Independent Study Finds Bush "Unequivocally" Lied U.S. into War with Iraq
- added January 23, 2008
- 0 responses
-
-
-
- Conniepae
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (39438)
- Politics (27771)
- Accountability Now (303)
- Fact Not Spin (90)
- Trusted Government (6)
- Take back our airwaves (4)
- Spinning fear (2)
This didn't happen by accident! Mainstream media enabled this to happen! No accountability for spinning, distorted facts to hide the lies. Is mainstream media doing it again? Why aren't they telling us: http://www.guardian.co.uk/nato/story/0,,2244782,00.html -- The west must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack to try to halt the "imminent" spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new Nato by five of the west's most senior military officers and strategists.
Calling for root-and-branch reform of Nato and a new pact drawing the US, Nato and the European Union together in a "grand strategy" to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a "first strike" nuclear option remains an "indispensable instrument" since there is "simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world".
Americans have yet to stop shopping and look at what has been done in Iraq in our name. Americans don't want to see the damage done by our pre-emptive war with Iraq. Will they want to see the damage done by a pre-emptive nuclear attack against Iran? Americans need honest journalism! The spin (lies) should be unacceptable! Accountability is what is needed to change the course we are on. Mainstream media perpetuated the lies! What did they know and when did they know it? What do they know now? Why aren't they telling us? We are getting campaign overload while "first strike" nuclear options are being considered for our future!
Calling for root-and-branch reform of Nato and a new pact drawing the US, Nato and the European Union together in a "grand strategy" to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a "first strike" nuclear option remains an "indispensable instrument" since there is "simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world".
Americans have yet to stop shopping and look at what has been done in Iraq in our name. Americans don't want to see the damage done by our pre-emptive war with Iraq. Will they want to see the damage done by a pre-emptive nuclear attack against Iran? Americans need honest journalism! The spin (lies) should be unacceptable! Accountability is what is needed to change the course we are on. Mainstream media perpetuated the lies! What did they know and when did they know it? What do they know now? Why aren't they telling us? We are getting campaign overload while "first strike" nuclear options are being considered for our future!
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
