Should unhappy Catholics leave the Church? Joy Behar and guests debate

Father Edward Beck, author of “Soul Provider: Spiritual Steps to Limitless Love,” Sister Maureen Fiedler, host of “Interfaith Voices,” and Jeff Field, communications director of the Catholic League, sit down with Current TV host Joy Behar to debate the rationale of New York Times columnist Bill Keller’s op-ed supporting Catholic League president Bill Donohue’s proposition for how to “resolve the crisis in Catholicism.”

“If all you’re trying to do is to undermine from within what the Church has taught for 2,000 years, if you’re trying to change things that the Church has taught for 2,000 years, what’s the point?” asks Field. “If you’re not happy, then why not leave?”

Watch "Joy Behar: One Week Only *Until the Fall" weeknights at 8 ET / 5 PT, starting Monday, June 18, on Current TV. For more information, visit current.com/joy.

  1. groups:
    Joy Behar: One Week Only
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

5 comments // Should unhappy Catholics leave the Church? Joy Behar and guests debate

  • BrJeff_Wolfe
  • whatiscurrent
    • 0
      whatiscurrent  
    • I don't agree with Keller. Why use the word "undermine" when it comes to people trying to transform the Catholic church in positive directions. Why not "reform." Why not "evolve" Why not help and change from within...

    • 11 months ago
  • SoCal_Rob
    • 0
      SoCal_Rob  
    • i can only speak for myself... i'm a person who left regular church services due to subject and topics like weither women should have a leadership roll or weither my gay freinds are sinners for who they love....and i understand thats not everybody in the church but i rather not be part of a church who excludes people because a decision was made by men many hundreds of years ago.... But i would go back if they were more willing to change

    • 11 months ago
  • Obama_Convert
    • 0
      Obama_Convert  
    • Joy, it isn't cold to say 'leave if you don't like it.' Give the church at least one break. It's a fair, reasonable, market-driven view, which allows Americans to choose which imaginary ghost to worship, or in my case, to decide that it's all rubbish.

      Tell me: when was compulsory belief ever true belief in any sense of the word? By definition, it cannot be. Bravo to anyone who recognizes this, whether friend or foe.

      Previously when the church held sway, if you wanted to leave, or were even falsely accused of heresy of any sort, you'd be tied to a chair and roasted alive. This is not the stuff of movies; it happened to lots, and lots, of people.

      In this regard at least, give me cold over hot any day!! Who needs those old geezers running around in impressive buildings, pointy hats, and long dresses to tell anyone what to do, especially on the subject of sex?

      As for the Sister's remarks: The church is not a fossil ONLY by dint of the emergence of the western democracies, laws which consider people to be equal irrespective of faith, and free press. Without these, for example, Galileo still wouldn't have received his apology. The blood libel would still be official doctrine, and there would be no apology, ever, for helping Nazi officers escape to South America. The church spreads no end of disinformation, and capitulates only occasionally when at the brink of total public humiliation, or loss of more members (whichever will cost them more).

    • 11 months ago
  • Quentin_Rinker
    • 0
      Quentin_Rinker  
    • Im a gay liberal Catholic, and choose to stay worshipping the Lord through the values taught to me by my parents and my Vatican II reformed Roman Catholic Church. I'm not going anywhere, nor are some 50,000 Catholic nuns. This small contentious group called The Catholic League gets way too much attention!

    • 11 months ago
ctv
  • ctv
  • added this

top videos