Did George Bush Break the Clean Air Act?
- added May 21, 2008
- 7 responses
-
-
-
- Conniepae
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (45131)
- Politics (34378)
- Earth and Science (13205)
- Environment (6211)
- Clean Air Act (8)
The Clean Air Act does not allow the EPA Administrator to take cost into account when he sets new standards for things like ozone levels. Now, as Henry Waxman's Oversight Committee makes clear, on several occasions, the EPA Administration changed his preferred policy to one much less beneficial for the environment after speaking to the White House.
In today's hearing, Administrator Johnson repeatedly discussed costs, even while insisting that his final decision did not take cost into account. So Paul Hodes asked the obvious question: well, did the White House take cost into account, and then you take the White House's counsel into account.
The law is very clear that EPA may not consider costs in setting a national air quality standard to protect the environment. The Supreme Court specifically addressed the issue in 2001, the court wrote that if EPA established a standard by 'secretly considering the costs without telling anyone' it would be grounds for throwing out the standard, because the administrator did not follow the law. I'm concerned that this is exactly what happened in this case. The record before this committee shows that the unanimous recommendation of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee was rejected by you, Mr. Johnson, apparently on the basis of White House opinion or desire.
That's when Administrator Johnson got all evasive. He was asked (the first several times by Hodes), whether the White House considered cost in its own consideration of the issue. When Johnson refused to answer that question, Hodes asked him to answer the much simpler question: whether he recalled talking to the White House about the ozone standard.
Johnson wouldn't answer that either.
Johnson neither asserted executive privilege, nor explained on what basis he could refuse to answer questions about whether he recalled whether or not he had had a conversation with the White House about it.
That's when Henry Waxman got pissed.
That's the execrable Darrell Issa that Waxman blew his stack at.
Of course, Johnson is desperately clinging to a memory that rivals Alberto Gonzales' for one reason: While Administrator Johnson can say he didn't consider cost when he set ozone levels (since he was apparently considering primarily what the White House told him), if the White House "secretly considered the costs without telling anyone," then the White House broke the law.
And in case you're wondering, Johnson made it clear that it was not Cheney, this time, interfering into scientific decisions. It was the Petroleum President, not the Vice President, who appears to have illegally considered cost when setting ozone levels.
-
Thanks for the post. Possible to get a video with better sound quality?
-
-
- uglycasanova10
- 6 months ago
-
-
george bush has broken too many laws too count,
americas #1 terroist. -
If you click on the firedoglake link below heading it may improve the quality. My sound from the link wasn't too bad. I'm not sure how to improve it. There is also an additional video if you click on the firedoglake link.
-
Dang, I just don't understand why this Mr. Johnson is avoiding the question. It is nice to see that they are actively persuing an answer though. I feel that too many people in power get away with doing things that they are not supposed to, and it is nice to see all these people trying to follow those laws and rules that are in place.
It is ridiculous if this Mr. Johnson denied the EPA regulations set because of their cost. We are pumping so much money into other things such as the war, we should be able to spend a little bit of money on our environment.
-
-
- Hunter2323
- 6 months ago
-
-
-
-
- Future_America
- 6 months ago
-
-
just the thought of Bush makes my body break the Clean Air Act...
-
Future_America, doesn't it seem odd that Bush is proposing easing clean air rules for our National Parks? Why would he do that? Who will benefit? Pretty crumby having a 'decider' instead of a 'Leader' isn't it?
In 2000, I voted for a 'Leader'. I voted for Al Gore, as did the majority of Americans. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court gave us a 'decider'! Mainstream media spun George W. (the future leader of the free world) into a President we would want to have a beer with? I wish they would have had a beer with him and left him at the bar.
Justice Scalia went hunting with Cheney just prior to ruling on his ability to keep secret, his Energy Policy information. Several lower courts had already ruled against him!
In 2006 we elected a Democratic majority in Congress and the Senate. One would have thought things would have changed? One would be wrong, all bark and no bite! Why? If the Republicans are in the majority, they win. If the Republicans are in the minority, they win? How is this happening? Who is shortchanging our representation?
Sad thing is, the more things change, the more they stay the same. We still have hackable voting machines. Even after it was proven and exposed that they were hackable, mainstream media ignored it! 'Move along, nothing to see here and the majority of Americans did'? Mainstream media leads Americans to believe Britney, Paris and the other bimbets are more important than our votes accuracy! It's an 'Assault on Reason'!
