Alberta government poisoning wolves to address dwindling caribou population near tarsands
source: http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/06/419563/canadian-government-poisoning-wolves-to-addr...
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
But rather than focus on habitat conservation efforts to protect threatened caribou populations in the province, Canadian officials are poisoning and shooting wolves that prey on caribou.
The practice is not new in Alberta. But the stunning decline in Caribou herds is forcing the Canadian government to ramp up culling efforts around Alberta’s oil sands — potentially resulting in the death of 6,000 wolves over the next five years, according to the Pembina Institute, a Canadian environmental think tank.
Government officials didn’t confirm those figures, but one Canada’s environment minister admitted it would be “very large numbers.”
Environmental organizations are hammering the Canadian government over the killing of wolves, saying that it is proof of the cascading environmental impacts of tar sands production. The National Wildlife Federation released a short report today on the issue:
Two particularly repugnant methods of destroying wolves – shooting wolves from helicopters and poisoning wolves with baits laced with strychnine – would be carried out in response to the caribou declines. Strychnine is a deadly poison known for an excruciating death that progresses painfully from muscle spasms to convulsions to suffocation, over a period of hours. Wildlife officials will place strychnine baits on the ground or spread them from aircraft in areas they know wolves inhabit. In addition to wolves, non-target animals like raptors, wolverines and cougars will be at risk from eating the poisoned baits or scavenging on the deadly carcasses of poisoned wildlife.
These methods have already been used in Alberta to kill hundreds of wolves. Now the Canadian government wants to use them to kill thousands more.
According to a report from the Alberta Caribou Committee, it is very possible that increased industrial activity in Alberta — much of it driven by expanding tar sands mining — will cause the complete collapse of caribou populations living in the Boreal forest:
Boreal caribou will not persist for more than two to four decades without immediate and aggressive management intervention. Tough choices need to be made between the management imperative to recover boreal caribou and plans for ongoing bitumen development and industrial land-use.
The Canadian government agrees that caribou populations around Alberta and British Columbia are “very unlikely” to survive due to decades of sustained industrial development in fragile habitat. The dramatic expansion of tar sands is becoming a key driver of this habitat loss.
But rather than slow this type of environmentally-destructive activity to prevent Caribou (and now wolves) from being eviscerated, the Canadian government only plans to continue aggressive expansion of tar sands.
More at the link
-
- groups:
- Green, Earth Care, Endangered Earth, Indigenous, 3 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Animals, Biodiversity, Wolves, 7 more
-
- recommended by:
- Vierotchka
-
-
northernexpat
-
We are suffering the same thing in the Northwest Territories. Our Caribou herds have been severely effected by the pipeline that runs from Norman Wells to Alberta. There was a major break in the line that wasn't discovered right away (because of the isolated location of the break) that has poisoned the tundra where the Caribou herds travel and eat.
I am not happy with the Canadian Government right now. Their need to be the number one oil producer is going to kill our once beautiful tundra. When are people going to put nature in front of profits?
- 4 months ago
-
northernexpat
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
Obama will approve the Keystone pipeline once he is re-elected.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
Dr. David Suzuki discussing "ethical" oil...
Oh, and I think it is a disgrace that both Bush and Obama have been a party to this.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
JanforGore:
excellent point.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
The tarsands are a reflection of where we are headed as a species. Not a good sign.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Leen61
-
Kill wildlife or ruin their habitat just for oil. Sickening.
- 4 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
warman1138
-
Destruction on so many levels just to chase the last drop of oil......sad.
- 4 months ago
-
warman1138
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
The native people's here will quickly forget the environmental issues once enough money has crossed their tables...it is you who generalizes. Would it be a better planet without the thirst for unrenewable resources? Of course but as long as we enjoy a easier life from it we can't complain. I call bullshit when you say you are not a consumer of resource based benefits. There are so many hypocrites here it's sickening.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
JanforGore
-
dudefromtherock:
Now you twist it. Below you stated that I must "use my vehicle" as much as anyone else, to which I replied I don't drive a car. Which is the truth. Now you expand on it because that didn't work for you to infer I stated I am not a "consumer of resource based benefits" which I never stated because that wasn't what you originally inferred. Why the hell do you think people like myself are out here calling for alternatives? Of course in our lives using something that requires oil is hard to avoid and it's been BY DESIGN. However, the difference between a person who sees that and the destruction it causes and works to CHANGE IT as opposed to someone who accepts it regardless of the damage it does just because they want an easier life is the key here. But I too have tried to cut consumption of "resource based benefits" to as much of a minimum as I can and work to stop this. I'm so sorry you can't understand there are those who actually walk the walk. I also know for a fact that the First Nations people have been fighting this for years because they know where the true value lies. And as far as generalizations go, I'm not the one who typed "you guys" here. It is those on ALL sides involved in these tarsands which are affecting so many species that I speak against, including THIS government. Again, this isn't about making factions between countries. This is about stopping a global environmental catastrophe that will affect many generations and species to come. And I am no hypocrite about that.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
JanforGore:
Blah blah blah...if someone doesn't agree with you fully they have no idea what they talk about. I have stated before In other posts that I applaud your zest and passion for what you believe in maybe just maybe some are tired of your holier than thou attitude. have you ever lived among the native populations here? I have and let me tell you when enough money has been negotiated upon deals will be made regardless of the environmental impact. Good day to you ma'am.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
JanforGore
-
dudefromtherock:
Right. So instead of illustrating what you know to prove your points, you attack me for caring. Whatever. Good day to you too.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
JanforGore:
Some of us have careers and issues to attend to outside of the online world. I'm going to drive my car to the grocery store and take my little son sliding...is that ok or should I force him to walk 3 miles in the snow. Maybe I should buy some carbon credits to lessen the blow to the environment ;p well wishes from Canada.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
JanforGore
-
dudefromtherock:
Well you sure spent enough time on this thread so I don't see your point. We all have issues to attend to outside of the online world. You're flailing now and totally ignoring the topic of this post.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
percipi224
-
JanforGore:
dudefromthe rock??? morelike under a rock....he asked for it...lol
- 4 months ago
-
percipi224
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
JanforGore:
Anyone ever notice these sensitive environmentalists have a real mean steak towards their fellow man. They would gladly do away with people to save some trees . I wonder are you off the grid? Do you walk or bike everywhere? Grow your own food? Wipe your butt with leaves? No?! You are a hypocrite!
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
percipi224:
The only rock around here sock puppet is the one occupying your cranial cavity.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
JanforGore:
Go buy some carbon credits to displace the BS you expell.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
dudefromtherock:
I need 5 more down votes for a badge come on people where are the sock puppets and hypocrites ?
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
Naumadd
-
So, yet another species in addition to the caribou must suffer for humanity's short-sightedness?
Ridiculous. It isn't wolves killing the caribou - it's mankind. Wolves are simply taking advantage of the situation.
- 4 months ago
-
Naumadd
-
-
Debrinconcita
-
The Creator takes care of these issues it's called kill or be killed. NATURAL Selection, who are they to mess with the ECO SYSTEM going on? WHO???
- 4 months ago
-
Debrinconcita
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
Those same wolves have decimated elk herds in Colorado. The wolves kill for sport not survival.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
JanforGore
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
Humans kill for sport. The point here is that the destruction caused by the tarsands has now dessimated the habitat of the caribou and affected their numbers. This is creating an imbalance. What the tarsands are doing to so many different species including humans is really the focus. However, it is the animals whose habitat has been destroyed that suffer for it. And really, poisoning with strychnine? That is a truly slow and horrible death. God forbid we actually stop our voracious hunger for oil.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
JanforGore:
I'm with you on the oil thing. I am wondering if the wolves had to move as far south as Colorado for survival as their habitat became unsustainable.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
Debrinconcita
-
JanforGore:
THANKS for putting it into perspective sanely, Instead of just making accusations like others always do on this website. I am with you.
- 4 months ago
-
Debrinconcita
-
-
Debrinconcita
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
That is totally ridicolous, wolves have never killed for sport in their lives. ONLY MAN Is this sick!
- 4 months ago
-
Debrinconcita
-
-
HarukoHaruhara
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
Wolves don't kill for sport. That is an old wives' tale.
People think that because sometimes they will kill an animal and leave it and not eat it. That's caching behaviour. They come back later to eat it. Sometimes they never come back to eat the kill. It's because they didn't need it.
And in many places in the Rockies, the elk were allowed to become overpopulated ... why? Because hunters wanted more elk to harvest.
People are the only animals on the planet that kill for sport.
- 4 months ago
-
HarukoHaruhara
-
-
artemis6
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
You have no idea what you are talking about .
- 4 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
artemis6
-
HarukoHaruhara:
Thank you for explaining it so patiently . How can people even THINK that !? oh wait , Hollywood ....
- 4 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
yodasworld
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
Wouldn't it be better if the Canadian Government either relocated them or repair their habitats? Neither is happening...Wouldn't want to break any fingers, I mean paws...
- 4 months ago
-
yodasworld
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
JanforGore:
How about you guys end your hunger for warfare, death and decimation of people's cultures in countries where you have no business? If these tar sands were in your country you wouldnt hear anything about it.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
JanforGore
-
dudefromtherock:
Well actually I speak out against all of that. By your logic then Alberta needs to stop killing the indigenous peoples of its land with their cancer causing sludge. By your generalizations regarding "you guys" then all who live in Alberta who are silent are murderers just as well. You are once again using the language of division, when it is likeminded people who care across borders and globally who should be joining with First Nations and places like Fort Chipewayan to STOP THIS because it is destroying pristine forests, water, cultures, species and the climate balance of this planet. And you can bet that wherever this was taking place you would hear about it from me.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
sugarmountian
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
Are you insane??? Provide a link for that statement. Read a book for petes sake.
- 4 months ago
-
sugarmountian
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
Debrinconcita:
I thought the same thing until my last visit to Colorado. There are parts of Colorado where the elk herds were so large it reminded me of how the buffalo must have filled the plains at one point. The herd is a magnificent thing to behold. Now the herds are getting smaller and smaller and we came across several carcasses, uneaten and clearly killed by wolves. A friend of mine who works for the dept of conservation said that the wolves have grown in large numbers and that their killing for sport had been observed.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
artemis6:
I have been there and seen the carcasses (not the killing for sport) myself. I grew up in Colorado and return at least once a year. I have been doing it for over forty years. I am an avid hiker and outdoor enthusiast. I love nature and being in it. I love the movie Never Cry Wolf. But, the wolves are very dangerous to the beautiful elk. Perhaps the term "surplus killing" instead of "sport killing" would be less offensive to you.
And I don't own a tv.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
yodasworld:
Yes I think that would be a better way to deal with it. I am not for exterminating the wolves, I only seek to examine one of the results of their introduction into places where they are not native.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
sugarmountian:
I engage in dialogue only. Insults distract from the topics at hand.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
sugarmountian
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
I only asked a question. Show all of us your proof that the wolf kills for sport. Good luck with that. You have no idea what your talking about on this subject. Do some research before you made a wild statement like that.
- 4 months ago
-
sugarmountian
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
sugarmountian:
No you didn't only ask a question. You engaged in personal slander. Again I prefer dialogue to debate. I talked about my own experience and what I have personally seen. If you don't find it relevant to the discussion, so be it.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
percipi224
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
damn man! you don't give up do you there are no wolves in Colorado, i live here and they just suggested bringing them in to control deer and elk, it is people that hurt wildlife not the other way around, including the idiots from texas that killed 9 moose with elk tags. they were fined 25 grand per moose, their vehicles and guns confiscated and their priveleges revoked here and in texas....so stop saying stuff you know nothing about....sheesh!
- 4 months ago
-
percipi224
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
percipi224:
I split my time between Virginia and Colorado. I saw this myself outside of Gypsum on the western slope. I am well aware of the discussions to bring them in for herd control. But, there is evidence that some of the wolves are already there. I am not saying anything about the wolves except that they are destructive to elk herds. Truth.
Here is a link to an article about the biologist who found that wolves had made their way back into Colorado.
http://www.hcn.org/issues/42.3/prodigal-dogs
"Officially, wild wolves do not live in Colorado. The nearest established population is in Wyoming, where gray wolves were introduced to Yellowstone National Park in 1995. But rumors of wolf sightings abound in Colorado, and in recent years, at least two wolves have died in the state. In 2004, a young radio-collared female wolf from Yellowstone was killed on Interstate 70 near Idaho Springs, about 30 miles west of Denver. In the winter of 2009, another young female collared wolf traveled a 1,000-mile-long route from the Yellowstone region to the Meeker, Colo., area, roughly 20 miles from where Eisenberg and her crew work. That wolf's death, in April, is still under investigation by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and neither state nor federal officials will comment on the matter."
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
HarukoHaruhara
-
They do the same in Montana, "we have to kill the wolves because they're killing the elk ...and there's not enough elk for US to kill...."
- 4 months ago
-
HarukoHaruhara
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
HarukoHaruhara:
My point had nothing to do with hunters or whatever their argument is. I have talked with no hunters about it. I am only talking about what I have seen with my own eyes.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
HarukoHaruhara
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
Yeah, but you know somehow magically wolves and elk managed to coexist just fine for 50,000 years. There were lots of wolves and lots of elk throughout the West when white people showed up.
What changed?
White people showed up.
- 4 months ago
-
HarukoHaruhara
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
HarukoHaruhara:
I don't know about the magic part or the white people part but undoubtedly predators and prey co-exist. I understand that wolves eat elk. I eat elk also. Why do some favor the wolf over the elk?
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
HarukoHaruhara
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
I don't favour one over the other. I favour both. They both coexisted for thousands of years and can again, if man stays out of the way.
- 4 months ago
-
HarukoHaruhara
-
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner:
The never ending struggle between predator and prey make both species stronger, culling out the weak of body wits and will, allowing the strong to thrive. I cheer this behavior in nature because I know that without it we wouldn't have half the wonderous splendor in our animal diversity as we do.
- 4 months ago
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas
-
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas:
I too cheer the diversity. I was sad to see the change in the herds that I have been watching for forty years. But, it is part of the cycle of life.
- 4 months ago
-
Truthitswhatsfordinner
-
-
JanforGore
-

-
This is what insanity looks like.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
JanforGore:
Americans are fantastic at pointing fingers at someone else. The very definition of hypocrisy.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
KB723
-
Perhaps they will hire Caribou Barbie to knock some out from a helicopter for a Photo Shoot, Ahem, No Pun Intended... =(
- 4 months ago
-
KB723
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
KB723:
You got it...some celebrity will jump on the bandwagon and take up the cause giving them popularity.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
Vierotchka
-

-
KB723:
You betcha...
- 4 months ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
GENERALNATTY
-
dudefromtherock:
plenty have come forward already to do so, they have even been making the front pages of the calgary sun lately.
- 4 months ago
-
GENERALNATTY
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
GENERALNATTY:
Of course get their pictures hugging a seal or tree ...cause celebritae. Any press is good press for some.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas
-
This is absolutely insane! I say we coat all the big oil exec in the thickest crude we can find! Bastard bonfire!
- 4 months ago
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas
-
-
JanforGore
-
Anything to assuage our OIL ADDICTION and greed. Even the destruction of species, forests, cultures and resources. This is simply barbaric. So every time someone starts their car here it is because many trees in the Boreal Forest were cut down, many animals were slaughtered, water had been contaminated, with cultures ruined and people dying of cancer. Is it really worth it?
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
JanforGore:
No hatred or anger intended but Im willing to bet you use your vehicle as much as anyone.
- 4 months ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
JanforGore
-
dudefromtherock:
I don't drive a car. So I'd take your bet.
- 4 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
artemis6
-
dudefromtherock:
No car here either . Anyway their are alternatives , so really , the excuses are diminishing . Nissan leafs , Teslas and all ....
- 4 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
Anonmaly
-
That's messed up.....
- 4 months ago
-
Anonmaly
