TV Schedule

Gun Control.

  1. Bracholi
  2. related topics
First and foremost when it comes to the issue of gun control do not insult your own intelligence by thinking that gun control is about safety. It's not. It was established to raise prices on guns. They were also established to eliminate competition in the firearms market by raising the prices on FFL's and allowing the BATF to enforce state and local statutes which are illegal for them to do. They began driving private FFL owners out of business... That's what it's all about MONEY.

Next I'll discuss the "But less guns means less crime... right?" issue.
The answer to this question is FALSE.
Gun Control advocates lead you to believe that gun control = less gun crime. In actual instances Drastic Gun Control = Drastic Gun Crime Increase. Please research your own statistics. Look up Washington DC for instance.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/guncrime.htm

Please read this site...
It's what the founding fathers discussed about the 2nd amendment.
Gun control advocates attempt to make you believe that the founding fathers were of another period of time much different than our own. They lead you to believe that the founding fathers hadn't thought about the consequences of every man bearing arms. This is bogus. What the founding fathers really thought about the 2nd amendment can be found here http://homepage.eircom.net/%257Eodyssey/Politics/Libert....

Many compare Bush to Hitler ... In my eyes I see the Clintons as the Hitlers of our times...
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms, history shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subjected peoples to carry arms have prepared their own fall"

- Adolf Hitler, Edict of March 18, 1938.
But you might say this about Bush as well, he passed the Veteran's Disarmament Act. Read into that.

As for the view that a automatic AK47 is more dangerous than a .22 pistol/carbine. This is QUITE untrue. Virginia Tech, the shooter had a 9mm and a .22, most of the fatal shots came from the .22.

What needs to happen.

1) Unban all weapons and ammo
2) Require all firearm owners to register their weapons legal or illegal before the previous bans.
3) Create a licensing system. A Federal Firearm Operator License. FFOL
4) Require everyone wanting to own a weapon to have a psychiatric evaluation.
-note- Psychiatric Evaluation limited to questions of citizens capacity for violence, both provoked (self defense) and unprovoked (Aggression)
A) This psychiatric evaluation is to categorize people into 5 different levels
1) This person will receive a 10 year FFOL pending Action 5
2) This person will receive a 5 year FFOL pending Action 5
3) This person will receive a 2 year FFOL pending Action 5
4) This person will receive a 1 year FFOL pending Action 5
5) This person will receive NO FFOL. Retest available in 6 months
5) Require everyone wanting to own a weapon to attend a federally funded weapon safety class
6) Create a National Concealed Carry database storing information on all concealed carry certified citizens. This certification will be based on the completion of the federally mandated weapons safety class and a 10 hour class with 5 hours classroom instruction and 5 hours range time.
7) Immediately revoke the FFOL of those accused of violent crimes at all levels, misdemeanor to felony until the expungement of the record.
8) Allow only the people earning the 5-10 year FFOL acquire Class 3 armaments. Allow those with a 2 year FFOL to acquire Class 3 armaments only on the 5th year after another psychiatric evaluation.
9) After the 10th year of being an FFOL carrying you automatically get the 10 year FFOL pending a good Psychiatric Evaluation.
Bracholi

3 responses // Gun Control.

  • Very good write up although I do not agree with psyc evals. Doctors would then have WAY too much power over the public. Maybe start off with the shorter FFOL like a probationary period... If nothing goes wrong you should just continue to get longer permits.. Any violent offense should get your only CCW suspended and ONLY until a judicial decision can be made. if not, and you were involved in an assault (self defense or otherwise) the ATF and or Police would be kicking down your door to confiscate your firearms.. I'm betting you would have a helleva time trying to get them back when your case is dismissed. Mostly some pretty good ideas though that I bet quite a lot of gun owners might not disagree with
    2part2
  • All we need is BIDS.
    Repeal all gun and ammo laws.
    Allow mortars, artillery, hand-held missile launchers, the same heavy weapons guaranteed of the militia and used by other militias around the world. (Tanks, aircraft, and ICBM's and such do not count because you cannot wield those type of weapons since they are not militia material and for the federal army but we need the handheld weapons to be able to stand up to them).
    Scott7891
  • I actually don't think the psych evals are a good idea either, there's no way to prevent bias and corruption. Doc are you saying I'm mentally unfit to carry? Heres 200 bucks, am I fit now?
    Bracholi

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response.