TV Schedule

Doctors ditching insurance to opt for better care for patients

  1. echoz
  2. related topics
"The only way a doctor can do a good job and still make a living is to reject insurers.

Imagine one morning you're craving something sweet, so you stop by the corner doughnut shop. Turns out the wait is half an hour, the clerk is rude and, when you finally get it, the doughnut is stale. Would you buy doughnuts there again? Of course not.

Yet, every day, millions of Americans put up with just that kind of service in their physicians' offices. And they keep going back.

Anyone who has visited a primary care doctor lately knows the drill: You show up on time, only to wait 45 minutes or even an hour. In the examination room, the physician (who offers no apology) seems distracted, harried and eager to get to the next patient. Then you're referred to a specialist -- who doesn't have an opening for a month.

Every politician and his Aunt Martha has a scheme to overhaul American healthcare. But not one of them will solve this problem: Most doctors are awful at serving their patients. The typical hair salon pays more attention to customer service than the typical doctor...

To be sure, physicians are not entirely to blame. With insurance companies dictating how much doctors can charge for services as diverse as a routine checkup or an appendectomy, a doctor has only one route to more income: increase volume. I know. When I began my own private practice in internal medicine, my volume grew quickly, and so did my work hours. I didn't complain because I took that as a sign of success. But before long I found myself toiling nights and weekends just to keep up with the volume. First I sacrificed my free time to my practice, then my sleep and finally the quality of my practice itself...

For more than a year, I haven't received a single dollar from any insurance company. I work for my patients. A few hundred doctors across the country are working the same way, some in blue-collar towns. Routine care should be affordable to the middle class, and as more doctors and more patients form relationships that exclude insurance companies, prices will drop. Insurance doesn't make routine care affordable; it makes it more expensive by adding a middleman. I know that some patients can afford nothing, so two afternoons a month I volunteer at a clinic that cares for indigent patients, which I could not have done with the huge patient volume I was seeing a few years ago.

When doctors break free from the shackles of insurance companies, they can practice medicine the way they always hoped they could. And they can get back to the customer service model in which the paramount incentive is providing the best care. Only then can doctors reclaim the simple dignity of any businessman: These are my doughnuts; only I and my customers can determine their worth. (At the end of each week, I will donate some to the needy, but I will not let a third party set the price.)

And when patients are the customers, doctors will listen when they ask for services not on the insurance company menu. If an urgent need arises after hours, patients want to be able to call their own doctor. Patients want to be able to e-mail their doctor with non-urgent questions and to fax them interesting articles. They want to be educated, not just medicated. They want to know they can get in to see their doctor the same day if needed, and that their doctor will be the one taking care of them if they are hospitalized. If doctors had fewer patients, meeting all of these needs would be easy..."

By Albert Fuchs
April 16, 2008
echoz

19 responses // Doctors ditching insurance to opt for better care for patients

  • I'm afraid I was too tempted to post the whole dam article that I got most of it =P hehe...but I think all of it (as the writer surely intends to our benefit) should be required reading. Especially for everyone concerned about the pervasive ineffectual (detrimental/backwards) influence of insurance companies on American health care. And most especially perhaps if you happen to be a doctor tired of insurance companies tying one/both hands behind your back with YOUR practice so to short-change YOUR patients on the care they need.

    I wonder what new genuine respect and honor is duly possible when doctors truly unite in their hippocratic oaths to forgo every invention meant to keep them from it...
    echoz
  • Well it seems that doctors are facing the same problems than self employed entrepreneurs or managers in other fields.. More hours, little sleep, more stress.The cost of health care has been growing every year.

    The free market and international competition is the best way to go in the long run because soon or later a smart entrepreneur comes along and change the paradigm, I buy my mediction in Canada/india for 60% less and canceled my prescrition insurance.
    Thanks Mr. Internet
    soleil10
  • It still baffles me that we are the only country in the western hemisphere that could care less about healthcare, well at least our government. It almost seems like the people don't care either because we just bend over and take it. Shit we bring the KY jelly!

    How does finland have better healthcare than the so called "most powerful country in the world" it is disgusting!

    Canada here we come!

    Tally Ho! LOL
    ROONEWS
  • There is no doubt that insurance deserves most of the blame for artificially high medical costs. But Doctors themselves are also to blame. They simply earn too much money for too little work. The only answer is to socialize medicine, but it's the greed of said doctors that prevents this from happening. If doctors really cared about people they'd stay off the golf course and in the free clinics.
    derk
  • Finland has 5 millions people, 2% of USA. They have 5000 immigrants per year.
    If the population of finland moves to America illegally, no one would know.

    What is your point ?
    soleil10
  • I wish there were more doctors like the aforementioned ones.

    I know a family where the parents are both doctors (they came here from India, lolz), and the parents said that they would rather help a patient without insurance because they receive one and half times the amount of money they normally would. In other words, they would like more to profit off of people and then put them in debt than to help people for the sake of helping them. (I'm not sure exactly how they earn more money this way -- something with the government having to step in and pay some of the tab; but I believe them: It is for this reason that they oppose nationalized health care where everyone is insured.)
    bWitty
  • If greed and conscience are the problem, socialized medecine does not solve it. Only a small part should be socialized to help people who somehow cannot help themselves. In countries with socialized medecine people take advantage too. At the end many feel that someone else is taking advantage so they feel that they shoudl fo the same. Some people even schedule when they will be sick so they can have time off, some go skiing.etc... The taxes then become more than 50% of their income. In freedom, you may have the best and the worst. In socialism the government becomes in charge. Do you trust politicians more or the insurance companies. Dont' forget the lobbyists too.

    The answer is within the conscience of each person.

    Capitalism is like a vacuum cleaner that take the profits to the top. Some government intervention is needed to keep balance. Socialism is worse
    soleil10
  • I respectfully disagree, soleil10. The answer lies with with collective action; it was capitalism that created this mess.

    For proof just learn some history. Capitalism has never withstood the test of time; for any culture; for any county; or for any community.

    I know you're a red-blooded American and believe the spoon-fed crap about the free market being the end-all answer to every single economic problem under the sun. But that is just the Curch of Money talking. And it's all BS.

    Doctors are a greedy bunch, who make a lot of money of the sickness of people. They feel entitled; deserved of more than other people that work much harder.

    So they'll never get my sympathy.

    Socialized medicine is real medicine because it's means real humanity. The system we have now is bourgeois - and all you have to do is take a walk in any urban in America to see the pain people are living with.
    derk
  • I mean some doctors ... of course ... not all. There are plenty of great people that practice medicine. I'm just talking about the individuals who chose the profession for the status and stature not the desire to help people.
    derk
  • Good idea. Certainly something worth trying. As of right now, my insurance, United Healthcare, doesn't actually pay for jack anyway. (It's currently undergoing a lawsuit)

    But what about people who can't pay out of pocket for their checkups? Or what if you require surgery? Nobody can pay that out of pocket.
  • Derk- Both systems socialism and capitalism have problems because humans have problems.
    All I was saying is that when you have more freedom. The good and the bad both come out.

    In socialism the bureaucrats control the power and it's worth. They do not even produce anything. They just create obstacles and discourage the risk takers to the point that nobody cares anymore.

    Show me one large socialist country where the poors are really better off.

    I do believe we want the same thing which is more unselfishness.
    soleil10
  • Well said, Cosmo. We should be emulating Norway, not race for the bottom with every greedy, fascist, despotic country on earth. Thanks for the info!
  • Cosmo_Plavix-
    In my post I was asking for one large socialist country.

    You pick Norway. It is 1.5% the population of the US. Why dont you pick Luxemburg ?
    Yes since they have found a lot of oil the country is very wealthy.
    Their lofty personal income taxes rate can go up to 56% and their Value added tax is 25%
    A pizza cost $35-$48.00, Norwegians go shopping for groceries in Sweden.

    I found it interesting that they do no pay taxes on their income made outside of their country. In the USA we do not have this privilege

    "You say, its people have been found to be the happiest of any nation on earth". What does that mean ? Where is the proof on higher happines ?

    Yes the divorce rate is a little lower than the USA, the suicidal rate is lower for women but the same for men. Oslo has a reputation for drug addicts.We could go on and on. They are so many criterias needed to claim being the happiest country in the world,

    One thing I like from the BBC report is that the income scale is not has large at the USA. That is great because more people can make a descent living

    It seems that Norvegians are frugal people. In the USA we love spending. Our children owe over $60.000 each
    In Norway the state has saved $22.000 for each Norwegian.

    Yes , we need more compassion, more justice and more love. But we need incentive for those who take risk, work hard and conribute more.

    Capitalism and Socialism is like a father and a mother.
    The mother wants to protect, the Father push his child to the world.

    Balance is the best.

    Norway has more protection, the USA has more amenities
    soleil10
  • Albert Fuchs is a blessed person for being so generous. More doctors should take an example from his acts.
    jubal
  • There is where we agree Mr. Derk! All ISM"S are wrong, I dont believe in any of em or this republic we live in and have the nerve to call it a democracy!

    Patients should pay doctors directly -period. Like you said all that middle man shit is bougeouis bullshit that is a direct result of capitalism, fascism, and narcism!
    ROONEWS
  • so true Cosmo' it's every/anyone getting the heftier pieces of that pie doing whatever they can to discourage people from honestly coming to any possibly successful view to anything better that excludes their bs, even if it means a better life for most people.

    that shite has to stop.

    but I just *love* derk's comment too that "If doctors really cared about people they'd stay off the golf course and in the free clinics." =D LOL ...nice!~
    echoz
  • We need change in the USA.
    VoyagerFilms
  • Yes we do. I tend to really think too perhaps derk, bWitty, jubal, etc... are onto something real regarding the character of doctors in general too.

    In days gone by, docs had the lofty but real and honest goal to practically help people because that was just who they were...it was their calling, even if it meant making midnight housecalls. You can't hardly buy that anymore. These days, we take a number and take a seat just to wait for someone (as the article also reads) "eager to get to the next patient."

    It used to be we'd counted on doctors by nature for the impetus to find cures for the things that plague people and destroy their quality of life. Doctors have completely abandoned that post for things more lucrative like, perhaps, surgeries... I think nothing pays them more than if they "have to" cut someone up! And for any glimmer of hope, I have to see some midnight infomercial with Hugh Downs if I want to find any "active" doctors speaking out all sorts of ailments..."buy the book, cuz you won't get this anywhere else" you're warned.

    Maybe it's still no more flatly true that things just won't change until people do. The real "epidemic" for everyone in the health care industry could be just that dictated and handed down by their corporate leaders...they will only singularly embrace the convictions that only the Almighty dollar brings. All else is secondary and entirely dismissible to that nature... "Sorry I [actually have at my disposal everything I need to help you, but if you've no money or "insurance"] although I empathize, I just can't help you. Maybe some other hospital will..."[and you're dead weight baggage].
    echoz
  • an "funny" (witty) illustration perhaps proving the point from someone cool enough to make us laugh about it while we still can...
    echoz

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response.