TV Schedule

Republicans Terrified Of John Edwards And In Love With Hilliary

  2. crob80227
  3. related topics
John Edward is kicking it up a notch. His core message is that America is suffering at the hands of billion dollar boderless and totally unaccountable corporations (Blackwater anyone?) Why is the Middle Class losing wages and becoming unemployed? What is really driving our foreign policy decisions? Who owns our politicans? John Edwards whats to reign in the Wild West ways of corporations who have grown increasingly reckless (and unaccountable) under Bush. Hillary Clinton, however, is waaaay more business friendly than Edwards and the Republicans know it. If given a choice between an Edwards administration or a Clinton "I Love Corporate America!" administration the Republicans would pick a Clinton Admin 100 percent of the time. Don't let the neocon talk fool ya. These guys know that if they can't get one of their guys to win the White House, Hillary is a damn good second choice for them out of all the Dem candidates.
crob80227

24 responses // Republicans Terrified Of John Edwards And In Love With Hilliary

  • Yes, Yes, Yes, on all points. Hillary is a closet Republican. Please let us be lucky for the first time in years and elect John Edwards. There is an almost total media blackout of Edwards because the corporations don't want him. He has to pay for any exposure he gets. Money is tight because he has not taken any corporate money. Send what you can. We desperately need a REAL DEMOCRAT.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • Go John go!There are Two Americas. Period.

    I really hope you get your chance to stick it to the Wrong Wing!!
    greendiggler
  • Maybe they love her because she has fat ankles. I'm ramping up my dislike of her too.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • I think the Conservative news networks love her because they think the old "anti-Clinton" resentment will bring people out on voting day and help the Republican candidate. But they also love her because even if they lose and she wins, well, she is so pro business that they didn't really lose too bad. So it's win win for them. The so called liberal press loves her because it's just so much juicier to write about either her, Bill Clinton or the fact that she could be the "first woman president!" Whereas Edwards is considered "boring" in contrast. Whereas John Edwards agenda for America would help the workers and Middle Class, eh, it's boring to write about. And those lazy journalists would much, much rather write about Bill Clinton or Hillary or Jennifer Flowers or any aspect of that saga then write about global trade agreements (which I doubt half the "journalists" working today even understand). Think about it from a typical journalists point of view: would you rather try to write 3000 words on NAFTA and our labor polices here in the states or write about how (gasp!) Jennifer Flowers went to a Hillary Clinton fundraiser! One is a helluva lot easier than the other. Sells more papers too, I bet.
    crob80227
  • Six Corporations own the majority of the media. They want Clinton, because even if their first choice (A Republican) loses to her they still win. She won't even commit to fixing NAFTA let alone getting rid of her husbands gift to the middle class. She has her ugly head so far up corporate's butt people don't see what an ugly Republican witch she is.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • Cosmo, Yes it would. I'd love to see it in a few newspapers this week. I've got a sick mind, and you do too.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • He's saying what needs to be said and what we need to hear. There is hope for us.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • Absolutely, John Edwards is our best bet for change!
    Chique
  • He is right about the corporations. American made means nothing anymore. When our corporations are finished moving out for cheap labor, I wonder who will be buying their products? Remember this G. H. W. Bush thought up NAFTA, and Bill Clinton implemented it. Hillary Clinton won't even commit to fixing it, let alone getting rid of it. We need a President that understands the middle class, or we won't have a middle class.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • qucumb wrote:

    Go to the john edwards website. You can read his history and his various policy statements, read his speeches and listen to them on youtube or google. Read his books, read his wife's excellent book and get an insight into the real people. When I began to read and listen I came to the understanding that Edwards is the candidate for us. Us. When he's talking about Americans, he is talking about the vast majority of the populace: We, the People. I support John Edwards because he understands that OUR democracy is broken and WE can fix it. We need someone who will speak truth to power. Edwards will restore our Constitution to the American people.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • well, you've got my attention. I promise to read up on Mr. Edwards. If's he's MM's candidate, then he's worth taking a look at!
    AngelinaH
  • I've been watching him foe eight years now., He is a sincere class act. He is so clean even the smears don't stick.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • Meet The Press showed Edwards leading by one point in the polls this morning, let's hope that holds and grows!!!!!
    Marilynn_Murray
  • http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/23940.html
    DES MOINES, Iowa 12/30/07 - - John Edwards has clawed his way into contention to win Iowa's caucuses on Thursday in the first vote for the Democratic presidential nomination, gaining strength even as rivals Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have lost ground, according to a new McClatchy-MSNBC poll.

    Among Democrats:

    * Former Sen. Edwards of North Carolina has the support of 24 percent;

    * Sen. Clinton of New York has 23 percent;

    * Sen. Obama of Illinois has 22 percent;

    * Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico has 12 percent;

    * Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware has 8 percent;

    * Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut has 2 percent;

    * Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio has 1 percent.

    * Undecided: 8 percent.
    Chique
  • This is the reason I support John Edwards. http://current.com/items/86211411_john_edwards_speaking...
    Marilynn_Murray
  • Zom, You sound jealous. He earned his money, get over it.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • Marilynn, I apologize, I hadn't researched Mr. Edwards upbringing and do recognize that he earned his wealth fair and square. I still don't agree with most of his positions, but I respectfully withdraw my previous comment.
    zombies_love_brains
  • Zom, Apology accepted. Did you watch the video I posted above? Do you realize that he is sincere in what he is saying. Know this he doesn't need the job. He has enough money to last past his lifetime. He just wants to fix the mess we are in and for young people to have the same chance as he did for the American dream. Who do you think has a better plan for the country?
    Marilynn_Murray
  • Edwards is really the only one talking about the economy in any detail. All the Republican candidates have take a oath to only speak of 9/11, 9/11, abortion, gay marriage and 9/11. And Obama and Hillary seem to have taken similar pledges. Believe me, I'll take Obama over Hillary any day of the week. But he seems to be just as vague about his plans for the economy as Hillary. I sincerely hope that a lot of people realize a lot of the support Hillary is getting is actually from Republicans and corporate America.
    crob80227
  • crob80227, You are right on all counts. The Republicans want Clinton because she is a closet Republican, and if they don't win they figure "She isn't so bad." She isn't saying anything because she doesn't want to offend anyone. Her experience that she brags about is being First Lady and Senator. She was not a very good Senator. Obama has not got enough experience at anything that would qualify him. Republicans don't want Edwards because he is a REAL DEMOCRAT.
    Marilynn_Murray
  • crob80227, Edwards isn't the only one addressing the economy. Ron Paul discusses widely and in great detail his ideas on the free market, monetary policy, free trade agreements, and other economic policies. But you are right about Hillary, did you know in fact that Ruport Murdoch who owns FOX has held fund raises for Hillary Clinton? yes, it's a mad mad mad mad world. She is bought and sold by major corporations and the military-industrial complex. @ Marilynn, I do like some of Mr. Edwards positions, such as withdrawing troops from Iraq, shutting down Gitmo, and that he talks a lot about, and provides ideas for solving, poverty, which is something not many candidates address. I like that he acknowledges NAFTA's shortcomings, but it's not all too clear what he'd do about it. I'd just do away with all trade agreements completely. I don't agree with his stance on increasing minimum wage, affirmative action, universal healthcare, abortion, or his CITO idea however. Personally I support Ron Paul for President, but will acknowledge that Mr. Edwards seems like a genuine, hard-working and intelligent person. Also, he, unlike Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, and Huckabee, isn't on Judicial Watch's 10 Most Corrupt Politicians of 2007 list. that's a good sign. Clinton seems like a juggernaut amongst Democrats, I'd like to see nearly anybody except her get the nomination.
    zombies_love_brains
  • http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/31/fox-news-wants...
    Fox News Wants To Block Ron Paul From Debate

    Wish someone would unplug Faux News . . . Iowa doesn't invite Kucinich to the Democratic debates and Fox follows with Ron Paul. How does this happen in a supposed democracy?
    Chique

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response.