Bush uses food crisis aid package to promote genetically modified crops
- added May 17, 2008
- 1 response
-
-
-
- jefftego
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (21595)
- News (9481)
- Food Crisis (69)
- GMO (39)
Controversial language is added to the proposal. Opponents of bioengineered food say the White House wants U.S. agribusiness to reap rewards.
The Bush administration has added a controversial ingredient to the $770-million aid package it recently proposed to ease the world food crisis: language that would promote the use of genetically modified crops in food-deprived countries.
The value or detriment of genetically modified, or bioengineered, food is an intensely disputed issue in the U.S. and in Europe, where many countries have banned foods made from genetically modified organisms.
Proponents say that genetically modified crops can result in higher yields from plants that are hardier in harsh climates.
"We certainly think that it is established fact that a number of bioengineered crops have shown themselves to increase yields through their drought resistance and pest resistance," said Dan Price, a food aid expert on the National Security Council.
Opponents of such crops allege that they can cause allergies, illnesses and unforeseen medical problems in those who consume them.
They also contend that the administration's plan is aimed at helping American agribusinesses such as Monsanto, which manufactures genetically modified varieties of seed.
"This is a hot topic now with the food crisis," said Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Assn. "I think it's pretty obvious at this point that genetically engineered crops -- they may do a number of things, but they don't increase yields. There are no commercialized crops that are designed to deal with the climate crisis."
Bush proposed the food package two weeks ago as aid groups and the U.N. World Food Program pressed Western governments to provide additional funds to bridge the gap caused by rising food prices.
The aid must win congressional approval.
The Bush administration has added a controversial ingredient to the $770-million aid package it recently proposed to ease the world food crisis: language that would promote the use of genetically modified crops in food-deprived countries.
The value or detriment of genetically modified, or bioengineered, food is an intensely disputed issue in the U.S. and in Europe, where many countries have banned foods made from genetically modified organisms.
Proponents say that genetically modified crops can result in higher yields from plants that are hardier in harsh climates.
"We certainly think that it is established fact that a number of bioengineered crops have shown themselves to increase yields through their drought resistance and pest resistance," said Dan Price, a food aid expert on the National Security Council.
Opponents of such crops allege that they can cause allergies, illnesses and unforeseen medical problems in those who consume them.
They also contend that the administration's plan is aimed at helping American agribusinesses such as Monsanto, which manufactures genetically modified varieties of seed.
"This is a hot topic now with the food crisis," said Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Assn. "I think it's pretty obvious at this point that genetically engineered crops -- they may do a number of things, but they don't increase yields. There are no commercialized crops that are designed to deal with the climate crisis."
Bush proposed the food package two weeks ago as aid groups and the U.N. World Food Program pressed Western governments to provide additional funds to bridge the gap caused by rising food prices.
The aid must win congressional approval.
-
Golden Rice may be a big part of the solution. Rice which has been engineered to survive in colder climates and is enriched with karotene and vitamin c so that it has more nutritional value. I live in a heavily agricultural state and we have been using gm corn crops for nearly a decade to a record yield and with no apreciable detriment. I am not a fan of genetic tampering and HATE agreeing with the president on anything but think that Golden Rice is a big part of the answer.
Login/Registration is required to add a response.
