Olbermann Rips Into Clinton For Praising McCain
-
-
- Chique
- added this
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/07/olbermann-rips-into-clint_n_...
Tonight on his show, Keith Olbermann eviscerated Hillary Clinton for a good ten minutes for promoting John McCain's presidency over her fellow Democrats. He compared her to Joe Lieberman. He asked "is she equating her time in the East Wing with McCain's time in the Hanoi Hilton?" You have got to watch these videos. They're devastating in only the way that Keith can be.-
- groups:
- News and Politics, Politics
-
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
English?
- 1 year ago
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
-
Dawn11
-
Marilynn,
Whatever makes you feel better.... - 1 year ago
-
Dawn11
-
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
Dawn while you are rolling on the floor. Profound is the word you were looking for not profanity. Profanity is swearing. You were not profound either.
- 1 year ago
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
-
Dawn11
-
I was referring to the republican 527's not Armageddon sure finished it is
- 1 year ago
-
Dawn11
-
-
undeadbydawn
-
"instead of cartwheels you'll both be ducking "
this comment in particular threw me, hence the Armageddon comment.
again, it is quite difficult to judge what you are alluding to as you continue to avoid giving any direct arguments.
If you so wish I will agree to consider this particular thread finished.
- 1 year ago
-
undeadbydawn
-
-
Dawn11
-
Just goes to show perception is everything. In no way did I suggest any thing remotely related to Armageddon.
Actually that never entered into my mind but it must have crossed yours. You are entitled your your opinions and I to mine. Thanks for your respectful comments. - 1 year ago
-
Dawn11
-
-
undeadbydawn
-
uhm, Dawn11:
much as I respect your diligence in supporting Mrs Clinton [and I do], that speech does not in any way prove or even suggest she read the Bill for War.
It suggests that she was aware of reports that Saddam may have weapons programs - reports that were widely disputed by [pause to clear the thought] the Weapons Inspectors as led by Hans Blic.Clinton has further stated on various occasions that she did not read the Bill. Nor did she read the Patriot Act. For that matter I don't think Obama did? i'll have to check that one.
Anyway, given that you almost exclusively use rhetoric rather than actual arguments it's kinda difficult to go over points - you specifically avoid making any and instead choose to chuckle veiled threats regarding an impending Armageddon if Clinton doesn't win.
Would you mind explaining that? If you have better things to do, don't worry about it.
I feel a need, again, to express that I *did* support Clinton 100% until I broke through the press ignorance of John Edwards, who convinced me over a month of highly intelligent arguments.
- 1 year ago
-
undeadbydawn
-
-
Dawn11
-
ROTFLMAO
- 1 year ago
-
Dawn11
-
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
Get yourself a dictionary sweetie.
Main Entry: pro·fan·i·ty
Function: noun
Pronunciation: prO-'fa-n&-te, pr&-
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
1 a : the quality or state of being profane b : the use of profane language
2 a : profane language b : an utterance of profane language - 1 year ago
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
-
Dawn11
-
Wow profanity must have hit a nerve LMAO!
- 1 year ago
-
Dawn11
-
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
Obama knows Resko period. He is not involved in anything, and not even a witness. So his minister knows Farrakhn? So what. Everyone knows Clinton did not read the war resolution. She said so. She said instead she had all this information that she trusted. Her was fooled. I didn't have the information and I knew it was bullshit. So how come Senator Clinton didn't know? She did. She is a corporate war monger.
- 1 year ago
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
-
Dawn11
-
Where did you get the information she did not read the Bill for war. Incorrect
Read this
http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html
Also no mention of Rev. Wight and Louis Farrakhan or Resko??? Believe me those issues will come back to bite Obama once the swift boaters get into play but maybe by then the Resko corruption trial will be further down the road and then they won't need the Farrakhan issue. Then there will be no pass from the press and instead of cartwheels you'll both be ducking
I would say you've missed quite a bit.
You also missed the the joke. - 1 year ago
-
Dawn11
-
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
applause (cartwheel) applause
- 1 year ago
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
-
undeadbydawn
-
That was considerably less visceral that I expected.
Dawn11:
No, Clinton did not call Barack a monster [MM did not, however, claim she did], she called him unqualified. She further claimed she *is* qualified because...... her husband was President. Right.
Yes, Clinton had access to the reports pre-War. She just didn't read them. Which means she had the same level of information Obama had. She voted for, he has at every opportunity voted against.
John McCain does indeed look better every day. If you want a President who openly states he knows nothing about the economy [kinda needs fixing, that], wants to keep American troops in Iraq indefinitely and wants to attack Iran ASAP. While continuing all of Bush's critically failed policies elsewhere.
If you really badly want WWIII and the world economy to crash overnight, by all means vote McCain. The sane people in the room would rather avoid the above.
If I've missed anything please do correct me.
- 1 year ago
-
undeadbydawn
-
-
Dawn11
-
I heard what she said and she certainly did not call Barak a monster. Apparently you haven't heard much about your canidate's involvement with Rev Wright, a Louis Farrakan supporter( just a tad problematic with jews) and with Mr Resko. Read the Chicago papers it all over the news. Maybe you should have read that he could not have voted for or against the war as he wasn't in the Senate therfeore not privy to any of the intelligence, flawed that it was. Even he cannot say with out the information that everyone else had to vote with what he would have done. You might also want to read some information that is actually accurate about Senator Clinton as well as your own canidate for president, Somehow I doubt that you will spend the time or energy to do that as it is easier to believe what you hear. People like you will get exactly what you are voting for but unfortunately so will the rest of the country. John McCain looks better every day and by the way 200 delegates ahead does not make a president or even a nominee
It takes 2025 to win and he does not have them.. - 1 year ago
-
Dawn11
-
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
Apparently you didn't hear what she said? She said that she and John McCain both have a lifetime of experience and Obama has a speech. Yes, it is sad when people make up news. He doesn't have to do anything to get ratings. He is about two hundred delegates ahead of that monster who has been who is trying to run on her husbands coat tails.
- 1 year ago
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
-
Dawn11
-
This guy is looking to start issues where there are none.
She was trying to show a difference between her and Obama, she will speak totally different about Mc Cain and his economy policies when she is running against him. Is is sad when news has to be "made up" in order to get ratings. He knows full well what she was saying. - 1 year ago
-
Dawn11
-
-
howell
-
dirty
- 1 year ago
-
howell
-
-
Chique
-
I don't know but I believe he sure thinks Obama is playing nicer in comparison! I love this man!
- 1 year ago
-
Chique
-
-
Marilynn_Murray
-
Do you think he likes Obama better? I keep wondering how he managed to get on TV? I love that there is someone smart to tell the TV dunderheads what is actually happening.
- 1 year ago
-
Marilynn_Murray