Climate goal unreachable. Time to panic.
- added December 10, 2007
- 2 responses
-
-
-
- stephenthomson
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- Earth and Science (12527)
- Environment (5571)
- Climate Change (1665)
- Global Warming (1624)
- Climate Crisis (505)
- CO2 (123)
- Emissions (58)
- Carbon Emissions (44)
- Carbon (37)
- IPCC (22)
- Auto Emissions (12)
- reducing emissions (5)
- time to panic (2)
- climate goal unreachable (1)
"... We may within 50 years need to take all, or almost all, the carbon out of the way we live. That would need an extraordinary technological and social revolution."
"...the UK still plans a huge airport expansion, there is not the slightest hint of a deal that would see rich nations pay poor nations to capture their emissions from coal and even Democrats in the US Congress want to postpone any tough action on emissions until after 2020."
"...since the world committed to avoid dangerous climate change, emissions globally are up around 22%, the highest levels of CO2 since dinosaurs roamed a sweltering earth."
"...the UK still plans a huge airport expansion, there is not the slightest hint of a deal that would see rich nations pay poor nations to capture their emissions from coal and even Democrats in the US Congress want to postpone any tough action on emissions until after 2020."
"...since the world committed to avoid dangerous climate change, emissions globally are up around 22%, the highest levels of CO2 since dinosaurs roamed a sweltering earth."
-
-
-
-
- stephenthomson
- 10 months ago
-
Will Terminal 5 make England terminally ill?
-
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/global_warming/2007/12/10/55974.html .................. rich nations pay the poor nations to capture their coal emissions?! ........ so that would be the USA paying China to not use coal? ............ that would be the end of any research in coal-fired power plant cleanup and sequestering of co2????? ................ why is it that all you seem to be able to talk about is reducing emissions rather than developing ways to eliminate their bad side-effects, if that's really true at all [see link...] ............... so using less hydrocarbons for energy and transportation is good but finding more is always bad ????? y'all have on not "rose colored glasses" but "black, opaque glasses." .......... your view is as obscured at least as much as you occuse your opponents of having "obscured views" .... but you can't see it! ........ ROTFLOL!
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
