Bridgend suicides: Are the media to blame?
- added February 21, 2008
- 4 responses
Researchers' view:
*Most people who die by suicide have been suffering psychiatric illness and this is consistently under-reported.
*Voluntary restraints on reporting suicides by specific methods have resulted in abrupt and statistically significant reductions in deaths by those methods.
*Media portrayals that encourage imitative behaviour often name or depict a method of suicide. Of particular concern is coverage of celebrities who take their own lives. Depicting celebrities or fictional characters dealing with emotional distress in constructive ways can promote life and hope. Such presentations reflect the reality that most people who consider suicide never act upon their feelings, but find ways to solve their problems.
*Reports which portray suicide as a natural or understandable response to problems such as failure to achieve important goals, relationship difficulties or financial crises, promote imitation, as does treating suicide as a tragic or heroic act by someone who apparently had everything to live for. Media should resist showing or implying a person may be "rewarded" for suicidal behaviour, for example by achieving a reconciliation, or getting revenge or sympathy.
So says the research. What do you think? Are the media to blame?
-
-
To be honest youll ALWAYS find the media up to know good and it wont stop - they wanna earn money - theyll do everything to earn it (right or wrong about it)!
The suicides and the resasons for them have to be focused on NOT what the media has to do with it!
-
If you want to argue the media's to blame for stuff like this, another prime example is school shootings in the US. Look at all the media coverage and attention they get and then consider how common they're becoming.
-
The "media as a scapegoat" debate always surfaces when unexplained tragedies like school shootings or serial suicides take place. On the one hand, some argue that were it not for the media's irresponsible sensationalizing events, highlighting specifics and drawing celebrity-like attention to the victims, then these things wouldn't happen (or would be drastically less common). And on the other hand, some argue that it's irresponsible and a cop-out to point the finger at the media for society's ills instead of taking a closer, inward look at their communities to find out what is going on off-screen and off the front page that is leading these young people to take their or others' lives. Where do you stand?
