Witness tells Fox "no second plane -- it was a bomb"

It wasn't newsworthy, because the dude was wrong.

I saw the second plane with my own two eyes. From the Verizano Narrows Bridge, in broad daylight.

There are many conflicting stories, some saw what they believe to be a fighter jet

I still like Current, TV and web.

But what happened to the news and culture aspect?

There are far too many conspiracy theories, celeb sightings and Sanford & Son episodes junking up the place!

The price of a public forum I guess. . .

Actualy, buidling 7 fell in a way that would suggest it was brought down with demolitions. If you see the videos of buildings coming dow, they buckle in the middle then the edges fall. Last video I saw of Building 7, it buckled in the middle and then the edges fell.

Building 7 was "demolished due to structural concerns"
That what the fire chief said.

I always thought about it too. My wife worked in building 7. We both asked ourselves about how it got demolished. And we both often thought about how strange it was that nobody had made a slightly bigger deal about it.

To be clear. I saw an object, which looked like a plane to me, hit building 2 with my own eyes.
Granted, i was a good distance away, but this was a bright sunny day, and people around here arent used to seeing huge objects in the sky over nyc. So when you see something that large flying over the city, you pretty much assume its either a plane, or a blimp. And what i saw, was no blimp.

first, if you google this stuff long enough, you'll discover that there was a power substation under the middle of building 7. overloaded, exploded, fire... just the right combination to bring it down from the center within hours of the two WTC towers' collapse...

camera angles are everything.

and finally, http://www.plusaf.com/falklaws.htm#40th for those who WILL NOT GIVE UP! check my other posts here at current.com on this subject and check the many links that destroy all of the conspiracy theories, including the one about a missile hitting the Pentagon. there's TONS of evidence that the conspiracy theorists are just that, and the evidence keeps making them look and sound downright silly.

stop it! this is worse than spam!

Attention all conspiracy theorists and Ron Paul Supporters: This is not Digg. This is Current. Please take your paranoia elsewhere and leave this credible news site alone.

im surprised im wasting my time to post to this but guess what I did today... I removed a truck from a section of raw video for a piece i'm working on. the truck was a little distracting so, with a combination of photoshop and after effects, I just simply erased any trace of it. a few hours later and shazzam! you'd never know it was ever there. Ahh, the joys of technology. sorry conspiracy theorists, it's a simple task, easy to do.

the smoking guns are the pentagon and flight 93
where is the plane wreckage. take a look at the video or photos and then take a look at an actual plane crash, notice the difference

watch the loose change video

a second plane most definitely hit the twin towers but seriously, whats up with whatever hit the pentagon? no debris? the only footage of the plane crashing into the pentagon has yet to be released, except for those 3 or 4 frames where you cant tell whats happening. whats up with that?

@riverdeer and @Betico .... I'll make it easy for you...

start here...

http://www.plusaf.com/soapbox/conspiracy.htm

enjoy http://www.plusaf.com/falklaws.htm#40th , too!

now go somewhere ELSE and discuss your "ideas."

Wow pulse. Great links to the aircraft museum and a search index to more blogs! Hahahaha!

Next thing you know you'll be posting a 3D animation from Purdue showing how a plane can destroy the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. If so, i'm ready for that too.

Hey, if you want to dispute facts, fine. Don't google "9/11 theories debunked" and expect to get me, or others seeking credible information to go away.

I haven't spent 3 years researching the evidence to have some wank push me off with a search query. Did I even mention the 757 and engine parts in the pentagon? That's the best you can come up with?

I have already said, this video that Celetial posted was crap and inaccurate. You're going to post links to more crap that i've looked at several times. Wait for the right time to come in with your debunk. I'll be posting video and documents over the next few days that will help even the most inept person to wake up. Until then, sleep tight little one.

Funny i thought this was a public forum....maybe your the one who needs to go somewhere else with that kind of attitude.

@YourMothersMilk.... first, you might be assuming that i give a rat's butt what you think of me or my posts....

i don't. i'm here to express MY opinions and ideas and often they're not exactly in synch with others who post here. i know that, and knew it from the minute Al started the site. see also... http://www.plusaf.com/soapbox/globalwarming.htm ... that wasn't exactly as popular as "mother's milk" around here, either, but i haven't seen any non-religious arguments here to refute any of my information THERE, either.

i'm not a wank or a wonk, but a seasoned engineer who learned decades ago how to sift through data objectively and draw conclusions from the data, not my preconceived notions. check my edited post again and ..... nah, you won't... but DO look at Falk's 40th Law.

and @Aug87, this IS a public forum, and lots of opinions get expressed here. if you are offended in some way by my "attitude" just look around. mine's one of the gentler ones here.... AND please consider my comment to have been an INVITATION to "go somewhere else" just as others have unsuccessfully invited me to do the same.

ciao for niao!

Of course there was no bomb, 99.99% sure of that, but it's ALWAYS good to have skeptics. Without skeptics, many things in life would not have been solved, disproved, invented, discovered, or reexamined.

It's so unbelievable that people come up with conspiracy theories for it to be able to register in their minds

Me? I can't stand to watch the footage, inside job or not. People are dying in there.

We all think we know the answers. It's better to question than just believe what you see on tv or even with your own two eyes. Just to be on the safe side. I don't know if I buy this story, but I wouldn't put it past the assholes running this three ring fucking circus of a country.

Oh and common sense lost it's meaning a long time ago.

Apparently the government had been running numerous "hypothetical" attacks on the WTC buildings and had a lot of fake and doctored footage produced to simulate what it would look like on television. This is why GWB didn't move an inch when he was told about the attack- he thought it was a drill. Also, a few months later, he let slip that he had seen the first plane hit the tower- but there wasn't any footage of that until much later after 9/11; this is also because of the simulated television drills that he had seen. Bush is a lying and scheming, machinating asshole beyond the shadow of a doubt. Also I'm just throwing this (my opinion) out there: Building 7 was brought down intentionally- why? I don't know but it wasn't a case of collateral damage, it was purely pre-meditated.

It was a plane.. this guy was wrong.
Just look at the video.

Unsettled soil!! I dig it clayjj05. You got a laugh outta me.Missle, plane does it make a difference?? Yeah cause Bush said it was a plane--cause Bush said it was a plane. Bush lied,people died. Is there an echo in here??blah blah blah. If I have it straight about 3000 people died BEFORE " Bush Lied"

It's time for an investigation.

Does anyone disagree?

clayjj05-

And half of New York(or at least the "half" that was in the vicinity of the WTC when the attack happened) was probably compensated for thier "testimonies".

Yes, say it in the most improbable way possible so you can immediately disqualify it. I can't claim to know the truth of what happened, I'm just here to dissent and find the truth. What I do know is that the facts we the people were told by the government was not the whole truth or in some cases out-right lies.

However, more than being serious I was really taking a shot at you for generalizing what happened without actually being in New York to see it. It's far more likely that "plants" were set up to give faulty testomony. Or the mainstream media capitalizing on the confusion of the situation. Or even telling people to read from a script. American media has no scruples, so I can totally expect something like this comment to be made. It's amazing that it appeared on the internet.

On a side note, please stop refering to things and ideas as "retarded". It makes you sound like an ignorant 5th grader. Maybe that's why you tried to make a gay joke in there and failed miserably.

I'm mentally challenged because I don't think like you? No sir, you are clearly sanity-challenged. As I've said before, I don't claim to be an expert like that guy above who "saw an object that looked like a plane(or missile)" you put so much faith in. Not that he has a reason to lie, but there's a chance he may not be exactly clear on what he saw. Maybe I'm wrong but I can live with that and accept it if that's what it comes down to. From what you've been displaying in comments here, you clearly cannot handle being wrong in proof or in theory.

I refuse to further converse with you on this subject, clearly you are too short-sided and immature to handle someone questioning 9/11 as being a government consipriacy. There are too many factors invovled around the incident to not question the situation. The people who died in the attacks deserve the truth to be known.

You got your opinion and I have mine, and you have no right to insult people or call them "retarded" because they don't think like you. The fact you've deliberately did it shows even you think your arguement is weak becuase you have to marginalize the opposing side in order to make yourself look better. That's a conservative pundit tactic, and frankly it doesn't work. Go find some other sap to share "9/11 debunked" stories with. Me and a good chunk of Americans ain't buying it, Clay.