InfoWars | July 04, 2011 | 33 comments

The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore

source: http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-elite-are-not-even-trying-to-hide-how-much-the...

Revelation1217
In the United States today, it is becoming increasingly fashionable to openly trash the U.S. Constitution. Many among the elite are not even trying to hide how much they hate the U.S. Constitution anymore. As the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement call for a return to the principles that this nation was founded upon, many among the elite and in the mainstream media are responding by publicly dumping on the U.S. Constitution. The level of vitriol that we are seeing for our founding fathers and for our Constitution is unprecedented.
  1. groups:
    InfoWars
  2. tags:
    News,  Politics,  tea party,  Ron Paul,  5 more
  3.     
    |

33 comments // The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore // Video

  • trut
  • Gravity_Man
    • 0
      Gravity_Man  

    • THAT'S IT!!! THE ANSWER WE'VE BEEN SEEKING!!! WE TOO CAN BE ONE OF THE ELITE => BY JUST STARTING TO HATE THE CONSTITUTION!!!

      HAHA HOW SIMPLE CAN SIMPLE GET?!?!

    • 11 months ago
  • KB723
  • Vic_Romano
  • savvy7
    • +3
      savvy7  

    • I'd like to suggest the T-baggers really return to the past by giving up i- phones, pods,pads and other i-doodads. Throw out the PCs, fax machines, TV sets, land line phones, daily newspaper and the radio. Grow your own food. Weave your own cloth and make your own clothes.Make your own shampoo and tooth paste. Drive your horse and buggies on your tax-free dirt roads and dig a compost pit for your garbage. Learn which plants cure and which kill. Good luck with melanomas. Buy leeches. Learn to cut your own hair and pull your own teeth. Put your guns to good use by actually eating something you hunted (if you can still find any game). And if a wild fire or hurricane should destroy your home and wipe out your family, DON'T, under ANY circumstances look for Federal assistance in any form, or any sympathy from the "elites" for that matter.

    • 11 months ago
  • EmileZ
    • +2
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • savvy7:

      I don't think Alex Jones is a Tea Party person. Actually he is definately not a Tea Party person. He has been around much longer, and has an entirely different point of view (though there may be some convergence). I, myself am neither an Alex Jones, or a Tea Party person so please don't be angry with me for pointing this out.

    • 11 months ago
  • timelord999
  • nobsartist
  • EmileZ
    • +3
      EmileZ [removed]  

    • I really wish I could get behind this guy. He is so right about so many things, unfortunately he is dead wrong about so many others... like global warming... and he doesn't appear to have spent much time contemplating morality (or compassion, much less ecology) and how it fits into this great big mess. I am no saint, but I just sense that there is something lacking in that department. OK I will be frank, I suspect he may be working for the CIA.

      In the "morning", when I am fixing coffee and I don't feel like singing, at times I like to imitate his gruff voice (for the benefit of my dearly beloved kitty). Is it wrong of me to do so??? My cat doesn't seem to mind, but he (bless his dear sweet cute cuddly heart) is usually fixated on food. Just thought I would share.

    • 11 months ago
  • marnierice
    • +1
      marnierice  
    • Image

    • Alex Jones has a website called PrisonNation.com. He is a "9/11 Truther", and believes in the "FEMA concentration camps". Is there anything more to be said.

    • 11 months ago
  • venne
  • rodstradamus
  • marnierice
    • 0
      marnierice  
    • rodstradamus:

      I have been to the web site and even read Jesse Ventura's book. I agree that something is wrong with the official stories of a lot of events. I think a lot of it may be something more simple like incompetants covering each other after the fact. A lot of making sure that no one ever gets punished for doing the wrong things like at Ruby Ridge or Waco. But I cannot cross the line into evil conspiracy. At least not yet. As for "manning up," . . . difficult since I am a girl.

      My son agrees with you that 9/11 was not the attack it was represented to be. And, he isn't a nut - he's a fireman and thinks the fire was an improbable (maybe impossible) event. I hate to think that could be a possibility. Maybe that is neing a coward. Maybe it was Dick Chaney getting us into a war in Iraq and Afganistan to help Haliburtan and Blackwater. That is such a depressing thought.

      What is even worse is that so many of our citizens think that other citizens would participate in such things as presidential assasinations and blowing up buildings full of people. Talk about loosing faith in the government.

    • 11 months ago
  • Nick19
    • +2
      Nick19  

    • Alex Jones is no different in his own fear mongering and absurd claims. Nothing should be taken seriously from a man who is devoted to setting up constant lies. Going from suggestions that a movie will cause race war to absurd ideas that the USA is introducing chemicals to make men gay. He even made recent predictions that WW3 is going to happen as well as having almost pro-Gaddafi tendencies which is rather ironic since he's so concern about the preservation of democracy.

    • 11 months ago
  • EmileZ
  • dugdog47
    • 0
      dugdog47  

    • “I hope that we shall crush in its birth the
      aristocracy of our monied corporations,
      which dare already to challenge our
      government to a trial of strength, and bid
      defiance to the laws of our country.”

    • 11 months ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +3
      UtopianSky  

    • You say:
      "the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement call for a return to the principles that this nation was founded upon"

      Now THAT is funny.
      Not funny ha-ha, but funny nuts.
      Actually, that makes it funny sad.

      The "Patriot movement" and the "Tea Party" fight AGAINST the principles this country was founded on, and instead fight for Corporations and theocracy at the bequest of the masters who brainwash them.

      The vitriol that we are seeing for our founding fathers and for our Constitution comes from those who wish to deny others equal rights, or who wish to treat Corporations as equal to humans.

    • 11 months ago
  • venne
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
    • +6
      BrushwithDeathToothpaste  

    • If being an elitist means I'm not the dumbest fuck in the room, then yeah, I'm an elitist Alex. Both documents are brilliant but not flawless. To solidly cling on to documents drafted two hundred years ago and claim that they are perfect for eternity shows a lack of social reality.

    • 11 months ago
  • Earl_Dixon
    • +1
      Earl_Dixon  
    • BrushwithDeathToothpaste:

      Agreed If I may propose an idea, when are we going to pass a bill to update the constitution? This document clearly needs a revision, how can a country continue to govern it’s self with a document that is maybe 80% un-applicable in 2011. Not trying to be an Azzhole, but come on guys, how is this any different from following the Teachings of the Bible? Not digging against the Bible because I understand that is has been rewritten countless times, however the constitution is in immediate need of updating, can we at least get it up dates to apply to the 1990’s, My .02

    • 11 months ago
  • TheChameleon
    • +2
      TheChameleon  
    • Earl_Dixon:

      You may know this but just in case you aren't aware there is a proceedure for re-writing the constitution which is for the states to call a constitutional convention. I believe It has to be initiated by the States themselves and if i'm not mistaken it takes 2/3 of the states being if favor of calling the convention to make it happen. And then the citizenry of at least 3/4 of the states have to approve of it's final draft on a majority vote in order to replace the old one. I think that's pretty close.

    • 11 months ago
  • Earl_Dixon
  • pissedoffinarkansas
    • -1
      pissedoffinarkansas  
    • TheChameleon:

      There are people out there who believe that well more than 2/3 of the states have requested a constitutional convention. Congress keeps ignoring this fact on technicalities,such as, all convention requests must come in a timely manner. Not true, there is no time limit expressed for this option. The other argument is that there is no written plan for a constitutional convention but I'm pretty sure the founders didn't have a written plan for THEIR convention but they got it done. Just more bullshit to keep the real will of the people from being heard.

    • 11 months ago
  • TheChameleon
    • 0
      TheChameleon  
    • pissedoffinarkansas:

      I doubt that seriously. Now it may be that 34 states have at one time or another requested to do so but i've never heard of anywhere near that many states having done so at the same time. I have a feeling that if they had and were refused that the Supreme Court would have taken up the states cause. Fact is im not even sure congressional approval would be necessary. It's somewhat different than the amendment process. Been a while since I read about it so i'll see what i can find about the full proceedure.

    • 11 months ago
  • TheChameleon
    • 0
      TheChameleon  
    • pissedoffinarkansas:

      Here is a link that both cites the constitutions reference to a constitutional convention and offeres it's interpretations of it's intent. What I got from reading it again is that the congress cannot call such a convention. They can only offer ammendments to the existing constitution. It appears to me that only the combined 2/3 legislatures of the states having already ageed to any number of amenements can then call a convention. I also read it as the fact that the congress itself cannot call such a convention nor could it participate in such excercise... the states representitives including inviteees from all 50 states would run the convention just as the original states did in drafting the original constitution. And even upon agreement of the convention on any new deletions or additions to the constitutions it shall not become law until such time as 3/4 of the states on a majority vote of the populace have agreed to the changes. Not an easy hurdle to clear. But it was done once in 1776 to overturn the Articles of Confederation.

      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_could_a_new_constitutional_convention_be_called_in...

    • 11 months ago
  • TheChameleon
    • +1
      TheChameleon  

    • An elitist to a tea-bagger is anyone who reads... Except for the readers who tell them how The Lord wants them to vote by reading it from the good book of course. ;-)

    • 11 months ago
  • sharin
    • +3
      sharin  

    • 12. Disparaging Education. There is an emerging and disturbing lack of reverence for education and intellectualism in many mainstream media discourses. In fact, in some circles (e.g. Fox), higher education is often disparaged as elitist. Having a university credential is perceived by these folks as not a sign of credibility, but of a lack of it. In fact, among some commentators, evidence of intellectual prowess is treated snidely and as anti-American. The disdain for education and other evidence of being trained in critical thinking are direct threats to a hive-mind mentality, which is why they are so viscerally demeaned.

    • 11 months ago
  • sharin
    • +3
      sharin  

    • reason #9 from The 14 Propoganda Techniques Fox "News" Uses to Brainwash Americans:
      9. Populism. This is especially popular in election years. The speakers identifies themselves as one of "the people" and the target of their ire as an enemy of the people. The opponent is always "elitist" or a "bureaucrat" or a "government insider" or some other category that is not the people. The idea is to make the opponent harder to relate to and harder to empathize with. It often goes hand in hand with scapegoating. A common logical fallacy with populism bias when used by the right is that accused "elitists" are almost always liberals - a category of political actors who, by definition, advocate for non-elite groups.

    • 11 months ago
  • kayopunk
  • meesh76
    • +1
      meesh76  

    • I don't believe the elite hate the constitution. I do believe that what we are seeing is an increase of people using the constitution in ways to justify wrong doings and evil intentions. Just as many do with the various religious books. The problem is most people don't even know or understand the document, love to make reference to it, and further, insist on making false interpretations of the amendments. The tea baggers want to keep the constitution of 1787, and apply those principles to today. We need to realize the constitution is a living document. It changes with our times. Even the founding fathers recognized this, and I believe they would be livid over how their masterful groundwork is becoming a foundation for pure ignorance.

    • 11 months ago
  • Simone_Castillo
    • +1
      Simone_Castillo  
    • meesh76:

      You are exactly right. They have probably heard someone say something about their "constitutional rights" and use the phrase to make their own case having little or no understanding o what the clause in which the quote even means. That is if they can even quote a clause.

    • 11 months ago
  • figgdimension
  • wynnmeg61
    • +1
      wynnmeg61  

    • oops, shame on me I should get all the way through a post before i state an opinion. Shame, shame on me. I do in fact agree very much with you.

    • 11 months ago
more from InfoWars:
from the community

top videos