McCain Frequently Used Wife’s Jet for Little Cost

Image...
Given Senator John McCain’s signature stance on campaign finance reform, it was not surprising that he backed legislation last year requiring presidential candidates to pay the actual cost of flying on corporate jets. The law, which requires campaigns to pay charter rates when using such jets rather than cheaper first-class fares, was intended to reduce the influence of lobbyists and create a level financial playing field.

But over a seven-month period beginning last summer, Mr. McCain’s cash-short campaign gave itself an advantage by using a corporate jet owned by a company headed by his wife, Cindy McCain, according to public records. For five of those months, the plane was used almost exclusively for campaign-related purposes, those records show.

Mr. McCain’s campaign paid a total of $241,149 for the use of that plane from last August through February, records show. That amount is approximately the cost of chartering a similar jet for a month or two, according to industry estimates.

The senator was able to fly so inexpensively because the law specifically exempts aircraft owned by a candidate or his family or by a privately held company they control. The Federal Election Commission adopted rules in December to close the loophole — rules that would have required substantial payments by candidates using family-owned planes — but the agency soon lost the requisite number of commissioners needed to complete the rule making.

Because that exemption remains, Mr. McCain’s campaign was able to use his wife’s corporate plane like a charter jet while paying first-class rates, several campaign finance experts said. Several of those experts, however, added that his campaign’s actions, while keeping with the letter of law, did not reflect its spirit.

“This amounts to a subsidy for his campaign, which is notable given how badly they were struggling last year,” said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that collects and analyzes campaign data.

Mr. McCain was not available to be interviewed, a campaign spokeswoman said. In response to written questions, the spokeswoman, Jill Hazelbaker, said his campaign had acted legally and ethically in paying first-class airfares for Mrs. McCain’s corporate aircraft.

“The campaign carefully followed all the relevant laws and F.E.C. regulations on air travel at all times, and paid for travel exactly as required by those rules,” Ms. Hazelbaker said.

Last summer, just before starting to use his wife’s plane, Mr. McCain was quoted in a newspaper report as saying that he did not plan to tap her substantial wealth to keep his bid for the Republican presidential nomination going.

“I have never thought about it,” Mr. McCain was quoted by The Arizona Republic as saying at a July appearance. “I would never do such a thing, so I wouldn’t know what the legalities are.”

The McCain campaign turned to using the jet last August, a time when it faced mounting debts and the possibility of financial collapse. It stopped doing so in March, those records indicate.

During the first half of 2007, a time when Mr. McCain’s campaign did not use his wife’s jet, it paid out over $1.04 million for travel on noncommercial planes, F.E.C. records indicate. Over the second half of the year, when that jet was used almost constantly for campaign-related purposes, his campaign’s total spending for noncommercial flying was about one-half that much, or $542,160, those records suggest
  • added April 27, 2008
  • flag
 

3 responses // McCain Frequently Used Wife’s Jet for Little Cost

  •  

    And this is not newsworthy...not in the least bit.

    Vjuggalo
  •  

    Vjuggalo, circumventing rules in a piece of legislation that you signed on to and supported, is probably not a crime. But, it is definitely newsworthy. That piece of legislation became a law?

    Why you would suggest it's not newsworthy is a matter of opinion and opinion really doesn't belong in news.

    Did you read the first paragraph? It references 'The Law', which in itself makes it newsworthy. Who gets to choose which laws get a pass? No accountability, no shame? Some actions require accountability and shame. It will discourage such actions in the future, if nothing else. We have to start somewhere. Accountability has been absent far too long.

    Did you read the first paragraph? I think it’s wrong to post information, which is incorrect. I will humbly apologize for posting inaccurate information and will admit my shame. I hate to see incorrect information posted by Democrats or Republicans. If John McCain did not use his wife’s jet and circumvent; ‘The law, which requires campaigns to pay charter rates when using such jets rather than cheaper first-class fares, was intended to reduce the influence of lobbyists and create a level financial playing field’. I will come back and apologize and I will write the New York Times and let them know they are printing false information.

    Conniepae
  •  

    Man, I need a sugar mama like Mrs McCain

    jlaboy

Add your response

Login/Registration is required to add a response

current videos