United States accused of holding terror suspects on prison ships

// added June 02, 2008 // 53 comments //
Image...
WorldPeaceTV
Guess this beats water boarding!
Information about the operation of prison ships has emerged through a number of sources, including statements from the US military, the Council of Europe and related parliamentary bodies, and the testimonies of prisoners.
  1. groups:
    News,   News and Politics,   Current News US,   Current News UK
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Current UK 10 more

53 comments // United States accused of holding terror suspects on prison ships

  • clayjj05
    • 0
      clayjj05 [removed]  
    • We have been to soft on the enemy, we should go in there and demand respect rather than trying to win it through "the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people". The reason they dont have respect for us becuase they think we are weak.

      Lets show them how powerful we really are

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • clayjj05:

      So exactly how do you know there's only ONE reason "they" don't respect us? For that matter how are you certain EVERY person in the Middle East thinks we are weak and NOT worthy of respect?

      Has it occured to you this is just a guess?

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • Image...
    • LibEX,

      It would seem that you may not be fully considering the implications of what you are saying- and so it seems you may also be misinterpreting what I am suggesting. If we choose to IGNORE the Rule of Law we are no better than terrorists. Allow me to correct your metaphor and demonstrate my point: Civilian law enforcement would have to simply reholster their weapons and then call in the SWAT marksmen!

      It's rather telling that you have missed the fact that religious extremists are a MINORITY not the majority and that terrorism is little more than glorified REVENGE. I mean didn't we attack 2 countries after we lost Americans UNJUSTLY on 9/11? It's a human reaction to seek revenge- much of terrorism has this as a cause. I'm sorry to point this out, but it appears that looking much beyond the surface seems to be a waste of time to you and I suppose you might be right.

      However, I wonder if you will come to see one day that your own attitude is NOT all that different than the religious extremist who hold ALL American's responsible for what a minority have done to their country. At a most basic level if one cannot equate security with JUSTICE one has missed the countless lessons of history.

      That's cool with me as I wasn't trying to change your mind. I'm not saying I'm correct, we simply disagree on what is required for LASTING security in the MODERN age. You are correct in broad strokes but any victory won will be TEMPORARY as a direct result of the tactic we are using.

      Applying your current thinking one would have assumed that with military spending in the TRILLIONS we'd NOT have to live in fear of uneducated religious zealots living in caves talking on unencrypted 2 way radios- Looks like those military industrial complex types have a lot to answer for...

      BTW you make an interesting point of holding the Middle East responsible, I'm curious why would the Bush Administration have given $43 million to the Taliban in May 2001?

    • 1 year ago
  • 1love
    • 0
      1love  
    • I feel sorry for the next President, he has a lot of work to do. If not fixing someone else's problem, taking the blamed for someone else's problem.

      Thanks Bush/Chaney you've made our future so bright!

    • 1 year ago
  • Liberal_Extinction
    • 0
      Liberal_Extinction  
    • I disagree completely, law abiding American citizens aren't being harmed. I don't give 2 shits if some illegal immigrant gets scooped up because he or she has a shady past and interrogated until they are certain he/ she has no terrorist connections. As for those in the neighborhoods/ countries these terrorists and their sympathizers hail from, SELL THEM OUT AND HAND THEM OVER or you're just as guilty. That is the problem with the citizens of the middle east, they are not being held accountable for the extremists that are being indoctrinated right in their midst, the mosques preaching and condoning these terror tactics are not being blown off the map, they're being left to preach their hate and destruction so some liberal isn't offended. Those who protect this garbage ARE enabling it.

      We aren't trying to become EQUALS to the terrorists that we are fighting, it's a constantly changing strategy to combat THEIR techniques. Once again, just because they are willing to hide amongst the innocent doesn't mean we let them be. By your logic EVERYTIME a criminal takes a hostage or runs into a building of civilians law enforcement would have to simply reholster their weapons, leave, and give every criminal a pass just because they are willing to endanger others.

      The middle east is problem that is NOT worth trying to deal with in a peaceful manner anymore, we need to pack up & leave a smoking crater behind with a sign next to it that reads "you want to be next Iran?"

    • 1 year ago
  • Liberal_Extinction
    • 0
      Liberal_Extinction  
    • So by your logic a non uniformed, non geneva convention signatory enemy should be privy to the same protections as those countries who do have a uniformed military and abide by the geneva conventions? THAT is what causes terrorism, giving these people a free pass because they are willing to hide amongst an innocent civilian population cannot and will not end their tactics. Sometimes you just have to send a bigger bully when fighting a bully, they won't always sit down at the negotiating table.

      Peace through superior firepower!

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • Liberal_Extinction:

      BTW the Bush Administration has also IGNORED the Geneva Conventions... But to your point- No I am NOT suggesting those who wish us harm be PROTECTED- I am suggesting protections are NECESSARY to protect the vast majority who are NOT trying to do us harm. If we apply your logic, should their be another attack- it will lead to FURTHER erosions in the name of safety and then there is simply no end. Look if someone killed my brother, I simply can't drop bombs on the neighborhood were he lives... This is why there is due process of LAW!

      What causes terrorism is complex but one must assume there's some traceable psychology to being willing to die for a CAUSE. This needs to be looked at- and I think revenge is a part of it, making the need for JUSTICE paramount!

      You might have forgotten that history teaches there are always unintended consequences to being a bully. Consider that no one in the history of earth has had the level of firepower we have in America. Yet you are willing to believe that we are to live in fear and abandon the rule of law just to fight those who live in caves? No thank you! The greatest nation on earth has no need to become mere EQUALS to those who they fight....

    • 1 year ago
  • gormlesstwat
    • 0
      gormlesstwat  
    • Liberal_Extinction:

      The problem is that the enemy we face today in terrorism have no borders and don't wear dogtags. You can suspect someone but if you don't have proof can you treat them as prisoners of war? Rhetorical question as it is already the case.
      The real enemy is not terrorism from religious fanatics but terrorism forced on us by our governments. That is history now but it's time to revolt. Act Now.

    • 1 year ago
  • gormlesstwat
    • 0
      gormlesstwat  
    • You Americans certainly are a nation divided and you are divorcing yourselves from the rest of the world. My only worry is who gets custody of the planet? The rest of the world may be well and truly fucked up but there is a desire there to do something about it rather than just watch it fall apart on your televisions.

    • 1 year ago
  • clayjj05
    • 0
      clayjj05 [removed]  
    • Although your statement was perfect in punctuation and grammar, it is more out of touch with America than you think.

      Your statement is a photo copy of the current.com-california ideology, and imo is out of touch with at least the people from Texas.

      Can i not be castrated for just saying that, and have some actual debate

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • It's a new world NOT because America has industrious enemies- We have ALWAYS had them- not so long ago the Russian Government was a far GREATER threat than religious extremists are today, and they had 1000's of nuclear weapons at the time!

      Back at the founding of our country, Great Britain was a far worse enemy than todays religious extremists, and there was NO technology to protect us- and yet in either time in our history- the rule of law and the Constitution were honored- NOT ignored!

      What makes it a "new world" is that we can LEARN from the mistakes of our fore fathers and also apply their wisdom.

      You might consider that the Republican talking points you are regurgitating are OUT of SYNCH with the facts on the ground. No wonder you still trust the Bush administration.

      I do agree- we are a nation divided- Those with their eyes OPEN, and those who apparently are unable or unwilling to do so...

    • 1 year ago
  • Liberal_Extinction
    • 0
      Liberal_Extinction  
    • kennyJ:

      Kennyj,

      I didn't realize the Russian gov't was flying airplanes into our buildings murdering civilians via suicide missions. Do you have a source for that? Yea, Russia had nukes, and they didn't use them b/c they knew full well it would be suicidal, there's a difference between an enemy and a fanatical maniac willing to kill himself to kill you. Hell even the kamikaze zero's waited until they were shot down before suiciding themselves into US warships. You're using a pretty damn broad brush when comparing foes of the past, who is it that's running around with his eyes closed again?

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • Image...
    • kennyJ:

      My point was NOT that the entire Russian government would use the same TACTICS as a handful of religious extremists, but that the Russians and their armies of millions wanted to "do us harm", and yet we were able to maintain a LAWFUL and effective strategy to combat them.

      Just because it is hard for you to see the parallels- doesn't mean they are NOT there, and for that matter because I think they are there they may NOT be. However according to you, the Rule of Law can only work when we have enemies NOT willing to die for their cause- My point being ALL of America's enemies through history have that in common- declaring war is being willing to die. But today under the Neo-Con guise of a strategy there have been DANGEROUS erosions to the foundations of this nation because 19 fanatics killed themselves?

      I'm really not sure how anyone would believe dropping Constitutional provisions and Rule of Law will make this country "SAFE", since it is the basis of FREEDOM we are fighting to protect.

      Please explain why you are in favor of condoning the same lawlessness that creates TERRORISTS in the first place.

      BTW- You should perhaps ask yourself why it was that the Bush Administration gave $43 million to the Taliban rulers of Afghanistan- BEFORE 9/11!

    • 1 year ago
  • clayjj05
    • 0
      clayjj05 [removed]  
    • Who the hell flagged my comment about torture at Club Gitmo the tropical get away from the stress of Jihad?

      Free prayer rug and Koran, complimentary of George Bush

    • 1 year ago
  • pdm1968
    • 0
      pdm1968  
    • It's a NEW WORLD ...If your just figuring that out ...IT Has been since 9/11/01 ...Wake UP !!! Everybody has forgotten this .....We are a Nation at WAR but a nation divided. That's sad.

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • We will NEVER be safe if we IGNORE the Constitution, the rule of law and the principles of JUSTICE that make this country great- You are welcome to interpret this as meaning "giving rights" to terrorists- But you could NOT be farther from REALITY... Good luck!

    • 1 year ago
  • pdm1968
    • 0
      pdm1968  
    • What has Barak learned ?? Quit your church after they spew vile racist rants for year and years and YOU Knew NOTHING about it or never heard it ?? Hang with Former freedom fighter homegrown terriorists ?? He's learned to become a politician just like ther rest of them. Go to his web site and you'll see he plans on ALOT of his changes to be in place by 2030 ??? 2030 Be real !!!

    • 1 year ago
  • pdm1968
    • 0
      pdm1968  
    • This country is becoming TOO LIberal. Crying about some Radical Extremists in a Prison on a Ship ??? It beats them being on your NEXT AIRPLANE TRIP RIGHT ? Or do they have RIGHTS too ?

    • 1 year ago
  • Liberal_Extinction
    • 0
      Liberal_Extinction  
    • Ummm, spoonie, DO YOU KNOW OBAMA? Are you his BFF? Or are you simply spewing some prepared speech he posted on his website ushering in the new millenium in politics? Come on, get real moron, NO ONE KNOWS WTF OBAMA IS REALLY ALL ABOUT. Who gives a shit if the guy can give "nice" speeches, he brings NOTHING to the table to back up his prophecies that he is the second coming of Christ himself.

    • 1 year ago
  • spoonieday
    • 0
      spoonieday  
    • talking with someone does not necessarily mean negotiations, nor does it mean that you condone their actions.

      pdm, do you know Obama? like, really know him? if not, how can you know what he'll do? i guess you could be his bff or something but I doubt it.

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
    • 0
      kennyJ  
    • pdm,

      Ummm- it was the previous Bush administration who "talked" with Saddam and armed him, so NO Obama will NOT do that for rogue nations. You would do well to recall that is was our own CIA who funded, trained and armed Bin laden. So let's hope Obama has seen the light of the wrong way to handle foreign affairs.

      Because Obama is a freshman, he has LEARNED from others mistakes. Learning the lessons history teaches does NOT require 'experience'- they require an INTELLIGENT mind- which Obama clearly has...

    • 1 year ago
  • pdm1968
    • 0
      pdm1968  
    • People in America are so QUICK to forget 9/11/01 it's RIDICULOUS !!!! If you think the way that Barak Obama is going to run the country is going to be any better ...You have a BIG PROBLEM. If he get's in he is going to be so overwhelmed with the job ..He's a FRESHMEN Senator !!!! He wants us to have talks with Rouge Nations ....Like Bush said ..He thinks he's going to talk and debate with these madmen and suddenly they are going to see that there "thinking is wrong " GET REAL !!!

    • 1 year ago
  • kennyJ
  • TyMarshal
  • spoonieday
    • 0
      spoonieday  
    • mrpibb, you speak of good treatment for these Prisoner's of War, how can you be sure? if that were the case, my conscience would be eased, as I think would many other americans. but we can't know that they are not being tortured or worse because of the willingness to torture that this administration has showed. there is not transparency, only deception. you spoke of world war 2, during that war our soldiers were treated very brutally, beaten and often broken, yet we did not visit that same kind of devastation upon our captured enemies. we rebuilt europe, we didn't break it. that, i think, is what made us the better nation.

      neutralizing and capturing an enemy to protect the troops and torturing some one who is in custody are two different things. just because they do it to our soldiers doesn't make it right for us to do it to them. I don't see how the death of 8,000+ (including war dead and 9/11 victims) justifies the killing of tens, maybe a hundred-thousand of their people.

      you are making an accusation that is really untenable, suggesting that we support terror because we oppose this war. we oppose this war because we want to fight all kinds of terror, including that which our government inflicts on Iraqis, including the terror that family members of armed forces members feel everyday, worrying that they'll get that call.

    • 1 year ago
  • masterjack
  • mrpibb19
    • 0
      mrpibb19  
    • Do you people also side with extremists when an American is captured and detained by a terrorist organization? C'mon! stop trying to be so kind and compassionate, the truth is, we're in a war, whether you like it or not, all military personel must protect themselves from the threats they run into.

    • 1 year ago
  • pigmonkey
  • Liberal_Extinction
    • 0
      Liberal_Extinction  
    • Hmmm, not Americans being held on prison ships = don't give a rats ass. I can safely say that every country that the US has helped in the past during natural disasters, wars, or any other incident that is now crying needs to find a new hobby, I'd suggest a nice game of "hide and go fuck yourselves".

    • 1 year ago
  • pigmonkey
  • gormlesstwat
  • clayjj05
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • Quiggles
  • Jtonio4823
    • 0
      Jtonio4823  
    • People are so blind to the things we do abroad! But it is ok to hide people wherever! We dont want these guys to attack our local supermarket remember! As long as we are fighting terrorists our quality of living will be great! Cheap gas , Food and energy thats what its all about!

    • 1 year ago
  • razezhel15
  • Jtonio4823
  • MRsmithers
  • VigorousAlloy
  • Egnatius212
  • jeffreyak
    • 0
      jeffreyak  
    • But they have no rights on these ships. There are no lawyers and they are being held only by suspicion. If were going to profile the rest of the world then why not try it in our airports and streets? Thats not the way our country is supposed to work.

    • 1 year ago
  • mrpibb19
    • 0
      mrpibb19  
    • jeffreyak:

      In the States, it is legal for a police officer to arrest a man on suspicion alone. This is a way to bypass the strenuous task to get a warrant and to be able to speedily acquire the criminal. These men held on these ships are taken to a detention center and later tried or released. Truth is, you cannot trust people anymore. There is always the one person who wants you dead. What would you rather want: 100 dead American sailors because of a bomb attack or an incarcerated man because of lawful suspicion?

    • 1 year ago
  • mrpibb19
    • 0
      mrpibb19  
    • If I was a sailor and I saw a ship obviously loaded with bombs coming towards me, I would do all I can to either sink it or capture it. Truth is, prisoners on our ships probably have it better on there than they do in their own homes. And they definitely have it better than US POWs have had it on enemy ships throughout history. Japan would shackle American sailors and throw them into the sea to drown in World War II.

    • 1 year ago
  • merasyad
  • cibalin
  • Marilynn_Murray
  • chillwillNJ
    • 0
      chillwillNJ  
    • I don't think the international community will ever be able to view Americans without discontent until they see us all unite and bring down those leaders who are responsible for all this crap.

      Because, right now, it just looks like we are LETTING them do it.

    • 1 year ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • The United States is just weaving a web that will strangle us all. At the same time there is no safe place in this world. All countries are failing in one way or another. No one has the right answers and everyone thinks they do. Too much ego and not enough let go.

    • 1 year ago
  • Marilynn_Murray
  • Jame89
    • 0
      Jame89  
    • I suppose this makes sense. With a traveling base, the government can avoid any chances of anyone stumbling across their atrocious acts.

    • 1 year ago
  • bossboo
    • 0
      bossboo  
    • I believe that it true thats why they are raising the oil and gas prices towards the U.S. This is only the beginning of what is about to come out on our NEW Black President. Once the U.S. pull out of their country they are going to really start a war, the Iraqee's are going to get into the country in coffins, diguised Soldiers and more... THats the real reason why the U.S. hasn't pulled out and are not coming home safely!

    • 1 year ago
  • eldamon
    • 0
      eldamon  
    • Thanks to Gorge, Karl and the gang nothing anyone comes up with is even arguable anymore. We're pretty much guilty as charged on all counts.

    • 1 year ago
  • passjay
  • cubbingabout

Add your comment

current videos