Prince Strikes Back!
- added November 9, 2007
- 4 responses
-
-
-
- rmaisel
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- Entertainment (20971)
- Music (12333)
- Music Industry (145)
- Prince (34)
- Prince.org (1)
- PFU (1)
- Prince Fans (1)
- Web Sheriff (1)
Prince Fans United is, according to CNN, "an amalgamation of his fan groups," protesting lawyers representing Prince for threatening "to take legal action against fan-run web sites unless they remove photos of him."
In response to the outcry, Prince has written a song and created a website of his own called Prince Fams United ( http://www.princefamsunited.com/ ). The song is actually really good and sounds a bit like a throwback to his Camille days.
Prince is notorious for sending his legal team at fan sites with cease-and-desist orders.
Prince.org went to great lengths, after receiving one such order, to monitor the dialogue between fans, barring any discussion of bootlegged material and even barring fake tracklists (of all things). Just stepping inside the Prince: Music and More forum to see yellow and pink highlighted legal warning and threats of being permanently deleted for violating any of their many rules became enough for me to just stop visiting the site altogether. It is, however, nice to see that theyre finally standing up to the attorneys representing Prince for what they consider to be bullying tactics designed to stifle freedom of speech.
I used to go to Housequake.com until Prince demanded recently they remove all videos; which was a real shame because they had an amazing collection of rare, hard-to-find live video / music videos of Prince. Apparently Prince has a vault of videos and unreleased music that will probably never see the light of day. Of course he has every right to keep any or all of his unreleased work from the public but its a shame all the same ...
It almost goes without saying that he got a little strange in the 90s during his contract war with Warner Bros., but I always respected the fact that he never quite went overboard in the way that say Michael Jackson went overboard. He never became too weird and he was never the center of any weird, over publicized scandal (and perhaps its because he always stayed busy), but this drive of late to protect his copyright has become unsettling to the point that I cant even listen to his music without feeling like Im violating his lawyers wishes.
Of course John Giacobbi, managing director of Web Sheriff, tried to reassure Princes fans that it isnt a direct attack on their freedom of speech so much as it is an issue between Princes record label and three unofficial websites that relates to the use of Prince trademarks and copyright. Though with the removal of said items, I can see how fans might feel that their freedom-of-speech is being stifled by a man who made a career out of testing the waters of the First Amendment.
This cease-and-desist order has gone as far as to demand the removal of fans own photographs of their Prince-inspired tattoos.
I mean, how far does Web Sheriff go with this?
If they happen to catch a Prince tattoo on someones body on their Facebook for instance, are they entitled to demand the user remove the photograph?
Doesn't entirely seem right.
In response to the outcry, Prince has written a song and created a website of his own called Prince Fams United ( http://www.princefamsunited.com/ ). The song is actually really good and sounds a bit like a throwback to his Camille days.
Prince is notorious for sending his legal team at fan sites with cease-and-desist orders.
Prince.org went to great lengths, after receiving one such order, to monitor the dialogue between fans, barring any discussion of bootlegged material and even barring fake tracklists (of all things). Just stepping inside the Prince: Music and More forum to see yellow and pink highlighted legal warning and threats of being permanently deleted for violating any of their many rules became enough for me to just stop visiting the site altogether. It is, however, nice to see that theyre finally standing up to the attorneys representing Prince for what they consider to be bullying tactics designed to stifle freedom of speech.
I used to go to Housequake.com until Prince demanded recently they remove all videos; which was a real shame because they had an amazing collection of rare, hard-to-find live video / music videos of Prince. Apparently Prince has a vault of videos and unreleased music that will probably never see the light of day. Of course he has every right to keep any or all of his unreleased work from the public but its a shame all the same ...
It almost goes without saying that he got a little strange in the 90s during his contract war with Warner Bros., but I always respected the fact that he never quite went overboard in the way that say Michael Jackson went overboard. He never became too weird and he was never the center of any weird, over publicized scandal (and perhaps its because he always stayed busy), but this drive of late to protect his copyright has become unsettling to the point that I cant even listen to his music without feeling like Im violating his lawyers wishes.
Of course John Giacobbi, managing director of Web Sheriff, tried to reassure Princes fans that it isnt a direct attack on their freedom of speech so much as it is an issue between Princes record label and three unofficial websites that relates to the use of Prince trademarks and copyright. Though with the removal of said items, I can see how fans might feel that their freedom-of-speech is being stifled by a man who made a career out of testing the waters of the First Amendment.
This cease-and-desist order has gone as far as to demand the removal of fans own photographs of their Prince-inspired tattoos.
I mean, how far does Web Sheriff go with this?
If they happen to catch a Prince tattoo on someones body on their Facebook for instance, are they entitled to demand the user remove the photograph?
Doesn't entirely seem right.
-
PFUnkHere's the supposed "dis" song that Prince released just when the press was heating up. Now, with Prince's sizable vault it's sort of hard to tell whether or not this song is freshly recorded or was pulled from the vault and updated a bit. Either way, the irony is that it took this ridiculous situation get a stellar Prince cut - the kind of cut that his fans have literally been begging for for quite some time now. This is directly from his 3121 site, but he did pass the cut onto the PFU group and can be heard directly from their site as well.
-
PFU - Prince Fams UnitedHere's a link to the PFU site for their take on the whole situation. It sounds like, as usual, the press has run a bit wild here. The lastest according to PFU:
"Many members and visitors will doubtless have seen the wildly inaccurate statement today by AEG that "Prince is not suing his fans" and referring to the Prince Fans United sites as "phoney". Not only is this statement confusing, libellous and misleading, we have actually been informed by Prince's representatives that his PR company (Outside PR) sent this in error last night and it has been picked up by a few key media organisations today.
We will shortly be issuing a (heavily) revised joint statement, however in the meantime please be aware that stories circulating on the internet that refers to "phoney" fan websites are wildly inaccurate and should not be taken at face value. Outside PR have assured us that every measure is currently being taken to withdraw these articles." -
-
-
-
-
- joshuaheller
- 10 months ago
-
-
Ouch. Comparing Prince to people that were on trial for murder and accused multiple times of molestation/pedophilia? A bit harsh, don't you think?
Prince is just trying to protect his business interests, albeit in a rather harsh and seemingly irrational way. How does that compare to the other nonsense?
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
