Ron Paul comments on the Housing Bill or "The Mother Of All Bailouts"
source: http://www.house.gov/paul/
-
-
- Hawkmang
- added this
The following is excerpted from Congressman Paul's Statement on H.R. 3221:
"Madam Speaker, For several years, followers of the Austrian school of economics have warned that unless Congress moved to end the implicit government guarantee of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and took other steps to disengage the US Government from the housing market, America would face a crisis in housing. This crisis would force Congress to chose between authorizing a taxpayer bailout of Fannie and Freddie, and other measures increasing government’s involvement in housing, or restoring a free-market in housing by ending government support for Fannie and Freddie and repealing all laws that interfere in housing. The bursting of the housing bubble, and the recent near-collapse in investor support for Fannie and Freddie has proven my fellow Austrians correct. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, instead of ending the prior interventions in the housing market that are responsible for the current crisis, Congress is increasing the level of government intervention in the housing market. This is the equivalent of giving a drug addict another fix, which will only make the necessary withdrawal more painful.
The provision giving the Treasury Secretary a blank check to purchase Fannie and Freddie stock not only makes the implicit government guarantee of Fannie and Freddie explicit, it represents another unconstitutional delegation of Congress’ Constitutional authority to control the allocation of taxpayer dollars. While the Treasury Secretary has to file a report with Congress, the lack of any effective standards for the expenditure of funds makes it impossible for Congress to perform effective oversight on Treasury’s expenditures.
HR 3221 also takes another troubling step toward the creation of surveillance state by creating a Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry. This federal database will contain personal information about anyone wishing to work as a “loan originator.” “Loan originator" is defined broadly as anyone who "takes a residential loan application; and offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan for compensation or gain." According to some analysts, this definition is so broad as to cover part-time clerks and real estate agents who receive even minimal compensation from "originators." Additionally, this database forced on industry will be funded by fees paid to the federal banking agencies, yet another costly burden to the American taxpayers.
Among the information that will be collected from loan originators for inclusion in the federal database are fingerprints. Madam Speaker, giving the federal government the power to force Americans who wish to work in real estate to submit their fingerprints to a federal database opens the door to numerous abuses of privacy and civil liberties and establishes a dangerous precedent. Fingerprint databases and background checks have been no deterrent to espionage and fraud among governmental agencies, and will likewise fail to prevent fraud in the real estate market. I am amazed to see some members who are usually outspoken advocates of civil liberties and defenders of the Fourth Amendment support this new threat to privacy."
(End of excerpt)
Full transcript of Congressman Paul's Statement
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2008/cr072408h.htm
For more information on H.R. 3221 please visit THOMAS (The Library of Congress)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03221:
-
-
Anum
-
just be careful of signing contracts if you are a buyer/seller, my brother almost lost $5000 reserving a house, the contract he signed had a clause that if he didn't show proof of insurance and a cashiers check with the down payment by a specific date and time the "reserving money" wouldn't be re funded, nice job of the Realtor for keeping it to the last minute. As long as you can use a lawyer you can trust and deal with the owner's lawyer you'll save even more than with geico :D.
- 3 years ago
-
Anum
-
-
Robroy1
-
Another giveaway of money to big business and nothing to help the consumers unless you have a high intrest rate on your mortgage to bebin with. Then you need to meet so requirements that really narrow it down to a very few. I guess it is better than spending the money on war or guns but I wish it would do more to help the homeowner who needs it rather than line the pockets of the top few rich people. This Bill is really an insult to anyone who knows how to read between the lines and talk with any large mortgage department at many banks. The banks are on a voluntary babsis and do not have to honor this bill unless they want to and if they do it may cost them some money, so you know what your chances are. Getting a bank to help you save money while it may cost the some is impossible, I think we are all aware of that. It's a farce.
- 3 years ago
-
Robroy1
-
-
GavinTheMother
-
Why isn't Ron Paul a presidential candidate? He is by far the best option for the average US citizen. Oh yeah I forgot, Republicans only pretend to be conservative.
- 3 years ago
-
GavinTheMother
-
-
Ricky84
-
This bill has me so mad right now it’s not even funny. I’m definitely recommending this story to all of my connections. Thanks for the link Hawk.
- 3 years ago
-
Ricky84
-
-
Hawkmang
-
-
C-SPAN coverage of Paul addressing the House on this bill.
- 3 years ago
-
Hawkmang
-
-
shadowtrekker
-
Hawkmang:
I want to bash my hands into the ground, quit everything and start something new, something loud and brash! why does this go on, why do we let those who we chose to lead us get away with this? Everyone needs to tells everyone, don't be afraid of who you might offend, tell the truth, share the truth. When all of this comes crashing down they will wish they knew, cared, and acted. If you know then act, share the truth, but by all means please educate yourself first.
- 3 years ago
-
shadowtrekker
-
-
shadowtrekker
-
Everyone should hear the truth
- 3 years ago
-
shadowtrekker