U.S Treasury is demanding reports the banks that received most gov. $700 billion
source: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=auklVwYcgEG0&refer=home
-
-
- Prijedor
- added this
________________________________________________________________
The U.S. Treasury, under pressure to revive lending, is demanding monthly reports from the banks that received the most capital from the government’s $700 billion rescue program.
Neel Kashkari, the official who administers the Troubled Asset Relief Program, wrote to Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and 18 others on Jan. 16 seeking figures on business and consumer loans. Treasury also wanted details on purchases of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, according to documents obtained by Bloomberg News. Kashkari will stay for a few months after President-elect Barack Obama is sworn in today.
Obama’s aides criticize outgoing Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s approach to rescues as lacking transparency and not doing enough to get credit flowing though the economy. While Paulson has defended the cash injections as having averted a collapse of the financial system, Obama had to pledge changes before lawmakers approved the release of the second $350 billion.
“Banks are becoming the whipping boy for the Treasury’s failed policies,” said Joseph Mason, a Louisiana State University professor in Baton Rouge who previously worked at the Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. “They’re going to continue to face this pressure.”
Citigroup spokesman Michael Hanretta said the bank will meet all reporting requirements. Bank of America spokesman Scott Silvestri said the bank extended $115 billion in new credit in the fourth quarter of last year and plans to “do whatever we’re asked to do by Treasury.”
Obama Considers New Bailout
Obama’s advisers are considering options for dealing with troubled assets still clogging banks’ balance sheets, according to people familiar with the matter. Among alternatives: setting up a government-backed “bad” or “aggregator” bank to hold the securities, or leaving the assets on banks’ books and providing a government guarantee.
The Treasury also asked the banks for commentary on their lending activity, to provide “qualitative” updates on trends. In addition, the government wants information on secured lending and underwriting of debt and equities. The first report covers data for October, November and December and is due by Jan. 31. Results will be made public. Subsequent reports will be monthly.
20 Banks
The 20 banks receiving the Treasury’s monthly data request are: Citigroup, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, PNC Financial Services Group Inc., U.S. Bancorp, SunTrust Banks Inc., Capital One Financial Corp., Regions Financial Corp., Fifth Third Bancorp., BB&T Corp., Bank of New York Mellon Corp., KeyCorp, CIT Group Inc., Comerica Inc., State Street Corp., Marshall & Ilsley Corp. and Northern Trust Corp.
More at the link...
-
-
JStation
-
The efforts that George W. Bush failed to put forward in this bailout package stemmed this lack of proper analyzing on the government's part. A number of these companies, including some banks, had no need to retrieve bailout funds. Many companies sought the funds in order to increase general profits, which would lead to new investors.
What we've seen happen is that corporate America is taking advantage of this opportunity to capitalize on income, that they don't necessarily need, in order to further their financial interests. Many of the corporate entities that have acquired bailout funds have continued layoffs, which only spurs further economic descent. After inadequate planning, the bailout plan has turned into another multi-million-dollar bonus for failed management at major corporations.
The bailout was intended to stabilize companies in the red. And the companies that have been in need of these funds have been foregone for corporations that are seeking a free handout. The prices on everyday things haven't dropped because the companies can lure investors in on the announced "profit"; our hard-earned money, and the debt we now owe, is being used to capitalize on furthering the wide margin between the rich and the poor.
I've stated this on another article, and I will state it here: The government should force these corporations to fall under an Economic Liability policy. If they continue layoffs, they are continuing to reduce the number of consumers, which results in less profits. If we allow the financial interests of a few greedy individuals to be omnipresent, we are signing our constitutional rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness away to a number of individuals who are not concerned with our general welfare.
- 3 years ago
-
JStation
-
-
USA
-
They should demand daily reports, get rid of Paulson, and monitor this situation closely and absolutely let nothing fall through the cracks, which I might say, is the continuous excuse that is given without any repercussions to those that are guilty of the crimes.
- 3 years ago
-
USA
-
-
Kepano
-
This is should be interesting I have read that most of the institutions are not wanting to report to the government and that many of them really would not want divulge information about their precious profits. This is why many people are having so many difficulties with the economy. Unjust Regulations that allow this madness to continue.
- 3 years ago
-
Kepano
-
-
plusaf [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
plusaf [removed]
-
-
chuckiebean
-
plusaf:
18+ population...taxpayers only...no illegals. now do the math.
- 3 years ago
-
chuckiebean
-
-
Prijedor
-
plusaf:
700 Billion divided to each American that:
legal US citizen
-is 18+ years old
-has no fellonies
-is making less then.. maybe 500K a year (too much or too little) I just dont think anyone who is loaded should get any help, I think they should be nice enough to just decline it.
-maybe add some other things like had to live in the US for the past 2 years... or have a good job standers... things like that...anyways, add things like that into the math and you will get a lot more 2k per person
but either way, it would be better then giving the big companies the money
- 3 years ago
-
Prijedor
-
-
Prijedor
-
It would of been a lot smarter if they gave us (citizens) the billions of dollars instead of the big companies that got it...
Think about it...
Divided the 700billion among each U.S citizen 18+, thats a lot of money per one person and what would each one do? SPEND IT, pay off some debt, buy a new car, be able to stay in the house, spend spend spend, and that means tax tax tax... so a lot of the money would go right back to the gov.
bunch more people would of went and bought a new car and we wouldnt have had to bail out the car companies neither... - 3 years ago
-
Prijedor
-
-
cerealforeal
-
Some oversight? Full oversight is needed, and should always take place.
- 3 years ago
-
cerealforeal
-
-
kennymotown
-
Some oversite is needed.
- 3 years ago
-
kennymotown
