Image
sandokan0
The bill introduced in the Senate would allow Americans to visit the island freely. This first step toward lifting the Cuba embargo has brought up to date the interest in the subject.

The following excellent article makes solid points against lifting the embargo without meaningful changes in Cuba. The author lays out good reasons why lifting the embargo
will benefit the Cuban dictatorship, no the Cuban people.

LIFT THE CUBA EMBARGO?


By Humberto (Bert) Corzo*
Columnist
Los Angeles
California
U.S.A.
La Nueva Cuba
January 09, 2009


In this article I analyze the arguments of lifting the Cuba embargo, which are more rhetorical than real, answering each one of the specific considerations of those that support the end of it.
  1. groups:
    Cuba at 50
  2. tags:
    Economy Cuba news & politics Embargo
  3.     
    |

16 comments // Lift the Cuba Embargo?

  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • I've never understood why Cuba is always able to "blame" the U.S. embargo for everything the embargo does. At the beginning of the embargo, there was some immediate dislocation and adjustments, but in relatively short order things were back to normal; other trading partners (communist block) rush in and fill the gaps. For over 30 years the embargo was a non issue. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Castros regime received support from ideological bedfellows such as the USSR, China, Venezuela and Iran and there is already plenty of tourism income from the other major countries of the world.

    • 2 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Álvaro Vargas Llosa is a Bolivian writer and political commentator on international affairs with emphasis on Latin America. In this article, that by coincidence has the same title than the one written by Bert Corzo, he exposes the moral reasons for abandoning the embargo. Until recently he was in favor to keep the embargo.

    • 2 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Image
    • Should the Cuban Embargo Be Lifted?
      http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/29/should_the_cuban_embargo_be...

      By Alvaro Vargas Llosa
      Real Clear Politics
      April 29, 2009

      WASHINGTON -- Most Americans seem to reject the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba. According to a Washington Post/ABC poll, 57 percent of Americans now oppose the policy. A survey by Bendixen & Associates shows that only 42 percent of Cuban-Americans continue to back it.

      I have been conflicted on this issue for years. Until not long ago, I favored the embargo. As an advocate for free trade, I would normally have called such a measure an unacceptable restriction on the freedom of people to trade with whomever they pleased. But I thought that trading with a regime that had killed, jailed, exiled or muzzled countless of its citizens for decades was not a worthy objective, as it would also preserve that dictatorship. Any transaction with Cuba would also benefit the government. After all, the authorities were already skimming 20 percent of the remittances from Cuban-Americans and 90 percent of the salary paid to Cubans by non-American foreign investors.

      Eventually, I admitted to myself that there was an intolerable inconsistency in my thinking. No democracy based on liberty should tell its citizens what country to visit or whom to trade with, regardless of the government under which they live. Even though the Castro brothers, Fidel and Raul, would obtain a political victory in the very short run, the embargo could no longer be justified.

    • 2 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Image
    • Think Again: Engaging Cuba

      By Nestor Carbonell
      Posted April 2009

      Why dealing with the Castro regime is a fool's errand.

      “It’s Time for the U.S. to Reach out and Engage the Castro Regime.”

      Watch out! Before embarking on any attempt at rapprochement with the Castro regime,

      U.S. President Barack Obama would be wise to review his predecessors' experiences.

      Gerald Ford's negotiations with Fidel Castro's representatives had to be called off when 15,000 Cuban troops landed in Angola. Jimmy Carter's efforts led to the opening of interest sections in Havana and Washington, but hopes for normalization were quashed when the Castro regime deployed troops to Ethiopia and subsequently unleashed the Mariel boatlift, which brought 125,000 refugees to Florida, including more than 2,700 convicted criminals and misfits. Several foreign-policy experts called the boatlift an act of migratory aggression.

      With the Cold War over, President Bill Clinton tried anew to improve U.S. relations with Cuba, fostering people-to-people contacts. These efforts were foiled by a crisis of refugee rafters in 1994 and again in 1996 when Cuban jet fighters shot down two unarmed planes flying over international waters on a humanitarian mission.

      The circumstances have changed since then, but the Cuban regime (now under the dual leadership of the Castro brothers) essentially remains the same. So, at the very least, caution and a step-by-step approach are called for in any new attempt to engage with this wily regime, which has managed to exploit naivité and signs of weakness to its advantage.

      Link: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4815

      Another excellent point by point editorial at Foreign Policy by Nestor Carbonell on the embargo.

    • 2 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Great column by Néstor Carbonell in Forbes that tells the 100% truth about the current situation in Cuba.

      Néstor Carbonell time-line provide important historical information that all Americans should know.

      Cuba's "bailout", by obtaining US-backed credit lines as well as the external debt of over $80 billion, will guarantee the continuation of the Castros regime, delaying instead of accelerating a transition to democracy.

    • 2 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Bailing Out The Castro Regime?

      Nestor Carbonell ,

      Not unless Communist Cuba makes concrete democratic changes.
      After 50 years of almost continuous antagonism between the U.S. and the Castro-Communist regime, there is a swelling desire in the U.S. and abroad to overcome this predicament through constructive engagement. Since this would not be the first time that engagement has been pursued, let us review the outcome of prior U.S. quests for a rapprochement with this regime, a regime that was expelled from the Organization of American States in 1962 because it had established a Marxist-Leninist tyranny declared incompatible with the inter-American system, had aligned itself with the Soviet bloc and had suppressed all human rights.

      Despite a litany of crimes, interventions in the internal affairs of more than a dozen of Latin American countries, and threats to the peace and security of the hemisphere that culminated in the Cuban missile crisis, President Kennedy tried to seek an accommodation with Castro. On Sept. 23, 1963, U.S. Ambassador William H. Attwood secretly commenced negotiations in New York with the Cuban ambassador to the U.N., Carlos Lechuga.

      A few days prior to Kennedy's assassination, a follow-up meeting was arranged with Castro in Havana. Negotiations were dropped almost simultaneously because several tons of war equipment that were shipped from Cuba to Venezuela's Marxist "Armed Forces of National Liberation" were uncovered by the local authorities.

      Link: http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/21/communist-cuba-castro-opinions-contributors-bai...

    • 2 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • This is why Obama's election wasn’t good to the cause of Cuban freedom. He could say until he's blue in the face that he's going to keep the embargo but congress will keep eroding it and he'll have his "political cover".

    • 3 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Call: Don't expect big changes soon on U.S. Cuba policy
      http://eurasia.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/04/17/call_dont_expect_big_changes_s...

      By Eurasia Group analyst Heather Berkman

      Does the recent White House announcement on relaxation of U.S. policy toward Cuba signal bigger things to come? Probably. But while these first steps were easy to take, high political hurdles lie ahead -- and substantial change in U.S.-Cuban relations is not yet on the horizon.

      These moves represent real change. The Obama administration announced it would lift restrictions on remittances, allow Cuban-Americans to travel freely to the island, and ease telecommunications regulations. The announcement wasn't surprising, given Obama's campaign trail rhetoric, and it was probably timed to establish a cooperative tone leading up to this week's Summit of the Americas.

      But the White House is also testing the political waters for further changes to its Cuba policy and will probably wait to see if Congress takes the lead on removing the travel ban for all Americans. Obama has the power to sidestep lawmakers by issuing executive orders that don't require congressional approval that encourage person-to-person communications and the exchange of information with the island. But there are bills pending in the Senate (the Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act) and the House of Representatives that would abolish the travel ban altogether. The White House knows these laws might well pass, though they will face a long road through committees and procedural votes. Congressional action would provide Obama with useful political cover.

      Cuban leaders would welcome a lifting of the universal travel ban, since it would provide a huge boost for the country's tourism industry. But they also know there's an element of White House strategy at work here. The changes to telecommunications policy will allow U.S. companies to work with Cuban carriers to establish fiber-optic cable and satellite telecommunications facilities linking the two countries, provide roaming services, and offer satellite radio and television service. Cuba's low level of telephone usage (11 percent of the population, according to one estimate) and broadband subscription reveal huge growth potential in telecommunications.

      This leaves the Cuban government with an uncomfortable choice: Open Cuba as never before to ideas and information from the United States, or keep the door closed and accept greater responsibility for Cuba's international isolation. With Obama administration rhetoric aimed at promoting democracy on the island -- ostensibly at the expense of the Castro regime -- the Cuban government will remain cautious toward increased and unrestricted communication with the United States.

      Despite these (significant) first steps, outright repeal of the 47-year-old economic embargo is not yet on the horizon. Domestic political considerations will continue to weigh heavily on congressional action, despite changes in Cuban-American demographics and evolving political attitudes among Cuban-American communities. A poll conducted in December 2008 by FIU-Brookings suggests that a small majority (55 percent) of Cuban-Americans now favor ending the embargo. But congressional action is required to rescind the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996 (known as Helms-Burton) that wrote the embargo into law, and the Obama administration will have to think long and hard about how much political capital it wants to spend on a broader diplomatic opening to Cuba.

      Given other foreign-policy and domestic priorities, it won't be an easy choice. The Castro regime could make the process easier with changes that address criticism of its human rights record and authoritarian governance. Raul Castro, who officially replaced his brother as president in early 2008, has enacted limited economic reforms, but Fidel continues to cast a very long shadow. Until both Castros leave the scene,

    • 3 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • The majority of those people who send money to Cuba send significantly less than what they were legally allowed to until the other day. It's because of this and the slow economy that I don't expect there to a sudden increase of new remittances to the island.

    • 3 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • The article highlights the ingenious nature of the remittance business which is just as admirable as any organized crime scheme. People naturally want to help their families. The regime exploits this for its own benefit to the tune of billions of dollars annually.

    • 3 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Good Bloomberg article about how the Castro regime profits from remittances sent to the island from abroad.

      Castro Feeds on Cubans’ U.S. Cash Support as Obama Eases Limits

      By Jerry Hart

      April 17 (Bloomberg) -- The Cuban state pension that Juan Gonzalez-Corzo receives since he retired from a government job in 2003 makes life easier after more than 50 years of work.

      So does the cash that comes regularly by wire from his son in West New York, New Jersey.

      It’s part of an estimated $1.1 billion sent to Cubans last year by relatives and friends around the world, an amount equal to about 1.8 percent of the communist country’s 2007 gross domestic product.

      “Most of the remittances end up used for consumption,” said Gonzalez-Corzo’s son Mario, 39, a Cuban-born assistant economics professor at Lehman College in New York City who has studied remittances and provided the estimates. “It helps.”

      The money also helps the island’s $58 billion economy, as the Cuban government charges fees that take about 20 percent of exchange-wired dollars, Gonzalez-Corzo said.

      Link: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aoNduw5GDRCY&refer=h...

    • 3 years ago
  • sandokan0
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Keep the Embargo

      By Peter Brookes
      New York Post | Thursday, April 16, 2009

      In another outreach to roguish regimes, the Obama administration on Monday announced the easing of some restrictions on Cuba.

      Team Bam hopes that a new face in the White House will heal old wounds. Fat chance.

      Sure, it's fine to allow separated families to see each other more than once every three years -- even though Cubanos aren't allowed to visit America.

      And permitting gifts to Cuban relatives could ease unnecessary poverty -- even though the regime will siphon off an estimated 20 percent of the money sent there.

      In the end, though, it's still Fidel Castro and his brother Raul who'll decide whether there'll be a thaw in ties with the United States -- or not.

      And in usual Castro-style, Fidel himself stood defiant in response to the White House proclamation, barely recognizing the US policy shift.

      Instead, and predictably, Fidel demanded an end to el bloqueo (the blockade) -- without any promises of change for the people who labor under the regime's hard-line policies.

      So much for the theory that if we're nice to them, they'll be nice to us.

      Link: http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=08C5AED9-C39E-4294-A3C4-2DE...

    • 3 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Coddling Cuba

      Why do the members of Congress rushing to befriend the Castros ignore the island's pro-democracy movement?

      Editorial, The Washoington Post
      Thursday, April 9, 2009; Page A16

      HALF A DOZEN members of the Congressional Black Caucus spent hours huddling with Fidel and Raúl Castro in Havana this week as part of a swelling campaign to normalize relations with Cuba. "It is time to open dialogue and discussion," Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) told a news conference in Washington after their return. "Cubans do want dialogue. They do want talks." Funny, then, that in five days on the island the Congress members found no time for dialogue with Afro-Cuban dissident Jorge Luis García Pérez.

      Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/08/AR2009040803769....

    • 4 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • What will bring "Change" to Cuba are free elections, the freeing of all political prisoners, and the implementation of a market economy. Everything else is “mental masturbation”

    • 4 years ago
  • sandokan0
    • 0
      sandokan0  
    • Lift the Cuba Embargo?

      You don’t need to look further; here you have the answer from the “horse” mouth:

      “It is necessary to impose financial, economic and material restrictions to dictatorships, so that they will not take roots for long years….Diplomatic and morals measures do not work against dictatorships, because these make fun of the Governments and the population”. Fidel Castro

      (Excerpt from the book “Fidel Castro and Human Rights”, Editora Política, Havana, Cuba, 1988)

    • 4 years ago
more from Cuba at 50:

top videos