attention. When I asked isn't it obvious, I was talking about conservation. Oh, and FYI, I'm not going anywhere either, and I conserve as well where I am. The point is that on the whole we have new challenges working to even negate that and we need to care about them and plan for them.

    • 8 months ago
  • wynnmeg61
    • 0
      wynnmeg61  
    • JanforGore:

      Actually, there is a great deal more to the Colorado River Compact than creating Golf courses in the desert. These dams and reservoirs have made it possible to farm millions of acres, support populations that would never been sustainable at all. They have even provided for the sustainability of hundreds of species of wildlife. Yes, there have been several species of salmonids impacted adversely, but far more species of fish, birds, and mammals have benefited.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • wynnmeg61
    • 0
      wynnmeg61  
    • JanforGore:

      A short list of the species benefited would be, Bald Eagle, Golden Eagle, Peregrine Falcon, Southwest Willow Flycatcher, Mule Deer, Elk, Racoons, Prairie Dog, multiple species of Trout, Wild Horse. As well as, many tribes of the indigenous peoples, such as, Hopi, Dine, Navajo. Drought is more severe right now that is true, but those species of wildlife and the peoples would be completely devastated without the system of dams and reservoirs in place. Plus there are millions of acres of riparian lands made possible. You are very much mistaken if you believe that my only concern is if I get mine.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • wynnmeg61:

      Which species have benefitted? Just curious. And even though this has been done, there is still danger now of these sources not being able to sustain the rate of growth due to climate change, declining rainfall, drought, etc. and it is those diversions and dams in part that have now slowed the river's flow keeping it from reaching the sea. That is the point. How much is enough? How much do we need?

      http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2011/05/report-raises-concerns-over-how-col...

      "A National Parks Conservation Association report examines problems dams along the Colorado River are causing national parks in the Southwest.

      Some of the most magnificent national parks of the Southwest owe their rugged beauty to the Colorado River and its tributaries.

      Unfortunately, dams that have sprung up along the river have changed the water flows in a way detrimental to these national parks, according to a report from the National Parks Conservation Association.

      Dinosaur National Monument, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park, Canyonlands National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, and Lake Mead National Recreation Area all have been carved to varying degrees into the landscape by the river, and continue to be massaged by the flow of water.

      But the series of dams that interrupt the Colorado River in its flow from the high country of Rocky Mountain National Park down to the Gulf of California has altered nature by constricting high runoff flows, artificially enhancing low flows, changing sedimentation patterns, and even impacting water temperatures to the detriment of native fisheries, says the report, National Parks of the Colorado River Basin, Water Management, Resource Threats, and Economics.

      Concern over the Colorado has been high in the past year, with at least two books, Running Dry, a Journey from Source to Sea Down the Colorado and The Colorado River: Flowing Through Conflict, examining the struggles the river basin has endured when it comes to appropriation of its waters.

      In Running Dry, author Jonathan Waterman traveled the Colorado River's 1,450 miles from its headwaters to the Mexican delta, taking time along the way to point out the too many diversion ditches, dams, and irrigation projects that suck constantly, and increasingly in some areas, from the Colorado.

      NPCA's report builds on these narratives, understandably with a bent towards how national parks along the river's path are impacted by the dams that have been built. In the 76-page report the park advocacy group points to a number of findings:

      * Large dams in the Colorado River Basin have had and continue to have significant and far-reaching impacts on natural and cultural resources in national parks along the Colorado River and its tributaries. Because of these dams, rivers are now characterized by highly unnatural flow regimes rather than natural hydrological cycles.

      * Dams fragment the Colorado River system and interfere with natural ecological processes in national parks.

      * Dams and reservoirs have profoundly changed the appearance and sounds of the Colorado River and several of its major tributaries as they flow through national parks.

      * Changes in river temperatures and habitats wrought by dams have contributed significantly to declines in native fish populations.

      * Dams affect prehistoric and historic cultural resources within national parks."

    • 8 months ago
  • EmperorThan
    • +2
      EmperorThan  
    • The Rio Grand, too, hasn't actually reached the Gulf of Mexico since 2001 if I'm not mistaken, because so many cities along it are using up the water before it gets that far. Nothing surprises me anymore.

      I think it's weird cus I crossed the Rio Grande on a little car ferry back in 1995 now you could just walk across that spot where I crossed.

    • 8 months ago
  • squarethecircle
  • Gravity_Man
    • +1
      Gravity_Man  
    • The 7,000,000,000 scapegoat isn't responsible for this => this is our baby, all ours.

      But, with around 200 million cars + all the trucks, fuel-burning power plants and so on we're taking too much oxygen out of the atmosphere which causes disease organisms in the air to go into crazy-fast growth from the over-balance CO2 when the oxygen is kept low.

      For instance, a smallish 140 hp combustion engine is gulping down and metabolizing the oxygen of a 140 horse stampede. We're a very stupid REATARDED ACTUALLY species to be using engines that destroys the O2 we need to live.

      Much less changing the entire chemical makeup of the environment.

      YEP. WE'VE DONE IT. WE'VE ACHIEVED RETARD.

    • 8 months ago
  • hombre76
  • jpvt
    • 0
      jpvt  
    • Well come on, how are all those well off white folks and retirees in Arizona and Southern California supposed to play golf if we don't let them drain the Colorado river so they can water their obscenely large golf courses. Please think of these poor pitiful folks before you rush to judgment about them "wasting" so much water. Have you ever seen some of those courses? They're beautiful!!!!!!!!

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • jpvt:

      Couldn't agree more. BTW, I hate golf. Totally useless elitist activity to me that wastes much needed water and land. People are starving and homeless, but damn it those CEOs and politicians need a place to unwind!

    • 8 months ago
  • PIANORAMA
    • 0
      PIANORAMA  
    • Beautiful documentary, thank you so much JanforGore. Same thing is happening to the Ogallala Aquifer. And when the pipeline goes through it, and when it leaks, as it will, that's the end of our freshwater supply. And in Colorado, I understand, it's illegal for homeowners to catch rainwater in rain barrels. How can this be?

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • PIANORAMA
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • This is watching the death of the American Nile and showcases the one thing so many Americans are wrong about:The water will not last forever- when it is wasted and abused. We can fix it if we want to. The question is, do we have the moral will to do so?

    • 8 months ago
more from Green:

top videos