Green | December 08, 2011 | 11 comments

Brazil senate loosens Amazon protections

Image
JanforGore
The Brazilian Senate voted 59-7 Tuesday to approve new environmental legislation that would loosen restrictions on deforestation in the Amazon and give amnesty to those who illegally cleared land before July 2008.

At least 70 amendments were tacked onto the bill and must still be voted on. But sponsors of the legislation swore to knock down anything that changes the text's main points, and they have the support to make good on the threat.

The bill now goes back to the lower house, which already passed one version of the measure.

President Dilma Rousseff must also sign any legislation approved by the Congress. She pledged during her campaign for the presidency last year to veto any portion of an environmental bill that provides amnesty for those who illegally cleared land in the past. She now faces a tough political battle dealing with a strong agriculture lobby.

Brazil is the world's second-largest agricultural producer behind the U.S., and farmers say Brazil could easily be first if it weren't for the legal hurdles imposed by environmental legislation.

"This is the first time we're ending the monopoly, that we're ending the environmental dictatorship, where half a dozen (non-governmental organizations) controlled the Environmental Ministry," said Sen. Katia Abreu, who is also president of Brazil's National Agriculture and Livestock Federation.

But Marcio Astrini, a spokesman for Greenpeace's Amazon campaign, said the measure would "reduce the area required for conservation, and actually allow new deforestation."

"It's based on the concept that the forest gets in the way, on the argument that developed countries cut their forests, so we need to do the same. That thinking is centuries old now," he said.

The Senate vote comes a day after Brazil's government reported its lowest recorded annual level of Amazon deforestation. From August 2010 through July 2011, about 2,410 square miles (6,240 square kilometers) were destroyed, according to the National Institute for Space Research.

The government credited stepped-up enforcement against illegal cutting for the success. But some environmentalists warn it was likely due less to the government's crackdown and more to the global economic downturn, as demand lessened for products linked to deforestation, such as soy, timber and beef.

Environmentalists and agricultural interests have both pushed for a refurbishing of Brazil's current environmental law, initially passed in 1965 and toughened in the 1990s.

The law requires landowners to keep a certain percentage of their land forested, an amount that varies between 20 percent in some areas to 80 percent for states within the Amazon.

Farmers have long argued the current law's gradual tightening pushed them out of compliance and hobbled production. Staying on top of the law proved expensive, farmers say, and the government has offered no incentives to comply.

Environmental advocates agreed with the need for a new, updated law, but say the code as approved by the Senate sends a message that deforestation will be forgiven, and encourages further flouting of the law by illegal loggers and land grabbers. They argue the bill as it stands would lead to cutting down virgin forests, erosion of hillsides and riverbeds, and extensive, irreversible environmental damage to the rain forest, an area the size of the U.S. west of the Mississippi River that absorbs the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.

About 20 percent of the Brazilian rain forest already has been cut down. Burning and rotting trees account for 75 percent of Brazil's greenhouse gas emissions.

The base text approved by the Senate would reduce the preservation requirement to 50 percent in states where 65 percent of the land is already included in indigenous reservations or conservation units. Just one state, Amapa, falls under that category. Two others, Amazonia and Roraima, are close to reaching it.

The new law would also allow agriculture and cattle grazing closer to environmentally fragile areas: riversides, the tops and flanks of hills, and the land around springs. Currently, hillsides can't be cleared to prevent erosion, and a minimum of 98 feet (30 meters) must be kept forested around rivers.

The new code allows logging on slopes of up to 45 degrees, and reduces the preservation area around rivers by half.

It also redefines riverbeds as areas covered by water most of the year, instead of during peak flow times, shrinking the amount of protected area around them. In vast, flat forests like the Amazon, the water level of a river can rise 32 feet (10 meters) during the wet season. Each year, flooding covers 154,441 square miles (400,000 square kilometers) in the Amazon, said Maria Tereza Piedade, head of the ecology, monitoring and sustainable use group within the National Institute for Amazon Research.

This new definition would open vast untouched tracts of forest to deforestation, she said.

More at the link
  1. groups:
    Green,   Culture,   Progressive America,   Sustainable Agriculture,   5 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Climate Change Brazil Amazon 5 more
  3.     
    |

11 comments // Brazil senate loosens Amazon protections

  • Anonmaly
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • Anonmaly:

      No shock here , There was one story JanforGore posted , a dude from Monsanto actually commented , if i recall correctly . Wish i could recall which one , maybe Jan can remember . That had to be about a year and a half ago , or was it two ?

    • 6 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • artemis6:

      Yes, I remember. His name was "Brad" I think and he even admitted to not using Round Up. They're here reading if we're posting about them. They're everywhere it seems. Which is good because they probably read about the verdict of guilty of human rights abuses the people gave in India gave at the PPT trial as well.

    • 6 months ago
  • artemis6
  • coolplanet
  • queenofit
    • +2
      queenofit  
    • $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

      (ha, ha) I tried to submit the dollar signs, but Current says "tell everyone why you think this url is important" Everyone knows, I think.....ha,ha,ha..... omg.

    • 6 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • Wyley_Wombat
    • +1
      Wyley_Wombat  
    • Most of the regulations were ignored even before they were loosened, although having them in place at least was some measure of deterrence. Despite the lax enforcement, they were a good start. If the regulations are significantly loosened, it will not be long before the rape of the rain forest resumes.

      As to being close to the tipping point in the health of the planetary ecosystem, I think we are far closer than we are willing to admit. When we pass that point multinational corporations will be beating down the doors of research institutions demanding they find a solution. They will be like spoiled children after breaking their favorite toy and demanding a new one from their parents.

      We only have one planet and when it is relegated to the dustbin of the cosmos,it will be too late.

    • 6 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • I wonder how much companies like Monsanto that surely lobbied behind the scenes for this paid to get more land for their GM soya. Intimidation is their MO. Oh well, that climate tipping point is getting closer and closer...

    • 6 months ago
  • JanforGore
more from Green:

top videos