Opinion | September 02, 2010 | 8 comments

James Lee is Al Gore is Prince Charles is the Unabomber

source: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100052207/james-lee-is-al-gore-is-prince-c...

Image
rodstradamus
Al Gore’s Church of Climatism has claimed a new glorious martyr. His name is James Lee – the Discovery channel attempted eco-suicide-bomber – and if he’d had his way he wouldn’t have been the only one who ended up in the great recycling bin in the sky. That’s because, as far as the late James Lee was concerned, humans like the innocent Discovery channel employees he held hostage are the scum of the earth.

Just read some of the manifesto he posted on the internet and see for yourself:

"The humans? The planet does not need humans. You MUST KNOW the human population is behind all the pollution and problems in the world, and YET you encourage the exact opposite instead of discouraging human growth and procreation. Surely you MUST ALREADY KNOW this!"

Does this sound like the ravings of a sad, deranged loner on the wilder fringes of eco-fascist lunacy? Not to me it doesn’t. Strip away the block capitals and what you have, word for word, is the core manifesto of the entire global green movement.

What’s really depressing is that the philosophy expressed in James Lee’s (and the Unabomber’s) manifesto – which is also, incidentally, the philosophy expressed in Al Gore’s The Earth In Balance – is also the philosophy that is taught every day to our children in their schools: the world is fragile; human beings are a blot on the landscape; through our greed and selfishness we make everything worse; really it would be better if we vanished altogether and let all the lovely pure noble animals take over.

Not only do our schools teach our children this misanthropic – and deeply ahistoric – rot, but so also do broadcasters like the Discovery Channel. Their sister station, Animal Planet, for example, broadcasts a series called Whale Wars celebrating the real-life adventures of animal rights extremist Paul Watson. (H/T: MSher)

It’s time we woke up to the threat posed by this mass brainwashing of the younger generation. We worry, rightly, about those Muslim children who are being indoctrinated with the extreme Wahaabist version of their faith. Yet we seem astonishingly complacent that every day, in schools of every kind throughout the Western world, our children are being taught by well-meaning teachers to view their world and culture through exactly the same anti-capitalist, anti-human, anti-growth eyes as James Lee and the Unabomber.

The modern environmental movement is not kind, caring or gentle. It is a series of ticking time bombs waiting to blow up in our face.

more at link...

Look forward to Delingpole's book: Watermelons, which breaks down the eco-fascist green shell covering the commie red core filled with black pits of eugenics death.
  1. groups:
    Opinion,   The White Rose,   Eugenics,   Climate Gate
  2. tags:
    Green,  Environment,  Global Warming,  Al Gore,  5 more
  3.     
    |

8 comments // James Lee is Al Gore is Prince Charles is the Unabomber

  • IceKat
    • 0
      IceKat  

    • “I can’t understand why there aren’t rings of young people blocking bulldozers, and preventing them from constructing coal-fired power plants.” - Al Gore.

      “It seems to me that young people, especially, should be doing whatever is necessary to block construction of dirty coal-fired power plants.” - James Hansen.

      So we have two high profile figures in the climate movement encouraging young people into civil disobedience. Notice however, that while young people throw themselves into the fire, these two idiots sit back and watch from a safe distance.

      Yes, lovely people, these greens...

      “We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work. And we be many, but you be few.” - Gene (Greenpeace).

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • IceKat
    • 0
      IceKat  
    • JanforGore:

      Pot... kettle...
      And don't be afraid to finish off your sentence, I'd be happy to hear what that last word would be. But again you use verbal violence to present your perspective, this time without the guts to actually write what's on your mind.
      I have never used the word Nazi. You, on the other hand, frequently label people denier, a distasteful term recognised for its holocaust denier connotation, and a term which bears absolutely no relation to the thoughts or beliefs of people who strive for a more realistic approach to environmental matters.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • IceKat:

      You are nothing here but a disruptor with no cause. You have proven that in countless threads. Just part of the segment here to stir the pot. You wouldn't know true environmentalism if it walked up and bit you on your denier butt. Now come back and tell me how mean I am for calling you a name. WAA WAA. Your side has spent too many years warping this debate and spreading misinformaiton and namecalling. Don't now whine when you get the truth back in your face. Your ignorant Monckton led brainwashing is perpetuating the state we find our world in so don't think for one second that you intimidate me or will ever cause me to be NICE to you. You should actually be grateful I have held my modem as long as I have. Now go read some more bogus talking points about the MIddle Ages. I'm done with your droning here.

    • 1 year ago
  • IceKat
    • 0
      IceKat  
    • JanforGore:

      Another fairly immature post from JanForGore, and there we go again with the word "denier".

      The Guardian, a British newspaper, and one known for its left-wing views especially when it comes to the environment, saw sense some time ago when it decided to stop using the word denier to label climate realists:

      "The Guardian’s environment editor argues: “Sceptics have valid points and we should take them seriously and respect them.” To call such people deniers “is just demeaning and builds differences”"

      Sadly, for some of the less well balanced people on this website the use of the word denier is one they wish to continue using, mainly because they lost the argument long ago and therefore name-calling is one of the ways they can relieve their anger.

      As for being a disruptor with no cause, you know what my cause is - to present a more realistic view to people who may stumble across your rantings and propaganda. Everything you write about rising sea levels, melting ice, global warming and other concocted scare stories are all easily debunked by real science, that's how I've always got a counter-view to present. People with any intelligence will at least read both sides and make their own mind up. When people see that the scaremongers' predictions keep amounting to nothing, they'll soon start to take things with a bigger pinch of salt.
      Example: why hasn't the Arctic melted? They've been telling us for years that we'll soon have an ice free Arctic - where is it?

      And what's all this about the Middle Ages? You're obsessed with the fact that I can post graphs showing (from multiple sources) that it was warmer in the middle ages, a natural phenomenon, and yet you expect us to believe we're frying the planet now.

      "...how mean I am for calling you a name. WAA WAA. "

      Oh dear. I think I stopped writing things like that when I was six years old. Still, when you're backed into a corner, childish ranting is the only way to go.

    • 1 year ago
  • IceKat
    • 0
      IceKat  

    • "It’s time we woke up to the threat posed by this mass brainwashing of the younger generation."

      A very true statement, although some of us woke up to it many years ago. Thankfully, not many people take notice of the green fanatics anymore, they've proved themselves to be little more than clowns, but not very amusing ones
      . As the article states, they're just anti-human. Nothing pleases them, well, except ranting about non-events and making up facts, that seems to please them.

      Once again we're looking forward to a winter with more ice in the Arctic than predicted, the world didn't fry, in fact things are beginning to look pretty cool as far as temperatures are concerned. Satellite temperatures show a 0.5C anomaly for the month of August. Half a degree - wow! No doubt GISS, who park their thermometers next to barbecues, will manage to find a warmer anomaly, and if they don't, they'll move the figures a little to a more suitable figure.
      Still, it doesn't matter whether the temperature anomaly is 0.5C or higher, or even lower, the greens will blame us - the planet is broken, the climate is wrong, man is to blame. Their predictions fail again but that doesn't matter, one day they'll be right... they will... they hope!

      "The modern environmental movement is not kind, caring or gentle."

      As has been proven here many times, the greens are violent and rude, have one-track minds, and little grasp of reality.
      It truly is a Church of Climatism, a belief system, and a corrupt one at that.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  

    • Using this just to bash Al Gore is low. But not surprising. And what of his book Our Choice? Where are all the people committing hari kari in the streets? I wish some would actually read what they type and see how absolutely stupid it is. This man didn't worship nor understand Al Gore, he used him for his own purposes not unlike what his detractors do.

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
more from Opinion:
from the community

top videos