Current News UK | August 06, 2008 | 18 comments

Two Britons held after Beijing demonstration

Image
fernandez_is_go
BBC is reporting that two activists demonstrating in Beijing city, in advance the of the Olympic games, have been arrested and detained by Chinese authorities. Iain Thom and Lucy Fairbrother are reported to have raised banners supporting a free Tibet, attaching them to a 36.5m lighting pole, proclaiming, "One world one dream free Tibet" and "Tibet will be free."

Speaking on a mobile telephone, while suspended from the pole, Mr Thom told BBC News: "I'm here today because I've been a long-term Tibet activist and I feel like now is a really critical time for Tibet.

A British Embassy spokesman said: "We are in touch with the Chinese authorities and are requesting immediate consular access should this information be correct." The Chinese authorities have not commented on the incident.
  1. groups:
    Current News UK
  2. tags:
    Current News UK China Olympics Protests 3 more
  3.     
    |

18 comments // Two Britons held after Beijing demonstration

  • J_Jammer
  • scott41
    • 0
      scott41  
    • Hmm... interesting that they climbed a large pole in order to make their protests. This is something I hadn't noted in the PA story.

      Whilst they have been detained for an improportionate length of time, I think they'd have been arrested in many western countries for protesting in such a way.

    • 4 years ago
  • Bandgeek89
    • 0
      Bandgeek89  
    • This is what i've waited for since I first heard china had gotten the Olympics. All of the things china has done to its people over the years will come out now, and what they've done to other country's like Tibet and Taiwan now is there chance to speak out against the Chinese so the world can hear.

    • 4 years ago
  • fuhleesha
  • J_Jammer
  • MeganMcKenzie
    • 0
      MeganMcKenzie  
    • Why are we there at the Olympics anyway? Not just the smog but the human rights record of China is horrible. I realize this is not a popular opinion but mine nevertheless.

    • 4 years ago
  • NoGodsNoMasters
  • Beta_Boy
    • 0
      Beta_Boy  
    • This is the first of many protests. I expect every country in the world will have an incident of some sort. The Olympics focus the world's attention on the host and if China can't take it then they shouldn't have applied.

      London will be no different in 2012, a hot bed of political activism.

    • 4 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Beta_Boy:

      And protesters shouldn't be so selfish to shift the light of what is to be about the athleticism of countries and bring them together not causing debates to be the focal point and using the Olympics like some sort of soap box.

    • 4 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • Beijing should never have gotten the right to hold the olympics there. Their global influence is what allowed this to happen. Those able and willing to make this sacrifice should do so, and have my full support. We should not be blinded by the powers that be concerning human rights violations. Also considering this is a protest for Tibet and freeing the Dali Lama from exile, terrorist attacks would be nothing but hypocracy. Though I wouldnt doubt there is a false flag event happening in the future.

    • 4 years ago
  • emmahill
  • tommydog
  • tommydog
    • 0
      tommydog  
    • I'm on both sides of this one. I believe in cultural diversity which is an arena full of conflict. On the one hand China is a communist country (ignoring any specific political nuances) and democracy cannot be forced upon it -this simply would not work. The idea of human 'rights' is not concrete either - just becuase one ideology posits freedom as one thing and another promotes it in a different way, I think that it is arrogant (and possibly naive) to assume your version is the only correct one. On the other hand these are the ways in which political ideologies work, and to deny your own views would be to deny your sense of self. So an activist should be able to promote his standpoint on Tibet and believe utterly in his (and others') right to do so. But said activist is necessarily conflicting with another ideology which defines rights differently, and must accept the consequences of that. Perhaps there are more sensible ways of protesting.

    • 4 years ago
  • JRM
    • 0
      JRM  
    • i dont think free tibet activists are about to launch a terrorist event. It shouldnt bother you that they are protesting, it is their human right, it is an important cause which is more important than surgically clean looking olympics. Its a shame that there were no protesters about china's funding and arms trading with darfur.

    • 4 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • JRM:

      The USA has for decades trained, armed and funded the rebels in southern Darfur because China happens to legally own the concession to the largest oil field in southern Darfur. The USA is far more culpable than China with regard to Darfur.

    • 4 years ago
  • abbym0308
    • 0
      abbym0308  
    • I appreciate the efforts of protesters... but I feel like there's a time and a place. It's the freaking Olympics. Why can't it just be a sporting event and not a hotbed for political tension, protests and terrorist threats. I hope we don't have a repeat of Munich.

    • 4 years ago
  • Blazesboy
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • abbym0308:

      It wouldn't be they getting a pass. It's upstaging the importance of the event they are hosting and causing them to focus their attention to those causing disturbances when they could be focusing on making the even the best it can be.

      I think protesting is great over this and it can be done in so many ways and so easily since China is hosting the Olympics.

    • 4 years ago
more from Current News UK:

top videos