Which would you prefer? Another 9/11 or eight years of Bush and Cheney?

Ummmmmm, I think I'll go with

C) none of the above.

Final answer.

PEACE

I prefer we get off the monetary freakin' system and kick all politicians over to a remote island to fend for themselves while we start over!

8 more years of Bush and his Buttboys is unimaginable Another 9/11 wouldn't be much better but is still preferable to anything that ignorant idiot could offer.

Days to go before I sleep ... Then it should really get interesting!

Peace!
Patio Patty

I would prefer we invest heavily in alternative energy, kick corporate America out of our government, and begin an era of leadership with hope and possibility rather than fear and retribution.

There might not have been a 9/11 if Bush had listened to the people trying to brief him about the possibility 0f it. Bush didn't have the balls to be president. He hid behind Cheney letting him bully the white staff and others in the administration. He showed his ineptness when he froze instead of acting when Katrina happened. For 8 years he showed his ineptness in front of the world when he could hardly put a proper sentence together before the cameras. Of course I don't want another 9/11 but God protect us from another Bush.

We'll pretend for a minute that Bush didn't have anything to do with 9/11...

Another 9/11 would be much easier to recover from than 8 more years of what we've experienced with this horrific president.

I'm surprised they still haven't been hanged for what they've done. Or more of the fact, what they're still doing.

Another 9/11, and hopefully this time all the questions get answered the right way. zeitgeistmovie.com's questions to be exact.

i hate to say it but i think id rather have a 9/11 than another bush as president. Holy shit he caused a lot of trouble for this country that will effect everyone for generations to come

i hate to say it but 9/11 i feel like i've been living in a dictatorship...

With the shot clock winding down, a second 9/11 can't be ruled out with 8 more years of Bush/Cheney under martial law possible.

Another 9/11. Less innocent people would die.
Plus, it would serve as a catalyst for greater oppression, which would serve as a catalyst for rebellion.

Depends, which of the two options has wasted more American lives, which has cost us more, and which is going to have a longer lasting effect?

eight years of Bush and Cheney

Look at it this way: The ONLY 9/11 was with Bush/Cheney.

Only Bush/Cheney gave us both crazy things: Remember, Bush was explicitly briefed about it, just as he was briefed about Katrina and the broken dykes.

So, I DON't have to choose between the two. I can easily choose neither.

2 words come to my mind re 9/11--INSIDE JOB. If other 9/11 events happen(ed), I'd believe the same.

MU!

Or NEITHER!

FALSE DICHOTOMY.

The question is absurd and subtly implies that without Bush/Cheney we would have had another 911. It's more than likely that if we had had someone other than those two in office we wouldn't have had the first 911.

A philosophical question deserves an answer in kind. Neither. Well written article with interesting equations though.