Oil in Haiti

Check again, the US imports roughly 75% of its petroleum usage. This is causing the value of the US dollar to sink like a rock. There is talk among OPEC members about suspending trading oil in the USD because of this. If this happens, expect the price of oil to skyrocket.

If you think the last price spike in oil price was a shock---you ain't seen nuthin' yet!

The time to be getting ready is now----not after it happens.

BTW----Mexican oil fields are drying up----PetroMex exports are way down, which is a major source of income for the Mexican government. The Mexican government is verging on bankruptcy now. This is the reason for all the crime and riots going on in Mexico right now----and the reason we are spending over $30 Billion trying to build a wall across 800 miles of border to try to keep it out. Which is not working.

Canadian oil comes from tar sand bitumen. Very expensive and destructive to mine and process. As more and more Bitumen comes into the mix going to refineries, you can expect the price of crude oil to at least double. Even if everything else remains exactly the same(doubtful at best), you can expect the price of gasoline to go to $6/gal. Add any little market disturbance, bad weather, shipping accident, pipeline break, anywhere, anytime----and gasoline will hump out at over $7-8/gal.

Bury your head in the sand in denial if you want to----but it would not be a good idea to bury your head in tar sands---it might be very hard to get it back out again.

It is a well know fact that the world's oil supply is quite finite. We expect to dry out worldwide within 20 years or so. As it is now we see people scrabbling to find oil. You've certainly heard of all the controversy about off shore drilling which was supposed to be banned but now we have pressure to do that. We are constantly searching for new pockets of oil.

if you take the time to read these articles and the linked articles they are derived from, you'll find that the U.S. supposedly had the Haiti oil reverves agenda on hold. They had been waiting for an opportunity to take them. This earthqauke was that opportunity, as we see the U.S. send in it's occupation forces of 13,000 troops versus just a few hundred medical aid workers. They may or may not have used HAARP. Regardless, the opportunity is here and we are exploiting it.

The shock doctirne says that emergency disasters are used by our government to push through emergency funding for programs that would never fly otherwise. Funding millions of dollars for Haiti and using that funding for 13,000 troops in an occupation would never have worked without the earthquake. It all fits into the agenda so neatly.

If you can asume for a minute that the U.S. is interested in the occupation of Haiti, that they do have oil and other rich resources, that other countries may have the same interests, and that there is a technology called HAARP that has the ability to set off an earthqauke in any area where a tectonic nudge is all you need to set one off, then it follows that at a minumum the U.S. is exploiting the earthquake situation and at worst actually caused it with HAARP. It really doesn't seem much like a crazy conspiracy theory or science fiction, because it all makes way too much sense.

Ever played Monopoly? You don't start collecting until all the pieces are in place.

The information is dated at 2004. I'd say that qualifies as well before the haiti earthquake.

Seriously, don't hold your breath on that one.

Haiti would have industry controlling the action like Shell in parts of Africa controls the flow of oil. And just like there, the locals would only be paid enough to put food in their bellies once a day before returning to work and possibly dying due to the lack of protective gear.

It's like slavery, only no one is whipping you or cutting your feet off if you run away. New age slavery that makes you feel like you HAVE to do it to make a living.

Well, wasn't that quick and geez we get to start from scratch and build new infrastructure all the while playing the part of rescuer. All of those donations will end up being used to prepare the corporations for their profit making thus eliminating the need for them to spend their own money doing this. All the regular players, Clinton, Bush, Daddy Bush, Obama and others will make their money while making the banks their money while giving each charity the chance to open up a new improved headquarters and hire more staff all while rebuilding a country we destroyed and then getting it ready for the corporations that paid to get them elected. I love this country, hoo-rah we're the best, three cheers for America (Satire of course). I've got a feeling some of us posters won't be on here too long, they came after some militias and set up the lead Oath Keeper recently. Too many people are starting to see the truth, so now they will try to re-write the truth. Just my guesstimation.

Every time I see a commet like this I have to assume that if you don't own any property because if you do you've undoubtedly turned it over to the Native Americans as they are the true owners.

Rubbish.

Like the native Americans?

Well, actually more like slaves, which is where the Haitian population is descended from. African slaves imported to the Carribean.

I'm inclined to agree with you. That country is, for lack of a better phrase, in the toilet and if there is in fact oil, the US should dig it up. Sounds harsh but they obviously didn't have their act together enough to capitalise on their alleged resources. Mind you, I doubt the resources exists or else the US would have been in there a long time ago. I mean honestly, do we believe Bush would have let all of that 'Black Gold' sit there untapped.

How about you be a dear and provide us with some of these links, I don't see any that say Haiti has oil.

You do that.

Just "gangs"

Robin Hood in reverse, rob from the poor to give to the rich.

Soldiers don't dig for oil. They just occupy so that contractors can.

Take a look, here is the REAL purpose of the war in Agahnistan-----to build an control a pipeline that will assure strategic control over oil reserves in Central Asia.

It is all laid out in testimony before the:

U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS

HEARING

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON
ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

by John Merasca, VP international relations for UNOCAL. And this was being planned over 3 years before the attack on the WTC in 2001.

http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa48119.000/hfa48119_0f.htm

(transcript of proceedings)

-----------"The second option is to build a pipeline south from Central Asia to the Indian Ocean. One obvious route south would cross Iran, but this is foreclosed for American companies because of U.S. sanctions legislation. The only other possible route is across Afghanistan, which has of course its own unique challenges. The country has been involved in bitter warfare for almost two decades, and is still divided by civil war. From the outset, we have made it clear that construction of the pipeline we have proposed across Afghanistan could not begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders, and our company."-------------

So, are you wondering why the US can't seem to be able to get out of Afgahnistan?
Because they have NO intention of leaving, that is why. We are there for oil.

Couldn't have they just allied with the Taliban, I mean, the Taliban have the US to thank for being there, and they get on with other fundamentalist regimes such as the Saudi's, they probably could've...

Astute observation Orbviper----just one hitch though. The Taliban have a heavy reliance on a religious power base. The Suadis are a hereditary monarchy. The monarchy can sell out their subjects for economic gain---and there is nothing the common people can do about it. If the Taliban compromise the religious tenets and the good of the common people however---they lose the support of the common people. This is clearly evident in the Karzai government. Why do you think that after almost ten years of invasion and occupation by the most powerful military in the world, and the earmarking of enough US taxpayer funds to give every inhabitant of Afghanistan about $4.5 million it STILL remains one of the poorest countries on earth, and the Karzai government is completely ineffectual, even at conducting a rigged election to give itself at least the appearence of ligitimacy. The one thing that is basically true of ANY guerrila war anywhere----without the help and support of the common people, it will fail. There is nowhere for guerillas to hide or get support otherwise. That is how you can know with confidence that no matter WHAT you are told in the media propaganda blitz, this is a war that is fueled by coporate greed to funnel and contriol money away from the ordinary people of Afghanistan and into coporate balance ledgers.

Hmm, yeah, there are quite large differences I guess, I'm not too sure overall. I get the feeling we're never going to get the real truth apart from everyone who really cares is dead and this is just another footnote in history...pity.