TV Schedule

9/11 : THE GREAT TV HOAX

  2. socialservice
  3. related topics
It is now a proven fact that we were shown
doctored images on TV on 9/11.

The SEPTEMBER CLUES video series (part1-9)
is an 80min analysis of all the inconsistencies of
the broadcasts aired on that fateful day.

The attached "NOSED OUT" video is a trailer of
sorts for SEPTEMBER CLUES. It demonstrates
beyond any reasonable doubt that the FOX live
shot showing "Flight175" hitting WTC2 is a computer
generated forgery.

The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served
the perpetrators well for over 6 years, giving the false
impression freedom of speech was alive and well but
ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.

As most theories have built on the false assumption
that one or more airliners were hijacked, the 'plane
myth' has held strong - in spite of the widespread
understanding no plane crashed at the Pentagon -
nor in Shanksville. There is, in fact, no evidence
of the existence or remains of any of the 4 planes.

The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw
passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld
solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media,
the higher levels of which evidently have complied to the
requirements of this military false-flag operation.

Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were
newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUES part4.
As for the second 'plane', most witnesses on the street
reported 'a small aircraft' or even 'a missile' - or merely
'explosions in the tower'. These reports were actually aired
on the day and never again.

Only about 36 videos exist depicting an airplane silhouette
impacting the towers. Some of those turn out to be cropped or
rotated duplicates of the same shot, while most disqualify each other by
the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch,
yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing
the actual 'plane' penetration depict an object penetrating the steel-
frame tower effortlessly without as much as a rear aileron breaking off.

Most still photographs show only the fireball and no plane. A dozen
stills - purportedly shot by amateurs - do feature the 'plane' : all
12 depict the 'plane' in its last 1 or 2seconds of flight, with tower nicely
lined up and both (tower and plane) in sharp focus and zero motionblur.

The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this
research has many motives, the foremost being the conditioning power
of the images from the newsmedia. However, the many mistakes made
by the authors of those forgeries will not stand the test of time. This branch
of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as
"disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of
this very sad and murderous hoax : no one is going to prove HOW the
towers fell or that a Norad standdown WAS ordered. The latter is what the
perpetrators are counting on. We may only hope that no decent human
being will allow this lie to live on unchallenged.



I am an audio-video professional who has spent many years researching 9/11,
only to realize in early 2007 that I could contribute actively to the truth with my
video-editing and audio processing skills.

My full research
SEPTEMBER CLUES (part 1-9+Epilogue)
911 AMATEUR (part1-3)
FOXED OUT (part1-2)
NOSED OUT
CHOPPED OUT

can be viewed here :

http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice
socialservice

35 responses // 9/11 : THE GREAT TV HOAX

  • absolutely excellent work... i appreciate and applaud your tireless efforts to disclose the truth...increasingly so many more Americans and the entire world will benefit immensely from the work you've done! I will be carefully educating myself for a while with all the subject matter you've amassed. thanks so much!!!
    echoz
  • I look forward to checking this out.
    twodee
  • Thoughts: not too many people are even looking at this post. That says something. Not sure what. Something about “head in the sand” or “I don’t want to know” mentality? Or “I don’t want to waste time on this.” But if you go to that thread about what your poop says about you (posted 6 days ago…. I wont bother linking it here cause you have probably been there) you find nearly 500 views. That says something….. I don’t know. Does it? Is poop more interesting than this? Maybe it is more fun to giggle about poop than take up the personal challenge that “I fell for it?” And because I “fell for it” along with most of the world it is kinda hard to be among the few who have doubts. You might get called names that don’t make you happy. Being interested in poop is “rad.” This is not so “rad.” Anyway, as I am watching this I am thinking of those who would say “why would we shoot missiles at our own buildings with our own people in them?” There are lots of reasons. But a thought that keeps coming up is that we have been busy bombing and shooting the shit out of civilians in Iraq. So Americans killing other people is not really such a big deal. We do it all the time. My guess it that when you are trained to fire missiles at a target that has lots of people in it you really don’t give a shit about those people no matter who they are. Unless, maybe, it is your mom. Power and Money trump people. All people. I suspect there is way more to learn and way more at stake by taking up the challenge this thread puts forward than analyzing our poop.
    twodee
  • it's so freakishly incredible isn't it twodee. the scope and the immensity of all this...so much to grasp in one big breath. for a lot of people it's going to be just like Morpheus' offer in 'The Matrix':

    "This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill...the story ends...you wake in your bed, and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the RED PILL..you stay in wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. REMEMBER...all I'm offering is the truth, nothing more.."

    it's just as true how Morpheus later explains to Neo how many other people really don't want to know being so inured in the minutia of their daily lives that they'll even defend "the system" even becoming the system itself believing it keeps them "safe." it's pretty pathetic to us of course, with open eyes, but...they do exist, and we were once just like them. :/ i know i'm not the same anymore. and i'm more grateful for the few people like you. just keep your middle fingers high (in the right direction) and your chin up... =)
    echoz
  • freakish is a good word for it. As dark as this whole thing can be it becomes one of the most interesting places to study our own human nature in action. If and why we do these things to each other I just can't keep wondering what the point is. Do humans hate being here? Is anyone or anything outside of "self" just a burden to be challenged? It is freakish.
    twodee
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UQ5CHifqMs
    echoz
  • or this one... =D you might recognize the voice...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8LzLRU35CY&feature=...
    echoz
  • Wow, I'm a photoshop user myself, and i couldn't BELIEVE the images we have just seen! Holy SHIT! This is some of the best evidence I have ever seen. I'm not a die hard 9/11 conspiracy theorist, but this definitely warrants more investigation. Good job Social Service, and I hope this message gets out there. And Twodee, you guys should know that I didn't look at the poop post. I'm proud to say that I saw it, and passed right over it, probably to read some piece of soul crushing news....
    AngelinaH
  • i am proud of you for resisting tho poop post Angelina. I had to click on it to see how many people opened it. I did not inhale. :)

    echoz, while those are interesting enough videos about secret society stuff I don't really go for that sort of mashup of important material. It confuses way too many ideas together without explaining why. I know a bunch of Masons and I don't think they have much interest or plan to take over the world. They certainly are not devil worshiping people. Someone watching those videos who knows nothing about Masons could conclude they are evil people.
    .
    twodee
  • I am recalling a VERY clear video image of a plane crashing into the towers and I do not see that in his collection of footage. Does anyone know the image I am talking about? I remember watching it headed towards the toweres....pitching slightly, just before it hits. In my head, anyway, I remember this as being a VERY clear image. anyone?
    twodee
  • Not all secret societies are created equally. The best, smartest, most god fearing man/father/husband I have ever met, is a freemason. Plus, haven't you ever seen national treasure? ;)
    AngelinaH
  • twodee, that day was hellish. We had SO many images flying at us, who's to say which was which? I'm sure someone could, but not me. All I saw was fear exploding and terror raining down on New York. Even now, watching this, it's heart breaking. Fake plane or not, that was a horrible day in American history. If it is a "hoax", it only makes this more tragic and heart wrenching, because it didn't have to happen. And there was absolutely NO reason to go to war, not like there was in the FIRST place.
    AngelinaH
  • thanks twodee...yeah I've met one or two "masons" in my lifetime and can't say they immediately struck me as lil hitlers or anything; but I think it's hard to deny that obviously some very important ones...namely the Bushes, certainly...are megalomaniacal masons to a large degree. I think the North American Union is treasonous and certainly Bush senior's rhetoric about a New World Order is absolutely treasonous. And...they are "Masons." Hard to think Dubya's gonna stand on his own two feet to disagree with dear old dad at any point.

    I don't think the short video clips in any way intend to be exhaustive as much as simply to raise important questions people should be asking... There is an agenda that is not so hidden anymore. I posted it here as some response to you, personally believing that it's related to what the government may ultimately foist on an unsuspecting public. Lou Dobbs is not an idiot either it seems to me. His coverage alone gives some reliable credibility and teeth to the argument of at least some usurpation of our Constitution. It's odd, to say the least, to hear and see our government officials as far back as the 1950s speaking so openly about it...as one of those quotes says..."whether we like it or not."

    I think it's really the bigger picture of what's happening...the ushering in of a One World Government..."whether we like it or not."
    echoz
  • Something went down that is So not the "official" story and I am endlessly perplexed and interested in this subject.
    twodee
  • as regards that image, twodee...i bet socialservice would know. he/she seems to be privy to even the imagery that even FOX has since pulled to cover their lyin' a$$e$...
    echoz
  • the truth would hit most people like reality hit Neo in the Matrix.
    puke, and more puke.
    stephenthomson
  • Hi everyone - glad to see your interesting
    comments here

    I hope you will all find the time to watch my full research as linked in the description. There really is no more doubt that faked images was the name of that (horrible) day.

    But don't take my word for it. Please set aside a couple of hours to see "the whole picture"
    ... so to speak.

    Twodee : the most famous still photograph is that of one Carmen Taylor who says she used a 0.3megapixel Sony Mavica FD7 to do her world famous snapshot. Her pic is impossible for a number of reasons. Here's a good article about this:

    http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2006/03/who-really...
    socialservice
  • Did it ever occur to you that the 9/11 truth movement is the biggest mindf***k of all. The perpetraters have already gotten away with it, so invest your time into something productive. Live as far outside the system as possible. Be as independant as possible. There are many ways to upstage our government and 9/11 hand wringing isn't one of them. You guys are CSI junkies on steroids. I don't dispute your claim, but I do dispute your spending time on this worthless subject.
    jinkies
  • Jinkies

    your attitude towards the world's realities is amusing. I would tentatively hazard to say that it is plain wrong.To live outside the System is exactly what you can do when you expose the System. By 'expose ' I mean of course 'to clean it from its most stenchy scum'. So long as you ignore it ("the perpetrators have already gotten away with it"...) you're a slave of it : in this condition, nothing will give you the opportunity to live outside it.
    socialservice
  • I wouldn't say that I ignore it so much as I give more focus on other more practical things. I find that attempts to 'expose the system' only cause you to get their filth all over yourself, without accomplishing anything. I would hardly consider myself a slave, if you can explain how or why I'm a slave, I'ld appreciate it. There's this thing called 'revelation of the method' and you are just as involved in the 9/11 psyops as the members of 'the system'. I hope this helps.
    jinkies
  • "I hope this helps..."

    So you think you're able to even help yourself with your disillusioned attitude ?

    Dude, we're talking about a restricted faction of criminal human beings, They're just flesh and bones like you and me. Are you going to let them get away with their crimes just because you pee in your pants ?

    Be a man - or a woman - whatever.
    socialservice
  • How'ld you know I pee (dribble more like) in my pants. It's only after I urinate. It probably has something to do with the fact I have a really big penis. Instead of wasting your time on this endevor of yours, you could put some time to find a cure for incontinence.
    jinkies
  • My endeavor is to save the world from its current
    vacuous carelesness, my friend. Incontinence is not my greatest worry right now. I love you as much as I love
    people around me. Do your homework and understand
    that we have been fooled by the greatest media fraud
    in history. You - and me - and everyone else.

    Please do an effort, look around yourself and do your own research. The 911 TV broadcasts are simply ridiculous - spend some time watching them and you will notice what was sold to you as truth. Understand what happened then, and you'll understand what is happening now. If you don't, it's ok. I'm not selling anything.
    socialservice
  • ss, I don't watch tv, so noone has fooled me. If people watch tv then they deserve to be fooled, in fact they are asking to be fooled. The mass media corrupt those who ask to be corrupted. Why are trying to get between the viewers and their television sets. Is it because you wish they were spending more time watching you, instead of the boob tube. Only a ridiculous person would spend their time around an event that they characterize as ridiculous.
    jinkies
  • Jinkies, you wrote :

    "Only a ridiculous person would spend their time around an event that they characterize as ridiculous."





    If your mom/your kids had died in the towers, in Iraq or in Afghanistan, would you still call this "a ridiculous event"?.

    How sick are you inside your soul, my friend ?
    socialservice
  • ss, your the one who called it ridiculous. I was quoting you.
    jinkies
  • No, dude, I did not say 'the 9/11 event' was ridiculous.

    I wrote :

    "The 911 TV broadcasts are simply ridiculous"

    What do you call people who misquote deliberately
    other people's statements? Are you a mainstream media journalist ? Please get off my back now, you obviously are here only to stir up a silly fight.
    socialservice
  • Your right, you said, "The 911 TV broadcasts are simply ridiculous", and that's what I quoted. Your focusing all your attention on something that you see as ridiculous (note your movie is based on the news reports), which makes you doubly ridiculous. Sorry, but I don't see any misquoting on my behalf.
    jinkies
  • Jinkies

    It is all too easy to throw generic, unsubstantiated dismissals at my work. I understand you have watched it all ?
    If you have, please provide at least three refutations of the numerous observations made in my analyses. Failing that, your flimsy comments get flushed down into the Great Gutter of irrelevance.
    socialservice
  • I agree with S.S. for many reasons... I have been doing alot of research on the way the medis alters our point of view to munipulate the citizens of America. The government cannot function without the support of the people so i do not doubt that they will do anything to gain our support, including the 9/11 tragedy.... If u look back on the information the media gave our people with vietnam, you will know that they are very, very capable of such a hanis, and desperate action for us to support our troops going to war! Check out the documentary " Why we fight" It will explain alot..... Great pod, n im on my way to check out more of the September Clues....
    MyLifeRMS
  • I always knew something was fishy when the buildings fell straight down. Plus it was weird that they fell at all, from such a small wound.

    Then I learned that the building was full of bombs and that Marvin Bush, the younger brother, was head of the WTC security, and that he cut out bomb sniffing dogs from the security detail just before the attacks.

    But I always assumed that there were planes hitting the buildings!!!! Nope. CGI. Of course.

    I'm so glad that someone with computer skills proved this.

    Let's make history together by spreading this information around for everyone to see.
    celestialceiling
  • Brillfilms,

    The TV fakery/No planes research is not solely based on the technical video aspects you mention. It is true however that forensic analysis of video material is always subject to controversy - and that's what the planners of this hoax knew - and are exploiting - very well. The fact is that I have now found much more high-res TV broadcasts of that sad day and am now reediting my entire research with these new files. The better the resolution, I have to say, the clearer the TV fakery has become.

    Let me stress that I'm just a lone researcher, an audio-video professional with a fair experience and certainly not a 'disinformation agent' as seems to be perpetrators' current line of propaganda/damage control tactics. There is very little they can do, other than waving the 'video compression/artifacts' flag and ridiculing even the most serious analysis of the damning footage. Also, they can impede people's access to high quality footage as they have done on the official tv.archive org where you can now only watch the days broadcasts in streaming quality with no mpeg download option. Unless you are one of 'them', I urge you to get up to speed on this because our very future is at stake. If, as I have a feeling is the case, you are a video/film professional, it won't take you very long to come to same conclusions I have reached. I hope you will set aside some time for this : we need as many film pros on board this ship as possible.

    kind regards

    ps . I see you like the band Sigur Ros...I'm friendly with them and may invite them home next time they drop by in Italy where I live. Love their stuff.
    socialservice
  • As a graphic artist, and a teacher of graphic arts, I have seen similar "effects" produced by video quality, picture quality and other factors (I list some below) in the very moment (short time) this was made, and after it was copied.

    The "pixels" and many other frame by frame things.. not being able to see all of a wing are classic and due to video quality and the distance from the tower it self, if the person was still, also..what DPI that the film was able to take is extremely important. A low DPI (dots per inch) will create these EXACT qualities.

    The same qualities will happen if someone uploads a lower quality image somewhere or if a graphic image is copied too many times without doing so from the original. It the file is changed or downsized or made with less than optimal DPI ... look at what happens!

    As far as the "nose" ummm there was an explosion! And after going thru a building if it wasn't altered, then you might have a case.

    I sincerely hope people DO NOT fall for your propaganda!

    Thanks for reading,
    arcticspirit
  • PS as a response to some novice photoshop users.. if it was done in photoshop by any decent artist.. all the above "clues" would not have been present!

    Each frame would be clean and perfect. Think about it.

    Girl against propaganda. Stop spreading Hate.
    arcticspirit
  • well its interesting to see that when you zoom in on anything it pixels no matter what so there is always going to be a cloud or some form of blurryness, the point your trying to make there has no support , second of all if you want real answers then go watch loose changes!!
    kevski79
    1 response to this