Religion | December 06, 2008 | 53 comments

Church takes on atheism by embracing doubt

Image
DeliaTheArtist
"Rather than return fire at atheists or get defensive and caustic, The Journey’s senior pastor, the Rev. Darrin Patrick, decided to explore the nature of doubt with his congregation.

He’s asking the church’s 2,300 members to be honest about their own skepticism and doubts about Christianity and is encouraging them to meet atheists halfway.

"Why are skeptics hostile to Christians and Christians hostile to skeptics?" Patrick asked in an interview. "We have to learn to live together rather than setting up straw-man arguments and portraying each other as caricatures."

On a recent Sunday, Patrick encouraged his congregation to go see Religulous and assured them he would, too. Church officials play a short video of atheists and skeptics they’ve interviewed making thoughtful points about unbelief, or questioning the nature of a certain Christian theology or doctrine."

There is a lot more to the article, but I thought these pieces were really compelling. Atheism, religion, atheism vs religion, etc has been getting a lot of hype lately- maybe it's the holiday season, or maybe more atheists are "coming out".

Either way, religious people are going to have to deal with the fact that there are people who don't believe in god, and that being skeptical of religious dogma is not only OK, but common- even for believers! Atheists will have to deal with the fact that calling religion stupid and being disrespectful will not make people give up god or even hear their POV.

We can be on different 'sides' for the sake of debate, but at the end of the day we all share this planet together, and what is important is not what god you believe in or if you have faith, but how you treat those around you and influence the world.
  1. groups:
    Religion,   God
  2. tags:
    Religion Society Propaganda God 6 more
  3. recommended by:
    uroborus8
  4.     
    |

53 comments // Church takes on atheism by embracing doubt

  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Petarro, how unfair. All I've ever done was post my point of view and try to get other people's opinions and open up discussion. All of my posts are like that, you just don't like what I have to say on a majority of them so you attack me. I personally do not believe in god but I'm well aware that many people do and we all need to work together for the betterment of the planet and humanity. Figuring out how we can respect each other, even when the POVs are vastly different, is important to me. I think if you looked more closely at my posts and didn't have a knee jerk reaction to them you would see that. In any case, I guess I'll take respect where I can get it and say thanks for noticing this time around.

    • 3 years ago
  • SDLN
  • petarro
    • 0
      petarro  
    • DeliaTheArtist: Finally, if this Post is your "Point of View" THEN FINALLY, you have understood that everyone has an opinion and then life goes on.

      Finally, propagating some Respect for the other.

    • 3 years ago
  • jmart574
    • 0
      jmart574  
    • i like DeliaTheArtist's summary
      my view of Christianity is to be open and caring to others, and that includes being able to see how others view life and reflect on the ideas that they bring

    • 3 years ago
  • megagrigg
    • 0
      megagrigg  
    • Bible says only 250,000 or so people are going to heaven any way so I'm not too worried about it. Never even won a cake walk let alone the eternal powerball.

    • 3 years ago
  • NoGodsNoMasters
    • 0
      NoGodsNoMasters  
    • megagrigg:

      It actually says 144,000 people will enter heaven which the Jahovah's Witnesses take literally but anyone who has studied Biblical history when it comes to numerical value understands that 144,000 in the days of the Hebrews means infinite.........I like numbers

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • GeoffNI
  • NoGodsNoMasters
    • 0
      NoGodsNoMasters  
    • Justright:

      You said up above:

      "If a native American passed away before Europeans came to America, and the native American didn't accept Jesus as his savior, would his soul be damned to hell even though he never had a chance to be redeemed under the christian belief?"

      You're wanting a real answer for a fake, anger fueled fairy tale....hence you get redicoulous answers like "yup, sucks to be him/her". You might as well ask the question "is mother goose and big bird related because they are both giant birds?" Who cares, it's all fake. And when you ask questions like the one above you aren't going to get a real answer. You're going to get the ravings of a bunch of fringe lunatics who decided that they would rather continue to believe in imaginary friends then enter the real world. They will spew out their hate monger sermons at you thinking they are better then others by condemning them to hell based on the teachings of a man who accepted everyone and condemned no one to hell. As a wise bumper sticker once said "Lord Jesus, save me from your followers." Because to them it's either convert or suffer. And if they can't make you suffer enough in real life they have this dark space in their minds that they hope people are burning for eternity. The whole thing would be funny if it wasn't just so fuckin sad.

      Now, allow the complaining on my comment to begin. This is going to be a good time = )

    • 3 years ago
  • ashleyoh
    • 0
      ashleyoh  
    • NoGodsNoMasters:

      I do agree that Christians push people into religion. As i am a christian, it's funny the look people give me when they find out i'm a Christian, but the difference about me and my family is, we could care less if you're Christian or not. It's your life do whatever the hell you want to do with it. I hate to say something bad about my own religion, but people who do push people into Christianity and make speeches about how non believers are going to hell just ruined the name of Christians. Technically we're supposed to quote "plant the seeds" and let the person do the growing. Some people just go too far, yes.

      I'd also like to add, however, that every Athiest friend i do have, if religion comes up, tries to talk me OUT of being a Christian and then gives me a million reasons why, and i give the same answer everytime. If there really is no God and we're all going to become trees, than what does it matter that I believe in something? If nothing will happen anyway? Just something i thought i should add...

    • 3 years ago
  • ashleyoh
    • 0
      ashleyoh  
    • NoGodsNoMasters:

      I do agree that Christians push people into religion. As i am a christian, it's funny the look people give me when they find out i'm a Christian, but the difference about me and my family is, we could care less if you're Christian or not. It's your life do whatever the hell you want to do with it. I hate to say something bad about my own religion, but people who do push people into Christianity and make speeches about how non believers are going to hell just ruined the name of Christians. Technically we're supposed to quote "plant the seeds" and let the person do the growing. Some people just go too far, yes.

      I'd also like to add, however, that every Athiest friend i do have, if religion comes up, tries to talk me OUT of being a Christian and then gives me a million reasons why, and i give the same answer everytime. If there really is no God and we're all going to become trees, than what does it matter that I believe in something? If nothing will happen anyway? Just something i thought i should add...

    • 3 years ago
  • ashleyoh
    • 0
      ashleyoh  
    • i think what he's talking about meeting an athiest half way is accepting the fact that there are people who don't believe in god and jesus, and not try to push them into it. I'm not sure that the pastor had a deceptive intention, unimatrix, i just think he's actually trying to make his congregation more acceptive, and like the last paragraph says, realize that we should just treat each other right and make the world a better place.

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • I don't know how a believer can truly meet an atheist half way and still be a believer. Denial of doubt is what faith is all about. It is odd for a pastor to encourage doubt, and I am suspicious as to the sincerity of the pastor's intentions. He seems either confused or deceptive.

      I am not sure that there is a win - win solution for the atheist and believer. It is a zero sum game: someone is right and someone is wrong. The competing claims are incommensurate.

    • 3 years ago
  • phillyphil
    • 0
      phillyphil  
    • unimatrix0:

      they can still be friends tho, right? meeting someone half-way and being civil towards one anothers beliefs sounds great and does not necessarily compromise either's view.

      i don't think that there really is such a thing as a zero sum game, only those that think they are playing one.... all games can become win-win if we look at them correctly.

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • unimatrix0:

      Of course a believer and an atheist can be friends - I don't think that was ever in doubt.

      However, it does seem to be the case that either god exists or god does not exist; hence either the believer or the atheist is right.

      Quantum physics does point to a possible multi-verse with multiple realities. One might imagine God existing in one but not the other. However, for god to exist in one reality and not another diminishes god's supposed omnipotence.

    • 3 years ago
  • phillyphil
    • 0
      phillyphil  
    • unimatrix0:

      or neither is right because they are both vastly misguided.

      or both are right because each moment everyone is simultaneously creating their own universe with a slightly different bend, and what makes the gears turn in one doesnt even happen in another. as they mesh together their is a cohesive WHOLE that works as many parts.

      it seems arrogant for us silly talking monkeys to be able to make claims about god existing or not existing. knowing the ultimate truth and pointing fingers at those that have come to different conclusions is quite the step.

      couldn't we all win?

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • InformedTexan
    • 0
      InformedTexan  
    • unimatrix0:

      It's not a zero-sum game. Most people aren't fully one way or the other - a deity must exist or it must not. Even many agnostics acknowledge that a god may or may not exist. Doubt is natural and for some it causes them to no longer believe where just as for other it causes them to further investigate their own beliefs.

      Faith isn't about a denial of doubt, but a belief that religion can answers many of the questions they about life and more. Doubt is the source motive for many to seek religion and also for many to leave religion.

    • 3 years ago
  • justright
    • 0
      justright  
    • If a native American passed away before Europeans came to America, and the native American didn't accept Jesus as his savior, would his soul be damned to hell even though he never had a chance to be redeemed under the christian belief?

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • jh64487
  • Vierotchka
  • ashleyoh
  • GeoffNI
    • 0
      GeoffNI  
    • justright:

      I believe in fact that the any one will be saved is untrue. Its like taking a verse, such as all Israel will be saved and then saying well Israel are all saved. While incontext the verse speaks prophetical of the gospel going back to the Jews at the end of the age and still man will have a choice.

      As for the original comment. I am no thelogion but the bible does have grounds that men and women that have never had a knowledge of Christ living in a region far away will still be judged based by the actions of there heart.

      As for unimatrix I am guessing the end time thelogy came from a book such as Left Behind.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • AutifK
  • J_Jammer
  • NoGodsNoMasters
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • UrbanGypsy
  • AutifK
    • 0
      AutifK  
    • J_Jammer:

      Reply to J_Jammer:

      I'm not sure that I can agree with Delia just because I am not sure to what extent she believes that it is ok to believe what we do 'just because' or without reasons (hopefully I am not misconstruing what she said). We definitely do not always have good reasons for what we believe because sometimes it is trivial, but I think that generally it is good to have good reasons for what we believe. I am more inclined to believe that we develop more by having more good reasons than no reasons for what we believe.

      However, I agree with Delia's question. I think it would be helpful if you could state who is doing the poisoning and how what those people are doing is poisonous in the way that you believe it is. That's what I would like to hear as well.

      I'm not sure how questioning what you believe is wrong even if you don't have a good reason. But, I will assume that it is. I am also assuming that you believe that atheists are wrong in questioning religion because they do not have a good reason to question religion. Well, actually, I think many atheists question religion for that same reason, namely that they don't think there are good reasons to believe religion. In this case, good reasons refer to physical evidence. Additionally, testimony does not count as physical evidence. If testimony is all that a religion has, then it is devoid of evidence. This means that atheists (as well as many other people) do not have good reasons to believe religion. Thus, they have a good reason to question it.

      Anyway, please correct me if any of my assumptions, statements, or questions were invalid.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • J_Jammer:

      "In this case, good reasons refer to physical evidence. Additionally, testimony does not count as physical evidence. If testimony is all that a religion has, then it is devoid of evidence. This means that atheists (as well as many other people) do not have good reasons to believe religion. Thus, they have a good reason to question it."

      Indeed- testimony, or "anecdotal evidence", is very subjective, relative stuff. Especially when it comes to religion and god- there are schisms throughout religion, even new ones happening right now in our society, based around the inconsistency of interpreting 'gods word'. Lack of physical evidence, inconsistent POVs from even the same faiths, religious hypocrisy, etc are all very valid reasons for questioning organized religion as well as god's existence.

      I can't think of many other things that people believe with only anecdotal evidence to support it. If any other piece of our society worked that way, it would surely fall apart- could you imagine medicine, technology, industry etc surviving based entirely on faith or instructions handed down thousands of years ago?

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • About the "christian doctrine of saving souls"-

      I was flipping through the channels just now and came across the Trinity channel or whatever it is called, and there's some rev or priest (not sure exactly what his deal was) hosting a movie marathon...in between the movies he comes on and talks about, well, god.

      First he starts out with "I'm praying you have a Merry Christmas." Ok, that seems nice. Then he starts talking about the "absence in people's hearts this year"...hmm, what direction is this headed? All of a sudden, he's telling people that Christmas is the perfect time of year to convert people to Christianity and he prays you can go out there and save some people.

      I'd get really pissed off if it didn't remind me of Moral Orel (anyone else Adult Swim fans?), but it's a good example of why there can be "hostility" between believers and non-believers- the principal of conversion.

      It's funny, religious people talk about believing in god as a "revelation". I felt something similar the day I realized I was an atheist- not that some force had guided me or shown me the way or anything, but a sense of freedom and realization. I bring this up because I don't think people can be convinced to believe or not believe in god. They will come to that themselves, and people change throughout their life.

      Conversion tactics are a waste of time; people are going to believe whatever they want. I think reasonable conversation and productive debate is different than trying to convert people. It is highly offensive to presume that I need to be "saved" because I don't agree or believe in your religion- you are more than welcome to explain to me why YOU believe it, but don't make any assumptions about me because I don't.

      I know people get excited when they learn something new or think they've found 'the way'. I'm guilty of it myself; The God Delusion was so full of rich conversation topic and excellent arguments that I annoyed my friends a lot after I had read it by telling them all about it. I understand if you read the bible and love it, if you are Christian and want me to feel 'gods love' like you do- but stop pushing people into it. You are much more likely to drive people away.

    • 3 years ago
  • GeoffNI
    • 0
      GeoffNI  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      My guess is that you watched TBN. Its probably the largest christian network but the most religous and there production values are real poor. You were not watching God TV as they don't air christmas programming, they have a good biblical understanding of there Jewish roots and Israel and are more Messianic Gentile while TBN is just a picture of the bible belt religous system, plus there telethons are extremely deceptive.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • GeoffNI
    • 0
      GeoffNI  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      Sad to hear such a thing. I think Christmas is a good reason to celebrate the God of your faith, but the church really does lack understanding of its idenity. Look at Martin Luther, he burnt down synagouges and was a complete enemy to the Jews, yet the new testament actually shows the church its identity. It portrays the christian gentile as being grafted into the olive tree. The Natural Branch is the Jew and the wild branches are the gentiles, and the roots of the tree are Judiasm.

      Yet christians have totally ignored this fact, they don't know the roots of the faith and much of christanity today is not going in the direction or has been going in the right direction for 2000 years. Jesus walked the earth according to the scriptures to remove the bondage of religion of the Jew and graft the gentile into the same relationship with God. But what most us see's as a religous system from Rome and America. A total abandon of there jewish roots of freedom from religion to a religious system and maniuplation.

    • 3 years ago
  • justright
  • anglcazn
    • 0
      anglcazn  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      Sad to say, justright is correct. My boyfriend's mom used to be an alcoholic. So, to move from one addiction to another, she went from someone who was addicted to alcohol to someone who is now addicted to god. XD

      I had another friend who went from alcohol to gum chewing (I dunno how that happened)

    • 3 years ago
  • vixen0078
    • 0
      vixen0078  
    • We need to hear more from people like Rev. Patrick. All too often the rightous left makes so much noise that it makes you forget that there are normal, loving people who believe in God, too.

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
  • timcat_blues
    • 0
      timcat_blues  
    • vixen0078:

      "not really, he's simply doing what Catholics did with the catechisms. he's taking all the flaws that "skeptics" point out and he's coming up with BS to try and cover it."
      * jh64487

      Ah, but there you are, in your own words.

    • 3 years ago
  • H3ADLINE
    • 0
      H3ADLINE  
    • "skeptics hostile to Christians"?
      Disagreement is not an act of hostility.

      No matter how well intentioned they may be, these religious leaders continue to misrepresent the situation. It's not that each side is equally at fault here. The violence, legal oppression and bigotry are largely perpetrated by religious individuals against those who do not hold their beliefs. This reality is so obvious that I have trouble accepting this move as a genuine attempt at reconciliation. If they do not own up to the skewed nature of the actual hostility, how can they be serious in stopping it? In all honesty, I think this is an attempt to silence the debate since "they've already met us half-way," and therefore have license to act morally outraged if we don't stop disagreeing with them publicly.

    • 3 years ago
  • timcat_blues
  • InformedTexan
    • 0
      InformedTexan  
    • A great point jh64487 about not having atheists there for rebuttal. I think perhaps though if person were to have there directly refuting the very purpose of the building he were standing in, a debate, and possibly a more than heated one, might have emerged rather than a reflective discussion. I think that such a discussion is certainly possible for the future of that church, having it accompanied by actual people to act as a rebuttal, but what this pastor is doing is very forward thinking and is probably quite a shock to much of the congregation's systems already. This is a delicate situation to approach and baby steps are necessary to keep what the pastor is trying to avoid, the straw-man attacks and antagonism, from occurring. He's trying something that has been unheard of in many churches, and still is in many. Even recommending the church to approach doubt with an open mind is an unfortunately forward-thinking thing for him to suggest.

      The point is that he is recommending people to think rather than yell at opponents of their ideologies. In a way he's having his congregation become further entrenched and understanding in their own beliefs to be able to answer skepticism, not only of others, but of their own questions as well.

      This is pleasant to see and a good affirmation that doubt isn't a bad thing but an area of faith that people of religious belief merely must be more informed and gain further understanding. To say that someone's entire belief is undermined by human misunderstanding is in itself a fallacy and so it's comforting to see people aware that such concern and confusion can be avoided by knowledge - of both thyself and of others.

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
  • InformedTexan
  • timcat_blues
    • 0
      timcat_blues  
    • InformedTexan:

      (A person can't be tricked or mislead into Faith. Even one born into the "Church" must discover their own way through doubt, otherwise their faith isn't their own. An untested belief is no different than belief in santa claus or the tooth fairy. In fact it is exactly the same belief. "The unexamined life is not worth living." still holds true. Every true believer is a formidable advocate for his belief system because he has laid himself bare to the ravages of doubt and is yet still whole.

      This argument never fades. Life is very short and the universe of man infinite in His variation. When one is honest with himself and his experience, unflinching in his desire for Truth however it may lead, then the journey is the destination, and Life is full of wonder.)

      I bumped this from an earlier comment just to keep from retyping the same idea in other words.

      I will add this though. Lumping Christians together is as un-PC as equating Palestine with Al-Qaeda. There are many different Christian belief systems and those who blindly condemn without basis in fact broadcast their ignorance to those who are more discerning.

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • "Atheism is a clear belief that God does not exist. "

      they're still making the same old mistakes though. I don't believe that god doesn't exist. I simply lack a belief in any higher power.

      I guess it's difficult for those who do believe to understand that some people simply don't, so they (rationally) assume that they believe in something different.

      Also, "Patrick then tackles that topic in a 45-minute sermon that dives deeper into the questions brought up by skeptics. "

      special, but how is this effective at getting to the core of an atheists logic when they aren't there to rebut them. It's easy to preach something to a bunch of people who already essentially believe in a glorified toothfairy, but its not really intellectually challenging now is it?

      The conclusion says it all. I give the idea a C +

    • 3 years ago
  • timcat_blues
    • 0
      timcat_blues  
    • jh64487:

      "but how is this effective at getting to the core of an atheists logic when they aren't there to rebut them"

      Actually it is very simple, ( I am not speaking for the article in question) the atheist logic in question is Aristotle's Logic. Using the tools of Reason to pick apart the Body of Faith. This alone is enough keep someone who is really seeking Truth busy for years and an outcome is not guaranteed.

      Gandhi said something along the lines of "We need Logic, but we also need Poetry." Reason alone cannot answer all our problems or questions.

      For those who disagree read "As the Driven Leaf" a work of fiction about a Jewish Scholar seeking to reconcile the mathematical purity of Euclid's Geometry with the Poetics of Faith. At least the Cliff notes and then we will talk.

    • 3 years ago
  • kyackr
    • 0
      kyackr  
    • ? skeptics ? sounds more accurately a term for the agnostic not the atheist or christian etc. thing is being agnostic does not mean you are in turmoil of doubt just that you prefer to ponder and wonder and don't need to have some abstract answer requiring faith.
      i think this pastor feels the christian has strength in their belief..while the non-believer is subject to doubt so in dialog things will fall the christian way? if he thought the opposite he would not go this route .. that would go against the christian doctrine of saving souls.

    • 3 years ago
  • timcat_blues
    • 0
      timcat_blues  
    • kyackr:

      A person can't be tricked or mislead into Faith. Even one born into the "Church" must discover their own way through doubt, otherwise their faith isn't their own. An untested belief is no different than belief in santa claus or the tooth fairy. In fact it is exactly the same belief. "The unexamined life is not worth living." still holds true. Every true believer is a formidable advocate for his belief system because he has laid himself bare to the ravages of doubt and is yet still whole.

      This argument never fades. Life is very short and the universe of man infinite in His variation. When one is honest with himself and his experience, unflinching in his desire for Truth however it may lead, then the journey is the destination, and Life is full of wonder.

    • 3 years ago
  • kyackr
    • 0
      kyackr  
    • kyackr:

      i don't doubt that.. however attempts to trick someone of a different faith or non religion are being carried out ..
      an story here on current a week or 2 ago detailed christian missionaries in a largely hindu country deceiving children into belieiving in the christian god by faking a engine problem in the bus.. then first asked the hindu children to pray to their hindu gods to get the bus running.. no success.. then he asked the children to try praying to the christian god??? and low and belold .. the bus started?
      anyway...growing up my christian parents and sunday school teachers used fear of painful damnation and burning in hell eternally to convince me to believe?
      i guess you would say .. i doubt it.. i do like to ponder nature and the universe but have no need to believe in any certain thing .. i much prefer the wonderment

    • 3 years ago
more from Religion:

top videos