Rove's IT Vote Flipper Testifies Today
source: http://www.velvetrevolution.us/
-
-
- uppityprogressive
- added this
Yesterday, after a contentious three hour hearing in an Akron, Ohio federal court, the judge ordered Bush/Rove IT expert Michael Connell to submit to a two hour deposition less than 24 hours before the start of the 2008 election. The Court ruled that Ohio attorney Cliff Arnebeck can question Connell under oath about Man in the Middle computer manipulations, the use of Trojan horses to control election results from a remote location, and the role of Triad in election manipulations.
Connell is currently on the payroll of John McCain. McCain has said that the election will shift late at night and he will prevail in the end, he said "the polls are wrong, we will win this election, I guarantee it"
...Mark Crispin Miller, author of Loser Take All: Election Fraud and The Subversion of Democracy, 2000 - 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLCi2E-drss
-
-
smice
-
I signed it. Also try truevote.us http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1331/t/6410/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26158 URGE MEDIA TO ARCHIVE ALL EXIT POLL RESULTS
Please take action to urge the media to report the unadjusted exit polls for the 2008 election.
Edison Media Research and Mitofsky International will again conduct all exit polling in 2008 for the National Election Pool, comprised of ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC and the Associated Press. Exit polls will involve polling more than 100,000 actual voters, remove sources of polling error and can be extremely accurate. In 2004 John Kerry was showing a 7 point lead in the unadjusted exit polls, but then on election night the computers were down for several hours and when they came back on-line a flip had occurred and Bush now narrowly led. This was not because of a change in the actual polling but because the exit polls had been "adjusted," i.e. "corrected" so as to conform to the vote count assuming that count was correct. Investigations into the election in Ohio later raised serious doubts about the accuracy of the actual vote.
- 3 years ago
-
smice
-
-
uppityprogressive
-
I will be so incredibly happy if you are right huntre! I do so hope you are right. Perhaps today's exposure will restrain the worst of it.
- 3 years ago
-
uppityprogressive
-
-
huntre
-
I've already signed the petition.
Try as they might, as God is my witness, the GOP will not steal this election. - 3 years ago
-
huntre
-
-
MsJG
-
I could not have said it better myself.
- 3 years ago
-
MsJG
-
-
uppityprogressive
-
An Open Letter to Senator Obama and the Democratic Leadership
From supporters of the Obama campaignOn Election Night, DO NOT CONCEDE!
“Eight years is too much” is how Barack Obama explained why we must win the coming election and begin to restore America. But, even if we receive the most votes, will we win the election?
DO NOT CONCEDE!
Both of the last two elections were conceded by the Democratic presidential candidate. The 2004 election was handed to George Bush while votes were still being counted in closely-fought Ohio. While the 2000 election was contested to the Supreme Court, it too was ultimately conceded to Bush “for the good of the country.”
Some good.
Numerous politicians, investigators and authors, including Robert Kennedy, Jr., agree the 2004 election was stolen, not only in Ohio but in several other battleground states. Tactics included purging of legitimate voters and the use of nefarious voting software--but when even these actions did not yield the required numbers, Republican election officials simply changed the vote tallies in several states, all without a peep from the Democratic Party.
DO NOT CONCEDE!
In the time since the last general election the public has learned much about these scandals, which have led some states to reject electronic touchscreen voting (and which caused the infamous Diebold voting machines corporation to hide behind a new corporate name), yet the Democratic Party seems to have learned nothing.
THREE STRIKES AND WE'RE OUT!
If we cannot afford another Republican administration, we cannot afford a third concession in the face of election fraud. Already there is evidence of massive fraud such as voter purging and caging of Democratic voters, and “flipping” of votes in early voting on electronic touchscreen machines. It is reasonable to once again expect further manipulation on election night by some Republican operatives and election officials, as was seen in 2004; should we also expect our Democratic Party leaders and candidates to repeat history, by once again conceding in the face of such blatant fraud? Senator Obama, we need you, our Party and all candidates to stand firm, come what may on election night. You ask us to work for you, contribute to you--and to have your back; we ask that you promise to have our back: We ask that you PLEDGE TO STAND FIRM, AND NOT CONCEDE THE COMING ELECTION in the face of election irregularities, no matter how long it takes to contest such fraud, while there remains any doubt as to any part of the process. Be assured, Democratic voters will be more--not less--energized if we see you promise to stand firm.
Senator Obama, if there is any reason to contest the election,
DO NOT CONCEDE!
- 3 years ago
-
uppityprogressive
-
-
uppityprogressive
-
Pledge of Action
Please accept my personal pledge of non-violent action to prevent another stolen election:"I remember Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004, and I am willing to take action in 2008 if the election is stolen again.
I support efforts to protect the right to vote leading up to and on Election Day, November 4th.
I pledge to join nationwide pro-democracy protests starting on November 5th, either in my community, in key states where fraud occurred, or in Washington, D.C..
I pledge: No More Stolen Elections!"
..........Follow the link to sign petition
- 3 years ago
-
uppityprogressive
