Gun Control
-
-
- natalie579
- added this
-
-
owlcritic
-
This is the typical left wing liberal rant of a high schooler or college student,that aparently,have never read a history book. This girl in the video? just what would she have us do?lets just disarm the entire law abiding,tax paying population so only the military,police,and of course,the criminal element will be armed.Let me be clear about this,you cant trust the military or police to protect you,we are diferent from other countries because we have an armed population,a good insurance policy to keep the goverment from imposing their will on the people.Am I wrong? lets look at what happened to the unarmed students at Kent State,when national guard fired upon un armed protesting students,two of which were not even in the protest,were shot and killed,and others injured,one permantly. Or Waco TX. and the Branch Dividians,crazy or not,it was a church and we still have fredom of religion in this country,or do we?
Obama wants to have gun control at the federal level,just another trait of a scocalist.He needs to understand the scond ammendment and we are a country of the people,by the people,and for the people.So,even if they impose goverment control on all weapons,the criminals will always have them..
And as far as "non military" people having automatic weapons,under BATF guidelines,a person can own,machine guns,suppresors,certin typs of grenades,and automatic rifles(asault weapons)Oh yea,its true!but you have to go throgh extensive back ground checks,finger prints,pay a transferable tax,per gun,and be registered with the BATF..somthing the gang bangers and other criminal element do not do.Same type of laws exist on the state level for concealed carry,they just dont hand out those permits to any one.So you see lady,we dont need gun control,we mneed better crime control,and one of the biggest thing we can start to do,expel ALL illigal aliens,no amnestythat would remove a huge criminal element right there,but you say,but they have been working here peacfuly for years and have children born here" to bad ,that the consequence of their actions,and the good will have to suffer for the bad.Next,open war on the gang problem,agresseve arrest and imposing hard sentences,and on that note,instead of having them bunched up in the presure cooker prisions,working out and killing and fighting in jail,have em on a chain gang making big rocks into little rocks sun up to sun down,that will take the fight out of them.As for the illigal imigrants,they just need to follow protocal to be leagalized,tax paying citezens,and the world to a better life will be there,but legaly.Lets not take away americans rights,to enable those who would hurt this country. - 4 years ago
-
owlcritic
-
-
resin_lungs420
-
no that is fucking redicioulas you know why our founding fathers laid down the right to bear arms?? it was to ensre the right of revolution. Even they said for this country to survive there would have to be a revolution every once in awhile.If i wanted to kill some one....like you(hint hint).... and i couldnt get a gun id use a fucking knife. How about you go try and control those you ignorant prick. your a fucking disgrace along with everyone else who thinks guns are ruining our society. The only thig you are doing by taking away guns is taking them away from law abiding citizens. if a fucking criminal want a gun to kill theyll do as criminals do and get it ilegaly. so fuck you fuck all the other ignorant pro guncontrol pricks you can go fuck your selves
- 4 years ago
-
resin_lungs420
-
-
Bracholi
-
First, I must say. PARENTAL FAILURES.
Second, Easy access to guns? It's difficult now for a law abiding citizen, for a criminal it's easy as pie. Reason: THEFT duh. You think a guy about to rob the quicky mart walks into the local gun store and says "Hey you got anything I can take down this store with?"
No... He buys a gun that has been in another crime far away and recycled back into the underground market (A market I should mention that is harder to trace than the drug trade and has way more wealthy hands in it).
Gun Control was initially created to allow those already making a large profit with their FFLs to limit the amount of FFLs private citizens could get, Limit the amount of sales private citizens could make, and lastly drive up prices on guns. Now when I say drive up prices on guns we're talking about hunting guns already costing 800+ dollars. The typical gun used in a crime 50 bucks. Thank you for the ignorance.Psycho people get guns with/without laws.
Before gun control there were less gun crime.http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/guncrime.htm
* New Jersey adopted what sponsors described as "the most stringent gun law" in the nation in 1966; two years later, the murder rate was up 46% and the reported robbery rate had nearly doubled.
* In 1968, Hawaii imposed a series of increasingly harsh measures, and its murder rate tripled from a low of 2.4 per 100,000 in 1968 to 7.2 by 1977.
* In 1976, Washington, D.C., enacted one of the most restrictive gun control laws in the nation. Since then, the city's murder rate has risen 134% while the national murder rate has dropped 2%.
The Verdict:
Tell criminals that the law abiding citizen will have a harder time defending against them and you've fed the wolves your flock.Tell them that everyone they meet has a weapon, They won't even be able to look up.
- 5 years ago
-
Bracholi
-
-
owlcritic
-
Bracholi:
Preach it brother,the people should not fear its goverment,but its goverment should fear its people
- 4 years ago
-
owlcritic
-
-
kda1000
-
You can't use an automatic weapon for target shooting? I think you can.
If you don't have easy acces to a gun its a lot harder to kill someone? I can think of about 100 ways to kill someone that don't require a gun- gun control won't slow down the murder rate at all. If you could effectively disarm the criminals too then maybe gun control would work but as long as they have guns, I want a gun.
Not to mention why the Constitution protects an American's right to bear arms in the first place... - 5 years ago
-
kda1000
-
-
owlcritic
-
kda1000:
just want to add to your comment,the argument that guns should not be in a house with children? then I guess evry cop in the country has to be single,or at least no children in the house if their married?thats a pretty stupid idea
- 4 years ago
-
owlcritic
-
-
bushido_blues1969
-
Amen Sir Rip
- 5 years ago
-
bushido_blues1969
-
-
SirRip
-
Did you here about the guy that had his AK took away? It don't matter, it's not you're gun. well what about the you name it? It doesn't matter either, it's not your gun. please think about it. pretty soon it will be you're gun then what? You wont be able to do anything about it. The only people that will have them, are the bad guys. I would like the bad guys to wonder if I had my gunor not. keep em thinking. Maybe they wont mess with me or my family. If guns are banned, the bad guys would know for sure i didn't have my gun. Therefore i would have no protection for my family. Just a thought Late Rip
- 5 years ago
-
SirRip
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
- more
