The very best #BindersFullofWomen on the Internet

Ok I need two of those to go please.

If my ears didn't fail me Romney did not ever mention Resumes, he just said Binders, but a nice try for you that get paid to post riduculous lying comments. Where will you get your beer money after the election when your no longer needed.

You really think he meant a binder full of women? What are you five. Anyone with a brain knows what he was talking about. When a owner wants to hire some one he might go to the file cabnit and pull out a folder of employees. Inside of the folder there will be resumes and job applications from people that turned them into the bussiness but were never hired because the bussiness couldnt afford or didn't need to hire anyone at the time. Only crazy left wingers are trying to bend what he said.

I don't need to get paid to blog about anything. Gallup today Romney 51% Obama 45%. no one has ever overcome from that far behind to win an election this close to election day. Plus even MSNBC's undecided voter group favored Obama. This election is over. Romney 2012

seriously? you call the fact that people have actually taken note of the condescending attitude this man has towards others an epic fail?

no one needs to bend what he said, except, perhaps, people without an emotional IQ who are incapable of recognizing the nuances of language and speech.

you do know about Gallup, don't you....or do you prefer to pretend they are as unbiased as Romney's binders full of women?

Yes I do and they, like many other polling institutions, oversample democrats in their polls.

HA. People do reconize that he noticed his administration was lacking female members so he went out and did something about it. Google women in the obama administration and see what you find.

Keep up with the news will you grhd1972! Those women got together, on their own, & sent their resumes TO Robme, He NEVER EVER asked for ANY 'names' of women!
What is IN that kool-aid, that you guys won't even admit when something is Blatantly False ((another example-the 47% video-srsly people it's right in your face on video, how the he** can you (& willy) deny it?)) ?
Boy, every thing's wrong & a conspiracy for you guys unless it's in your favor-good philosophy for life-hang onto that unicorn horn!

What kind of retard thinks he meant an actual binder of women? How would these women fit in this binder? This is the same as a child laffing at a word a person said without listening to the whole sentence to gain the context of the word in the sentence.

CORRECTION: It is BINDERS Not Resumes. My mistake (there see how easy it is admit that you're wrong sometimes grhd?!) !!

He NEVER mentioned applications OR resumes, he just said "binders of women" which to any common sense thinking person takes that to mean Names of Women!

AW, that's cute! And who's gallop poll was it sweetie-wait, let me guess-ah, I'll bet a conservative leaning poll. A million polls are saying a million different things today, believe what ever tickles you.
Like the saying goes...it's not over till the *repuds* cry!!
Isn't it funny how whenever the Pres. was up in the polls you guys said the polls were 'biased' & 'fixed' but when your Robotney was up or even, then the polls are Correct. Dam*, are ALL repuds Flip Floppers? It's hard when you tell SO many Lies to keep them straight huh?

And the proof is? Oh ya your a fan of Current so the proof was made up in your head. You are just buying in to obamas class warfare BS. Let me guess you hate the ownerof your company because you feel he\she should pay you more and you feel that without you the business would never make it yet the fact is without him you would have no job. Catch 22's are a bitch huh?

only to you and people that believe romney is evil because of the lies that the liberal media and the obama administration has handed out.

Yet here you are saying the polls are fixed for romney even though liberal biased polls are giving romney the edge too.

Google Bickers and Barry's election prediction model. They have never had a wrong prediction of the winner of a presidential race.

Let me introduce you to something called the "Electoral College".

Electoral maps from both sides of the fence....

RCP:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_...

and HuffPo:
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romney-vs-obama-electoral-map?hw

really, really dense response.....

What makes you think I need to Google women in the Obama administration? I'd rather Google Mishima on Current and see what I find.

Ahhh a map based on polls. get back with me when you have an unbiased and reliable source.

the maps arent even close to each other and they change daily.

Hahaha. Mishima on current huh. Sure google your lies from current. that is why current is considered a joke in the world of journalism. Even liberal journalists consider current to be al gore propaganda B.S.

RCP is a self described right leaning site. They average tons of polls together, both left leaning and right, to come up with their results.

HuffPo is left leaning.

These sources are wide ranging, and they ALL come back with the answer that Obama wins. It doesn't get more unbiased than this. You're in denial if you can't see that.

They're not super close, but they both come back with the same answer. They might change every day, but they've always come back with the same answer. Obama was much further ahead before Romney's post-debate bounce, but even with the bounce, all sources say Obama is winning, based on electoral college math. I recognize that your optimism is outweighing basic math right now, but that doesn't change reality.

Yet gallup just released today 52% for romney, up from yesterdays 51%. All the other polls are giving romney more and more percentage points. Your electorial map means nothing untill november 6. If you knew anything about the electorial college you would know they only vote after the ballots come in. The maps they've been using right know are forever changing. I find it funny how the polls are used on current to tell there viewers that obama is going to win when he is ahead yet once the polls tip in romneys favor this channel all of a sudden says they mean nothing. If you think the people of america are gonna let obama run us further down the drain then you are in denial. I just want to know what excuse this channel is gonna come up with as to how romney won.
" Note right away that this isn't a forecast of what will happen in November on Election Day; but rather a synthesis of available polling"
" That said, it is important to note that there is a lot more going on than just poll averaging"
Like how hiffington disclosed us on the last two statements.
On the other hand the RCP map hasn't been updated since the 9th.

I love how you quote national polling, as if that's how elections are determined. That would be relevant if we determined winners based on popular vote, but we don't. If you think the electoral map means nothing, then no polling means anything. Yes, the maps are constantly changing, but they also constantly give the same answer. Inconvenient, I know.

so what brings you here then? we wear pink on Wednesdays.....

"If you think the people of america are gonna let obama run us further down the drain then you are in denial."

well.........'you people' did elect Bush to two terms......

I was out of the country during bush/kerry election and there was no way i was gonna vote for someone as crazy as gore during the gore/bush election so I was forced to vote for Bush. You people? You mean moderates? Cause i'm not democrat and i'm not republican.

You were using national polling to say obama is going to win. Those electorial maps you were refering to are based on popular vote polling. The real map doesn't come out untill Nov. 6 after voting. Yet they come up with the same answer? Looks like Real Clear Politics updated its map today, Doesn't look good for Obama. Lately ,if you have been paying attention, the polls have romneys lead increasing and obamas decreasing little by little. Inconvenient trend huh.

I was not using national polling to say Obama would win. I was using state-by-state polling and electoral college math. You might want to educate yourself on the difference.

Look at the RCP map again. Look at the "No toss ups" map. Based on the most current polls state by state polling, i.e. the way the electoral college is determined, Obama is still winning.

I like your optimism though, it's refreshing.

Please show me the comment I made that I think the polls are 'fixed' in favor of Robme. I can't seem to find where I said that about Robme.

hmmm...then Please enlighten me as to Why you seem to have set up camp here?

OH, That's why you're against any kind of equality for women.
SURPRISE - SURPRISE - SURPRISE!

I feel like i'm talking to first graders on this site. The map you are talking about uses national state by state polling to come up with the results for the map. The no toss ups map isn't accurate. It puts toss up states on one of the candidates sides. TOSS UP means it is to close to call the state in favor of one candidate or the other. Class is now over simpleburn, you may now go home to your mothers basement.

Thank you so much for your valuable lesson. Enlighten me... how do they determine who gets the electoral votes for the toss up states on the no toss up states map? Do they just flip a coin?

I love the constantly fluctuating relevance that you assign to polling. You pick and choose which polls are informative, and which ones are irrelevant, entirely depending on the convenience to the narrative you're trying to advance.

PS- Obama 281, Romney 257. And that doesn't include the polling after the beating Romney took on Monday. Keep your chin up though bud, it's not over til it's over.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_...

Ha. Your still looking at a no toss up map which shows you are only using information that proves your point. The toss up map uses poll averages that are within a margin of error that is as big as their polling gap. As long as the polls difference is as big as or smaller than the margin of error the the poll can't be accurately counted for any candidate. Its cute that you keep on trying to win this argument but your wrong. Keep believing in "change" because the American people are gonna change the president this year. I hope you don't cry to bad when Obama looses. But since you live in your moms basement still you won't be too far from a shoulder to cry on. So go to college get a political science degree and get back to me so I actually have someone to debate with that isn't talking out of their ars.

You are the one that decided to use electorial maps that use majority vote polls to determine their results to prove your point. Or did you forget about your first post.

LOL... thanks for the "margin of error" explanation. That might be relevant if it was one poll for each state, but RCP uses many polling sources and averages them. When all the polls lean in the same direction, even if their individually within their margin of error, the answer is still pretty clear... as clear as polling predictions can be anyway.

I'm going to keep believing in hope and change, and you can keep believing in a pathologically lying windsock that contradicts himself weekly. Let me remind you about the primaries where Romney could never get more than 25% of the GOP's support. They spent months desperately trying to get excited over an alternative option, rallying around clowns like Bachmann and Cain and Perry... clamoring for a viable option that didn't include Mitt. Since they settled on Mitt, he's been trailing the ENTIRE time. He spends and spends and spends.. normally money is the chief determiner in these things, but for Mitt, it doesn't matter... still trailing. It took Mitt playing dirty tricks and etch-a-sketching himself into an entirely new platform to throw Obama off and have a horrible night at the first debate to get a bounce that even remotely started to arguably be a "lead". Even then it was a matter of a couple points in a few polls. That little flicker of success is all you've got, and it's already fading with two weeks left.

Keep on recycling that tired old basement cliche, like a Limbaugh muppet drone. Empty, but hardly surprising from someone who would still vote for that clown after the 47% video.

"As Ohio goes, so goes the nation"
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/oh/ohio_romney_vs_obama-1...

RCP Battlground State Averages
Ohio Obama +2.1
Florida Romney +1.7
Virginia Romney +1.4
New Hampshire Obama +0.8
Wisconsin Obama +2.7
Michigan Obama +4.0
Pennsylvania Obama +2.0
Iowa Obama +2.0
Colorado Romney +0.2
Nevada Obama +2.7

Obama is ahead in 7 of 10 battleground states, including Ohio. Can't wait to hear how you spin this, and please spare me the "margin of errors" denial.

Yet all 10 states are toss up states. Please don't tell me you weren't listening when I explained what a toss up state was. You libs just don't pay attention. Tisk, tisk, tisk.

Yawn. You're working really hard to skew reality. We'll see I guess.

The margin of error is irrelevant when you have 10 polls all giving the same answer. You seem to like math, I wouldn't think this obvious point would be lost on you if you were thinking straight. Emotion has clearly clouded your judgment.

By the way... I just LOVE that you think you understand polling better than RCP, Rassumussen, Gallup, Fox News, and on and on... like you have some magic formula that none of them are aware of. You know that the voices in your head aren't really real, right?

Yes the same answer TOSS UP not leaning left or right TOSS UP. But to eliminate toss ups in a map the winner even if it is only 1-3% points gets he state. If it is a tie the side that won last election gets the state.

Apparently you didn't understand that post. I'm not surprised though from someone that thinks Obama will get reelected. At least he's winning with independents. Opps, no he isn't. At least obama still has the majority of women voters in his pocket. Opps, nope, that’s now a tie. Over the last few weeks obama’s lead in ALL polls has been decreasing. And now after this Libya cover-up he is involved in He better start packing his bags. But chin up buddy, I give you credit for believing in Obamas B.S. and failed administration. You realize the voices on Current from Gores drones don't know what they are talking about, right?

The post uses polling data and past election results to express trends. Einstein.

We'll see.

I'll leave you with the words of Colin Powell. He's a decorated soldier, a patriot, and about as accomplished, experienced, knowledgeable, and credible as it gets. Oh yea, and a Republican.

about Obama:
"When he took over, the country was in very very difficult straits. We were in the one of the worst recessions we had seen in recent times, close to a depression. The fiscal system was collapsing. Wall Street was in chaos, we had 800,000 jobs lost in that first month of the Obama administration and unemployment peaked a few months later at 10 percent. So we were in real trouble. The auto industry was collapsing, the housing was start[ing] to collapse and we were in very difficult straits. And I saw over the next several years, stabilization come back in the financial community, housing is now starting to pick up after four years, it's starting to pick up. Consumer confidence is rising. Generally we've come out of the dive and we're starting to gain altitude. The unemployment rate is too high, people are still hurting in housing but I see that we're starting to rise up… the president got us out of one war, starting to get us out of a second war and did not get us into any new wars. And finally I think that the actions he has taken with respect to protecting us from terrorism have been very very solid. And so, I think we ought to keep on the track that we are on."

about Romney:
"The governor who was saying things at the debate on Monday night ... was saying things that were quite different from what he said earlier. I'm not quite sure which Gov. Romney we would be getting with respect to foreign policy. One day he has a certain strong view about staying in Afghanistan but then on Monday night he agrees with the withdrawal, same thing in Iraq. On almost every issue that was discussed on Monday night, Governor Romney agreed with the President with some nuances. But this is quite a different set of foreign policy views than he had earlier in the campaign. And my concern ... is that sometimes I don't sense that he has thought through these issues as thoroughly as he should have.

As I listen to what his proposals are especially with respect to dealing with our most significant issue, the economy, it's essentially let's cut taxes and compensate for that with other things but that compensation does not cover all of the cuts intended or the new expenses associated with defense."

about the state of the GOP:
"I think I'm a Republican of a more moderate mold. That's something of a dying breed I'm sorry to say."

He is very accomplished. One of his accomplishments was getting the us into this war in Iraq. He made a speach in front of the UN accusing Iraq of having WMD's. So he IS in the same boat as Bush. The massive debt the US has accumilated from the recent wars is his fault to. He does know what he is talking about when it comes to foreign policy but as far as how to create jobs and fix the economy, not so much. I wonder what Powell thinks about how Obama handled the libya attack? Or what he think about the tax hikes obamacare is going to cause or the tax hikes on the people that make $250,000 or more(which is going to kill job creation).
Lets look at obamas other accomplishments
Increased America’s debt by 35%. Increased unemployment by 18%. Violated the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution by exerting federal government over state’s rights. Largest increase in federal government in history. Created a national health care system, modeled after the failing systems in Canada and Great Britain, and which creates nearly 100 new government agencies and programs. Made the federal government the monopoly agency for student loans.Made the federal government co-owner of various industries. Alienated one of the US closest allies –Israel. Refuse to defend US borders against illegal aliens. Violated the US Constitution by requiring every American to purchase health insurance. Openly embrace Muslims who have vowed to destroy America while at the same time pushing to remove more Christian rights from Americans. Established more socialist policies than any President in history. Removed more citizen’s rights than any President in history. Striving to make 15 million illegal aliens US citizens in time to vote in 2012.

Too bad the majority of america doen't care what Powell thinks.

Oh really? Tell me more.

Are you really staff of current? If you are, the new owners are more than likely gonna change the dirrection of the station. Read this little bit of info
Founded in 2005 by Al Gore, Current TV quickly made a name for itself as a go-to source for environmental incoherence, Democrat lunacy, and far-left diatribes. If providing an outlet for liberal kooks was the goal, it succeeded admirably. However, if it was trying to attract viewers, well, it's had some difficulty. Now, it's up for sale.
CEO Joel Hyatt recently told the New York Post that “Current has been approached many times by media companies interested in acquiring our company. This year alone, we have had three inquiries. As a consequence, we thought it might be useful to engage expertise to help us evaluate our strategic options.”
That's big-time TV exec speak that roughly translates as "We're getting ready to dump this turkey."
The network began its life by focusing on young, high school and college age, liberals. Predictably, its early crusade against global warming failed to attract eyeballs, so it began to reinvent itself as a standard, left-wing, talking head channel - packed with a host of zany pundits that even MSNBC had rejected.
Chief among these was Keith Olbermann who, after being fired from MSNBC due to his horrible personality, took his show "Countdown" to Current in 2011. There, he experienced the same kind of ego-driven controversies that have plagued him at every network in his career. The acquisition of Countdown was supposed to save the struggling net but, a few months after he started, Olbermann started to implode. He began insulting his bosses, famously referring to the station as "amateur hour," and was fired seven months ago.
Since then, Current has played host to a wide range of progressive nut jobs, with its most notable shows including such outstanding fare as “Joy Behar: Say Anything!,” “Viewpoint with Eliot Spitzer,” and of course, "The War Room with Jennifer Granholm."
All of these programs boast ratings which are regularly dwarfed by those earned by Dukes of Hazzard reruns.
Current reaches approximately 60 million homes, earning 12 cents a month per cable subscriber, or a little more than $80 million a year. It generates a measly $16 million a year in advertising revenue.

Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

When around ten credible news outlets are reporting the same story, its safe to say its true.

One Murdoch rag (NY Post) reports it, everyone else repeats it. One distorted lie in an echo chamber means nothing.