Commentary: Roe v. Wade turns 37
Lily Bixler is our new intern at Current News. She'll be blogging on the News Blog regularly.
Thirty-seven years ago the Supreme Court established a woman’s right to abortion. Over the years, the right has worked its way into the fabric of our society--so much that we tend to take it for granted. When this time of year rolls around we're supposed to commemorate the efforts of all the second wave feminists who worked their tails off for the ability to plan when and how to have our families. However, we often forget to challenge our government's slow infringement upon this constitutional right. But, wait, don't all look at once: they might catch on that we know. The fact is we're far from crossing this one off our collective “to-do” list. Eighty-seven percent of U.S. counties have no abortion provider, according to NARAL Pro-choice, the reproductive rights advocacy group. What does it all boil down to? This basic human right is under attack on many fronts.
In the courts: Yesterday the trial began for a pro-life fanatic from Kansas City, Mo. named Scott Roeder for the premeditated, first-degree murder of Wichita physician Dr. George Tiller. Roeder told The Associated Press in November that he was driven by religious zeal to shoot Tiller in order to protect unborn children. For 33 years Dr. Tiller defended women's constitutional right to access safe abortion care. "Abortion is about women's hopes and dreams,” he said. “Abortion is a matter of survival for women."
In Congress: After four months of debate around health care reform, its still unclear if our leadership can stand up against Catholic Bishops and Congressman Bart Stupak whose efforts in health care legislation have worked to chip away at abortion rights. The Stupak-Pitts Amendment, as it's called, prohibits federal funds "to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion."
Where does the president stand? The last few presidents have used the anniversary of Roe v. Wade to make a statement about their stance on abortion rights by flip-flopping America’s policy on the global gag rule. The “gag rule” denies American funding for HIV/AIDS clinics, birth-control providers and other organizations that council about abortion to countries that even mention abortion to women with unplanned pregnancies. This policy has become a political punching bag for incoming presidents. But last year, Obama broke the cycle and reversed the order several days after Roe v. Wade anniversary in an attempt to disrupt the political bantering.
Abortion protesters continue to rouse their dissent. This weekend March for Life activists marched the National Mall, the Supreme Court and Capitol Hill to promote anti-abortion legislative action. The pro-life advocacy group thinks the "life of each human being shall be preserved and protected from that human being's biological beginning," according to the organization’s Web site.
In the shadow of this year’s anniversary is the death of a leader of the reproductive rights movement. On Thursday, Ruth Proskkauer Smith died at 102 years old. Smith advocated for women’s access to birth control in the 1940s, and in the late 1960s she co-founded NARAL pro-choice, a reproductive rights organization that helped shape the kind of culture that led to the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. It's easy to brush off abortion as a fixture among our reproductive options, because most of us don't remember a time when things were any different, but our political climate constantly drops little reminders that this right is as delicate as ever.
Recently on the Current News Blog:
- The world's first suicide bomber comedy
- Hillary creates China kerfuffle over internet freedom speech
- How people are helping Haiti
- Supreme Court opens doors to corporate money
- China to start watching texts
Thirty-seven years ago the Supreme Court established a woman’s right to abortion. Over the years, the right has worked its way into the fabric of our society--so much that we tend to take it for granted. When this time of year rolls around we're supposed to commemorate the efforts of all the second wave feminists who worked their tails off for the ability to plan when and how to have our families. However, we often forget to challenge our government's slow infringement upon this constitutional right. But, wait, don't all look at once: they might catch on that we know. The fact is we're far from crossing this one off our collective “to-do” list. Eighty-seven percent of U.S. counties have no abortion provider, according to NARAL Pro-choice, the reproductive rights advocacy group. What does it all boil down to? This basic human right is under attack on many fronts.
In the courts: Yesterday the trial began for a pro-life fanatic from Kansas City, Mo. named Scott Roeder for the premeditated, first-degree murder of Wichita physician Dr. George Tiller. Roeder told The Associated Press in November that he was driven by religious zeal to shoot Tiller in order to protect unborn children. For 33 years Dr. Tiller defended women's constitutional right to access safe abortion care. "Abortion is about women's hopes and dreams,” he said. “Abortion is a matter of survival for women."
In Congress: After four months of debate around health care reform, its still unclear if our leadership can stand up against Catholic Bishops and Congressman Bart Stupak whose efforts in health care legislation have worked to chip away at abortion rights. The Stupak-Pitts Amendment, as it's called, prohibits federal funds "to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion."
Where does the president stand? The last few presidents have used the anniversary of Roe v. Wade to make a statement about their stance on abortion rights by flip-flopping America’s policy on the global gag rule. The “gag rule” denies American funding for HIV/AIDS clinics, birth-control providers and other organizations that council about abortion to countries that even mention abortion to women with unplanned pregnancies. This policy has become a political punching bag for incoming presidents. But last year, Obama broke the cycle and reversed the order several days after Roe v. Wade anniversary in an attempt to disrupt the political bantering.
Abortion protesters continue to rouse their dissent. This weekend March for Life activists marched the National Mall, the Supreme Court and Capitol Hill to promote anti-abortion legislative action. The pro-life advocacy group thinks the "life of each human being shall be preserved and protected from that human being's biological beginning," according to the organization’s Web site.
In the shadow of this year’s anniversary is the death of a leader of the reproductive rights movement. On Thursday, Ruth Proskkauer Smith died at 102 years old. Smith advocated for women’s access to birth control in the 1940s, and in the late 1960s she co-founded NARAL pro-choice, a reproductive rights organization that helped shape the kind of culture that led to the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. It's easy to brush off abortion as a fixture among our reproductive options, because most of us don't remember a time when things were any different, but our political climate constantly drops little reminders that this right is as delicate as ever.
Recently on the Current News Blog:
- The world's first suicide bomber comedy
- Hillary creates China kerfuffle over internet freedom speech
- How people are helping Haiti
- Supreme Court opens doors to corporate money
- China to start watching texts
