Commentary: Gun control is not a political issue
By Victor Balta / current.com / @VictorBalta
Why? How did this happen?
Those are the first words anyone asks when confronted with a tragedy such as the shooting at a late-night screening of "The Dark Knight Rises" in Aurora, Colo., that left 12 people dead and at least 50 others wounded.
And when the perpetrator's weapon of choice is a gun, one obvious conclusion is: What if he didn't have that gun?
Current.com asked that simple, basic, moral question this morning, and although there have been several articulate responses — including from those who oppose gun control — reactionary gun advocates have been quick to jump on accusations that we have politicized the issue.
Here's Al Gore's mostly unwatched TV network @current making political hay off the Colorado murders: twitter.com/#!/current/sta…
— Joshua Treviño (@jstrevino) July 20, 2012
Treviño, who lists vice president of communications at the Texas Public Policy Foundation as his position in his Twitter bio, would do well to learn the difference between policy and politics. There is one.
The question of whether such a tragedy will reopen the gun-control debate ought to be assumed, and it's certainly not political. Gun advocates like Treviño make it political by jumping to the defense of guns in response to such a tragedy and vilifying anyone discussing gun control.
Another user's partially profane tweet accused us of not even waiting "until the bodies are cold before turning it into a political issue."
The fact is that it's never too soon.
Today's tragedy is not an opportunity for gun-control advocates. There's no joy in witnessing yet another dozen innocent victims lose their lives as a result of gun violence. No one is sitting around hoping more people will be killed so that the case can be made to take your guns away.
The question isn't coming up too soon, it's coming up too late — again.
It's coming too late to save the two students who were killed in February at Chardon High School in Ohio.
It's coming too late for the six who died in January 2011 at Rep. Gabby Giffords' constituent meeting at a Safeway shopping center near Tucson, Ariz.
It's coming too late for the 32 people killed by a gunman at Virginia Tech University in 2007.
It's coming too late for the five schoolgirls killed in rural Pennsylvania in 2006.
The long, sad list unfortunately goes on.
It's coming far too late for the 12 students and a teacher who were killed at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colo., in 1999 — less than 20 miles from last night's shooting in Aurora.
This isn't political. There is no personal or political gain for anyone advocating gun control. It's about human lives.
There is no celebration over the fact that this is another chance to talk about gun control. It's just another unfortunate reminder that the conversation is coming too late and likely still won't come as a result of this terrifying event in Aurora, Colo.
It's just another chance to ask everyone to put down their guns, put down their talking points and put down their guards — and have a civilized debate about what really matters.
(Photo: Getty Images)
-
- groups:
- news blog
-
-
Miserable_Matt
-
http://www.weapons4sale.com/top-10-dumbest-pro-gun-rights-sayings/
The entire NRA driven, Anti Gun Control arguments are made by bumper stickers, internet placards, glib one liners, stupid analogies (which arent valid analogies) designed to appeal to the less educated who normally vote against their own self interests.
- 9 months ago
-
Miserable_Matt
-
-
rebel999
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
rebel999
-
-
Bill_Said_It
-
rebel999:
Just one thing to remember when you vote in November - Anybody except Obama
Yes call me a racist - I'm for the American race. No citizen should have a hyphen in front of American. Your doctor is the only person that needs to know what nationality you are for medical reasons. An American owe's No Allegiance to another country. immegrants signed an oath of allegiance when they became citizens. It's automatic if you were born in the USA. There isn't any "Dual Citizenship American" yet Obama claims he is. That is yet another lie and something else to have sealed from public view.
Your asking a gun sportsman to use one gun on all targets - Now go tell a fisherman to use only one or two kinds of tools to catch fish.
- 10 months ago
-
Bill_Said_It
-
-
rebel999
-
Bill_Said_It:
What's with you right wing nuts! Can't we have an intelligent discussion about ANYTHING! I said hunters can have the ability to BUY four more guns. How many different kinds of guns does a hunter need!? I said EVERYONE can keep the guns they already HAVE! I'm sure you hunters and gun nuts ALREADY have a LOT of guns already. However sadly this conversation is going nowhere because the so called politicians in Washington are refusing to even address this issue which shows how useless our government is when it comes to solving our problems. The only question we got is who is going to be shot next!?
- 10 months ago
-
rebel999
-
-
SandMouse
-
-
rebel999:
I'll tell you who is going to be shot next: the next person to threaten someones life. The police aren't always there to defend us. It is our duty, as individuals to stand up for ourselves. See here for an example of why people conceal carry firearms:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZNC2VwyaPU
As for hunting, I don't think you are understanding what is being said. Unlike fishers, who can use whatever rod and bait they want, hunters are extremely limited by what they are permitted to use to hunt. You can't just pick a rifle or a shotgun, or whatever you want. You have to buy a single tag for each animal you are going to hunt, and you have to take everything you kill. You are only allowed to take a firearm that uses an exact action (such as pump action, semi-automatic, bolt action, lever action, etc.) and you are only permitted to to hunt on the few days listed on your license, something that you have to pay for separately from the tags, and that does not carry over to the next hunting season. Hunters that live near where I live in the united states live at a much lower income level than a lot of other places in the United States, such as some parts of California, or New York. It is their duty to feed their families, so they hunt. They own so many firearms, because they are so limited with what they are permitted to legally hunt with.
- 10 months ago
-
SandMouse
-
-
oldf4rt
-
From http://www.commonsensereview.com/
I have a few questions about what “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” means for us right now, today.
How, today, does the Second Amendment serve the purposes of the Constitution as stated in the “Preamble”?
In what way does “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” contribute right now to the formation of “a more perfect Union”?
How does “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” contribute to the establishment of “Justice” right now, today?
How does “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” “insure domestic Tranquility” here and now?
How does “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” help “provide for the common defence” in our everyday lives today?
What “Blessings of Liberty” do the Second Amendment secure “to ourselves” today and to “our Posterity” tomorrow?
Today, here and now, how well does the Second Amendment serve its own stated purpose? Is “a well regulated militia…necessary to the security of a free State” today, now that federal, state, and local governments have established armed units that did not exist in the 1790s?
Those “Arms” they were talking about when the nation ratified the Second Amendment – how many rounds per second did they fire?
Is it okay that the USA’s per capita firearm homicide rate is lower than Brazil’s, Columbia’s, and Mexico’s, and higher everyone else’s?
Should we continue to accept Luby’s massacre (1991), Columbine (1999), Virginia Tech (2007), Tuscon (2011), Aurora (2012), and so on, as the necessary cost of the right to bear Arms?
What has the Second Amendment done for us lately? - 10 months ago
-
oldf4rt
-
-
Bill_Said_It
-
oldf4rt:
Right Now your freedom is being taken away from you by a socialist POTUS
Right Now your Government is forcing you to buy medical insurance. Next - The Government can force a tax on you for buying a gasoline powered vechicle for not buying an electric one. - The door is open don't let the horses out. - 10 months ago
-
Bill_Said_It
-
-
Pat_Riot
-
"Why? How did this happen?"
Let me tell you how it happened.
Someone in the Aurora City Council decided that it would be a good idea to ban guns. Then, someone in the Theater decided it would be a good idea to ban guns. so they put a sign up that said, "No Concealed Weapons," and all of the people that obey the law left their guns at home.
Then a half crazed and mostly stupid man went to the theater, saw the sign, and said, "The people I want to shoot will be unarmed in here, Gun Control works!"
So, the lights went down, the movie started, and a man left by the fire exit, got his guns, and stood down-house shooting up at the audience.
So imagine this. You see the door open, and the man is standing in a place that is clearly visible and an easy shot for anyone with a CCW license and the proper training.
The range is not far, less than the first target at the shooting range where even novices come close to the bullseye.
The audience is in flight, and running away, and if a gun owner could wait, just a few seconds, then he can get a clear sight picture. Since there is a concrete wall behind the shooter, there is no worries about missing and hitting someone else.
The smoke is not tht much of a problem, as the theater ventillation system is designed to pull it up and out, so from less than 30 feet away, a round would easily hit the target. but he was wearing a vest, right?
A 9mm round carries 337 ft lbs of energy. That is enough energy to move an object that weighs 337 lbs one foot. He was about 2/3rds of that. If he had been hit, then it would have likely knocked him down, and many people shot with 9mm rounds report that they were knocked out for a few moments.
So the gun control crowd managed to kill and injure some more people, and you, as a holder of truth in the USA, and with the responsibility of being part of the media and telling the facts as they are, not as you would like them to be, should understand this.
The Theater had PERFECT GUN CONTROL. everyone was unarmed, everyone was sitting and having a good time, just like the Brady Bunch want. They were also very good targets.
Gun Control kills people.
I would like to see the person that pulled the trigger standing trial for murder, alongside the people who disarmed the victims and made the shooting possible... and I am petitioning the DA's in this country to do just that... prosecute the people that disarm victims.
- 10 months ago
-
Pat_Riot
-
-
brschiller
-
Pat_Riot:
You're absolutely right. It had nothing to do with just anyone being a buy an unlimited number of guns at any gun store with a background check only taking THIRTY MINUTES.
The guy was covered in armor from head to toe. No amount of guns in the hands of the other patrons would have done a damn thing.
You are stating the facts as you would like them to be to suit your own beliefs.
- 10 months ago
-
brschiller
-
-
Pat_Riot
-
brschiller:
Hi there! Thanks for replying.
Yes, you can buy a lot of guns, and if you do you will get flagged by the FBI. That i how they knew that people were buying a lot of guns during Fast and Furious. But that is not really what you're saying, is it?
No, I think what you're saying is that people have guns, and you don't like that. I wish I could say I'm sorry you feel that way, but I'm not. You get the freedom in this nation to feel any way you please. You can feel any way you want, and do anything you want, and go anywhere you want to. I'm glad of that, I really am.
I would like to ask if you could respect my rights as well. but for some reason I doubt very much you will, manners are, well, some people just lack them.
But let me address your points.
I've seen a man shoot a weapon so fast that two rounds sounded like one. Nope, not a fancy newfangled slide action killing machine, but an old western style Cowboy Action gun that was older than you, me, and two of our grandpa's combined. Well, not quite that old, but it was up there. He was able to shoot it super fast, and reload super fast. I've seen modern weapons shoot fast enough manually to rival some machine guns. Now, given that there are about 750 million guns in the USA, enough for every man, woman and child to have two, you are not going to get rid of guns, ever.
But to address your issues.
I went to the movies and saw Batman. I was armed. I was not the only one that was, and the Sheriff's deputy that saw us nodded and then went back to his conversation. I looked at the theater and came to some conclusions.
First, let me tell you about my weapon. Now don't blush, it's a nice one. It's a SCCY 9mm. It;s very light weight, conceals well under my clothing, but leaves just enough bump to let people know I'm armed. I prefer people to know I'm armed. You might understand why, you might not, but you're young, you have time.
The weapon can be drawn in about three seconds if my shirt is in the way, two if it isn't. The rounds it fires carry 337 ft lbs of energy, and that means that it has enough force in the round to move a man who weighs 337 lbs one foot backward. It is about like getting hit in the chest with a 20 lb sledgehammer hard enough to lift you off your feet and back about a foot and a half if you are 250 lbs. The vest does distribute that force outward, but many of the people who get shot with a gun in a vest will tell you, it hurts, knocks the wind out of you, and can leave some nasty bruises. In some cases, it will also knock you out due to blood displacement when the sudden force hits the person in the chest. The vest does not protect you from the effects, it just keeps you alive.
Most theaters that seat the people written about are about 50 feet wide. They have a stadium profile which lets you see clearly to the front. The shooter was at the emergency exit at the front. He was shooting upwards into the crowd, with a goofy AR-15, standing in smoke, wearing a gas mask. He was ridiculous looking, and knew it. He was also clearly visible and an easy target. To make matters even better, he was standing with his back against a concrete wall.
Ranges generally have pistol targets. The 15 meter target is a little under 40 feet away. That is the target that even amateurs can hit near the bullseye. You've never shot a gun, so you don't know, but like I said, you're young, you'll learn.
The lights were bright enough to see the shooter. There was a clear line of sight if someone were willing to wait a few seconds after the panic started. The shooter was nearly blind, was shooting a rifle he could not even aim with the mask on, and was shooting through his own smoke. He was unskilled, and the only reason he hit people at all was that there were so many of them. ONE SHOT from an audience member. Just ONE SHOT could have stopped him. the defender didn't even need to worry about what was behind the gunman, because the blocks can stop the rounds.
So I'm glad you think I have no idea what I'm talking about, but trust me, I do.
Those people died because one man decided to kill a bunch of people, and because some theater and politician thought it was a good idea to disarm a bunch of people and leave them defenseless.
Do yourself a favor. Find a gun range somewhere and put on a pro-prez shirt and go there. Oh, don't worry, you'll meet a lot of good people who will look at you a little funny, then offer to let you shoot their weapons. I've seen it happen, even made a few friends like that. Anyway, go shoot a little, talk to some real people (and keep the attitude down, we're a it upset at being made targets lately) and educate yourself. If you lived close to me, I would let you shoot my black powder Penn Long Rifle, it's GREAT! (and makes a LOT of smoke, lol)
Best of luck to you, and remember, you are responsible for yourself, no one else is.
- 10 months ago
-
Pat_Riot
-
-
SandMouse
-
brschiller:
Actually, they might have. Do you know what ballistic rating his body armor was? There is no such thing as a bullet proof vest.
- 10 months ago
-
SandMouse
-
-
brschiller
-
SandMouse:
Maybe if the whole Colorado National Guard had been in there.
- 10 months ago
-
brschiller
-
-
brschiller
-
Pat_Riot:
Honestly, I could not care less whether or you own a gun or what kind of gun you own. You are clearly an expert on guns, their arsenals, and their firing ranges. But that is not the issue. The issue is that there is something horribly with the system when a civilian can purchase that kind of military grade rifle with very little questions asked.
- 10 months ago
-
brschiller
-
-
Pat_Riot
-
brschiller:
Oh, not an expert, just shoot on occasion and have a CCW license. The license training covers a lot, and I like to study and learn.
A civilian did not purchase a military grade rifle. He had a civilian AR-15 which is a fancy plinking rifle.
Best of luck to you.
- 10 months ago
-
Pat_Riot
-
-
zieg [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
zieg [removed]
-
-
Phil_Hopson
-
zieg:
Little off topic aren't you?
- 10 months ago
-
Phil_Hopson
-
-
Bill_Said_It
-
Phil_Hopson:
this may not be a gun topic either but it could control Government. turn government back to the people using the internet and elect web moderators - let everyone use their own voice to run the country by consent of the people - Why settle for 543 voices when you can have 400 million voting on a servey with one click
- 10 months ago
-
Bill_Said_It
-
-
Phil_Hopson
-
Bill_Said_It:
I like your idea! We need to explore and implement other ways on how we are governed, especially with the technology we now possess! But good luck getting rid of the politicians receiving huge corporate $'s. They would impede every attempt to change our currently broken, antiquated, and inefficient way of governing.
- 10 months ago
-
Phil_Hopson
-
-
SecretJeff2284
-
Well I think that Guns should be outlawed, but if the GOP get their way, they will make sure to kill enough people with them to reduce the global Population by half, because in turn only few races should only survive, that is the GOP way...
- 10 months ago
-
SecretJeff2284
-
-
cgoofies
-
Gun control, if we didn't have so many laws someone in the theater would have blown that dude away. Some kid, likeing Westerns of whatever the reason might have had a pistol and stopped 12 people from dieing. People kill people not guns, this persons guns could have even be illegal. Again you see the bad guy will get guns no matter what laws we make, and again it is an issue that makes guns illegal where more good could come from lighter restrictions on carrying and buying guns. End of story.
- 10 months ago
-
cgoofies
-
-
Phil_Hopson
-
cgoofies:
Editing and proofreading is such a lost art …...
- 10 months ago
-
Phil_Hopson
-
-
oldf4rt
-
cgoofies:
"if we outlaw guns, only criminals will have guns." I've heard that ridiculous slogan for 40 years.
1. Reasonable people are not asking that guns be outlawed, just regulated and limited.
2. Yes, criminals will still have illegal guns. Does the fact that some drivers exceed the speed limit make speed laws pointless?
You are naive if you believe that the shooter was the only one in that theater with a gun.
You are even more naive if you think someone shooting back would've solved anything.
- 10 months ago
-
oldf4rt
-
-
Bill_Said_It
-
oldf4rt:
As soon as they had in hand, The nearest light pole and some rope would have served justice, Without taxpayer funds and political posturing.
- 10 months ago
-
Bill_Said_It
-
-
Bill_Said_It
-
Liberal vs. Conservative
If your a Conservative and don't like guns, you won't buy one, use one or promote its use.
IF YOUR A LIBERAL, YOU SHOUT THAT NO ONE SHOULD HAVE A GUN.
Criminals don't care about gun laws or any law that they feel is intimindating them so why would someone want to do away with not being able to have access to weapons for personal use. Common sense and a full metal jacket is a better defence than a pocket full of cell phones. Government has their ideas about crontroling cell phones too.
- 10 months ago
-
Bill_Said_It
-
-
brschiller
-
Bill_Said_It:
That is complete exaggeration and you know it. The shooting in Colorado was another example of something horribly wrong with existing gun laws, or lack thereof. There are no permit laws and no limits on the number of guns an individual can purchase. Pointing that out is nowhere to "shouting that no one should have a gun."
And by your logic, criminals are just going break the law anyway, so why even differentiating what's legal and illegal? - 10 months ago
-
brschiller
-
-
Bill_Said_It
-
brschiller:
What part of leave my guns alone do you not understand - 2 amendment - Crime = Commit a crime and be punished approprately. It's the Law not a political view.
- 10 months ago
-
Bill_Said_It
-
-
brschiller
-
Bill_Said_It:
What part of pointing out how lax Colorado's gun laws are is nowhere near the same as "shouting that no one should have a gun" do YOU not understand?
- 10 months ago
-
brschiller
-
-
SandMouse
-
brschiller:
What do you mean that there are no limits on permits? You obviously don't know about the expensive classes and lengthy background checks required to get a permit. People are arrested for carrying firearms where it is illegal.
- 10 months ago
-
SandMouse
-
-
brschiller
-
SandMouse:
Obviously, son, that is not the case in Aurora, Colorado. The background check at the store where the shooter purchased the rifle has only a thirty minute background check and no limits on how many can be purchased. Of course, there are plenty of ways to purchase a gun without a background check.
http://current.com/shows/the-young-turks/videos/how-to-buy-an-ar-15-without-a-ba...
- 10 months ago
-
brschiller
-
-
SandMouse
-
brschiller:
Ignoring the completely bigoted and moronic implications of calling me son; who is talking about buying guns? We're talking about permits, remember? You said, and I quote: "There are no permit laws" You are wrong. There are. Concealed Carry permits are expensive and time consuming to get, and the classes required to receive them teach not only where it is legally acceptable to carry, but also shooting courses to teach when and where it is safe and appropriate to shoot.
- 10 months ago
-
SandMouse
-
-
brschiller
-
SandMouse:
I meant in the municipality the shooter IN THE MOVIE THEATER bought the gun. I admit I was negligent in not making that clear, but I would think in this particular context it would be obvious I was referring to where the perp bought the gun. I am well aware there are gun permit laws, but that does not mean they are all the same.
- 10 months ago
-
brschiller
-
-
Bill_Said_It
-
The 2nd amendment was never intended to protect people from people. It was writen to protect the citizens from Government. NRA is the largest army in the world, End their army and end our freedom, the choice is yours
- 10 months ago
-
Bill_Said_It
-
-
atomiclegion
-
This quote form the show The Newsroom fits right "Why are Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and the head of the NRA so colossally lying to you? I don’t know. But I know when they do, ratings go up, political contributions go up, membership in the NRA goes up, the president’s approval rating goes down, and gun sales go through the freaking roof."
The context from that episode was focused on the Gabby Giffords shooting.
- 10 months ago
-
atomiclegion
-
-
SandMouse
-
atomiclegion:
Actually, ratings go up when someone says that guns kill people... Or when people say they don't support gay rights, but that's a completely different topic.
- 10 months ago
-
SandMouse
-
-
Ricky84
-
"It's just another chance to ask everyone to put down their guns, put down their talking points, and put down their guards, and have a civilized debate about what really matters."
If the Pope asked women to put down their contraception, close their legs and have a civilized debate about what really matters he would rightfully be called a hypocritical asshole. This is not the language of a civilized debate. It's over the top imagery. I'm pretty sure Joshua Treviño and that unnamed tweeter were waving around words and not firearms. Then again I don't really use twitter so who knows?
- 10 months ago
-
Ricky84
-
-
warman1138
-
If it isn't an issue it ought to be.
- 10 months ago
-
warman1138
-
-
Phil_Hopson
-
All you card carrying gun owners should realize the NRA doesn't care about you or your 2nd Amendment rights. The only thing that matters to them is how they can sell more guns for profit. Profits over People. Greed over Empathy.
- 10 months ago
-
Phil_Hopson
-
-
Radical_Centrist
-
Phil_Hopson:
I HONESTLY do not care why the NRA advocates for my Second Amendment rights so long as they do so!
- 10 months ago
-
Radical_Centrist
-
-
Phil_Hopson
-
Radical_Centrist:
My point is the NRA is just another corporate-fed PAC. When they decide it's more profitable to change their position, all your 2nd Amendment rights will be tossed aside just like sensible gun control.
- 10 months ago
-
Phil_Hopson
-
-
wburg
-
Phil_Hopson:
The NRA is a non-profit organization who's sole purpose is to advocate for gun rights and safety. Sure, they're sponsored by gun companies, that's just good business on both sides. They were founded a century and a half ago not to make money, but to defend our rights.
- 10 months ago
-
wburg
-
-
Phil_Hopson
-
wburg:
Was that a "cut and paste" off their web site or copied from the back of your NRA membership card? You have not been paying attention the last 20 years or so. Unfortunately, a radical fringe element has taken over - spouting their paranoia, fear, and conspiracy theories. They do not care about your "gun rights" and little about safety. The only "gun right" the NRA cares about is your right to buy as many guns as you want! If they are so concerned with safety, how come they don't support even low-tech gun locks? How come they don't support even common sense regulation? The only legislation they have proposed, passed, or allowed to expire is for the easier sale of guns - not one bit for safety or common sense. The words NRA and non-profit in the same sentence? That is comical. The NRA is smiling right now - business has been good lately ……
- 10 months ago
-
Phil_Hopson
-
-
Radical_Centrist
-
I believe in Gun Control, this is why I hit "everything" I aim at! The "only" people who are disarmed by Gun Control Legislation are the law abiding.
- 10 months ago
-
Radical_Centrist
-
-
SecretJeff2284
-
Texas and the Tea Party with Religious Right Mocking Current TV?
Very Bad Move, and how about letting the United Nations take their stance on the Gun Control issue, the GOP are the ONLY party that wants lax Gun Control Laws, it is all about "Controlling the Human Population"...
- 10 months ago
-
SecretJeff2284
-
-
SandMouse
-
SecretJeff2284:
I don't live in the United Nations, I live in the United States. I would appreciate it is foreign powers would stop trying to dictate to me how I should live my life. I don't understand what is meant by controlling the human population. How is empowering people by extending their rights controlling them? Does limiting their rights free them?
- 10 months ago
-
SandMouse
-
-
RichardFeldman
-

-
The entire gun rights/gun control debate is more complicated and more nuanced than mere sound bites or bumper stickers can encapsulate. The question we Americans need to focus on is never about the gun itself but rather "in whose hands are the guns"?
- 10 months ago
-
RichardFeldman
-
-
atomiclegion
-
Anyone saying "if only someone was packing and had shot the guy" needs to realize that it'd be next to impossible for a even trained person to do that in a dark theatre with a loud movie running, one that's full of tear gas and panicking people, with an assailant who's dressed in black and wearing body armor.
Odds are they'd have easily hit some more bystanders instead, increasing the already horrific body count.
Just having a concealed carry permit and a handgun doesn't make you into Jason Bourne/Harry Callahan/The Punisher/whatever super hero you think you could be as you bullcrap at the water cooler today.
This isn't a question of politics, this is a question of reality.
- 10 months ago
-
atomiclegion
-
-
Radical_Centrist
-
atomiclegion:
Practice does not necessarily make perfect, but it does normally make permanent. This is why I target shoot at least 8 hours a month at least 2 of those are Tactical Shooting. I am, not going to say that a "TRAINED" shooter is always going to save the day, but there are MANY times when we will.
- 10 months ago
-
Radical_Centrist
-
-
SandMouse
-
atomiclegion:
How would you know? Have you ever even fired a firearm? You should go skeet shooting. I think you are drastically underestimating the skills of trained shooters.
- 10 months ago
-
SandMouse
-
-
SandMouse
-
Radical_Centrist:
You are not the only one. I actually know people that practice six to eight hours a week. That's not unusual either.
- 10 months ago
-
SandMouse