news blog | October 24, 2012 | 1 comment

Rape 101: A GOP primer

By Jo Piazza / current.com / @jopiazza

Attacks on victims of rape have become all too commonplace this campaign season.

We have wondered whether it is a case of foot-in-mouth disease or a missing sensitivity gene in certain members of the Republican Party that leads them to make such outrageous comments about the crime of rape and consequences for a woman's body in the aftermath of that violent act. 

On Tuesday, Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock declared that he opposes aborting pregnancies conceived in rape because "it is something that God intended to happen."

For more on Mourdock's remarks and the response from both sides of the aisle, watch conservative commentator
Mark Levin tonight on Joy Behar: Say Anything! at 6E/3P.

The remark came while Mourdock, the tea party candidate who defeated longtime GOP Sen. Richard Lugar in the primary, was debating his Democratic opponent Rep. Joe Donnelly. Mourdock was asked whether abortion should be allowed in cases of rape and incest.

"The only exception I have to have an abortion is in the case of the life of the mother. I struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize life is that gift from God. I think that even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen."

Mourdock's remarks have already been compared with Missouri Senate candidate Rep. Todd Akin's remarks in August that women's bodies have ways of preventing pregnancy in cases of what he called "legitimate rape."

Both Mourdock and Akin have backpedaled, and Mitt Romney, who endorsed Mourdock for the Senate seat, has released a statement disavowing the candidate's remarks. Nevertheless, Romney still appears in Mourdock's most recent ads.

Will Mitt Romney have the guts
to withdraw his endorsement of Richard Mourdock?


Catch "Full Court Press with Bill Press" weekday mornings at 6E/3P on Current TV.

A pattern of GOP insensitivity toward the victims of rape is becoming very clear. For that reason, we have gathered some pertinent facts and figures that may make these gentlemen running for office think before they utter any sort of opinion on rape.

(Photo from Getty Images)
  1. groups:
    news blog
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

1 comment // Rape 101: A GOP primer

  • web_egalitarian
    • 0
      web_egalitarian  
    • The "1 in 71 men have been raped" stat from the CDC survey doesn’t tell the whole story. It defines "rape" as the attacker penetrating the victim, which excludes women who use their vagina to rape a man (rape by envelopment) which is counted as “made to penetrate”. The very same survey says “1 in 21 men (4.8%) reported that they were made to penetrate someone else,” which is far more than 1 in 71. Also, the study says that 79.2% of male victims of “made to penetrate” reported only female perpetrators, meaning they were raped by a woman.

      The above, lifetime stats do show a lower percentage of male victims (up to 1.4% rape by penetration + 4.8% made to penetrate = 6.2%) than female victims (18.3%) although it is far more than the 1 in 71 you stated. However, if you look at the report’s stats for the past 12 months, just as many number of men were “forced to penetrate” as women were raped, meaning that if you properly define “made to penetrate” as rape, men were raped as often as women.

    • 7 months ago
jopiazza
more from news blog:

top videos