We Are Change Kentucky 191 items | updated Mar 17 2010
-
-
New Years Resolution for America: Stop Fighting the Bankers' Wars
Former Soldiers like, Mike Prysner, come together to tell why they oppose war.
Our real enemy is not the ones living in a distant land whose names or policies we don't understand; The real enemy is a system that wages war when it's profitable, the CEOs who lay us off our jobs when it's profitable, the Insurance Companies who deny us Health care when it's profitable, the Banks who take away our homes when it's profitable. Our enemies are not several hundred thousand miles away. They are right here in front of us
- Mike Prysner Former U.S. Soldier
The chain reaction of
evil... wars producing
more wars... must be
broken, or we shall be
plunged into the dark
abyss of annihilation
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
If tyranny and oppression
come to this land, it will be
in the guise of fighting a
foreign enemy... The loss of
Liberty at home is to be
charged to the provisions
against danger, real or
imagined, from abroad...
- James Madison
Read that last quote again. Why do we ignore the advice of the men and women we respect most in this country? James Madison understood the concept of False Flag attacks. He understood that, if given a chance, elements in our government are capable of treasonous acts against the People. We the People are the government of this country. Let's remind them.
After the last poll closes on election day, the work is not over, We must be ever vigilant, we must write letters, call our Congress, Senate, State and local officials. Every time you close your eyes another liberty is taken. We can say NO! Even after they are elected we can still say NO! NO more wars, NO more lies, NO more bailouts. NO more lobbyists. NO more corruption. NO more deception. NO rigged elections.
Vote Independent for an unwavering candidate and support them every way you can. We need CHANGE! It's obvious nothing has Changed with Obama except his promises. Wall Street owns Washington and convinced Washington, when the economy failed, to give them more of your money essentially making everything worse for you. THIS MUST STOP!
Let's make 2010 the year the We The People take America back! Are you with me?
We need more soldiers, police officers, national guardsmen, firefighters and you, yes you to become a NEW AMERICAN HERO like Mike Prysner. Stop the wars!
Christopher Hignite
Monkey Press 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwr-y6OxGqk&feature=relatedFormer Soldiers like, Mike Prysner, come together to tell why they oppose war. Our real enemy is not the ones living in a... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
The Twilight of the Elites - 10 Ideas for the Next 10 Years - TIME
In the past decade, nearly every pillar institution in American society — whether it's General Motors, Congress, Wall Street, Major League Baseball, the Catholic Church or the mainstream media — has revealed itself to be corrupt, incompetent or both. And at the root of these failures are the people who run these institutions, the bright and industrious minds who occupy the commanding heights of our meritocratic order. In exchange for their power, status and remuneration, they are supposed to make sure everything operates smoothly. But after a cascade of scandals and catastrophes, that implicit social contract lies in ruins, replaced by mass skepticism, contempt and disillusionment.
In the wake of the implosion of nearly all sources of American authority, this new decade will have to be about reforming our institutions to reconstitute a more reliable and democratic form of authority. Scholarly research shows a firm correlation between strong institutions, accountable élites and highly functional economies; mistrust and corruption, meanwhile, feed each other in a vicious circle. If our current crisis continues, we risk a long, ugly process of de-development: higher levels of corruption and tax evasion and an increasingly fractured public sphere, in which both public consensus and reform become all but impossible.
For more than 35 years, Gallup has polled Americans about levels of trust in their institutions — Congress, banks, Big Business, public schools, etc. In 2008 nearly every single institution was at an all-time low. Banks were trusted by just 32% of the populace, down from more than 50% in 2004. Newspapers were down to 24%, from slightly below 40% at the start of the decade. And Congress was the least trusted institution of all, with only 12% of Americans expressing confidence in it. The mistrust of élites extends to élites themselves. Every year, public-relations guru Richard Edelman conducts a "trust barometer" across 22 countries, in which he surveys only highly educated, high-earning, media-attentive people. In the U.S., these people show extremely low levels of trust in government and business alike. Particularly distrusted are the superman CEOs of yore. "Chief-executive trust has just been mired in the mid- to low 20s," says Edelman. "It started off with Enron and culminates in Citi."
Such figures show that the crisis of authority extends beyond narrow ideological categories: Big Business and unions, Congress and Wall Street, organized religion and science are all viewed with skepticism. So why is it that so much of the country's leadership in so many different walks of life performed so terribly over this decade? While no single-cause theory can explain such a wide array of institutional failures, there are some themes — in particular, the concentration of power and the erosion of transparency and accountability — that extend throughout.
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1971133_1971110_1971117,00.html#ixzz0iQYu4JDjIn the past decade, nearly every pillar institution in American society — whether it's General Motors, Congress, Wall... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
Final destination Iran? - Herald Scotland | News | World News
Hundreds of powerful US “bunker-buster” bombs are being shipped from California to the British island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean in preparation for a possible attack on Iran.
The Sunday Herald can reveal that the US government signed a contract in January to transport 10 ammunition containers to the island. According to a cargo manifest from the US navy, this included 387 “Blu” bombs used for blasting hardened or underground structures.
Experts say that they are being put in place for an assault on Iran’s controversial nuclear facilities. There has long been speculation that the US military is preparing for such an attack, should diplomacy fail to persuade Iran not to make nuclear weapons.
Although Diego Garcia is part of the British Indian Ocean Territory, it is used by the US as a military base under an agreement made in 1971. The agreement led to 2,000 native islanders being forcibly evicted to the Seychelles and Mauritius.
The Sunday Herald reported in 2007 that stealth bomber hangers on the island were being equipped to take bunker-buster bombs.
They are gearing up totally for the destruction of Iran
Dan Plesch, director, Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy, University of London
Although the story was not confirmed at the time, the new evidence suggests that it was accurate.
Contract details for the shipment to Diego Garcia were posted on an international tenders’ website by the US navy.
A shipping company based in Florida, Superior Maritime Services, will be paid $699,500 to carry many thousands of military items from Concord, California, to Diego Garcia.
Crucially, the cargo includes 195 smart, guided, Blu-110 bombs and 192 massive 2000lb Blu-117 bombs.
“They are gearing up totally for the destruction of Iran,” said Dan Plesch, director of the Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy at the University of London, co-author of a recent study on US preparations for an attack on Iran. “US bombers are ready today to destroy 10,000 targets in Iran in a few hours,” he added.
The preparations were being made by the US military, but it would be up to President Obama to make the final decision. He may decide that it would be better for the US to act instead of Israel, Plesch argued.
“The US is not publicising the scale of these preparations to deter Iran, tending to make confrontation more likely,” he added. “The US ... is using its forces as part of an overall strategy of shaping Iran’s actions.”
According to Ian Davis, director of the new independent thinktank, Nato Watch, the shipment to Diego Garcia is a major concern. “We would urge the US to clarify its intentions for these weapons, and the Foreign Office to clarify its attitude to the use of Diego Garcia for an attack on Iran,” he said.
For Alan Mackinnon, chair of Scottish CND, the revelation was “extremely worrying”. He stated: “It is clear that the US government continues to beat the drums of war over Iran, most recently in the statements of Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.
“It is depressingly similar to the rhetoric we heard prior to the war in Iraq in 2003.”
The British Ministry of Defence has said in the past that the US government would need permission to use Diego Garcia for offensive action. It has already been used for strikes against Iraq during the 1991 and 2003 Gulf wars.
About 50 British military staff are stationed on the island, with more than 3,200 US personnel. Part of the Chagos Archipelago, it lies about 1,000 miles from the southern coasts of India and Sri Lanka, well placed for missions to Iran.
The US Department of Defence did not respond to a request for a comment.Hundreds of powerful US “bunker-buster” bombs are being shipped from California to the British island of Diego Garcia... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
Barack Obama, former CIA agent
I recently had the pleasure of talking with Dr. James David Manning who has been ministering to the people of Harlem since 1981. He is now the Senior Pastor at ATLAH which stands for All the Land Anointed Holy, Manning's inspired name for Harlem as of September 14, 1991.
Dr. Manning heads the Columbia Obama Treason Trial which is scheduled for May 14-19, 2010 at the ATLAH building at 38 West 123rd Street in ATLAH, New York, 10027. Unfortunately, the Department of Justice and the Supreme Court have failed in their duties to uphold the Constitution and address the legitimacy and other questionable issues surrounding the White House's current resident. So, Dr. Manning, being a longtime resident of the Columbia University area, the school that Obama allegedly attended, began an intense investigation into Obama's educational background and discovered some profound discrepancies.
According to Dr. Manning, Obama (born in 1961) enrolled at the very pricey Occidental College in Los Angeles, California in 1979 and was recruited there in 1980 by the CIA which has made it a practice since its inception to recruit college students. He was, by his own admission, a "C" student, a dope smoker and a member of the Marxist Club at Occidental, a co-educational liberal arts college. In 1981, Obama allegedly transferred from Occidental to Columbia University. It is atypical for a student to begin their education in one four-year school and then transfer to another school. Columbia University requires that incoming students pass certain academic requirements which Obama apparently lacked. However, Columbia had a foreign student program and the CIA has major connections and influence with Columbia and the nation's other educational facilities.
The CIA needed Muslims or others who were fluent in Farsi and who could easily blend into the Muslim environment in the Middle East. The CIA persuaded Columbia University to extend their foreign student program to Obama, now a Columbia student, so that he might travel to Pakistan and enroll in the universities around Karachi in addition to the Patrice Lumumba School in Moscow. [1] The school, one of Russia's most prestigious universities was founded on February 5, 1960 as The Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (PFUR). It was renamed the Patrice Lumumba School on February 22, 1961. On February 5, 1992 the university re-adopted its former name. According to their web site, "The main aim was to give young people from Asia, Africa and Latin America, especially from poor families, an opportunity to get University education and to become highly qualified specialists. The students were admitted through non-governmental organizations, governmental establishments, and the USSR embassies and consulates." [2]
Obama, as an undercover agent, was the lead agent in the arms and money supply for the CIA-trained Taliban Army against the Soviet Army war machine. His actions were integral to the Taliban's success in their opposition to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Obama, it is publicly acknowledged, went to Pakistan in 1981. There is no way of knowing how often Obama traveled between Pakistan and Russia. According to Dr. Manning, Obama was an interpreter for the CIA during the war in Afghanistan. When Obama completed his CIA operations in the mid 1980s and returned to the U.S. he persuaded the State Department to maneuver his entrance into Harvard Law School; since the CIA, the U.S. president's personal agency for black operations throughout the world, also has connections to federal and state politicians, they managed to arrange Obama's entrance to yet another elite school in 1988.
Percy Ellis Sutton, a civil-rights activist and lawyer, was the Manhattan Borough President from 1966 to 1977. He was an intelligence officer with the Tuskegee Airmen, the name of a group of African American pilots who were part of the 332nd Fighter Group of the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War II. Sutton entered Harlem politics and became a leader of the Harlem Clubhouse, known as the "Gang of Four" which has controlled Democratic politics in Harlem for at least fifty years. His Clubhouse allies were New York City Mayor David Dinkins, U.S. Representative Charles Rangel, and New York Secretary of State Basil Paterson, father of the currently beleaguered David Paterson who replaced Spitzer as New York Governor in 2008. Percy Sutton wrote a letter to Harvard officials requesting that they admit Obama as a student after a hiatus of five years (from 1983 when he allegedly left Columbia to 1988).
Despite a five-year absence from the rigors of college activity he was accepted at Harvard where he excelled and on February 5, 1990, was elected president of the venerable celebrated Harvard Law Review, the highest student position at Harvard Law School, a term that lasts for one year. [3] After graduation he could have worked in any leading law firm except that he lacked the proper citizenship qualifications which would have come to light during the interview and normal background checks pursued by major law firms. Moreover, his academic deficiencies at Occidental College would have disqualified him from the top law firms. Furthermore, he was a CIA operative in the Middle East during the time that he was supposed to be attending Columbia University. So despite his Harvard achievements, Obama became a Saul Alinsky-style community organizer in South Chicago which alleviated the necessity of providing a legitimate background check. [4]
In 1990, Obama accepted a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, a law firm which represented civil rights cases but also represented Rezmar Corp. owned by Chicago slumlord, Tony Rezko. The law firm helped Rezmar Corp. get more than $43 million in government funding. As early as 1995, Rezko started contributing to Obama for his political aspirations. In 2003, Rezko was a fundraiser for Obama's Senatorial campaign as part of a group that raised over $14 million. In 2006, Rezko was found guilty of sixteen out of twenty-four charges filed against him.
Barack Obama had been employed for a short summer stint as an associate with Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, the same law firm that Harvard graduate Michelle Robinson worked for from 1988 to 1991. She became his trainer and supervisor and, as such, may have handled any background information. Michelle Robinson, through the efforts of Valerie Jarrett, then-deputy chief of staff for Mayor Richard Daley, became an assistant to the mayor. Robinson later became an "economic development coordinator." Obama married the politically connected Michelle Robinson in October 1992 in the Trinity United Church of Christ. This gave him citizenship and credibility. [5] In 1993, according to the Records at the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, Michelle Obama, as an attorney, was "voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law" per her request. After she gave up her law license, Michelle Obama worked for the University of Chicago Medical Center where she received a very generous annual salary of $317,000. [6]
Dr. Manning, an African American, asserts the following:
More at the link:I recently had the pleasure of talking with Dr. James David Manning who has been ministering to the people of Harlem since 1981.... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
Is Our Sexed-up Society Creating Prosti-Tots? | | AlterNet
Super-sexualized 'prosti-tot' culture posits hotness -- as opposed to, say, math -- as a girl's highest attainable goal.
March 11, 2010 |
Last week’s YouTube sensation was the adorkable 12-year-old Avery, all haystack hair and crooked glasses and giant Bugs Bunny teeth, lip-syncing in her messy bedroom to the Ke$ha mega-hit "TiK ToK.” (Sample lyrics: “I'm talking about everybody getting crunk, crunk / Boys tryin' to touch my junk, junk.”)
What’s awesome about Avery is that -- especially given the other sagaciously smart-ass material on her YouTube channel -- it’s safe to say she is totally in on the joke. (Doofy kid + “brush my teeth with a bottle of Jack” = funny!) She’s not trying, pathetically/disturbingly, to be grownup “hot.” She’s letting her creative eccentric ironic sarcastic confident dweeb flag fly. “I’munna fight!” indeed.
But much of Avery’s charm comes from the fact that she embodies a refreshing counterpoint to (if not commentary on) everything that is disturbing these days about pop culture for young girls. In other words, she’s not Azucena Diaz, the Peruvian 9-year-old who remade Britney’s “Toxic” video shot into terrifying soft-porn (and was then applauded for it, when she wasn’t being enthusiastically slut-shamed, slash, threatened with sexual assault). Diaz is not just shaking what God gave her. (Though God did appear to give her an unusually large budget.) She is shaking what we gave her and her tween peers: the super-sexualized "prosti-tot” culture that re-packages porn as mainstream "sexy" and posits “hotness” -- as opposed to, say, math -- as a girl’s highest attainable goal.
Just a small sampling of what we get from teen culture’s role-model-o-matic: mini-Miley Noah Cyrus, following in the pole-dancing steps of her big sis, sharing her rendition of “Smack That,” and dressing up as Hermione Granger a diminutive dominatrix for Halloween. Recently came the “news” that 9-year-old Noah was launching a lingerie line for little girls. That she is in fact doing no such thing (the error has reportedly been traced to the otherwise unimpeachable Perez Hilton) is “not the point,” writes Marjorie Ingall at Tabletmag.com. “The point was that it seemed completely credible, because hey, look at her.”
Also: Suri Cruise’s red lipstick, Brazil’s 7-year-old “samba queen,” slutty undies in the juniors department, Toddlers & Tiaras, baby’s first stilettos (which, we understand, are supposed to be "heelarious"), Bratz.
What’s going on? Why the ever-more-aggro sexualizing of ever-younger girls -- even as abstinence-only crusaders and their ilk try, fatuously, to wish their sexuality away?
“The most basic answer is that it’s highly profitable,” says Meenakshi Gigi Durham, professor of journalism and media studies at the University of Iowa and author of The Lolita Effect: The Media Sexualization of Young Girls and What We Can Do About It. “These sexualized images are all commercially driven. The younger the demographic advertisers target, the more they can create cradle-to-grave consumers.” (And gone-to-early-grave parents.) Tweens were already the “most powerful consumer group since the baby boom" -- a $335 billion market -- in 2004. By 2007, according to Durham, the tween market had reached $700 billion worldwide.
more at the link:Super-sexualized 'prosti-tot' culture posits hotness -- as opposed to, say, math -- as a girl's highest attainable... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
Alert the Government! - Jewish Internet Defense Force
If you were worried about the U.S. Government keeping track of you....Well, now they have the support of Israeli citizens. Free Speech? Think Again! Your opinion might get you in trouble. You are now a virtual Anne Franke in the internet attic with nowhere left to hide.
Alert the Government!
1. Pro-terrorist and antisemitic content on the web poses a serious threat. Much of this content can be found on areas like Facebook, YouTube, Blogger, Wordpress, Wikipedia, etc.
This content is often against these ISP's own terms. For example, Facebook's terms state:
One cannot "upload, post, transmit, share, store or otherwise make available any content that we deem to be harmful, threatening, unlawful, defamatory, infringing, abusive, inflammatory, harassing, vulgar, obscene, fraudulent, invasive of privacy or publicity rights, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable"
Also, one cannot "upload, post, transmit, share, store or otherwise make available content that would constitute, encourage or provide instructions for a criminal offense, violate the rights of any party, or that would otherwise create liability or violate any local, state, national or international law"
2. Despite a massive campaign to report these groups to Facebook and to the Media, Facebook barely made a dent in removing them. However, we do give them credit for removing 106 problematic groups impacting over 125,000 people active in them (due to our concentrated effort of reporting groups.)
3. There are hundreds more which have not been deleted despite thousands of complaints. There are also many more new groups created daily, so the problem is spiraling out of control.
4. Therefore hatred and cyber jihadists continue to grow stronger despite operating against Facebook's terms, and in some cases against international and regional laws.
5. We do not understand why. Perhaps this excerpt from a popular blog about Facebook might explain:
"Recently Shimon Peres suggested that Israelis and Jews worldwide use Facebook to fight anti-semitism in addition to inviting Mark Zuckerberg to Israel. I asked him about his thoughts on Facebook as a tool to fight anti-semitism and if Facebook would take proactive measures to fight against it. Mark believes that Facebook need to focus on building useful communication tools and that the users can use these tools to connect and generate more worldly perspectives. As such Facebook does not need to be proactive about it. When asked about whether he will visit Israel next year, he said maybe."
6. Politicians know that the future is in the hands of the younger generation. Let them know your concerns by writing. Please ask them to do whatever they can to help combat the serious problems of pro-terrorist and other hate groups all over Facebook (and the web.) Let them know that you feel much of the activity happening here might be illegal (since there are groups actively promoting illegal terrorist groups here) and that a proper government investigation should be considered.
7. We believe the following steps are now necessary:
-Contact the White House here: Contact the President!, Contact the Vice President!
-Contact your Attorneys General by State: http://www.naag.org/ag/full_ag_table.php
-Contact your Senators: http://www.senate.gov/contacting/index_by_state.cfm
-Contact your State Reps: https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
-Contact any other local law enforcement agencies as needed.
-Keep it simple. Make sure you use your name, age, where you are from, and let them know that seeing all of this on Facebook is not making you feel comfortable online and that you would like to see our government doing more about it as you see this as another important front in the war which you feel is being neglected. Make sure you provide them a link which will take them to the most problematic material:If you were worried about the U.S. Government keeping track of you....Well, now they have the support of Israeli citizens. Free... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
Public input period for federal fishery strategy has ended - ESPN
Personal note: Federal control of state and private waters. Communist? Socialist?
The Obama administration has ended public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing some of the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters.
This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is "fluid" and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn't issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters.
Fishing industry insiders, who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force, had grown concerned that the public input would not be taken into account.
"When the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) completed their successful campaign to convince the Ontario government to end one of the best scientifically managed big-game hunts in North America (spring bear), the results of their agenda had severe economic impacts on small family businesses and the tourism economy of communities across northern and central Ontario," said Phil Morlock, director of environmental affairs for Shimano.
"Now we see NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and the administration planning the future of recreational fishing access in America based on a similar agenda of these same groups and other Big Green anti-use organizations, through an Executive Order by the President. The current U.S. direction with fishing is a direct parallel to what happened in Canada with hunting: The negative economic impacts on hard-working American families and small businesses are being ignored.
"In spite of what we hear daily in the press about the President's concern for jobs and the economy and contrary to what he stated in the June order creating this process, we have seen no evidence from NOAA or the task force that recreational fishing and related jobs are receiving any priority."
Unless more anglers speak up to their Congressional representatives so their input will be considered, it appears the task force will issue a final report for "marine spatial planning" by late March. President Barack Obama then could possibly issue an Executive Order to implement its recommendations.
Led by NOAA's Jane Lubchenco, the task force has shown no overt dislike of recreational angling. As ESPN previously reported, WWF, Greenpeace, Defenders of Wildlife, Pew Environment Group and others produced a document entitled "Transition Green" shortly after Obama was elected in 2008.
What has happened since suggests that the task force has been in lockstep with that position paper, according to Morlock.
In late summer, just after the administration created the task force, these groups produced "Recommendations for the Adoption and Implementation of an Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes National Policy." This document makes repeated references to "overfishing," but doesn't reference recreational angling, its importance, and its benefits, both to participants and the resource.
Additionally, some of these same organizations have revealed their anti-fishing bias with their attempts to ban tackle containing lead in the United States and Canada.
Also, recreational angling and commercial fishing have been lumped together as harmful to the resource, despite protests by the angling industry.
Morlock's evidence of collusion -- the green groups began clamoring for an Executive Order to implement the task force's recommendations even before the public comment period ended in February.
On Feb. 12, the New York Times reported on that "President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities."
Anglering for access
Click here for archive
Morlock fears that "what we're seeing coming at us is an attempted dismantling of the science-based fish and wildlife model that has served us so well. There's no basis in science for the agendas of these groups who are trying to push the public out of being able to fish and recreate.
"Conflicts (user) are overstated and problems are manufactured. It's all just an excuse to put us off the water."
In the wake of the task force's framework document, the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation (CSF) and its partners in the U.S. Recreational Fishing & Boating Coalition again voiced their concerns to the administration.
"Some of the potential policy implications of this interim framework have the potential to be a real threat to recreational anglers who not only contribute billions of dollars to the economy and millions of dollars in tax revenues to support fisheries conservation, but who are also the backbone of the American fish and wildlife conservation ethic," said CSF President Jeff Crane.
Morlock, a member of the CSF board, added, "There are over one million jobs in America supported coast to coast by recreational fishing. The task force has not included any accountability requirements in their reports for evaluating or mitigating how the new policies they are drafting will impact the fishing industry or related economies.
"Given that the scope of this process appears to include a new set of policies for all coastal and inland waters of the United States, the omission of economic considerations is inexcusable."
This is not the only access issue threatening the public's right to fish, but it definitely is the most serious, according to Chris Horton, national conservation director for BASS.
"With what's being created, the same principles could apply inland as apply to the oceans," he said. "Under the guise of 'marine spatial planning' entire watersheds could be shut down, even 2,000 miles up a river drainage from the ocean.
"Every angler needs to be aware because if it's not happening in your backyard today or tomorrow, it will be eventually.
"We have one of the largest voting blocks in the country and we need to use it. We must not sit idly by."Personal note: Federal control of state and private waters. Communist? Socialist? The Obama administration has ended public... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
Former CIA Pilot Tells of Guns and Drugs Shipments : Veterans Today
Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, former CIA pilot, reported the illegal shipments of guns and drugs to Congress. Plumlee said he flew into former MCAS El Toro, CA, a number of times, in unmarked C-130s in the early hours of the morning.
Colonel James Sabow, USMC
However, the death of Marine Colonel James Sabow is not some crackpot conspiracy tossed around by those with nothing else to do.
Last week’s tragic shooting of two guards at the Pentagon was definitely the result of a mentally unbalanced individual who apparently was consumed with the death of Marine Colonel James Sabow at MCAS El Toro in January 1991.
Robert "Tosh" Plumlee, Santa Elena, Costa Rica, mid-1980s
The truth is that experts outside of the Defense Department believe that the forensic evidence supports that Colonel Sabow was murdered. According to Dr. David Sabow MD, his brother, the motive was to prevent him from telling about the shipments of cocaine into the U.S. to fund the Contra war in the 80s.
Independent investigations by others and the overwhelming forensic evidence strongly suggests murder. There was no reason in the world after Vietnam, 27 years in the Marine Corps with an outstanding record, the rank of colonel and a wife and children, that Col. Sabow would commit this act.
Michael A. Jacobs, attorney and retired supervisor of the Orange County District Attorney’s Homicide Trials Division, believes that homicide is supported by:
(1) compressed fracture to the right rear occipital skull and the resulting hemorrhaging beneath the skull and
(2) the large amount of aspirated blood found in the alveoli of Colonel Sabow’s lungs.
Jacobs told Congressman Duncan Hunter that “Colonel Sabow’s death could not have been a suicide but had to have been a homicide inflicted by the hands of another.”
Former Lt. Col. Anthony Verducci, a Marine Corps JAG [attorney] who was stationed at MCAS El Toro in 1991, wrote Dr. Sabow, “I have reviewed x-rays, crime scene photos, and letters submitted by forensic pathologists and other experts about Col. Sabow’s death… these materials lead me to believe that Colonel Sabow did not die of a self-inflicted gunshot wound [my emphasis]. As a Marine, former prosecutor, and citizen, I believe that an impartial law enforcement agency must review this case.”
Deadly Setup for a Whistleblower
Colonel Sabow, Assistant Chief, MCAS El Toro, had been removed from his position a few days before his death, pending the outcome of an investigation for a minor infraction relating to the carrying of personal items on an official military flight.
Friends close to Jim Sabow say the charges were concocted strictly in an effort to keep him from blowing the lid off clandestine federal drug running that he became aware of, with the planes actually landing at El Toro.
Dr. David Sabow, a retired neurologist and the younger brother of Colonel Sabow, said his brother was pressured to retire but told others that he would accept a court martial, since he had nothing to do with the shipment of cocaine in civilian aircraft to the U.S. In doing so, Dr. Sabow said his brother unknowingly signed his own death warrant.
A former CIA pilot, Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, is very familiar with the events surrounding Col. Sabow’s untimely death. He says that the word being spread from military personnel at El Toro through his group, was that Col. Sabow had discovered illegal flights coming into El Toro Marine Air Base at 2:00 or 3:00 a.m., obviously carrying illegal contraband, and that he intended to blow the whistle. He had also heard that Col. Sabow was going to be relieved of his duties because of his intention to report the drug shipments.
Plumlee is convinced that Col. Sabow was murdered to silence him.
“These trips were approved by military intelligence personnel attached to the Pentagon, with CIA logistical support. They were made in total secrecy to the extent that other government agencies were not aware of the existence of these flights, or of the operation. The pilots were given a specific coded transponder number to squawk so their aircraft would not be challenged by U.S. Customs aircraft when patrolling the U.S. border.” – Former CIA pilot Tosh Plumlee
“It is highly probable that Col. Sabow became aware of the night flights into El Toro, as his base housing was on the landing flight path. A serious hitch in the operation came when a new loadmaster assigned to El Toro complained about the unregistered planes landing at night and demanded that they be registered, but a senior officer ordered him to shut up and to stop insisting on registration. The loadmaster complained to the inspector general, which prompted the IG to come to El Toro for an investigation.”
Plumlee said, “He was willing to expose the operation that sent American weapons into Latin America on American cargo aircraft, and he would prove that he had no hand in bringing illegal drugs into the country on return trips.”
Col. Sabow’s wife Sally Sabow, told her brother-in-law that the day before her husband was killed, a senior officer entered Col. Sabow’s home, and was observed shaking his finger in Col. Sabow’s face, shouting, “You will never go to a court martial…”
Drugs, Weapons and El Toro
“These trips were approved by military intelligence personnel attached to the Pentagon, with CIA logistical support. They were made in total secrecy to the extent that other government agencies were not aware of the existence of these flights, or of the operation. The pilots were given a specific coded transponder number to squawk so their aircraft would not be challenged by U.S. Customs aircraft when patrolling the U.S. border.”
He says it began in the 1980s, when the U.S. Army’s 82nd and 101st Airborne were sent to Costa Rica for maneuvers. A large number of weapons were sent with them.
“However, some of the weapons did not return to the United States and were later taken off the books by the military, marked as either lost or destroyed and reported to the Government Accounting Office as such”.
“When the weapons were repaired and tested at China Lake and Twentynine Palms, in California, they were staged and once again flown back from El Toro Marine Air Base to Latin America, via Mexico, to be supplied to the Contras, the American-financed rebel group seeking to overthrow the Sandinista regime in Nicaragua”.
“These flyways and airstrips were secretly recorded by undercover flight crews and reported to various government interdiction agencies in the United States. In 1986, an early operation known by the code name, ‘Penetrate,’ was shut down because of the politically explosive Iran-Contra matter.”
According to Plumlee, an American DEA agent from Guadalajara, Mexico, by the name of Kiki Camarena, was killed because of his knowledge concerning the “CIA-Mexico” thing, as it was widely known among the covert civilian pilots.
Tosh Plumlee emailed a copy of a February 1991 letter from former Senator Gary Hart to Senator John Kerry, Chairman, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International Communications and a redacted summary transcript of his testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations from August 1991. The Senate report shows that Plumlee was a “former deep-cover military and CIA asset from 1956 to 1987 with a long history of CIA activities in Central America, Cuba, and Mexico.”
A little less than a month before Gary Hart’s letter to Senator Kerry, Marine Colonel James Sabow was found dead by his wife in his backyard at MCAS El Toro. Although there’s no connection to his death, the letter does describe in some detail the illegal arms and narcotic shipments made to fund the Contra war.
Conclusion and more at the link:Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, former CIA pilot, reported the illegal shipments of guns and drugs to Congress. Plumlee said he... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
GORDON DUFF: 9/11 AND CURRENT ATTEMPTS TO COVER UP AN AMERICAN HOLOCAUST : Veterans Today
CAUGHT! A NEW 9/11 GAME OUTED
By Gordon Duff / STAFF WRITER / Senior Editor
Today, John Avalon wrote a piece for the Daily Beast describing those who are asking for a new 9/11 investigation as “wingnuts.” What he fails to tell us is that, as “propaganda chief” for Rudy Guliani, a man whose former chief of staff is now doing time as a Mafia “bag man” Bernie Kerik, burying the truth has long been a part of his job.
The prisoner in question, Bernie Kerik, was supposed to head Homeland Security. Think about a character from the movie Goodfellas as the nation’s chief law enforcement official and you have an idea where John Avalon comes from. The only way of going further would have been to put the ghost of the “dapper don,” John Gotti himself into the Whitehouse. Is Avalon another Kerik or just a “Kerik/Guliani associate?”
Much of the 9/11 controversy centers around the mysterious collapse of Building 7, never hit by a plane, a building Guliani is said to have been warned to leave before it was brought down by controlled demolition.
Larry Silverstein, the controller of the destroyed WTC complex, stated plainly in a PBS documentary that he and the FDNY decided jointly to demolish WTC 7 late in the afternoon of 9/11. In the documentary “America Rebuilds“, aired September 2002, Silverstein makes the following statement;
“I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”
The problem with this story is that, according to literally thousands of engineers and architects, it would take weeks to engineer the collapse of a building like this. Did Silverstein have a crystal ball or are all buildings in New York wired to explode, “just in case?” The 9/11 Commission was never allowed to look into Building 7. Guliani and Silverstein are people John Avalon worked with on a daily basis.
It has become so powerful that the “assets” are coming out of their holes. Avalon’s approach is classic:
“It is appropriate that Ahmadinejad used the phrase the “big lie,” first coined by Adolph Hitler in Mein Kampf to explain the psychology behind propaganda campaigns of misinformation. “In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility,” Hitler wrote, because “It would never come into [most people's] heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”
Avalon is describing a conspiracy. Who is the “wingnut” here?
Never Forget No Plane Hit Building 7Exactly what group is conspiring together? Who is financing the “9/11 truth” propaganda campaign that is part of the massive conspiracy that Avalon is referring to? What is their goal? So far, the “9/11 truth” movement is what it looks like, people unsatisfied with the explanation they got, scientists, scholars, politicians, world leaders and a few crazy people, all loosely tied to one idea, finding the truth, a truth that key members of the 9/11 Commission have said is not in their report because of a “criminal conspiracy” to mislead them.
If anything, the “9/11 truth “movement is the victim, a victim of smear campaigns and it is increasingly reported that their organizations, which number in the hundreds, have come under investigation by security agencies and their membership has been heavily infiltrated much as with the militia movements of the 80s and 90s.
Avalon’s article appears to be a small and very stupid part of the “truth debunking” movement, clearly tied to “insiders,” and there is no more of an “insider” than Rudy Guliani. Is someone figuring that if we are drowned with enough baseless charges of conspiracy, the real conspiracies can go unchallenged? This is a very common “psy-ops” deception ploy meant, frankly, to be wielded by a greater intellect and with greater skill.
Do the terms “truth debunking” and “obstruction of justice” mean the same thing? We should think about this.
“9/11 truthers” aren’t armed radicals and nothing is being threatened other than a “cover story” that fell apart years ago. If the “9/11 truth” movement is being investigated as a criminal conspiracy, as seems to be the case, using extraordinary means, even to the point of applying Patriot Act “counter-terrorism” provisions, what does this mean?
Informants are being discovered in nearly every 9/11 group, some spouting insane theories, others advocating violence. We call people like this “agent provocateurs.” This is also a classic “counter-intelligence” practice. Why is this being done and who is ordering it, financing it? It’s happening, and on an ever growing scale.
911 2nd Plane Hitting BuildingAfter dragging out Hitler, Avalon then went after poor and long dead Osama bin Laden. While in Pakistan last week, meeting with Lt. General Hamid Gul, former head of the Pakistani intelligence agency, the ISI, and General Aslem Beg, former Chief of Staff, Army of Pakistan, along with Col “Imam,” coordinator of military activities against the Soviets, I was able to verify the December 2001 death of Osama bin Laden. This was also confirmed at the highest governmental levels, the same folks that regularly brief our own government.
If you are looking for suspects, you are now safe to start looking at anyone presenting video, audio or other “evidence” of bin Laden or statements about bin Laden, 9/11 or terror attacks after bin Laden’s death. Anyone originating such information can easily be assumed to have been involved in the planning and execution of the acts being put off on bin Laden.
Thankfully, we know who these people are and can arrest and prosecute them as soon as we come to our senses.
Not only has bin Laden been dead for years but the CIA’s own translation of bin Laden’s tapes shows him denying all involvement in 9/11. What does Avalon do? He brings out the transcript of a long discredited “phony bin Laden” tape received from former Israeli Defense Force member, Rita Katz and her organization Site Intelligence, a group that downloads things from conspiracy sites on the internet, something Avalon must know alot about.
Here is what Avalon had to say:
“Alternately, you can just take Osama bin Laden’s word for it. He’s repeatedly taken credit for the attacks, including on a videotape where he recounts the planning process and his wish for maximum damage: “We calculated in advance the number of casualties from the enemy, who would be killed based on the position of the tower. We calculated that the floors that would be hit would be three or four floors. I was the most optimistic of them all. … Due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above it only. This is all that we hoped for.”
Of course, bin Laden never said any of this. This is a fabrication. Why would someone write something like this unless there was something to hide? Who teaches people to write like this? Did writing speeches for Rudy Guliani suddenly make a political propagandist into a journalists? Let’s check Avalon’s sources against the official record.
This is edited, more at the link:CAUGHT! A NEW 9/11 GAME OUTED By Gordon Duff / STAFF WRITER / Senior Editor Today, John Avalon wrote a piece for the Daily... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
15 Reasons Why We Need a Revolt in This Country | | AlterNet
Government works quite well for big corporations, banks, insurance companies, military contractors, lobbyists, and for the rich and powerful. But it does not work for people.
March 7, 2010 |
Photo Credit: yomanimus
It is time for a revolution. Government does not work for regular people. It appears to work quite well for big corporations, banks, insurance companies, military contractors, lobbyists, and for the rich and powerful. But it does not work for people.
The 1776 Declaration of Independence stated that when a long train of abuses by those in power evidence a design to reduce the rights of people to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, it is the peoples right, in fact their duty to engage in a revolution.
Martin Luther King, Jr., said forty three years ago next month that it was time for a radical revolution of values in the United States. He preached “a true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies.” It is clearer than ever that now is the time for radical change.
Look at what our current system has brought us and ask if it is time for a revolution?
Over 2.8 million people lost their homes in 2009 to foreclosure or bank repossessions – nearly 8000 each day – higher numbers than the last two years when millions of others also lost their homes.
At the same time, the government bailed out Bank of America, Citigroup, AIG, Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the auto industry and enacted the troubled asset (TARP) program with $1.7 trillion of our money.
Wall Street then awarded itself over $20 billion in bonuses in 2009 alone, an average bonus on top of pay of $123,000.
At the same time, over 17 million people are jobless right now. Millions more are working part-time when they want and need to be working full-time.
Yet the current system allows one single U.S. Senator to stop unemployment and Medicare benefits being paid to millions.
There are now 35 registered lobbyists in Washington DC for every single member of the Senate and House of Representatives, at last count 13,739 in 2009. There are eight lobbyists for every member of Congress working on the health care fiasco alone.
At the same time, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that corporations now have a constitutional right to interfere with elections by pouring money into races.
The Department of Justice gave a get out of jail free card to its own lawyers who authorized illegal torture.
At the same time another department of government, the Pentagon, is prosecuting Navy SEALS for punching an Iraqi suspect.
The US is not only involved in senseless wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, the U.S. now maintains 700 military bases world-wide and another 6000 in the US and our territories. Young men and women join the military to protect the U.S. and to get college tuition and healthcare coverage and killed and maimed in elective wars and being the world’s police. Wonder whose assets they are protecting and serving?
In fact, the U.S. spends $700 billion directly on military per year, half the military spending of the entire world – much more than Europe, China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, North Korea, and Venezuela - combined.
The government and private companies have dramatically increased surveillance of people through cameras on public streets and private places, airport searches, phone intercepts, access to personal computers, and compilation of records from credit card purchases, computer views of sites, and travel.
The number of people in jails and prisons in the U.S. has risen sevenfold since 1970 to over 2.3 million. The US puts a higher percentage of our people in jail than any other country in the world.
The tea party people are mad at the Republicans, who they accuse of selling them out to big businesses.
Democrats are working their way past depression to anger because their party, despite majorities in the House and Senate, has not made significant advances for immigrants, or women, or unions, or African Americans, or environmentalists, or gays and lesbians, or civil libertarians, or people dedicated to health care, or human rights, or jobs or housing or economic justice. Democrats also think their party is selling out to big business.
Forty three years ago next month, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. preached in Riverside Church in New York City that “a time comes when silence is betrayal.” He went on to condemn the Vietnam War and the system which created it and the other injustices clearly apparent. “We as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a “thing oriented” society to a “person oriented” society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism and militarism are incapable of being conquered.”
It is time.Government works quite well for big corporations, banks, insurance companies, military contractors, lobbyists, and for the rich... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
Homeland Security Prepares You For Future Screening At All Large Events - Is This What You Want?
WARNING: TAKE YOUR ZOLOFT BEFORE VIEWING
Pay close attention at 3:30. Full interrogation of everyone. If this isn't a Police State, I don't know what is. Welcome to the Fourth Reich. Congratulations America, Al Quaeda, if you believe they did 9/11, has won the war and has taken away our freedom completely! If you believe we did 9/11 then the traitors wIn and have taken away our freedom completely. I woke up this morning and my clock said 1984.
IF YOU'RE NOT MAD AS HELL AFTER THIS VIDEO.....WHY NOT? THIS HAS TO STOP!WARNING: TAKE YOUR ZOLOFT BEFORE VIEWING Pay close attention at 3:30. Full interrogation of everyone. If this isn't a... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
And So Begins The Push For Monsanto To Control Marijuana
Hey, what did you expect? Of course when they finally legalize it they're going to give the profits to the corporate owners of our government. It's the American Way!Hey, what did you expect? Of course when they finally legalize it they're going to give the profits to the corporate owners... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
Joe Bageant: Americans Are "Hope Fiends" Because Honestly Looking at the Present Situation Would Destroy Just About Everything We Hold As Reality | | AlterNet
An awareness of class makes clear who is screwing whom. That's why American capitalism's official line is that we are a "classless society."
March 1, 2010 |
Near midnight and I am making tortillas on an iron skillet over a gas flame. Some three thousand miles to the north, my wife and dog nestle in sleep in the wake of a 34-inch snowstorm, while the dogs of Ajijic are barking at the witching hour and roosters crow all too early for the dawn. While my good Mexican neighbors along Zaragoza Street sleep.
Yet here I am awake and patting out tortillas, haunted by the empire that I have called home most of my life.
I like to think that, for the most part, I no longer live up there in the U.S., but southward of its ticking social, political and economic bombs. Because the US debt bomb has not yet gone off, Social Security still exists, and the occasional royalty check or book advance still comes in, allowing me to remain here. And so long as America's perverse commodities economy keeps stumbling along and making lifelike noises, so long as the American people accept permanent debt subjugation -- I can drink, think and burn tortillas. Believe me, I take no smugness in this irony.
There is a terrible science fiction-like awe in the autonomous American economic monolith, in the way that it provides for us, feeds on us and keeps us as its both its lavish pets and slaves. The commodity economy long ago enslaved Americans and other "developed" capitalist societies. But Americans in particular. The most profound slavery must be that in which the slaves can conceive of no other possible or better world than their bondage. Inescapable, global, all permeating, the commodities economy rules so thoroughly most cannot imagine any other possible kind of economy.
------
It comes down to owning stuff, and that the stuff we own also owns us (as anyone paying rent for a storage locker can attest). Transmogrified by industrial materialism, we have become what we own. More specifically, what we are observed by the rest of our society as owning. In the commodified society of industrial materialism, owning is being. So much so, that politicians bandy the term "ownership society" about, not only without causing the public to gag, but to cheers. Even liberals who claim to dislike the term don't want to be in a "We don't own shit society."
Early modern capitalism was more or less understandable, if not always pleasant. One can see why a pre-industrial world that had owned less would embrace owning a bit more. Who gave a damn if it came from Adam Smith's "unseen hand," the hand that was taking care of the already rich, who in turn managed the order of the world as seen through the lens of aristocratic and bourgeoisie English commerce. "If we work our guts out Nellie, we can buy a pork knuckle every Sunday. And a featherbed, if you get my drift. Woo Hoo!"
Enter the reign of the bourgeoisie, self-appointed and self-interested middlemen to anything and everything. The sheer complexity of the industrial revolution and associated finance was a dog that could fatten many fleas.
When the bourgeoisie did not get what it felt was a good cut of the action from the monarchies, it raised hell, sometimes enough to cause revolutions. If they won, as they did in America, they took credit for establishing democracy. If they lost, they fobbed it off as a "people's revolution," leaving the working slobs, the actual producers of wealth, to face the king's hangmen.
Even when "the people" occasionally win one of those "people's revolutions", we never really win. Not in the end. For instance, here in Mexico, contrary to what we've seen in Zapata movies, there has never been a successful people's revolution in terms of lasting and real egalitarian reform. Just armed struggle, and many promises of reform, always to be abandoned after the revolution. They were subsequently wiped out by the politically potent urban middle class, in league with traditional elites, such as the haciendados and corporatists. The bourgeoisie never gives up its profitable connections to the elites. Same as in America. The bourgeoisie lives at the pleasure of the elites.
However, in the people's revolutions it was mainly "the people" who got killed. So they get naming rights. The people own their revolution only in death. Just as in the U.S., the elites here and the business classes get everything else and rent it back to us as mortgages or whatever.
You can argue that people have always screwed other people for a buck, or a drachma or a shekel. You will win with that argument every time. However, the real issue is about how many people got screwed and how hard by how few. Under 250 years of capitalism, the rising take from the ongoing screw job has grown astronomical. Enough to buy every political tub-thumper in Washington and a Supreme Court. Enough that if the elite cartels on Wall Street rip 300 million Americans for trillions, leaving them squinting at the fine print on their eviction notices, they cannot do jack about it. Except pay the next ransom demand for their credit . On their credit cards. Then sign their children into future debt slavery.An awareness of class makes clear who is screwing whom. That's why American capitalism's official line is that we are a... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
GORDON DUFF: IS AMERICA SUBJECT TO A DOMESTIC REIGN OF TERROR? : Veterans Today
IS AMERICA THE VICTIM OF A WAR FROM WITHIN?
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
One day you read about a break-in at a Senator’s office, the next day, you learn the Acorn “scandal” was a ruse. None of these things get any follow-up in the MSM/Corporate news. Then you find the only magazine that will report on massive spy operations against America is Hustler, and their coverage of the national security scandal involving Sibel Edmonds testimony.
This is the biggest spy scandal, biggest scandal in America’s history, best documented and most damaging and has been covered up for years. When a huge story like this breaks, we hear nothing, read nothing.
Keep thinking, “If it isn’t in the newspapers or on TV, it can’t hurt me.” You couldn’t be more wrong.
Your spam box fills with accusations, polished lies, propaganda, dozens a day sometimes and you never know who or where. It is never anything exposing the truth, always something coordinated with the MSM. They report only what they are allowed and leave the cover-up and lies that point fingers the wrong way to their friends on the internet.
Its called “psy-ops,” a form of warfare and we are the victims. The military spends billions protecting us from “cyber-warfare” but fails to note that the spam we get daily is cyber warfare, in fact it is terrorism. Every criminal organization, every terrorist group, uses psy-ops, and cyber warfare. Much of your email is part of it and it is so successful that you don’t even know who your real enemies are anymore.
An enemy calls this “winning.”
The current leaked memo showing the GOP plan to “scare,” read DESTABILIZE the United States through an organized and systematic plan of disinformation is psychological warfare, “psy-ops” and a form of cyber-terrorism. Who runs the GOP? Who runs the Democrats? Do you think we do?
If you do, you are a victim of psy-ops. Score another one for the “enemy.”
Any systematic plan to misinform and deceive Americans to undermine their ability to make informed decisions for their own welfare is an attack on the United States and, under law, a criminal act. If it is done with intent to inflict damage on the security of the United States it is treason. Anyone have a problem with this definition?
Where are those we trust, those we pay to protect us? You say you believe they are part of it?
We had an electronic voting scandal and no newspaper reported it. A witness who claimed he had been threatened by Karl Rove died in a mysterious plane crash, the financier, Ohio Republican leader, Tom Noe went to prison for 22 years and more than minor proof is available that the 2004 election for President is invalid.
This gave us the Roberts Supreme Court, whose decisions have done untold damage to the security of America. You won’t hear this on the MSM/Corporate news but 4 “minority” Supreme Court justices will glady tell you. 5 members of our Supreme Court are now defacto “enemies of the state” yet now, they control the state to the point of stepping so far outside their Constitutional mandate that our original system of government is gone.
Hijacked. Two crooked elections had a purpose, stacking the court, bring us to permanent war and looting the American financial system while undermining our civil rights and system of laws. It is done, signed sealed and delivered.
Proof is flowing in from around the country of votes being “flipped” and machines being hacked, to the point of millions of votes. Not only is this not reported, the government itself is either unwilling or unable to protect America from these basic attacks on our freedoms.
This is how we define a “failed state” when talking about others. Normally, we would ask for sanctions and plan a regime change to save the people from tyranny and injustice.
The crimes aren’t just torture and massive election fraud, it goes deeper. All the talk about the “bail outs” is part of it too, that and the hundreds of billions stolen by defense contractors in Iraq.
The GAO itself even reports 295 billion stolen so far but nothing is done, not a day of jail time, no investigation.
What does this prove?
If elections are rigged, news is managed, public opinion is twisted by phony scares, or invented news and massive deception campaigns, then anything can be done, any crime, murder, theft, spying, treason, we aren’t safe from anything.
America’s own “war on terror” has made America itself a victim of those some of us trusted to protect us. Finding proof of this is child’s play but nobody is looking, nobody reporting, nobody “minding the store.” There are no investigative journalists, not ones on TV or in Newspapers or major magazines, no curious judges or prosecutors, Congressional committees “getting at the facts.”
Could everyone be involved? Who has that kind of power, that much money?
Are there domestic black operations? Are there groups that are controlled by political parties, like the GOP’s private militia, “Blackwater” or the AIPAC/Mossad groups that can do alot more than just manage the news or harass citizens?
With hundreds of trained spies, snipers, “black-bag” crews and “hit squads” from the CIA and other spy organizations, not only working for extremists but working inside the US for years, has anyone wondered why nothing is done to investigate anything?
Is there a secret domestic reign of terror, unreported, unseen by the public but there just the same?
How many of our national leaders are being blackmailed? Check on the “retirements” and resignations. Then add to that number, those who vote for things they despise and say nothing about corruption and tyranny. It isn’t just the Whitehouse and Congress but the courts, Justice Department and, of course, the Pentagon.
Not everyone can be bribed by defense contractors or bullied by the AIPAC/Israel lobby, it has to get rougher than that, or we would be hearing more, much more. When we turned our Joint Special Operations Command over to Dick Cheney as his personal private army then began “privatization” of our black operations, rendition programs, counter-intelligence, those who are supposed to silently kill America’s enemies to “keep us safe” did we suspect it would all go so wrong?
The results are obvious. We are now in the middle of massive military operations in Afghanistan against an enemy who is laughing at us. We are waving flags, claiming victory and they, with their weapons put aside, are cheering us on. We know it, they know it, only the American people are fooled. It is all a game, dead Afghanis, broke and unemployed Americans and rich and fat defense contractors.
Oh, we also forgot to mention the drug barons in Afghanistan. Do you really believe that our new “privatized” CIA and mercenary armies are above drug running? Get real. Ask one of your kids how cheap heroin is now, any kid over 10 will know.
Can a population, can the American people be free if systematically deceived by every information source they are told to trust? It started small, with phony Osama bin Laden translations, done in Israel, that were the opposite of what he actually said. From there, where did they go?
We accept the things we seem to have once feared as though they don’t matter.
One of the best psy-ops games is to bombard us with phony conspiracies to hide the real ones. We get so many now that none seem to matter, we either deny everything out of “funk” or simply feel overwhelmed. This is what was intended and if you feel overwhelmed, “they” have done their jobs to perfection.
It is a war, a terrorist war against America, as real as crashing planes and blowing up buildings, in fact it is worse. We are slowly being beaten down with lies to where we don’t care anymore. We may have been there for years already.IS AMERICA THE VICTIM OF A WAR FROM WITHIN? By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor One day you read about a break-in at a... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
The Video the Army Does Not Want You To See. No Justice, No Peace.
The American Military, in the name of keep us 'safe', has committed years of atrocities. Some of the soldiers go awry and become savage immoral killers. Some of the soldiers go crazy when they return home after witnessing such atrocities. We don't fight in the name of PEACE. We don't fight in the name of FREEDOM. We fight in the name of HALLIBURTON, RAYTHEON, KELLOGG, PFIZER and the rest.
How dare we claim the high moral ground when the wars we are in are for profit and lies and have nothing to do with freedom or saving anyone? Did you know that an 'insurgent' is someone who doesn't like having a foreign military stomping around on their backyards? I'd be willing to bet most of you would be insurgents if the roles were reversed. An estimated 90% of the foreigners killed in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have been civilians...innocent. We call them collateral damage. They call them brother, sister, father and mother.
Take a good look at this video and hear the testimonies. Then, think about all of your complaints, fears, demands, petty arguments that you take for granted every day. Think about everyone asking for money, jobs, cutting back on carbon emissions. Now, answer this. How dare we complain about what we lack when we've taken so much from so many? How dare we complain about carbon emissions when our death machine is creating the majority of it? How dare we argue between Democrat and Republican when so many in our own streets are fighting for a meal? How dare we judge anyone for hating us when we've destroyed their lives, their land, their water and their future?
There will never be peace anywhere on this planet until we learn that the 'Justice' that we preach must be the 'Justice' we deliver.
No Justice, No Peace.
No Justice, No Peace!
Christopher Hignite Monkey Press 2010The American Military, in the name of keep us 'safe', has committed years of atrocities. Some of the soldiers go awry... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
AMERICA’S POLITICAL MESS, TIME TO START OVER : Veterans Today
TERM LIMITS, A THIRD PARTY OR EVEN REAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE RULES AREN’T ENOUGH
By Gordon Duff / STAFF WRITER / Senior Editor
start-over-governmentWhere do you start? John McCain is facing a challenge in Arizona. He is going to drag out his military record and his experience as a personal recommendation. Few Americans really know that McCain is a mental case with a “war record” he has had to have “classified” to keep himself out of prison.
The truth, is this all? Does he have lifelong ties to organized crime, a history of voting against veterans and working against POW/MIA group? It is even worse than that. We have never had a person this crazy with this much baggage running for any office in our history. McCain, the personal shadow of Josef Lieberman, the Senator from Tel Aviv, along with dozens of others, could and should all be doing time, not “serving democracy.”
We have never had a political candidate in our history so deserving of the attention of criminal profilers as John McCain. Now that there is time for reflective and intelligent thought, those who supported him should take a look at his real history. The myth of John McCain, carefully groomed by the organization was challenged by POW advocate Ted Sampley. It makes a powerful read and earned Sampley the hatred of McCain and John Kerry until his death. I can think of no better epitaph for an American.
McCain, the lovable sociopath, is not the only one, not by a long shot. We have peppered the country with junior versions of McCain, all chasing the brass ring represented by selling America to the powerful and generally evil groups that own our government. It isn’t just AIPAC, front for poor Israel, a country that touts itself as the “second most powerful nuclear power on earth” or the endless lobbies. The disappointment so many feel about President Obama tells the story.
As a veteran, I had to work for Obama, or so I thought. McCain had done so much against our POWs and their families, was so crooked, did so much to betray America’s veterans that he had to go. This left me with having to push support to Barack Obama, another of those “out of nowhere” politicians, obviously alot smarter than McCain and with some sense to know what economic disaster looks like. I knew he couldn’t be running for office unless he had been “packaged” by some group with an agenda to keep things as they were.
Here is a question. If Congress wasn’t as corrupt as we know it to be, a pile of money hogs with their noses stuck in a trough, would the health care bill have passed by now? Any idiot knows we need one, OK, any half idiot. Every American that opposed health care, or at least a public option, must be a total dupe. When we started, 40% of Americans had no coverage, it is now 55%. However, the bill we are voting on is a boondoggle for the insurance companies and, even then, the GOP isn’t happy with that.
How do I hate the democrats for their corruption and gutlessness when the entire Republican party is even worse, pawns of gangsters, totally bereft of any humanity at all?
All Americans asked of Obama was to clean up the remains of two stolen elections and investigate the criminal conspiracy at the heart of the Bush administration. At least, we need a new 9/11 Commission and a Special Prosecutor to go after those who have been accused of perjury and submitting false information to the first one. This would jail half the Bush Administration and, perhaps, open the door to a look at how things really work.
Tens of millions of Americans and most people outside the United States believe 9/11 was a conspiracy involving the Bush administration and groups from Israel. Whether this is true or not, since 9/11 we have found massive evidence that it may be true and, since the Detroit “Crotch Bombing” of 2009, we have a publicly know evidentiary trail showing how it could have been done using the Mossad and Israeli owned companies.
Even those Americans who still buy the MSM/Corporate press version of the conspiracy, there is enough proof that the Iraq invasion was part of a criminal conspiracy that should jail, not only a former President and Vice President but dozens of others also. That one is a slam dunk.
Obama has failed totally in his responsibility as president there.
Remember the Acorn scandal? Filled the newspapers with stories of buying votes and people dressing up as pimps. Now we find our “pimp” was a CIA employee, the newspaper stories were totally false and Acorn was victimized by a plot between the GOP, CIA and Israel as part of a ploy to rig a 3rd consecutive election. These are the facts as they stand, facts that will never be reported but facts just the same.
They tell you what is wrong. Nobody will ask newspapers why they take orders from lobbyists or why paid lobbyists like Tom Ridge and so many others are paraded in front of the public, them and their scripts, bringing us endless falsified news.
I was never a big one for the “grand conspiracy.” I had worked in politics, knew I was around crooks. Every American accepts this silently. It is why America is a failed state, heading down the toilet, dead in the water and, as any real economist knows, hopeless. I spent a alot of time with former Washington attorney and Senate Finance Chief Counsel, Jeff Gates over the last couple of weeks. We were on a lecture tour of Pakistan together and ended up dozens of discussions, some including alot of table pounding. We are both good at that part.
Jeff wrote tax code, the detail stuff, when working in the Senate as a lawyer. I come out of banking and finance also, so we had alot to go over. It took a couple of days, but eventually it began to sink in. What he knew and what I knew went one direction, our government had been under the control of organized crime for many years, not just since Reagan, as I had suspected. It went back long before that. Kennedy stood up against it, so did his brother Bobby.
The facts were there, not “newspaper” facts or Fox News “fair and balanced” facts. You could tie the ownership and control of newspapers, corporations and political parties to a few families. The “conspiracy theories” about the Trilateral Commission, CFR or Bilderbergers and Illuminati was a joke. It was the “mob” clear and simple. Prohibition, millions in profits buying government, not the Italian “Mafia” but a Jewish one, steeped in politics, both Republican and Democrat heading one way, the destruction of America.
Jeff’s conclusion was that the nation of Israel was established as a base for criminal operations as the legitimacy of a “nation state” was needed to gain control of America from within and without. The facts were there. His book, Guilt by Association and his website, www.criminalstate.com put it in terms that are unavoidable. I talked at length about history, where my background comes in. It all went together too well. We are continually bombarded by conspiracies to keep us off track. Everything is manipulated.
It was depressing. I keep looking within the political system and wonder why it does nothing but the same things, with Democrats moderating some aspects of financial abuse and theft but the direction keeps coming back. Our political system itself failed because we allowed money to buy power, which it did. It has never let go, it only made more money and bought more power.
More at the link:TERM LIMITS, A THIRD PARTY OR EVEN REAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE RULES AREN’T ENOUGH By Gordon Duff / STAFF WRITER / Senior... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
Barefoot and Progressive: Meet Christopher Hignite, LFUCG At-Large candidate (UPDATE)
City Council Candidate Runs to Expose Corruption and Murder As Documented!
Please go to the website link to view the videos mentioned in the following article:
From his campaign site's home page:
Who is Christopher Alan Hignite? Why should you vote for Christopher Alan Hignite?
Let's start by talking about who and what Christopher is not from Christopher's voice!
I'm not sure what that means, but I'm all ears!
Wait, before we go further, I must share the header pic. I'm not sure who these frightening stock photo people are, and why there is only a small blurry picture of the candidate. But we have a lot of ground to cover, so let's just move on.
undefinedOK, let's get back to who Christopher Hignite is:
I am not a politician and have no interest in becoming one. I am not tall. I don't have parents in politics. I don't have a Hollywood smile. I am not rich and have no interest in becoming rich. I am not interested in making cozy connections inherent in today's politics. I don't take money from corporate interests that will demand I vote in their interests.
Fair enough. So we have kind of a grassroots populist thing going? I'm down with that...
I am not a criminal even though some would have you believe that I am.
...(head turns) what's that?
I am not going to let murderers get a pass just because they wear a badge.
Come again?
Please read on in the following pages to find out why I decided to run for Council at Large this year. You will discover an intriguing story of the American Dream destroyed by corruption.
****
Yes, read on to find out more about my story, your story, Deborah Wardlaw's murder, government corruption and how to stop it.
Alrighty then.
So... this is what Christopher is talking about:
Mr. Hignite claims that his knowledge of this murder is why Lexington police constant follow, harrass and arrest him. He has many videos on the matter here.
He also asks:
WHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHY.........................?
I've been asking that for years.
Also, there is this:
Let me sum up by reminding everyone that six candidates will make it through the primary to the general for the 3 available LFUCG At-Large seats.
It's still early, but as of now I'm rooting for Christopher Hignite to be one of those 6, so we can hear his unique brand of populism over the next 9 months.
UPDATE: BONUS FOOTAGE! (be sure to keep watching until you hit the 3:27 mark. That's the kicker.)City Council Candidate Runs to Expose Corruption and Murder As Documented! Please go to the website link to view the videos... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
How the DEA Scrubbed Thomas Jefferson's Monticello Poppy Garden from Public Memory | | AlterNet
Visitors to Monticello don't learn how Jefferson cultivated poppies, and his personal opium use may as well never have happened.
March 3, 2010 |
The following is an excerpt from Jim Hogshire's "Opium for the Masses: Harvesting Nature's Best Pain Medication" (Feral House, 2009).
Thomas Jefferson was a drug criminal. But he managed to escape the terrible sword of justice by dying a century before the DEA was created. In 1987 agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency showed up at Monticello, Jefferson's famous estate.
Jefferson had planted opium poppies in his medicinal garden, and opium poppies are now deemed illegal. Now, the trouble was the folks at the Monticello Foundation, which preserves and maintains the historic site, were discovered flagrantly continuing Jefferson's crimes. The agents were blunt: The poppies had to be immediately uprooted and destroyed or else they were going to start making arrests, and Monticello Foundation personnel would perhaps face lengthy stretches in prison.
The story sounds stupid now, but it scared the hell out of the people at Monticello, who immediately started yanking the forbidden plants. A DEA man noticed the store was selling packets of "Thomas Jefferson's Monticello Poppies." The seeds had to go, too. While poppy seeds might be legal, it is never legal to plant them. Not for any reason.Visitors to Monticello don't learn how Jefferson cultivated poppies, and his personal opium use may as well never have... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
YouTube - Chile earthquake and HAARP colors in the sky!
The signifying aurora that accompanies the use of a HAARP type of weapon could be seen in China, Indonesia, Haiti, Chile, and I'd be willing to bet they were seen in Japan. I recently posted an article where Secretary of Defense, William Cohen admits that HAARP type weapons can be used to create earthquakes, alter the weather and even set off volcanoes. This is what is happening, I believe, and if so, we are in for a roller-coaster of events over the next few years. They could either be trying to simulate the effects of Global Warming to push the World Government or they could be trying to simulate a 2012 type situation to use fear to initiate martial law and tyrrany. Either way, what do we do now?The signifying aurora that accompanies the use of a HAARP type of weapon could be seen in China, Indonesia, Haiti, Chile, and... more-
-
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
-
Obama's Budget Revealed: Money for Wars and Weapons, While More Americans Face Joblessness and Hunger | | AlterNet
The latest federal budget opens the American public to yet more pain, while shielding the military and the rest of the national security establishment from the same.
March 2, 2010 |
Send up a flare! The 2011 federal budget has sprung some leaks in the midst of a storm. Not sure there's enough money for life rafts! Forget women and children first!
Buffeted by economic hard times, the 2,585-page, $3.8 trillion document is already taking on water, though this won’t be obvious to you if you’re reading the mainstream media. Let’s start with the absolute basics: 59% of the budget’s spending is dedicated to mandatory programs like Medicaid, Medicare, Unemployment Insurance, Social Security, and now Pell Grants; 34% is to be spent on “discretionary programs,” including education, transportation, housing, and the military; 7% will be used to service the national debt.
A serious look at this budget document reveals some “leaks” -- two in actual spending practices and two in the basic assumptions that undergird the budget itself. Ship-shape as it may look on the surface, this is a budget perilously close to an iceberg, and it’s not clear whether the captain of the ship will heed the obvious warning signs.
Whose Security Is This Anyway?
In his State of the Union Address, given several days before the 2011 budget was released, President Obama announced a three-year freeze on “non-security discretionary spending.” This was meant as a gesture toward paying down the looming national debt, but it should also be considered an early warning sign for leak number one. After all, the president exempted all national-security-related spending from the cutting process. Practically speaking, according to the National Priorities Project (NPP), national security spending makes up about 67% of that discretionary 34% slice of the budget. In 2011, that will include an as-yet-untouchable $737 billion for the Pentagon alone.
Within the context of the total budget, then, so-called non-security discretionary spending represents a mere 11% of proposed 2011 spending. In other words, Obama’s present plans to chip away at the debt involve leaving 89% of the budget untouched. Only the $370 billion going to myriad domestic social programs will be on the chopping block.
What's in that $370 billion? Well, for starters, programs that focus on the environment, energy, and science. In the 2011 budget, these categories combined are projected to receive $79 billion or 6% of total domestic discretionary spending. Though each of these areas could actually use a significant boost in funds, that’s obviously not in the cards -- and this will translate into less money at the state level. New York, for example, is projected to receive $247 million in home energy assistance for low-income folks, down more than $230 million from 2010. These funds mean an energy safety net for our communities, and also warmth and jobs in a cold winter, which looks like “security” to most of us, no matter what our captain says.
Asking for disproportionate cuts and efficiencies in programs in only 11% percent of the overall budget might perhaps be slightly easier to stomach if military spending wasn’t allowed relatively free rein in 2011 (and thereafter). The NPP estimates, in fact, that aggregated increases in military spending over the next decade will exceed $500 billion, drowning twice-over the projected $250 billion in non-security discretionary savings from the president’s cuts over the same time period. Consider this visible unwillingness to control military-related spending leak two in our budgetary Titanic.
By now, danger flags should be going up in profusion because the second leak is so familiar, so George W. Bush. With each new bit of information, in fact, it sounds more and more like the same old song, the last guy's tune. It’s clear that, as soon as the stimulus bump wears off later this year, we're in danger of falling back into exactly the same more-money-for-the-military, less-federal-aid-to-the-states rut we’ve been in for years, despite strong statements from both President Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates decrying Pentagon waste.
And speaking of waste, the Department of Defense is currently carrying weapons-program cost overruns for 96 of its major weapons programs totaling $295 billion, which alone are guaranteed to wipe out any proposed savings from President Obama's non-security discretionary freeze, with $45 billion to spare. That's only to be expected, since neither the Pentagon nor any of the armed services have ever been able to pass a proper audit. Ever.
Even more at the link:The latest federal budget opens the American public to yet more pain, while shielding the military and the rest of the national... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
CBC News - Canada - It is not just women who are the victims of spousal violence
In the almost 40 years since the first shelter for battered women opened its doors, we have made noticeable progress in dealing with and denouncing domestic violence.
Nevertheless, much still needs to be done and the biggest challenge, in my view, is what to do about men.
Not men as perpetrators — there we seem to have a handle on things. Rather, I'm talking about the hundred thousand or so confirmed male victims who are, often violently, abused by their female partners every year.
Domestic violence is not a gender-specific reality. Women are capable of hitting, beating, abusing and killing their male partners.
Just how prevalent these attacks are depends on what statistical study you choose to highlight.
But based on what we know, there should be no argument that female violence against men is at least a problem worthy of much greater consideration than we have given it so far.
Gender neutral
According to a large-scale Statistics Canada study in 2005, the likelihood of a man being the victim of violent abuse by his female partner is almost the same as it is for a woman.
A A "red silhouette" campaign to mark the 32 individuals killed by family violence in South Carolina in 2007; 28 of them women. Begun by Minnesota art students in 1990, the campaign has spread to 18 countries, including Canada. (Associated Press)
In this study, an estimated seven per cent of women and six per cent of men surveyed had encountered some form of spousal violence over the previous five years.
This means, StatsCan said, that roughly 653,000 women and 546,000 men considered themselves the victims of violence at the hands of a current or previous spouse or common-law partner, an estimate that was unchanged from an earlier study.
However, if you look simply at cases that are reported to police, the victim profile changes significantly.
In 83 per cent of these cases, women are the victims, according to a different Statistics Canada survey.
There may be a simple reason for this. "Men are less likely to report domestic violence to police than women are, and police are less likely to take male complaints seriously," says Don Dutton, professor of psychology at the University of British Columbia.
As a result, he says, we end up with a reporting system on the subject in which "men are selected out" and then "government agencies say 'look, it is only women who are the victims,' which of course is a self-fulfilling prophesy."
Higher standards of proof
Dutton is no axe-grinder in this debate. He has written extensively about wife assault and the abusive personality, and he has been an expert witness on many occasions, including, notably, for the prosecution in the O.J. Simpson trial in the U.S.
He is also far from the only person in the field who feels this way.
For Erin Pizzey who founded the world's first shelter for battered women in the U.K back in 1971, the reality of female violence against men did not have to wait for the statisticians to sort out and analyze the research.
"Of the first 100 women who came into my refuge, 62 were as violent or more violent than the men that they were leaving," she says. "This was not a gender issue."
It makes you wonder then why more battered men are not coming forward and demanding access to the same resources that women are increasingly seeking out.
Part of the answer there, according to recent research by Denise Hines, a professor of psychology at Clark University in Massachusetts, is that men are often confronted with higher standards of proof when they make a complaint.
All three of the institutions that Hines studied — assault hotlines, domestic violence agencies and police — "blatantly told the men that it was somehow their fault and that they must have been the real batterer," she says.
"As a matter of fact, when the men called the police on their female partners they were just as likely to be arrested as she was."
Off the pedestal
Yes, the male recipient of female-instigated violence might well be a "bastard" and an "idiot."
And, yes, most studies indicate that women experience more severe forms of domestic violence than men. Although here, too, the results can vary significantly depending on how the statistics are compiled, whether through police reports or independent research.
But just as the alleged shortcomings of a female partner should never be used as a rationalization for violence against women, the same should be true when the situation is reversed.
Call me stubborn, but I can't accept any notion that gives women a different moral or legal standing when it comes to domestic violence. In fact, that may be the problem that landed us in this box in the first place.
As things now stand, several provinces offer support to men who are victims of female abuse. But these services have largely been baby steps.
What seems to be holding them back is our society's lingering assumptions about male superiority and, what you might call, chivalry, which remain the single biggest obstacles to resolving domestic violence.
"Men have an extraordinary fear of supporting each other or alienating women," says Pizzey. "The reason why men will not see women for what they are — human like everyone else — is the male need to put women on the pedestal."
The result, she says, is that "we refuse to see domestic violence as a human issue, we insist on seeing it as a political issue. Everything is driven on this hatred of men."
When might it all change?
In my view only when we all climb down from our respective pedestals and see this as a common problem that transcends our he-said, she-said views of the world.
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/02/22/f-vp-smol.html#ixzz0gvGonHIEIn the almost 40 years since the first shelter for battered women opened its doors, we have made noticeable progress in dealing... more-
-
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
-
-
-
to add stories and get updates
-
CDC Admin:
-
about
We ask questions and demand answers. We are the Patriots our Founding Fathers asked us to be. We seek to correct disinformation and spread the truth. Feel free to send any information our direction and we'll make sure we get it out to all of the We Are Change chapter and we'll make it viral on the internet. Now, go out there and get me the truth!
group leaders (1)
members (2) | see all
-
-
related
- GROUP Libertarian Party (419)
- GROUP Corruption101 (280)
- GROUP Collective Journalism (3287)
- GROUP Progressive America (1709)
- GROUP US News (4380)
- Tags:
- Barack Obama
- Christian
- Conspiracy
- Police
- Corruption
- Constitution
- Cops
- Conspiracy Theory
- Jesus
- Truth
- Court
- Communism
- Christianity
- Police Brutality
- New World Order
- Fascism
- Bill of Rights
- Constitutional rights
- NWO
- Liberty
- constitutional law
- Mao
- john locke
- government abuse
- Police Abuse
- fluoride
- we are change
- Conspiracy Fact
- Swine Flu
- H1N1
- Politics
- Religion
- Funny
- flue
- tyrrany
- maitreya
- we are change kentucky
- we are change ky
- flue shot
-
