You're one of those guys who believe 2 planes didn't bring down 3 buildings?

you are correct , I agree with you, the weight of the planes could not have brought those buildings down, and the pentagon does not look like it got hit by a plane. do you know how low to the ground a plane would have had to be flying to hit it straight on, you know how many cars it would have took out on the road, wake up people. with all do respect to all the people who died. do you really believe the plain over somerset, was brought down by the passengers. the plain was shot down. when a plain falls out of the sky you see some type of wreckage all we saw was a hole in the ground. wake up.

The more witness testimony I see online from firefighters and people on the ground who heard and saw bomb explosions, expert testimony from structural engineers who attest to the impossibility of the towers falling the way they did, etc. the more I'm saddened by the idea of a Big Lie, to which we have or had all ascribed.

StephenThomson:
The problem is that it wasn't a lie in the beginning. Anyone watching the 9/11 events on tv as they happened heard folks talking about the explosions, the third building on fire, the lack of a plane, etc etc. These details were REMOVED in the re-writing of history by media and the government. As Mr. Orwell said, "He who controls the past controls the future."

but Elligirl, no one at the beginning assumed it could have been done by our own government either. The bombs were there and accounted for by eye witnesses, and the media has it on record, but then what? What is the administration's official stance on the fact that there were bombs there too? I mean, how do they define 9-11? As a feat in deceptive aviation? or as a coordinated attack that included on-the-ground accomplices? Has there been an investigation into those bombs that so many people witnessed? Has the absence of a Pentagon plane been accounted for? Do we have access to the neighboring security cameras that were confiscated by the FBI, and why were they confiscated? and i'm sure they weren't destroyed, or at least they wouldn't be destroyed for any legitimate reason, and an independent investigation should have access to these tapes, so where are they? I mean, how could these questions just go unanswered? or have they been given an answer? The distinction i'm trying to discern here is one between their lying and our just not asking.

So this is where all you freaks are....
I'll tell my brother-in-law to stop waisting his time on
MySpace........................................................................

Maybe the media wants us to think the government did it...those special someones probably think the U.S CONSTITUTION is outdated....

Don't Start the Revolution without me by Jesse Ventura?? WTF is that about??

This is a great audio clip.

Apparently, life on the "Iron Range" got boring for former wrestler and MN. Gov., Jesse Ventura. He's found yet another way to get back in the news. I just remember how much he changed once he became the governor. Many of us Minnesotans were fooled into thinking that he was a radical liberal, willing to take on the "status quo", and a new force in politics. We learned, all to quickly, that he was just another opportunist who really didn't give a damn about anyone other than himself.
Looks like he hasn't changed at all.
There's more to the 9/11 story but, I don't want to hear it from Ventura.

It starts with Howard Stern as a skeptic, and ends with him saying,
"I might have to read your book"

Van Romero, the country's most prestigious explosive experts from the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology was in NYC on 911 and he's that guy who said it was controlled demolition.
He changed his opinion.
The Institute got a huge gov. grant.
Prince Harry was at the ground breaking ceremony for the new buildings.

More info....

http://www.rense.com/general65/911m.htm