TV Schedule

The Real Truth: Hillary Rodham Clinton has virtually no chance of winning.



  3. Liberal007
  4. related topics
This article explains why it's highly unlikely that Clinton will win the nomination when she trails in the popular vote, the number of states won, and pledged delegates. Her chances are gone now that Michigan and Florida won't revote.
Liberal007

7 responses // The Real Truth: Hillary Rodham Clinton has virtually no chance of winning.

  • She's revolting!
    bluepolo21
  • Could someone please explain to me the difference between these two candidates. Except from the obvious race/gender variations. It seems to me that they have the exact same viewpoints.
    theblockbuster
  • Why does not God believing people not see through this recent news about Obama's church. I have gone to many churches and when I hear the Preacher's sermon I know whether I can continue to go, it does not take ne 15 to 20 years to understand what he is saying using God's name in vain is not preaching. Wake up America and think for yourself, go by what you see and vote for a woman who will help poor and elderly people because your day is coming and it looks like it will be soon, because hard working Americans are in big trouble.
    mamaw64
  • The math has been the same since the Ohio primary...Clinton can't win...
    jimmyp
  • theblockbuster, one of the largest differences is actually on healthcare. it's a small yet very important detail. Clinton's plan mandate's healthcare. which means you are required, by law, to purchase healthcare. Obama's plan does not mandate healthcare, although it seeks to create a national healthcare system. this is a very important difference ideologically. Clinton's belief is that you don't know what's best for you, the government does, so the government should be telling you what to do, what to eat, what to buy, etc. Obama's plan recognizes that healthcare is a sham in this country, but does not require you to purchase any, because he still believes in individual choice. there are more differences, but that's a biggie.
    thedismembermentplan
  • why don't we mandate drug price/availability in the US? we pay more here than anywhere else in the world. and OUR tax dollars subsidize research which is then patented and exploited by the folks spending millions in marketing dollars...In a time where even our tax returns are being processed overseas (thanks BIG 4), a large percentage of the popluation is worried about getting to work and paying rent. How the hell are we supposed to afford "mandatory" helath care? The problem is price and availability, not desire. Hillary is dead wrong. Her plan will further enrich the drug companies. Can you imagine the marketing wars if the companies have a captive audience? (I do not trust Clinton and have probably not done her plan justice, but mandated health care is a bad idea.)
    jimmyp
  • thanks, I know who im voting for now. Hilliary sounds like a communist.
    theblockbuster

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response.