What DOW Chemical doesn't want you to know about your water
source: http://www.grist.org/pollution/2011-06-08-what-dow-chemical-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about-yo...
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
In the video I submitted, which you can watch below, I stress that one of the greatest threats to clean water is chemical contaminants -- and that Dow Chemical has a long history of water pollution. The PR representative emailed to say "unfortunately we can't use your video," but that she would be happy to include me, still, if I would consider re-recording it. When we discussed what that would mean she said, no "fingerpointing"; they wanted a "positive, inclusive discussion."
I believe in inclusiveness and engagement, but I also believe we must pursue those principles within a context that is honest. To do otherwise is to participate in what is popularly called "greenwashing," painting a veneer of environmentalism on an otherwise unchanged product or practice -- a corporate strategy many of us are all too familiar with.
In this spirit, I felt it would be disingenuous to engage in a conversation about water sustainability, for a campaign paid for by Dow Chemical, without pointing out the direct relationship between Dow's core business products -- a source of its $8 billion in profit last year -- and toxins in our environment.
At the same time Dow launches this initiative, the company is actively fighting multiple lawsuits from communities who contend that their water has been polluted by the company, including from its hometown manufacturing plant in Midland, Mich. In 2007, the EPA detected the highest level of dioxin ever discovered in the country's rivers or lakes in waterways near Dow's global headquarters. Dioxin levels in some places were 1,000 times higher than the residential standard, according to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. A recent study found women living in Midland, as well as Saginaw and Bay counties, have significantly higher rates of breast cancer; dioxin was to blame. A class action lawsuit is pending.
"In the backyard of Dow's corporate headquarters, the company for decades through philanthropy, public relations, and politics has made the choice to push back at every regulatory level instead of addressing their dioxin contamination of 52 miles of freshwater and Lake Huron," said Michelle Hurd Riddick of the Saginaw Bay grassroots environmental organization, Lone Tree Council. "The company has mastered the art of greenwashing while poisoning a whole watershed and getting away with it."
Community members in another Midland -- Midland, Texas -- filed suit earlier this year against Dow and three other companies for contaminating groundwater there with hexavalent chromium. Barred from use in the European Union because of its toxicity, hexavalent chromium is a known carcinogen. The EPA's own hazard report notes that exposure, including through contaminated drinking water, "may produce effects on the liver, kidney, [and] gastrointestinal and immune systems."
Dow also continues to drag its heels and fight regulators in order to continue production of some of its most toxic and water-polluting products.
In 2000, for instance, the EPA announced it was phasing out approval of Dow's insecticide, and potent neurotoxin, Dursban, for new home construction in the United States because the product is linked to serious illnesses and even death in children. Five years later, the chemical was still in use in U.S. homes. And in 2003, Dow settled a $2 million lawsuit with the state of New York, the largest penalty ever in a pesticide-related case, for repeatedly violating an agreement about proper advertising of Dursban and making misleading safety claims.
Dow is also a leading manufacturer of Bisphenol-A (or BPA), used in numerous consumer products such as baby bottles, children's toys, and the linings of food cans. It's a particularly dangerous chemical, with proven toxicity even in low doses, especially in utero. The National Institutes of Health's National Toxicology Program has found the chemical may increase the risk of certain cancers and alter brain development. The chemical, a synthetic estrogen, has also been linked to reproductive and hormonal problems. New research is showing that a vast majority of Americans is exposed to low concentrations of BPA not only through consumer products, but from surface water, too.
More at the link
-
- groups:
- Green, Sustainable Agriculture, Earth Care, Human Rights, 4 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Water, Cancer, Texas, 11 more
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Presidents are not voted in for their Energy know-how => Obama ia a false lying CHRIST~MESSIAH WANNABEE. SOLAR COOKER POWER CAN POWER EVERYTHING ON EARTH. All it takes is a hole drilled and a water streaming into and through the FOCAL POINT OF THE SOLAR COOKER.
That's what you need to know about water now quit looking to a butt wipe President for Energy Answers yur making me throw up.
- 7 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Gravity_Man:
TALKING A SOLAR STEAM ENGINE FOR EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY.
EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY. EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY. EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY. EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY. EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY. EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY. EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY. EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY. EVERY HOME ON EARTH TO HAVE PLENTY ELECTRICITY.
- 7 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
ecoalex
-
The Oil/Gas Alliance has nightly ads cheering on fracking assuring it is safe,and has added now the Keystone XL pipeline to it's campaign.Obama has signed on to these misguided energy assaults on the people's health,besides trying to resurrect the nuclear industry.A recent study showed America could get in the West up to 75% of it's electricity from Solar/wind,and slightly less elsewhere.The Republicans are hell bent on destroying the EPA and environmental law.Profits over people,how short sighted,typical corporate psychopathy.
- 7 months ago
-
ecoalex
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
An extreme majority of Americans are getting TOO MUCH ESTROGEN that reduces our muscle our physical fitness. Not enough muscle around the spine causes SAGGING SPINE IN WOMEN.
Ignorant doctors say it's low calcium. HOGWASH! Well no, not completely. Caffeine-stuffed sodas|colas leach calcium from our bones.
This guillotine has two blades and it comes for Thee.
We are being exterminated. We are being exterminated. We are being exterminated. We are being exterminated. We are being exterminated. We are being exterminated.
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
queenofit
-
Gravity_Man:
Maybe we are being exterminated or maybe it is something like Huxley's novel, which he wrote in 1946 - I am quoting and will source at bottom of my comment; "The first three chapters present most of the important ideas or themes of the novel. The Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning explains that this Utopia breeds people to order, artificially fertilizing a mother's eggs to create babies that grow in bottles. They are not born, but decanted. Everyone belongs to one of five classes, from the Alphas, the most intelligent, to the Epsilons, morons bred to do the dirty jobs that nobody else wants to do. The lower classes are multiplied by a budding process that can create up to 96 identical clones and produce over 15,000 brothers and sisters from a single ovary.
All the babies are conditioned, physically and chemically in the bottle, and psychologically after birth, to make them happy citizens of the society with both a liking and an aptitude for the work they will do." Since this is a novel, and it was written over 50 years ago, it isn't exactly what is happening, but it could be in terms of the classes of society being bred to do the jobs nobody else wants to do, and then there are the drugs which he alludes to in this quote, "There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it.”
― Aldous HuxleyReading Huxley, it almost appears he is writing a prophesy for our future and maybe it is a rough outline for our "controllers". All conjecture on my part of course, take it or leave it. The source for my 1st quote is from a study guide I found online; http://www.huxley.net/studyaid/bnwbarron.html the 2nd quote - from Huxley himself. (sigh) so much for that American Dream....
- 8 months ago
-
queenofit
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
queenofit:
Our calendar is wrong. It was supposed to be switched over at Jesus' birth, but later it was discovered Jesus was born in the Fall of 2 BCE.
Move everything supposed to happen in 2012 to today. This is 2012. In fact, the lunar eclipse projected for Dec. 21 2012 already happened on 12/21/2010. FORGET CALENDARS THIS IS 2012.
We are living on borrowed time, possibly since December 2010 => ten months ago. The number 10 in the Bible stands for earthly completeness. Armageddon is in the pieline.
Those with pure hearts will be allowed through, others not so much.
- 8 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
jubal
-
Americans have been both brainwashed and greenwashed ever since the green revolution that supposedly was going to feed the world through industrialized agriculture and massive land accumulation through privatization of public lands..
- 8 months ago
-
jubal
-
-
queenofit
-
Well, it is back to profits once again, no concern for environment nor social responsibility. Sound familiar? Reminds me of Monsanto.....If a person involves themselves with a company that has been, well in the toxic chemical business since 1897, well.... kind figure said person would know or could find out something about said company. Here is a little tidbit I happened across today...."So how does Dow attempt to raise the public's perception of the Dow Chemical Company? Dow Management utilizes well-known and respected individuals like Princeton University's Past-President on the Dow Board of Directors. Princeton supposedly has a stringent Code of Ethics. Certainly, utilizing respected individuals on the Board helps Dow raise the public's perception of the company's ethics and integrity. The over-whelming question here is do these individuals truly understand the type company they are helping to run? There are only two answers to that question - they are naive or ignoring what Dow does or they are a part of how Dow operates. Either way their association with Dow is prostituting the respect they have gained from their association with a respectable organization and their involvement with Dow is then tarnishing that organization's respect" ring a bell? There is no way to sweep the dirt under the rug when you take a few minutes to find out what this company has contributed to our health and safety of humans and our environment.
- 8 months ago
-
queenofit
-
-
JanforGore
-
queenofit:
This is exactly what Monsanto does. They too have infiltrated universities and bought professors to "extol their virtues." It is truly insidious!
- 8 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
squarethecircle
-
JanforGore:
they are funding their projects?...yes. It's no different than the American Cancer Associations lack of desire to actually talk about the fix....greed and self preservation.
- 8 months ago
-
squarethecircle
-
-
Avior
-
I live 20 minutes from their headquarters. :(
- 8 months ago
-
Avior
-
-
JanforGore
-
Avior:
You have my sympathy. Have your water checked.
- 8 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
coolplanet
-
Down to our shampoo and deoderant we are poisoning ourselves and our planet.
- 8 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
TanzaniteDiamonds
-
coolplanet:
Yes, we certainly are. Many of us don't realize how many of these chemicals exist --- all around us -- in our daily lives.
- 8 months ago
-
TanzaniteDiamonds
-
-
squarethecircle
-
Great video but I imagine she could have gone on and on about the true quality of the water across the planet. This only touches the smallest tip of the iceberg.
- 8 months ago
-
squarethecircle
-
-
JanforGore
-
squarethecircle:
"Earlier this year, I was contacted by a PR firm working for Dow Chemical to contribute a 60-second video for the Future We Create virtual conference on water sustainability"
This was the video she submitted in which she was held to 60 seconds which was rejected by Dow. That's why it wasn't longer.
- 8 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
squarethecircle
-
JanforGore:
i understand Jan, just saying she has a great deal more to say I am sure
- 8 months ago
-
squarethecircle
-
-
chew_chew
-
"In the video I submitted, which you can watch below, I stress that one of the greatest threats to clean water is chemical contaminants -- and that Dow Chemical has a long history of water pollution. The PR representative emailed to say "unfortunately we can't use your video," but that she would be happy to include me, still, if I would consider re-recording it. When we discussed what that would mean she said, no "fingerpointing"; they wanted a "positive, inclusive discussion.""
They don't want truth, they want "independent" observations of how great they are.
Jack Nicholson to Dow Chemical: "You can't handle the truth!"
- 8 months ago
-
chew_chew
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cmte=C00074096&cycle=2010
DOW contributions to fed candidates.
- 8 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
TanzaniteDiamonds
-
JanforGore:
Thanks for this link, Jan.
Excellent story from you!
- 8 months ago
-
TanzaniteDiamonds
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.paintsquare.com/news/?fuseaction=view&id=6025
Dow Chemical Company has agreed to pay a $2.5 million civil penalty to settle alleged violations of federal air, water and waste regulations at its century-old manufacturing and research complex in Midland, MI.A 24-count complaint by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Justice accused Dow of violating the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) at the facility.
Dow Chemical Company
Dow’s industrial portfolio includes products for marine and protective coatings.The complaint, filed simultaneously Friday (July 29) with the settlement in the Eastern District of Michigan, accuses Dow of violating Clean Air Act requirements for monitoring and repairing leaking equipment; for compliance with regulations applicable to chemical, pharmaceutical and pesticide plants; and for failing to comply with reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
The complaint also says Dow violated the Clean Water Act’s prohibition against discharging pollutants without a permit and violated RCRA requirements for hazardous waste generators.
VOC, HAPs Reductions Ordered
In addition to paying the penalty, Dow will implement a comprehensive program to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from leaking equipment such as valves and pumps, EPA and DOJ said in a release.
These emissions—known as fugitive emissions, because they leak directly from equipment rather than being discharged from a stack—are generally controlled through work practices, such as monitoring for and repairing leaks.
The settlement requires Dow to implement enhanced work practices, including more frequent leak monitoring, better repair practices, and innovative new work practices designed to prevent leaks, the federal agencies said. The enhanced program also requires Dow to replace valves with new “low emissions” valves or valve packing material, designed to significantly reduce the likelihood of future leaks.
The changes will reduce HAPs by nine tons annually, EPA said.
Background
The case arose from four EPA site inspections between August 2005 and August 2006 and an additional inspection in March 2007.
The result, EPA said, was these infractions.
Clean Air Act. Dow violated the CAA’s National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) at several of the facility’s process units, EPA said. Almost all of the violations alleged involve failure to comply with various NESHAP provisions related to initial compliance demonstrations, testing, monitoring, leak detection, recordkeeping, and reporting.
RCRA. The most serious RCRA violations resulted from cracks and pits in secondary containment structures for several tanks and pieces of equipment. Secondary containment structures are ditches, walls and other types of structures intended to hold in accidental spills and releases of hazardous waste from tanks and equipment.
Clean Water Act. In its CWA permit application, Dow allegedly failed to identify seven additional waste streams that contributed to its unpermitted outfall discharges to the Tittabawassee River. Dow also failed to update its Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to identify and evaluate runoff from several secondary containment structures, EPA said.
more at the link. - 8 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
DOW, Dupont, Monsanto... the list goes on as they are allowed to get away with BS PR campaigns to "reinvent" themselves while they continue to poison people.
And they are also into GMOs just like Monsanto and have alliances with them.
- 8 months ago
-
JanforGore