911 AMATEUR part2
- added February 12, 2008
- 0 responses
-
-
embed code
-
-
-
- socialservice
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (33848)
- Politics (21896)
- VC2 Top Contenders US (8633)
- Bush (1289)
- War on Terror (376)
- 9/11 (246)
- 09/11 (234)
- Dick Cheney (185)
- Osama bin Laden (116)
- September 11 (47)
- 9/11 Truth (43)
- September 11th (24)
- 9/11/01 (17)
- Post-9/11 America (13)
- 9/11 Commission (11)
- September the 11th (9)
- September 11 attacks (7)
- 9/11/07 Truth (4)
- September 11 atacks (3)
THE ULTIMATE PROOF
NO PASSENGER JET HIT WORLD TRADE CENTER 1
An analysis of the Naudet brothers' footage
of the first strike on World Trade Center 1.
If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice. The Naudet WTC1 footage is maybe the most famous of all the 9/11 images.
My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ).
The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a poor graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly :
EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :
We may observe that the visible right side of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, we may see 30% of the (righthand) wall still INTACT for several seconds after impact. At the 6sec mark we see the ignition of the shape charges which eventually rip open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember.
As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the perpetrators : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the approx160gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1. (NOTE TO SKEPTICS : No, that black gash appearing suddenly is NO SMOKE - it appears too quickly and develops in opposite wind direction).
The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET crashed into the WTC1.
This “911 AMATEUR” series is the sequel to my
wider analysis of all the 9/11 TV footage with
over a million views over the internet :
"SEPTEMBER CLUES" (part1-8)
English version : www.livevideo.com/socialservice
italian subtitles : www.livevideo.com/tricky1975
spanish subtitles : www.youtube.com/user/jesudel
NO PASSENGER JET HIT WORLD TRADE CENTER 1
An analysis of the Naudet brothers' footage
of the first strike on World Trade Center 1.
If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice. The Naudet WTC1 footage is maybe the most famous of all the 9/11 images.
My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ).
The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a poor graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly :
EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :
We may observe that the visible right side of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, we may see 30% of the (righthand) wall still INTACT for several seconds after impact. At the 6sec mark we see the ignition of the shape charges which eventually rip open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember.
As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the perpetrators : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the approx160gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1. (NOTE TO SKEPTICS : No, that black gash appearing suddenly is NO SMOKE - it appears too quickly and develops in opposite wind direction).
The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET crashed into the WTC1.
This “911 AMATEUR” series is the sequel to my
wider analysis of all the 9/11 TV footage with
over a million views over the internet :
"SEPTEMBER CLUES" (part1-8)
English version : www.livevideo.com/socialservice
italian subtitles : www.livevideo.com/tricky1975
spanish subtitles : www.youtube.com/user/jesudel
-
-
-
-
- socialservice
- 6 months ago
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
