Green | October 07, 2011 | 155 comments

Wall Street protestors disgusted with both parties

JanforGore
Although their main concern is Wall Street practices and economic inequality, some demonstrators in New York and across the U.S. say politicians from both major parties are to blame for policies they say protect corporate America at the expense of the country's middle class.

"At this point I don't see any difference between George Bush and (Barack) Obama. The middle class is a lot worse than when Obama was elected," said John Penley, an unemployed legal worker from Brooklyn.

The Occupy Wall Street movement, which began last month with a small number of young people pitching a tent in front of the New York Stock Exchange, has expanded nationally and drawn a wide variety of activists, including retirees, union members and laid-off workers. As new groups continue to organize, demonstrators Thursday marched in Philadelphia, Salt Lake City, Los Angeles and Anchorage, Alaska, carrying signs with slogans such as "Get money out of politics" and "I can't afford a lobbyist."

The protests are in some ways the liberal flip side of the tea party movement, which was launched in 2009 in a populist reaction against the bank and auto bailouts and the $787 billion economic stimulus plan.

But while tea party activists eventually became a crucial part of the Republican coalition, the Occupy Wall Street protesters are cutting President Barack Obama little slack. They say Obama failed to crack down on the banks after the 2008 mortgage meltdown and financial crisis.

"He could have taken a much more populist, aggressive stance at the beginning against Wall Street bonuses, and exacting certain change from bailing out the banks," said Michael Kazin, a Georgetown University history professor and author of "American Dreamers," a history of the left. "But ultimately, the economy has not gotten much better, and that's underscored the frustration on both the right and the left."

Obama on Thursday acknowledged the economic insecurities fueling the nearly 3-week-old Wall Street protests. But he pinned responsibility on the financial industry and on congressional Republicans he says have blocked his efforts to kick-start job growth.

"I think people are frustrated and the protesters are giving voice to a more broad-based frustration about how our financial system works," he said at a nationally televised news conference. "The American people understand that not everybody has been following the rules, that Wall Street is an example of that ... and that's going to express itself politically in 2012 and beyond."

He said the U.S. must have a strong and effective financial sector for the economy to grow, and that the financial regulation bill he championed ensures tougher oversight of the financial industry.

The president also has been pushing for a $443 billion jobs plan to be paid for in part through a tax on the wealthy. Republicans have resisted such tax increases.

GOP presidential candidates Mitt Romney and Herman Cain have criticized the anti-Wall Street protests. All the Republican contenders have also pushed back against the demonization of Wall Street. They accuse the Obama administration of setting regulatory policies that have stifled job creation and say his health care overhaul will prevent many businesses from hiring new workers.

In Zuccotti Park, the center of the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York, activists expressed deep frustration with the political gridlock in Washington. While some blamed Republicans for blocking reform, others singled out Obama.

More at the link
  1. groups:
    Green,   Culture,   Humanism,   Actual News,   9 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Health Government America 20 more
  3.     
    |

155 comments // Wall Street protestors disgusted with both parties // Video

  • unimatrix0
    • +2
      unimatrix0  
    • While both parties are flawed, it is a mistake to claim they are equally flawed. Republicans are positively evil - Democrats are not.

    • 8 months ago
  • Molotov
  • letsliveinpeace
  • jsayler
    • +1
      jsayler  
    • Although I am very disappointed with the Whitehouse response in support for Wall Street while "understanding" the pain of the protesters. We deserve better than that. For the most part, though, I do not see that this is a two-party problem. Clearly, the republicans (and their teabags and hags) are attempting and winning for the upper 2%ers.

      The democrats are the party that has come up with regulations and protections for regular citizens against abusive practices. The republicans have refused to fund many of the policies that have already passed Congress. Of course, we do have those damn Blue Dogs who only pretend to be democrats. And then there's Mary Landrau who will do anything to protect her money bags -- most notably the oil companies that she feels should not have to pay taxes. Paying taxes would have little to no affect on these companies drilling for oil in fragile environments. If they can make a profit and of course the make huge profits without all the deductions and credits that they get.

      We need real democrats in Congress and anyone who votes for republicahis mess will be responsibile for the decline in the middle class even further and the

      Republicans hae stopped all progress in the House and the Senate which in effects leaves the Executive branch void of ability to change anything.

    • 8 months ago
  • DanCastro
    • +1
      DanCastro  
    • Neutral, yepper, those who call you "mobs" are your friends as much as those who want to know how they can help! And we wonder how we got here? Manifesto #1 Promise to work with those who work for the good of the people and not just themselves or their bosses! #2 for one year spend as much on getting everyone in the US wired ("space race" to make Social Media our forward step to direct democracy) and spend saved money on the web! Thus do we affirm our hope for the future by spending OUR money on our future instead of endless war, hate, of our brothers and sister from another mother, and senseless/endless killing.

    • 8 months ago
  • Lavrans
    • +1
      Lavrans  
    • Keith: Keep up the good fight!

      Some suggestons for the Occupy ----- Movement:

      Slogan: “Overthrow the government: register and vote!”

      The long-term goal is to effect change by working within the existing system. We must make our voices heard in the ballot box next year, where it counts.

      The Wall street financial and corporate powers are not going to respond to direct confrontations and demonstrations. They must, however, respond to government regulations.

      The way to develop more effective regulation is to replace the Republicans in Congress with Democrats.

      The way to accomplish this is to take an active role in the Democratic party; form PACs, focus local activity on registering voters, be prepared to knock on doors, work to become delegates. Forget third party divisiveness; be a Progressive Democrat!

      Use websites, Facebook and other social media to raise awareness. More effective PR must be developed.

      Do fund-raising events. Democratic candidates should not have look for financial support from the usual suspects, but from individuals and non-corporate sources.

      Focus on issues that affect the middle class working people: jobs, housing, and health. Bring in all of the unions.

      Support small local businesses. Develop green, populist-based entrepreneurship.

      Infiltrate and subvert: bring as many of the Tea-Partiers over to the real populist movement. Redirect their anger away from the government and at the corporatists.

      Emphasize that conservative Republicans who have been elected to office at the local sate and Federal levels are working against the people who elected them.

      Start now at the state level to petition for recall elections and impeachments.

      Aim for next summer and the Democratic convention to bring activities to a peak.

      Do not become targets. Always be peaceable and non-violent.

      Wit, humor, holding the ridiculous up to ridicule are all good weapons to use.

    • 8 months ago
  • RaceBannon
    • 0
      RaceBannon  
    • So far so good, and the best part the protestors are using alternative way to spread discourse without the state apparatus, a leader and by maintaining the counsels to demonstrate the possibility of a working direct democracy. It must be emphasized that no leader can emerge as if one did it would not mean just an end of the movements anti hierarchical foundation it would also signify the end of the protest ability to create change altogether; a leader can be picked apart (or worse) rendering a movement null and void as the members (as in trade unions for example) whom as a result of operating under a hierarchy believe less in their own abilities seek out another personality willing to tell them what to do, and so on ad infinitum...

      Some old pals of mine and some professors (one who's been very vocal in the press) are there literally on the ground putting theory to practice, discussing new ideas with people who've been yearning for a new way. Again there's no need to get to excited, we still have capitalism, banks, and the horrible state for the human condition but one can hope this is just the beginning, and the world is watching.

      ... there will be more insurrections. - Franco "bifo" Berardi

    • 8 months ago
  • Paratus
    • -2
      Paratus  
    • The protesters have a lot of ideas I support. The protesters problems with lobbyists and the bank bailouts mirror the Tea Party stances on these issues. Return to making government have a limited role will solve many of the problems stated. You can't single out any one party "blocking reform". That term itself is pretty subjective. I view Obamacare as "blocking reform" because it confers too much power to the central government and reduces freedom but many disagree. There are pro statist and anti statist feelings expressed. The bottom line is, are we going to retain the right to govern ourselves or will we cede even more power to the central government? This will happen at the local level but not at the federal level. I don't like the Marxist concepts running through the protests such as wealth redistribution nor do I like the backers of the protests such as George Soros and our own boy king, Obummer. Soros, Obummer and others such as Pelosi (another idiot who needs to share responsibility for the divide in this country). For these reasons I can't get behind them. IF the protesters flush the feces from their movement I'm with them.

    • 8 months ago
  • jeffreyak
  • coolplanet
    • +1
      coolplanet  
    • jeffreyak:

      Because we are not as simpleminded as that.
      The unpaid Bush/Cheney concocted wars is what got U.S. into this mess!
      "The war will pay for itself from the oil" is what they promised.
      Blame the poor people Clinton provided homes, rednecks
      but W and the teaparty are really to blame for all of this bullshit

    • 8 months ago
  • Paratus
    • -2
      Paratus  
    • coolplanet:

      "The unpaid Bush/Cheney concocted wars is what got U.S. into this mess! "

      It is not as simple minded as that. Decades of government mismanagement which transcends parties and administrations have brought us here. If you want to play favorites, During the present administration this country has accumulated more debt than it did from the administration of George Washington to Clinton. We cannot tax our way out of this, we cannot stimulate our way out of this. We cannot eat the rich and get out of this. We cannot destroy corporations and capitalism and get out of this, in fact, this last will make things worse. We continue to spend on things the government has no business and no authority spending on. Right now, something like 49% of all households receive government assistance in some fashion. 30 years ago that number was below 30%. We cannot support this. Social Security is decimated, our "representatives" did not sequester this money but put it in the general fund and used it as another revenue source for government spending. We can fix this but not with government social engineering.

    • 8 months ago
  • SFirman
  • Introspective
  • Ambill94
    • +2
      Ambill94  
    • I think from what I have heard and seen today that some of the Dems might think they have an opportunity to co-opt the messages...what they don't realize is that for most of us, they had plenty of time to respond to their constituencies and take up the cause and through their refusal to act have forfeited their rights to claim the cause as their own...both Reps and Dems are getting scared and don't really know how to respond...they want to think its still the same old game and that the mob will get tired and go home...this is a new day and a new game for politicians of all stripes...one thing I am really enjoying is that with each day, real democracy is making the wacko right like Rush and the talking stupids at Fox more and more irrelevant..as they lash out at the "mobs" of "Americans attacking Americans"...it would be great comedy if it weren't so serious...

    • 8 months ago
  • David_H
  • Ambill94
    • 0
      Ambill94  
    • David_H:

      I could agree with you to a point, but I think there are very few truly liberal media outlets...on TV there is Current and a handful of Websites and a handful of good mags...all the rest are conservative or middle of the roaders with right of center bias...I take great issue with the "wacko right"...that's why I separate them out of the pack...the liberal media you refer to have no claim to the mantle...

    • 8 months ago
  • SAINTJULE
    • +3
      SAINTJULE  
    • "some demonstrators in New York and across the U.S. say politicians from both major parties are to blame for policies they say protect corporate America at the expense of the country's middle class." Absolutely correct. from:" wella wella there you go again" "to Rising tides were in there with both feet pimping for profits at all cost and shipping sweat equity and legacy savings off shore. When a politician says: "it is complicvated" ,don't pick up the soap. Who voted for: GRAMM LEACH BLILEY? 90 senators both parties. Who voted for all the trade agreements? yup. Who is pushing for the Korean free trade agreement? Who were the idiots pushing the, "education will save you"? Don't need a masters degree to be a greeter at Wall Mart. Some of us can't be neurosurgeons. Some of us were not allowed to pledge to the right fraternity/sorority. The Occupy Wall Street crowd are really intelligent to not voice specifics. The highly paid Corporate pimps will go into hyper mode and truncate every statement. These are well paid highly educated polemicists that can turn a lie into a convincing argument. Example that trade agreements will bring jobs: Truth; all the trade agreements have added a net zero jobs and have degraded the American labor income. Also they have added to our massive deficit, example; we owe China over 2 trillion, 80 trillion around the world and profits all going to the top 23%

    • 8 months ago
  • Anonmaly
  • SandyBerman
  • SAINTJULE
  • SAINTJULE
  • blueyellowgreendogs
  • SAINTJULE
  • nikonwilly
    • +3
      nikonwilly  
    • Obama...Understand this...The protest is NOT simply about a lack of JOBS!
      Try this Obama, I don't want to have to work every wonderful day of my life to survive!!! I don't want or expect to live rich, but when I have to work 7- 12 hr. days every week , every year and still can not afford a decent place to live , health insurance or real non-processed food ...something is terribly ( your choice) wrong! This system ,our system is not working..it's rotten , corrupt to the core...every federal agency has been taken over by corporate slugs ..either from the revolving door policy or lobbyists.
      We want JUSTICE for past criminal conduct , we want REAL transparency..we want TRUTH for a change! Make it happen or be GONE!

    • 8 months ago
  • SAINTJULE
    • +1
      SAINTJULE  
    • nikonwilly:

      I would polish that a little but I agree. Jon Stewart can get away with fucking every third word but he is a millionaire. I love the word too and I know where it comes from:The British court secretaries filed sexual cases under the rubric File Under Carnal Knowledge. Perfectly honorable term, since turn into a bad word. Some really anal people find it objectionable use it sparingly for effect.

    • 8 months ago
  • queenofit
  • nikonwilly
  • nikonwilly
  • amo42
    • +4
      amo42  
    • It is far to early in the process to be concerned about the old model of left vs right - GOP vs the DEMS. The process will attract those leaders and politicos that share the values and concepts of the group. The OWS movement does not need to market it self to the existing political structure.

    • 8 months ago
  • chew_chew
  • SAINTJULE
    • +5
      SAINTJULE  
    • amo42:

      I would be very careful letting any politicians into the group. Ron Paul for example is dangerous. And corporate pimps come in all stripes. Political parties don't ask for purity pledges Ben Nelson, Mary Landrieu.

    • 8 months ago
  • ibrake4rappers13
    • 0
      ibrake4rappers13  
    • Vote for Ron Paul to win the Republican nomination. You dont have to vote for him in the general election.Its the only way to destroy the false left/right paradigm. Both parties are wars parties they want to continue the drug wars and the wars overseas. they want to keep the fed open. And they both want keep the patriot act in place. Hold obamas feet to the fire and destroy the GOP establishment by making him win the nomination. Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity say Ron Paul will destroy the republican party so maybe that oughta be some motivation

    • 8 months ago
  • Leen61
    • +3
      Leen61  
    • The people have every right to be disgusted with both parties. Neither party is doing a thing to benefit the working class. Alot of it is this disconnect in the Beltway bubble.

    • 8 months ago
  • Jim_Smith2
    • +3
      Jim_Smith2  
    • The only way to remove these people and their political parties is to vote for independents, and get everyone you know to do the same. And forget about that it would be a "wasted vote". Remember your civics teachers always said to vote for the best person for the job, which means ANY candidate from the two parties in power is NOT the right person for the job.
      And a vote for ANY party member just keeps the problem going.

    • 8 months ago
  • nanac
    • +4
      nanac  
    • I will be willing to bet, and I am not a betting person, that most of these people will not support the TB/GOP in the 2012 elections.

    • 8 months ago
  • SFirman
  • nanac
  • CalgarC
  • kennymotown
    • +5
      kennymotown  
    • This is the beginning of America's last stand! We must drag Obama to the left big time, kicking and screaming if thats what it takes. I'm sure you all remember the speech Obama gave to a joint session in his state of the union address when he chewed out the Supreme's sitting right in front of him for legalizing citizen united. I would rather he remained in office than a corporate job killer like nit-wit Romney!

    • 8 months ago
  • SFirman
  • kennymotown
  • JanforGore
    • +4
      JanforGore  
    • kennymotown:

      I would rather we had Kucinich. Why can't I in this "free" country call for that without being seen as a traitor? Why can't I hope he could actually win an election for president? The answers to those questions exhibit starkly the true systemic problems we face that must be remedied.That is the point of all of this..

    • 8 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • JanforGore
  • kennymotown
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • kennymotown:

      And he paid with his life unfortunately. And let's face it, if Dennis Kucinich actually did mount a primary challenge to Obama he would be ostracized by his own party just as Al Gore was for wanting to count votes. So much for democracy.

    • 8 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • JanforGore
  • kennymotown
  • SandyBerman
  • JanforGore
  • kgMA
    • +2
      kgMA  
    • kennymotown:

      Maybe we should elect some of the OWS crowd to Congress? I'd be willing to bet we could find 90+ honest people to replace the turds we have in the Senate now? While we're at it, lets find 240 OWS supporters for house seats as well. The young in this country need good paying jobs and would do 100% better then any of the greedy useless bastards in Congress today!

    • 8 months ago
  • kennymotown
  • kgMA
    • +3
      kgMA  
    • JanforGore:

      Or told, run and you'll get the Harvey Oswald treatment or someone in your family will have a terrible accident! These people behind the green curtain are capable of anything! Perhaps this is why the voices against the corruption are so silent?

    • 8 months ago
  • Argon18
  • nikonwilly
    • 0
      nikonwilly  
    • JanforGore:

      Kucinich , Sanders and we need to get Grayson back into Washington...These guys are so far off the party line that I sometime think maybe they are affraid to actually run for the top job....I believe Kennedy was the warning for future rebels. Kennedy was about to dump the FED when he was assinated ...Johnson of course squashed this once he moved up.

    • 8 months ago
  • StandaboveUnderstand
  • KB723
  • Argon18
  • chew_chew
    • +4
      chew_chew  
    • While I am not certain who I *will* vote for in 2012, I know those I will not vote for. I will not vote for *any* Republicans, since we see everyday how they behave and how obstructionist they are in all manners. Well, I should qualify that: Republicans are always obstructionist unless it benefits big business by taking from the middle and lower classes. I will not vote for that behavior.

    • 8 months ago
  • CitizenHill
    • -2
      CitizenHill  
    • "As in the tea parties to which it has been compared, many in this movement are condemning a nebulous conception of the status quo without much of an inspiring alternative vision.

      It gets worse. Although there is no single ideology uniting the movement, it does seem to have a general philosophical thrust, and not a very good one at that. OccupyWallStreet.org has a list of demands, and while the website does not represent all of the protesters, one could safely bet that it lines up with the views of most of them: A "living-wage" guarantee for workers and the unemployed, universal healthcare, free college for everyone, a ban on fossil fuels, a trillion dollars in new infrastructure, another trillion in "ecological restoration," racial and gender "rights," election reform, universal debt forgiveness, a ban on credit reporting agencies, and more power for the unions.

      All in all, this wish list is a terrible recipe for moving far down the road toward socialism. On the way to achieving these goals, totalitarian controls on the population would be necessary. Some of these demands are merely horrible ideas that would injure the economy severely — such as the huge expansion of public infrastructure. But others are so fancifully utopian — such as a living wage guaranteed to all, especially when combined with free immigration — that their attempted implementation would confront the many disasters and horrors we have seen in every nation that has seriously attempted socialism. Such policies would vastly expand the government, including its manifestations in the corporate state and police power that these protesters find so unsavory.

      ALL OF THE CORRUPTION AND BRUTALITY THEY THINK THEY OPPOSE ARE SYMPTOMS OF THE SAME ESSENTIAL POLITICAL IDEOLOGY THEY FAVOR"

      excerpts from; Mises Daily: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - by Anthony Gregory

    • 8 months ago
  • Frank29
    • +1
      Frank29  
    • Careful, remember, the Democratic Party does represent the values that we hold dear. We are going to need their help to overthrow the strangle hold the Republicans have on the Congress and Supreme Court. We all need to stick together, things are going to get much worse before they get better. IT WILL GET UGLY! You can bet on the Republicans to get out all the dirty tricks along with the lies. Remember, if you can simply tell a lie often enough, people will start believing it even when they know the truth. Why do you think the Right Wing has Fox TV/News and now CNN. (I'll bet Ted Turner hates whats been done to his creation.)

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • Frank29:

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/oct/07/keystone-xl-pipeline-final-pub...

      Really? Then why aren't they standing up for them! Why do people like Dennis Kucinich who is a Democrat get marginalized by his own party?! Tell me they represent the values we hold dear after this pipeline is approved and the company building it, a foreign one at that gets to take liens out on the property of American citizens to build it over the largest aquifer in this country to import toxic bitumen crude through seven states to be sold elsewhere for profit of the very system that has brought on these protests. We don't need Democrats or Republicans who betray these values, we need Americans who will fight for them.

    • 8 months ago
  • SFirman
    • 0
      SFirman  
    • Frank29:

      I agree, we need to stand together and vote these republicans out of congress that stand in the way of progress for our country. They will always stand by the top 1%.The Bush tax cuts will stay. There will be many lies. Stand together Democrats. Thank you. Good comment.

    • 8 months ago
  • Frank29
    • 0
      Frank29  
    • JanforGore:

      Don't misunderstand me, I do understand where you are coming from. The problem is that us "liberals" are our own worst enemy. I'll never forget watching Real Time, when Bill Maher and Michael Moore got down on their knees and begged Ralph Nader not to run in the 2000 election. You do realize that if he had not, Al Gore would have been President and I'll bet we wouldn't be in nearly the mess we have now. Instead we let the republicans steal our government. Now it will take an all out war, to get it back. We need everyone we can get. This is going to be a hard, bloody battle that I will not loose! P.S. The republican never fight fair.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • Frank29:

      No actually, I don't think you do understand where I am coming from because if you did you would have at least commented about the pipeline, and I think it is obvious that some people in this thread totally misunderstood the article and what this was meant to be about. This movement is not partisan. It is about a social movement meant to change the ENTIRE status quo which has rotted our entire system to the core.

      You can vote for whoever you want, but the point being is that we wouldn't also be in the place we are if the obstructionists had been met with representatives on all sides including Democrats who had a spine. Excuse that all you want as well as the fact that Bush squatted in the White House for eight years and Democrats did nothing but let him get EVERYTHING he wanted. And Al Gore ( who I voted FOR not because he was a Democrat but because he is a good man) would have been president had the Supreme Court not picked Bush and it would have gone to them regardless of who was in the running. Don't you get it? THE FIX WAS IN.

      Oh, and to the person who voted my valid comment about Keystone XL down, I guess the truth hurts.

    • 8 months ago
  • artemis6
    • +3
      artemis6  
    • Frank29:

      We the people need to get back in charge . Neither democrats or repubs will allow that . They keep us divided . We are getting united , and that is the one thing they do not want . That is what is happening here . The people are organizing a collective and taking back their power . Divide and conquer ? Not any more !

    • 8 months ago
  • Frank29
    • 0
      Frank29  
    • Image
    • JanforGore:

      You and I will have little to no effect. In order to succeed, we are going to need everyone we can get. I hate to say it but we are extremely out numbered. We will find slightly more trustworthy allies with the Democrats than the Republicans. Remember, they have unlimited funds to draw from. We need to be smart. I do agree that many of the Dino's need to be replaced. Bill Clinton made a huge mistake on Blanche Lincoln, but I hope he's on my side when things get hot. At this point, I don't want to alienate anyone except those that have their "jack-boots" on our necks. It's too early. This will take time to accomplish. We just need to control our rhetoric. This will be the "final battle." If we don't get this one right, we're doomed. Have you been to getmoneyout.com? That's the real problem. That's why some are marginalized. If they want to be re-elected, they need to play to the money. It sure isn't right but that's the way it is. I appreciate the details you are giving but this is a much larger battle than the pipeline. That's why there is no "single" issue regarding OWS. We need everyone.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • Frank29
    • 0
      Frank29  
    • artemis6:

      I understand your miss trust but I do believe the point is to unite and not divide. Not all of the democrats are the enemy but the republicans are. Correct?. They are the ones that screwed everything up, but we too are to blame. Why didn't we vote. As democrats, we out numbered republicans for many years, but still, we have held the office of the President for only 14 out of the past 43 years. If we have voter turnouts as low as they have been for the last half century, what did you expect. Finally, after all these years, some of us are waking up. Too bad it took so long.

    • 8 months ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • Frank29:

      IF anyone is with US , let them SHOW IT . Talk is cheep . I will not trust , until it is earned . Boots on the ground , holding a sign , babay . For the duration . IF you are united , prove it . Give up your worldly possessions , corporate profits and connections . Obama said he would put on his walking shoes , but he is not there ..... He was not in Wisconsin , he sold out to the OIL companies , are we STILL not sure where his allegiance lies ? REALLY !!? It is all too clear .

    • 8 months ago
  • Frank29
    • -1
      Frank29  
    • artemis6:

      I am with you in principle but also a realist that would like this to succeed. It saddens me when I here "what has Obama done for us!" That sounds like a great "talking point" for the GOP. You do realize, they can have that repeated hundreds of times, in a matter of minutes, across all the Fox TV, Clear Channel, and Talk radio their freinds own across the country..Hurray for their side!? Keep in mind, the GOP is very much like the old "Nationalist" government that Germany had. They truley believe in "exceptional-ism," "Christianity," and "ideological purity." They also know how to stick together and will stop at nothing to get their way. They will take your anger and use it against you. Really, what did you expect? We still live in a democracy, not a dictatorship. Was he to invoke martial law to get things done? You know "W" would have if he could! Obama needed a filibuster proof Senate. He didn't get one thanks to low voter turn out along with a bunch of "Dino's". I do believe he tried, but know one single person can do it alone. We need your passion. please keep it up. There is nothing wrong with asking for commitment. Demanding won't get it.

    • 8 months ago
  • artemis6
  • floydyboy
  • remanns
  • remanns
  • Richard_Wyatt
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • Richard_Wyatt:

      Damn straight ! IF we had REAL choice , it would not be just as the lesser of two evils , as it has been for decades now . We could actually vote for , and elect someone RIGHT for the job .....

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
  • kgMA
    • +3
      kgMA  
    • Buckeye_Bill:

      I remember! Sure, blame Obama, put a Republican in the White House, and we'll be repeating this same message in 2016! Flip the House back and get rid of the dead weight in the Senate! I Remember! Damn straight!

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • 0
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • kgMA:

      Funny how there's ONLY Liberals and Progressives on this thread and yet I had SOMEONE "down" my comments!!

      I know where a Rethuglican is coming from...they're MY enemy....but when it comes to THINKING that a Progressive or a Liberal MUST be a "FRIEND" is what pisses me off more than anything. You never expect a friend to do what they do. Yet they smile as they stab you in the back.

    • 8 months ago
  • SFirman
  • chew_chew
    • +2
      chew_chew  
    • Buckeye_Bill:

      "Funny how there's ONLY Liberals and Progressives on this thread and yet I had SOMEONE "down" my comments!!"

      It's happening again, BB. Some cowardly bully types coming through threads and downing comments. I've noticed it in a few threads the past few days that I have been back semi-regularly.

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • chew_chew:

      If you want to know who I think it is....it's a Ron Paul fanatic. I have been getting bombarded with nasty grams and "downings" from that lot because I have pointed out how their Hero is a John Bircher and he's NOT who they BELIEVE he is! They are soooo insanely loyal to him it borders on a mental disorder. I have been trying to find some very interesting sites that had some excellent source material and those sites have up and "disappeared" and have been replaced with others that will say, "Why I WON'T vote for Ron Paul", and when you go there, it's ACTUALLY someone wanting to get others to believe Ron Paul is the Man Of The Hour...the Savior Of America!

      Like Hell he is!

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • 0
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • Who, may I ask, is promoting this propaganda? Tea baggers? Rethuglicans?

      The ill-informed?

      The ones that would LOVE to see the Dems/Libs/Progs/Indies turn on one another?

      If you REALLY believe that there is no difference, don't vote....or vote for a Repub....or vote for a Third Party candidate that has as much chance of winning the election in 2012 as I do convincing those who have already made up their minds and will NOT listen to reason.

      And you know who YOU are.

    • 8 months ago
  • CreditFigaro
    • +5
      CreditFigaro  
    • Buckeye_Bill:

      I think the issue with democrats is that they carry the progressive flag very poorly. They effectively are as useless as republicans because, when it comes to important legislation, the blue dog democrats are first in line to stand up against it in order to placate their corporate sponsors. Make no mistake, many democrats play as bad of a role as republicans in many situations.

      True progressives don't do that crap. Progressive isn't synonymous with democrat, either. Bernie Sanders is a self-proclaimed Socialist. The point, I believe, is to be as skeptical of Corporatist democrats as we are of all Republicans.

      This is why, I believe, the movement is waving the finger at dems, too. Having a D by your name doesn't make you safe from this movement.

    • 8 months ago
  • remanns
  • squarethecircle
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +3
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • CreditFigaro:

      I agree that we ALLOWED DINOs to infiltrate OUR Party. Those damn Blue Dogs need to be muzzled until we can get rid of them by voting in REAL Democrats like Alan Grayson.

      When the Rethugs in Wisconsin wanted to lush their agenda through their state government, the Democrats did their best to slow it down since they couldn't stop them from changing the political environment that unsuspecting voters put into office. Scott Walker immediately showed everyone whose pocket he was in...the Koch Brothers!

      Don't be fooled into thinking that ALL Democrats aren't FOR THE PEOPLE...because if they wren't any different, you and me would have lost everything that has been fought and won by the past generations of good, honest, caring Democrats.

      And if you think how those Republican Governors are bad...wait until a Republican walks into the Oval Office!

      The wailing and moaning and groaning that will rise from the ranks of all those Liberals and Progressices that voted for a Third Party candidate will be heard for FOUR YEARS...and IF...IF there's anythng left to fight over after that Republican President destroys what GWB didn't, it will take 20 years to rebuild the damage. If it can be repaired.

      Liberals....a dangerous voting block in my book. They vote by falling in love with a candidate, whereas Republicans fall in line with their candidate!

    • 8 months ago
  • Georgia_Jim
    • +5
      Georgia_Jim  
    • So true!! I am sick of both parties. I am sick of the "DO NOTHING CONGRESS" and I am sick of the Blue Dog Dems. who block policy when trying to get things done for the American people. Why not state what the Blue Dogs are "Rejected Republicans".

    • 8 months ago
  • kgMA
    • +1
      kgMA  
    • Georgia_Jim:

      I agree! Both parties are at fault! Blame the wimpy Democrats who wouldn't open their mouths unless it was election season! Not all of them I'm happy to say, but quite a few just the same. Lets not forget to pass blame to the bluehogs who are basically greedy Republicans with their hands opened wide, and lets definitely blame the Republicans who would step on the neck of your grandmother to get an ounce of power and $$$ for their masters! Thanks to folks like B-Bill, and SB, I'll always REMEMBER the truth and how we got here!

    • 8 months ago
  • gatormouth
    • +1
      gatormouth  
    • The Repubs shot themselves (and us) in the foot. As President Johnson moved on Civil Rights, the Repubs ran with their "Southern Strategy". The Southern Democrats were a conservative regional power base left over from Reconstruction. Disaffected by the "liberal" social policies of the Democratic party, they looked to be an asset to a corporate oriented Republican party (plantations were corporations too, weren't they?).

      Repubs were sure they could be jollied along and controlled. Right (see Weimar Republic, 1920s). Now, the tail is wagging the dog, and we have a Corporatist directed fundamentalist rump attempting to run the remains of a National party.

      The problem is that Democratic party leaders have been trying to compete by moving the party center to the right to attract independents and disaffected moderate ex-Repubs! Progressives are now being called “The Professional left”, Far Left, and “Extremists” BY THEIR OWN PARTY! Oh, and "a nation of whiners" by Phil Gramm. (and how is YOUR mental recession going?),

      President Clinton (a good Democrat?) cooperated with Phil Gramm and the Republican Congress on the Repeal of the Glass Steagall Act in 1999. Then there was NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT and WTO. Not so much the friend of either small business or Labor, was he?

      Now we Progressives are called “Far Left”. But T.R., FDR, Truman, Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, and even Nixon (on social policy) all had these contaminating “Far Left“ Progressive tendencies. We are in good company, at least

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • gatormouth:

      Is it that bad to be "centered" with the majority of the voting population?

      Or would you want to see the Democratic Party go "Hard Left" and stay that way?

      My father, as he was teaching me about how to understand the different sides of issues, used a coin as a reference. He said, "There are two sides to every argument. Then...there's the middle where truth is overlooked by both."

      This country has been spit apart by those that refuse to come together and find equal ground and yet those on the Left OR Right only want to push farther away from the other.

      Compromise is NOT a dirty word.

      Any other political stance one decides to make only hurts US..and the working middle class is always left high and dry when there cannot be meetings of hearts and minds.

      Politics has been reduced to a pissing contest. And all we'll ever get from that is just being wet.

    • 8 months ago
  • gatormouth
    • +1
      gatormouth  
    • Buckeye_Bill:

      Common misunderstanding. "Centrist" is not the same as Moderate.
      A Centrist is similar to the old "Transformist" politicians of pre-Fascist Italy.
      It is not the center of the positions of the voters, but of the political positions of the delegates, that is sought. Then the extreme positions of the delegates, left and right, are ignored. So if you have politicians more sensitive and representative of the positions of their source of corporate financing rather than that of preferences of the voters and constituents you get a non democratically derived center policy. This is regarded as being very practical, but it leaves out the ideology of the public.(who may greatly differ at the conclusions and solutions selected for governing).

      For more background query ... Neoliberal, Reagan, Thatcher, Clinton, Bush Obama... .

    • 8 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +3
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • Image
    • gatormouth:

      Gobbledygook....all you're doing is muddying up the stream.

      You knew what I meant and if you don't, then there's not much we will agree on so it would be an exercise in futility to attempt a dialog now, wouldn't it?

      There's no such thing as a unicorn, a neoliberal, a liberal conservative, a conservative liberal, a conservative democrat, a liberal republican, a rightist republican (since they are already there), a leftist Democrat (since they are already there)...and if you believe any differently, then you'll have to take it up with the website: oxymoronlist.com/

      Besides, the topic of discussion was about people and their Party afiliations, not forms of government or economic philisophical policies.

    • 8 months ago
  • hombre76
    • +2
      hombre76  
    • Buckeye_Bill:

      Asking me to comprimise with republicans is like asking me to compromise with nazis ... I will not do so period I refuse. even to the end of the fucking world, I refuse to compromise with the likes of those scum because to do so is to compromise myself.

    • 8 months ago
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • hombre76:

      I agree totally . That is like compromising with a homicidal maniac . Those that do compromise with them are traitors to US and the freedoms , checks and balances in the constitution .

    • 8 months ago
  • SandyBerman
    • SandyBerman  
    • This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • SandyBerman:

      I haven't seen anyone in this thread state they are staying home, so I don't know why you think that. And of course all representatives who have not held to their oaths regardless of party (but yes especially the tea party) need to be defeated. But on that note I will also critique Obama when he deserves it. He is a milquetoast leader who goes the way the wind blows. He needs to get his act together (especially regarding the environment) because he has alienated many people. He needs to take responsibility for his own actions like allowing drilling in the Arctic and coming soon the Keystone XL pipeline because they are clear bows to the oiligarchy and is exactly what Bush would do.

      So I suggest instead of chastizing us you send him a letter explaining how his own actions are alienating Americans who are becoming more wary of his true motivations. Let's also see how much corporate money because Citizens United trumps anything we can give he takes in this upcoming campaign season as well as the others to keep perpetuating the dysfunction of this government and the stifling of our voices. If it were up to me NONE of them would get a penny and would have to win it on their own merits as it should be. This system is bought from top to bottom and anyone in it continuing the wars that feed it and bowing to the industries that live off it is part of it.

    • 8 months ago
1 - 100 of 155
more from Green:

top videos