Unexplained | October 13, 2010 | 6 comments

How To Disprove Evolution

source: http://signsofthelastdays.com/archives/how-to-disprove-evolution

Image
Revelation1217
Today, an increasing number of people in the world believe in the theory of Darwinian evolution. In particular, the vast majority of institutions of higher learning in most of the nations of the world only teach that all life on earth "evolved" from a single cell which somehow popped into existence. So is this theory actually true? Of course not. In fact, this article is going to teach you how to disprove evolution very easily. The truth is that no species has ever been observed changing into another one. Neither are there any transitional fossils which show one species "evolving" into another species. Rather, what we see in the fossil record is the very sudden appearance of fully-formed complex life. This is much more consistent with a creationist paradigm than it is with a Darwinian paradigm, but the scientific community doesn't seem to care.
  1. groups:
    Unexplained
  2. tags:
    Science,  Religion,  Christianity,  Christian,  4 more
  3.     
    |

6 comments // How To Disprove Evolution

  • ThatdBMe
    • 0
      ThatdBMe  

    • Evolution is not leaps and bounds. It's made of microevolutions. Small adaptations over long periods of time.

      To emphasis this; a dog will be a dog but, with human intervention, we have many, many different breeds of dog. From great big Mastiffs to the itty bitty Chihuahua. One of the most recent breeds was created in the 90s (Australian Bulldog). This is microevolution that we can see and actually have a hand in. Macroevolution happens in such a long time and in such small steps that we can't notice.

      Now, since evolution is a bunch of microevolutions, there can hardly be a fossil record of it because either that small change was helpful and that led to an eventual macroevolution or it was detrimental and it wiped out that species. Evolution is proven by genetic mutations that are inherited such as Down's Syndrome. Obviously, this is detrimental to the species so, it's not as common as "healthy genetics". If you go digging about in graveyards, you're going to find more "healthy human fossils" instead of a bunch of bones with Down's Syndrome. And, as time goes by, those fossils will be destroyed by natural processes. Since there are more healthy human fossils, you have more a chance to find those rather than the Down's Syndrome fossils.

    • 1 year ago
  • Varex_Sythe
    • 0
      Varex_Sythe  

    • I can only explain this article as massive retardation.

      Everyone who has read this article is now dumber. I shall award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

    • 1 year ago
  • unimatrix0
  • Ryuu88
    • +1
      Ryuu88  

    • "from a single cell which somehow popped into existence" wrong that is not an accurate description of the Darwinian theory. I suggest you actually read the theory before commenting on it, buffoon.

    • 1 year ago
  • Chod77
  • Chod77
more from Unexplained:
from the community

top videos