Bush’s Legacy Leads to Iran: Will Clinton or Obama Make Any Difference? Will You?
- added April 2, 2008
- 6 responses
-

-
embed code
-
-
-
- HeatherWokusch
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (39320)
- Politics (27681)
- Barack Obama (3748)
- Election 2008 (3722)
- John McCain (2717)
- Hillary Clinton (1505)
- 2008 Election (1454)
- Presidential Candidates (441)
- Presidential Election (386)
- Democratic Party (311)
The lack of oversight characterizing both the Bush administration and crony capitalism have bankrupted the U.S. and created the need for perpetual war. With Cheney stirring up trouble over Iran, we can't wait until November 2008 to fight back.
-
-
-
-
- HeatherWokusch
- 6 months ago
-
It's crazy how we let these crooks continue to run our country into the ground. we need to stop the BUSHIT. WAr is all they care about. We'll be paying for this Toxic Waste for the next century. Democrats must not let these maniacs go to Iran. It is possible. Dicks and Georgie have been beating the drum for a long time. Power of the Purse!!
-
Barack, March 2, 2007:
"As the U.S. redeploys from Iraq, we can recapture
lost influence in the Middle East. We can refocus our efforts to critical, yet neglected priorities, such as combating international terrorism and winning the war in Afghanistan. And we can, then, more effectively deal with one of the greatest threats to the United States, Israel and world peace: Iran. The world must work to stop Iran’s uranium enrichment program and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. It is far too dangerous to have nuclear weapons in the hands of a radical theocracy. And while we should take no option, including military action, off the table, sustained and aggressive diplomacy combined with tough sanctions should be our primary means to prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons. Iran’s President Ahmadinejad’s regime is a threat to all of us."
Hillary, January 2007:
"A nuclear Iran is a danger to Israel, to its neighbors
and beyond. The regime’s pro-terrorist, anti-American and anti-Israel rhetoric only underscores the urgency of the threat it poses. U.S. policy must be clear and unequivocal: We cannot, we should not, we must not permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons. In dealing with this threat ... no option can be taken off the table. To deny the Holocaust places Iran’s leadership in company with the most despicable bigots and historical revisionists. We need to use every tool at our disposal, including diplomatic and economic in addition to the threat and use of military force."-
-
-
-
- BlueDotProdux
- 6 months ago
-
-
Excellent analysis. Get this woman on TV!!!
-
Couldn't play the video at first but the version on her page (put 'wokusch' into search) works great. Wow, really incredible stuff. Frightening information but really important and no one else is talking about this. I will watch this video more than once.
-
It is no wonder. The plan is to make money while destroying us. Toxicity (both environmental and economical) is promoted to reduce population, or reduce the population's power, while making money. And I think there is a high probability that there will be no elections in November.
I say there is a 90% likelihood that there will be another manufactured attack on our soil, a HAARP manufactured weather or geologic upheaval, or a genetically engineered outbreak which will "justify" martial law.
Debating what others would do if they were in power will likely be moot. Let's hope that 10% pulls through. -
Anyone is better than the Bushit Administration
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
