TV Schedule

The Caucus


  3. Tarapotamus
  4. related topics
Did you watch the debate last night? Who might YOU vote for?
Tarapotamus

13 responses // The Caucus

  • I want Al Gore to run sooooooooo badly! As it is... *sigh* Edwards... I guess.
    The_Awesome
  • I truthfully just don't know yet, but I can say that I most likely will not be voting for Clinton.
    Tarapotamus
  • Al Gore even if I have to write his name in.
    marlakay
  • I didn't watch the debate...truth be known I have only seen two or three since they began having them earlier this year. My vote until Gore is in "Is None of the Above"
    tippytwo
  • Gore is still my first choice, and I'll write him in if I have to. But, Edwards is my solid second choice after last night.
    ACandyDarkly
  • http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/30/democrats.debate...
    Image...
    Clinton rivals attack Clinton Dominance.
    joshuaheller
  • The future of this country depends on who the next President is
    ladynite
  • Al Gore would be my choice, with Edwards as his running mate, but since Al isn't on, John Edwards is the only person in the field who really has his finger on the pulse of working America... i.e., me.
    He really could be one of the great ones, at least his heart isn't for sale to lobbiests.
    furyious
  • I wish Al Gore would run because Clinton/Obama/Edwards are a dismal failure in a system that is failing us (the people) everyday.
    ladynite
  • I don't think Gore will ever run.
    Tarapotamus
  • Edwards. He seems the most likely to end the war, to make big sweeping changes such as healthcare for all, curbing carbon emissions enough to stave off the worst effects of global warming and create green jobs. He will also end corporate lobbyist influence at the expense of the American people.

    He has always been for the people. I'm glad he articulated it well last night.
    phoenix_fire999
  • The problem with wishing for Al Gore is that it distracts from dealing with the situation at hand. As much as I admire and respect him, he's not in the game. At least, not yet.
    John Edwards is. If we hope to make the kind of changes that need to be made, we first have to find someone who is willing to separate themselves from the "business as usual" "you rub my back I'll rub yours" gang in D.C. Hillary is a Republican in Democrat's clothing. Obama is a rock star, and has about as much experience, and Biden just doesn't have the flair and appeal that is going to be needed to motivate the younger demographics.
    John Edwards could be the real mover this nation has needed.
    We need to nominate someone who has a real chance of beating the republicans. And it would be a truly sad commentary if the only reason a democrat got in office was because no one wanted to vote for Guliani or McCain. We need someone, that people can get behind and believe in. Someone who is going to put logic and reason back in foreign affairs and be done with the fearmongering method of browbeating the nation.
    We need someone who will work HARD for the hardworking people, the children, and the uninsured. John Edwards is the only one that gives me any hope for any of those things.
    furyious
  • OK. That's a very persuasive argument, furyious. I can get behind that.
    The_Awesome

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response.