Rich guys 'give the ladies more orgasms'

wtf that is so stupid but i think a good 90% of women are more likely to have sex with you in for the money...

Guys, girls do not find security to be sexually desirable by itself. Or else the "best friend status" wouldn't be dreaded by high-schoolers everywhere.

sounds pretty riduculous in that they have more orgasms because of the amount of money he has. whats more realistic is that she is sleeping with him cuz of the more money he has.

They even have better orgasms when they divorce him, get half and then screw a broke guy!

this is completely untrue...I have never dated or slept with any rich men and i have no problems with the pleasure department

I think this makes a lot of emotional sense and I wouldn't consider this means a woman is a golddigger, but rather she is turned on by a sense of security and maybe a love of the good life; and what's the downside of that????

this is stupid

*sigh* no hope for me....

its hard to believe...

Who pays for a study like this?

lol @ the superficiality of this society.

hahahaha....
what a great first response
"i aint saying she's a gold digger...
....but she aint messin with no broke nigga"

Dr Thomas Pollet is behind the study... I already checked it out he's not on kanye's label. the study was done in china.. I looked at his homepage! lol gotta love the internet and he's a young white guy probally in his twenties and by the schools he went to i'm guessing his pockets are lined nicely i bet he made this "study" just to bag some girls at his college.

My bf happens to be unemployed .. AND he's the best lover I've ever come across...

Maybe the reason people say that is because when there is financial stress alot of couples tend to self destruct. We don't have that problem.

She works hard for the money, so hard for the money...

what a crock of shit. these idiots will say anything to preserve the status quo. so it boils down to

More money=More pleasure.

lol

Im not a rich man but i get my girl off just fine.

The whole problem with this 'study' is the classic causation =/= correlation issue. Because wealth is the variable in the study, the assumption is that the wealth is the defining factor. But what if wealth is merely a reflection of something else? How about elementary value?

further proof that attraction is primarily mental and not physical.

oh flim flam.

I would not dismiss this as a myth or biased opinion. A woman’s ability to orgasm is tied to the security she feels with her partner. That level of security may vary but it's a well known fact that women have a deep need for financial security. If that need is met she is likely to have an easier time connecting to her partner and achieving climax.
Men don't let your ego fool you. Your woman has likely faked an "O" to keep you feeling like the king of her castle. Another free piece of advice is that a vast majority of one night stands do not produce a female orgasm. Sorry guys that notch is just a notch.
That's not to say that poor folk can't get her there too, they just need to make her feel secure in other ways. Many men can compensate for the lack of financial security by committing to a monogamous relationship.

Other inhibiting or un-inhibiting factors can include whether or not the woman is helping support the household financially. There is no one item that is done to ensure that it will happen every time. Women are more than that. Build security (or trust) in her and you WILL see the fireworks, or what I like to call heaven on earth.

Ciao.

FIrst of all, nobody "gives" you an orgasm. Whether you come or not is up to you, not anyone else. Don't people realize that? If you're shallow enough to only get turned on by the size of the guy's bank account, that's your problem. But nobody "gives" anybody an orgasm.

I don't think it's the sex that better it's the sence of security that they don't have to get up and work the next day... It's more stress free, care free, sex.... Wow I can't wait till I get a bigger bank account because I am doing a damn good job now!!!

yea this study like some others is ignoring the variables.

What a steaming pile of horseshit.

This seems sketchy at best. Does more equal better?

And they just asked people questions, that's not scientifically proving anything.

Is it only Chinese women? Did they look at men as well? Etc, etc. Hardly a scientific study.

Controlling society through means of so called scientific study is flat out immoral. You can call me broke all you want I own a business.

My problem with these types of theories is that when idiots actually believe them to be fact it changes society for the worse. We are already a society that believes money = happiness and this pushes it even father. Enough is enough stand up and tell these fools they are full of s...

I sense a lot of broke guys in this audience....what with all the complaining

Well, it's pretty obvious that men with money always get beautiful women.

Psychologists are not scientists. Find me someone that can read a persons' thoughts and I will listen otherwise its a bunch of suedo science. Easily disproved threories ruin our society. People start thinking money = pleasure is a total farse and has been proven time and time again. Try this question on the same subjects, would you rather have money and a dildo that gets you off as good as this rich guy or someone you love? That would rock this study's world.

I agree naty_forty.

Just painting women in a bad light.

I would rather live on the streets with someone that I am passionately in love with than tolerate someone because they have money. Ugh.

ridiculous...

Yeah, I can confirm this. I make about $15,000 a year unemployed. My girlfriend hates me.

I wonder if telling her that your rich even if your not helps :D

I suspect rich men have an easier time attracting the type of women who will do anything for money. They say a high priced whore performs better than a street hooker. The same is true all along the socio-economic spectrum where superior performance is rewarded.

further proof that evolution (as this is labeled in the article) isn't synonymous with progress

"She moaned, squirmed, shuddered and screamed all the way to the bank."
I'm going to use that in my first novel.

hmmm
the thing is that the men with the doh can take lessons to find out where the g spot is. so, I see no surprise here.
meaning, this is bologna. I agree. The women are faking for a chance to stay one more night with Daddy Warbucks. The best faker gets the man... and the money.
Do I smell a reality TV show?
I think yes.

maybe they just fake more orgasms to keep close to the bank balance... [/cynicism]

That's an interesting though.

i call bullshit on this.

it's the specie's imperative. human females biologically conditioned response is to seek the pheromones of the alpha male. this is traditionally indicated by crotch bulge ,
"can I take him home to meet my parents if I miss a couple of months and decide to have it,?" and the subtle fragrance of Benjamin Franklins.

I can confirm this. :D

And they spend millions bailing themselves out of the messes they get in. And that's only the beginning!

Hardly anything to envy!

Damn! this is news??

Money and champagne are sexy.

inherently programmed?

is it not possible that they've been culturally conditioned, rather?

and oh, these results are based on interviews, not lab research or anything. gold diggers also tend to be bullshitters.

Are they sure about those results? Tell you what, in the interest of science only, give me a couple of mill and access to the woman of my choice and I'll double check those results.

and yet why are all those rich trophy wives always banging the pool boys?

no wonder the girls at the bank are always askin me out

n here i wuz thinkin it was ma b boy style

:D

How do you sign up to help in these studies?

but she aint messin wit no broke broke broke

now I ain't sayin' she a gold-digger ...