Green | December 10, 2011 | 11 comments

COP 17 to climate negotiators: DON'T KILL AFRICA

Image
JanforGore
In this extract from his book, To Cook A Continent, Nnimmo Bassey argues that climate negotiations, from Durban in late 2011 onwards, will increasingly confront the issue of climate justice.

The atmosphere is a common space, a global commons. Industrialised nations pumped a disproportionate amount of emissions into the atmosphere and they have cornered a disproportionate amount of global resources, largely by exploiting nations that are on the other side of the coin. Climate impacts are already being felt in a severe way in Africa as well as in other regions of the global South. Centuries of exploitation have weakened the resilience of these regions and in tackling climate change these historical facts must be addressed. One way of addressing this is by the payment of climate debt to make the needed financial and technological resources available to these vulnerable regions.

The Conference of Parties at Copenhagen and the following one at Cancun did not generate outcomes consistent with scientific warnings that the world faces a severe climate crisis. Copenhagen ended with an accord spearheaded by President Barack Obama of the United States with the backing of the BASIC countries (Brazil, South Africa, India and China) concocted in a 'Green Room' dreamed up by Denmark's conservative ruling party. In that room, Patrick Bond recalled, were 26 countries 'cherry-picked to represent the world. When even that small group deadlocked, allegedly due to Chinese intransigence and the overall weak parameters set by the US, the five leaders (Obama, Lula da Silva, Jacob Zuma, Manmohan Singh, and Wen Jiabao) attempted a face-saving last gasp at planetary hygiene.'12

The demand of climate justice is that those who created the climate problem must be the ones to mitigate it, and in the process must transform their economies and societies.13 There are two ways to go about making this happen. First, rich nations must reduce rapacious consumption patterns and address the climate crisis with real solutions and not ones that have been seen to be false. Second, the rich nations have to support the poor nations who are being forced to adapt to a situation they did not create. One practical way of making that happen is through support for sustainable, green development paths.

Among governments, the Bolivians have made the clearest call for climate justice while India and China have used related arguments to defend their growth paths. At a time when the world has been calling for a curtailment of polluting industrial establishments, China has been building new coal-fired power plants at a prodigious rate.14 It is interesting to note that while China is massively expanding its coal-powered plants, it is also quickly assuming leadership in the utilisation of wind power. The discourse on how much both China and India must do in tackling global warming must not overlook the fact that vast numbers of people in both India and China still require electricity supply and that meeting that gap requires huge financial outlays.

Following the catastrophic outcome of the United Nations climate negotiations held in Copenhagen in December 2009, President Evo Morales of Bolivia announced that the world would meet in Bolivia for a thorough and inclusive discussion on this vital issue.

The summit, held in Cochabamba in April 2010, attracted 35,000 participants from 140 countries. The summit stood in sharp contrast to the Copenhagen event in many ways. First, this was an assembly of governments and peoples. In Copenhagen no effort was spared in keeping civil society out of the conference: the conference was marked by lockouts of civil society, detentions of climate activists and outright brutality towards non-violent protesters on the streets. In Cochabamba the police were offering assistance and were also participants. Whereas Copenhagen showed a disdain for the voices of the people, Cochabamba was about raising the voices of the people. The only similarity between the events is that they were both held in cities whose names start with letter 'C' followed by nine letters.

The key outcome of the Cochabamba conference was the People's Agreement. This agreement demanded that countries cut their emissions by at least 50 per cent at source in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (2013–17), without recourse to offsets and other carbon trading schemes. In terms of finance, the People's Agreement demands that developed countries commit 6 per cent of their GDP to finance adaptation and mitigation needs. The financial suggestions of the Copenhagen Accord are a drop in the ocean compared to what is needed to secure vulnerable peoples and nations. The peoples of the world also affirmed that there is a climate debt that must be recognised and paid. The payment is not all about finance but principally about decolonising the atmospheric space and redistributing the meagre space left. Developed countries already occupy 80 per cent of the space.

The climate debt is also about taking actions needed to restore the natural cycles of Mother Earth and one clear way of achieving this will be through the proclamation of a Universal Declaration on the Rights of Mother Earth, with clear obligations for humans. Bolivia is in the forefront of promoting the adoption of this declaration at the United Nations. The People's Agreement recognises that the causes of climate change are systemic and that systemic changes are needed to tackle them. On this note, the model of civilisation that is hinged on uncontrolled development can only compound the crisis. The world needs to move towards living well and not continue on the path of domination of others and of conspicuous and wasteful consumption.

An area glossed over in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations is the role of industrial agriculture in climate change. The People's Conference debated this key sector and reached the agreement that the way to a sustainable future is through the enthronement of food sovereignty based on agro-ecological agricultural systems. The issue of access to water being a human right was also affirmed by the people and later on in the year by the United Nations.

In all, the People's Agreement recognises that real strategies to tackle climate change must be based on the principles of equity and justice in dealing with the structural causes. Without climate justice it will also clearly be impossible to achieve the much talked about Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

Cochabamba resonated with calls for urgently securing the rights of Mother Earth as a means of reconfiguring our relationship with the earth and with each other – in a way that respects the past, today and the future. All these will be a pipe dream unless peoples' sovereignty is supported, restored or built across the world. Cochabamba was a turning point in the march to transform our world from the path of conflict, competition, exploitation and domination to a path of solidarity and dignity. It held a ray of hope for Africa.

More at the link
~~~~~~
I posted this excerpt from this article because it hits the nail on the head about the mechanisms involved in the schemes being put forth by industrialized nations, the World Bank and corporations (industrial agriculture especially) looking to use this planetary emergency as a way to profit from it without really doing anything to address it. And that includes our seeds and water. Our voices now can make a dfference and they must be heard.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Green,   Culture,   10 more
  2. tags:
    Current TV Environment Climate Change Africa 25 more
  3.     
    |

11 comments // COP 17 to climate negotiators: DON'T KILL AFRICA

  • Paratus
    • -1
      Paratus  
    • The attendees at Durban tried to implement a "treaty" to get all western nations, didn't apply to others, to pay a "climate debt". One of the things in this treaty was a requirement for a > 100% CO2 emission reduction by 2050. Presumably all breathing forms of life would have to go under this. All the money paid by this climate debt and penalties, if any, would go to the U.N. who would dole it out as they see fit.
      There is more of this stupidity but anyone can find it on the net. This stupidity failed to prevail, thank God a measure of sanity crept in. Every time this global warming which morphed into climate change because the cold winters didn't cooperate crops up I view it with the same scepticism as racism charges. If anyone needs any more reason for the United States to withdraw from the U.N. in all respects and throw those leeches out of this country they need look no further than Durban.

    • 6 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • I just sent this to the U.S. climate negotiators in Durban. It is still going on.

      There is no more time to waste in protecting this planet and our species. You know the science, you see the reality and yet you do not act. This is an extreme abrogation of your moral duty to the world as leaders of it. Millions of people are already suffering the effects of climate change and thousands globally have died. Millions more will follow. All you think of is $$$$ as you neglect the moral imperative. The cost of not addressing this as science now dictates will cost us even more in $$$$$, biodiversity and lives. And make no mistake about it, you are not immune from its effects either nor are your own children. A world warmed by 4 degrees will be unsustainable. What do you not understand about this? Is this really the world you want for your children? Money is transient, humanity and biodiversity are the ultimate treasures. This is not a case of having a choice of what you want to do. This is about what needs to be done to sustain civilization. It's time to GET IT DONE.

    • 6 months ago
  • Ambill94
    • +2
      Ambill94  
    • Let's not forget, that Dow is the company that brought us Agent Orange (Vietnam) or commercially known as dioxin, at one time recognized as the most dangerous chemical concoction known to man...maybe still is. If you google it you will find that it continues to be a major health problem for the Vietnamese and is also involved in many lawsuits in this country as well.

      The US spread millions of gallons over thousands of square miles in Vietnam for over a decade in an effort to defoliate the countryside to make the enemy more visible from the ground and the air.

      These guys are also responsible for mass suicides in places like India etc...they are not good guys by any definition, regardless what they call themselves.

    • 6 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • Oh and also, MONSANTO and other industrial agricultural corporations like DOW as well that now claim to be "sustainable agriculture" and "life science" companies continue to greenwash their toxic images by now trying to claim that using RoundUp and other GM seeds entitles them to carbon credits in order to use these conferences as a way to also shove GMOs down the throats of the people of Africa as they use climate change to steal the natural drought resistant traits of natural plants through biopiracy. It is absurdity to the max for them to even be at these conferences after what they have done and continue to do to pollute and deforest this planet to grow their toxic GM soy for animal feed and BT corn biofuel that exacerbates hunger!

      These are the lobbyists present at these meetings behind these sessions deciding the fate of our children and theirs... and yet, apart from Democracy Now, the American media is GAGGED. Has this even really been covered on Current TV?.. oh wait I forgot, the "election" and politics are all they're about now, not human rights. Just as an observation, there have also been 15 posts to my knowledge posted here regarding this in the entire time COP 17 has been in session.
      ~~~~~~~
      Excerpt from article above:

      "Africa has become a major battleground for GM crops, and efforts to ensure the penetration of the continent by hook or by crook have been thick and persistent. With a picture of unyielding hunger, malnourished people and an inability to plough with anything other than a hoe, Africa is presented as a lost cause that must be helped by a loving, caring world. Climate change provides a wonderful cover to push this agenda. The GM industry claims they can produce varieties that do not need water to grow and indeed will produce others than do not require agro-chemicals. The promises keep rolling off the tongues of their salesmen. The message is that without GM crops and with climate change, Africans will not only be left with empty bowls, but the continent will become a dust bowl.

      True, the effects of climate change are clearly manifest in the agricultural sector. But, trust the purveyors of genetically engineered crops. They want to gain from all ends of the pipe. As we often hear, agriculture contributes a large chunk of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and thus impacts on the climate. What is often not heard is that the culprit is industrial, chemical-dependent agriculture and not the environmentally sound agro-ecological practices. Nevertheless, even though smallholder farmers are not climate criminals, they are severely impacted by it. For the Niger Delta, continued degradation in the form of spills and gas flares render the area extremely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change with a projected loss of 50 per cent of the ability to produce cereals by the year 2020 and an 80 per cent loss by 2050.16 This is worse than any armed conflict.

      In grasping at carbon credits and offsets, some entrepreneurs suggest that, for the agricultural sector to benefit from the carbon market, systems that reduce the need for tillage should qualify. If this is taken on board, genetically modified crops such as Monsanto's Roundup-ready varieties could be used to claim carbon credits by arguing that they reduce the need for tillage and thus reduce emissions. This would be a perverse incentive for growing GM crops.17"

    • 6 months ago
  • Ambill94
  • coolplanet
  • JanforGore
  • Not_A_Troll
    • -2
      Not_A_Troll  
    • Not to sound all looney, but i thought that plants breathe co2 and produce oxygen, and a co2 rich atmosphere will only provide more gas for plants to grow and produce oxygen.. but hey what do I know. Fukushima, now thats climate change.

    • 6 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • Mother Earth is mic-checking US.

      THANK YOU to those there speaking out for climate justice!

      The people united will never be defeated.

      World Bank out of climate finance!

    • 6 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • The fact is that climate justice is the farthest thing from the minds of industrialized nations in putting together a climate pact that resembles anything regarding true climate justice and moral courage. Greed, selfishness, geopolitics, intolerance ( yes I can believe a part of this is based on just not wanting to help people of color along with the poor and women) all things that have rotted the governments of these nations to their core. And Americans, our government is one of them. This government and this administration along with others have failed future generations on a huge scale by continuing to serve the status quo that now sees our planet teetering on the edge.

      Instead of progress, we get obstruction. Instead of solutions, we get deception. Instead of food sovereignty and recognizing the Rights of Mother Earth, we get MONSANTO and BP. Instead of respecting the science, we get political rhetoric delivered by those so far removed from the reality of what climate change is doing to those who had nothing to do with making it. There is no other way any more to say this. The planet is warming. The effects are real. They are affecting our ability to provide food, water, and sound social structures to MILLIONS of people globally, with climate migration not some distant delusion but a present humanitarian crisis.

      When you have the people relegated to the streets and arrested for seeking merely to be able to survive, you know who really runs this show. This is the epitome of what OWS is about. The environmental effects of the actions of the 1% have now insured us that the world our chldren and grandchildren will live in will be unlike the world we pictured and lived in.They are not on the side of working for real solutions that bring justice and equality that in turn brings food sovereignty, clean water, social justice and respect for the processes of our planet that we must now work with in order for our species to survive.They are climate criminals intent on using this crisis for their own profit at the expense of all of us as this is killing people and will kill Africa and many others in this world if allowed to go unchecked any longer.

      Therefore,I stress again my belief that they should all be held accused of human rights abuses and abuses against Mother Earth and dealt with accordingly and the people must now take into their hands the work they refuse to do. Our survival depends on us. If anything this will hopefully inspire more people to see the truth and to understand this is a real and present danger to our continued survival. It's time to GET IT DONE.

    • 6 months ago
more from Green:

top videos