Court Won't Force California to Defend Prop 8
source: http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2010/09/02/court-wont-force-calif-to-defend-prop-8/
-
-
- EthicalVegan
- added this
September 2, 2010 3:36 PM
From cbsradio2010
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (CBS/AP) — A California appellate court says state officials don’t have to enforce a voter-approved ban on gay marriage, setting up a likely Supreme Court fight over the issue.
The 3rd District Court of Appeal on Wednesday denied a conservative legal group’s request to force the officials to defend Proposition 8.
Presiding Justice Arthur Scotland did not explain why the appeals court turned down the request filed two days earlier by the Pacific Justice Institute.
The institute now plans to take the matter to the California Supreme Court, Chief Counsel Kevin Snider said Thursday.
“We are disappointed that the appellate court showed indecisiveness in trying to prevent a constitutional crisis,”
Snider said. “They didn’t want to deal with it.”
The institute maintains the attorney general and governor have the duty to uphold all laws, not just those with which they personally agree.
Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker — an openly-practicing homosexual — struck down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional last month.
The measure approved by 52 percent of California voters in November 2008 amended the state Constitution to outlaw same-sex unions five months after the state Supreme Court legalized them.
The state has until Sept. 11 to challenge Walker’s ruling. Both California attorney general Jerry Brown and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger have said they don’t plan an appeal.
The coalition of conservative and religious groups that sponsored the ban has appealed the ruling by Walker. But doubts have been raised about whether its members have authority to do so because as ordinary citizens they are not responsible for enforcing marriage laws.
Twenty-seven members of the California Assembly sent Schwarzenegger a letter this week urging the governor to bring an appeal if Brown will not.
-
- groups:
- US Politics, Human Rights, LGBT, Left Coast
-
- tags:
- Human Rights, Gay Rights, Prop 8, Same-Sex Marriage
-
-
timetide
-
Judge walker is not an openly practicing homosexual. there is speculation about his sexuality but he has not said if he is Homosexual or heterosexual, despite the amount of attacks on him. To identify him as a homosexual is based on emotions rather than facts.
- 1 year ago
-
timetide
-
-
ahappymintleaf
-
why must it say that Judge Walker is homosexual? Would it have said he was an openly-practicing heterosexual if that was the case? Stupid. All it does is suggest he had a bias because his ruling possibly benefits him. But it moreso speaks to the neutrality of heterosexuality. Which is just...
I don't think this country is pro-people enough for any good to come out of a Supreme Court decision. They're already flipping out about a dark-skinned president still. Either the high court will find that equality isn't guaranteed in the US, or they will bring an equality that ... sigh. This country.
- 1 year ago
-
ahappymintleaf
-
-
toyotabedzrock
-
Yeah this is a problem, we need the freak show to be allowed to appeal this so it can be decided once and for all.
- 1 year ago
-
toyotabedzrock
-
-
littlwarrior
-
Really california should defend this we need it in the supreme court of our nation that is where this fight needs to go that is where the war will be won.
- 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior
